Keywords
Quality, television, programming, information
Abstract
Quality in television has been conceived as: diversity in contents and genres, plurality of opinion and perspectives, long term financial objectives, and professionalism in planning, programming, and execution. Today, because of «seduction strategies», programs have turned into formats; programming has changed from vertical to horizontal; audience wars turn the spectators into a public to be conquered, but also served. The relations of supply and demand are now on a new level where a generalist television conceived for broadcasting is possible and, with the expansion of the digital television there is also place for programs for a reduced public.
References
BLUMLER, J.G. (1992): Television and the public interest. Londres, Sage.
BRUNO, M. (1994): Neotelevisione. Mesina, E. Rubbetino; 19
CORTES, J.A. (1999): La estrategia de la seducción . Navarra, Eunsa.
COSTERA, L. (2003): «What is quality televisión news. A plea for extending the profesional repertoir of newsmakers», en Journalism Studies , vol.4, nº1; 15-29.
GARCÍA AVILÉS. J. A. (1996): «Algunos parámetros del periodismo de calidad en Televisión», en VVAA: Ecología de la Televisión: tecnologías, contenidos y desafíos empresariales. Pamplona, Eunate.
GONZALEZ, J. (1992): El discurso televisivo: espectáculo de la modernidad. Madrid, Cátedra.
JAKOBSON, R. (1975): Ensayos de lingüística general . Barcelona, Seix Barral.
Fundref
This work has no financial support
Technical information
Metrics
Metrics of this article
Views: 0
Abstract readings:
PDF downloads:
Full metrics of Comunicar 25
Views: 0
Abstract readings:
PDF downloads:
Cited by
Cites in Web of Science
Currently there are no citations to this document
Cites in Scopus
Currently there are no citations to this document
Cites in Google Scholar
Currently there are no citations to this document
Alternative metrics
How to cite
Blanco-Mallada, L. (2005). Standards of quality in TV and their valuation. [Estándares de calidad en televisión y su valoración]. Comunicar, 25. https://doi.org/10.3916/C25-2005-105