Analogue sunset. The educational role of the British Film Institute, 1979-2007

 Cary Bazalgette, Londres (United Kingdom)

https://doi.org/10.3916/C35-2010-02-01

Keywords

Film, moving image, education, media literacy, entitlement, curriculum, schools

Abstract

This paper traces key features of the BFI’s evolving strategies for film education in UK schools during the final 25 years of the analogue era. Historically, the BFI did much to establish the characteristics of film study, but it also embodied tensions which have continued to preoccupy educators, such as the relationship between the instrumental use of film to support the curriculum, and learning about its intrinsic and distinctive qualities as a medium, or about its ideological function in society. The paper also addresses the question of whether «film» on its own constitutes a valid area of study, or whether it is more properly studied alongside television as part of «moving image media». The BFI has played a key role in exploring these issues and in exemplifying how film, or moving image media, can be taught to younger learners, but the internal vicissitudes it has constantly experienced have always pulled its educational activities in different directions. The central argument of this paper is that film education –and indeed media education in general– should be an entitlement for every learner, not something offered only to a minority or provided as an optional extra. The key projects described in this paper indicate some of the ways in which a publicly funded cultural institution can intervene in educational policy and practice.

References

Alvarado, M. & Boyd-Barrett, O. (1992). Media Education: An Introduction. London: BFI.

Link Google Scholar

Barratt, A.J.B. (1998). Audit of Media in English. London: BFI Education.

Link Google Scholar

Bazalgette, C. (2002). An Open Letter to Len Masterman. (www.mediaed.org.uk/posted_documents/openletter.html) (03-12- 09).

Link Google Scholar

Bazalgette, C. (2007). La educación en los medios en el Reino Unido. Comunicar, XV, 28; 33-41.

Link Google Scholar

Bazalgette, C. (Ed) (1989). Primary Media Education: A Curriculum Statement. London: BFI.

Link Google Scholar

Bolas, T. (2009). Screen Education: from film appreciation to media studies. Bristol (UK): Intellect.

Link Google Scholar

British Film Institute (2008). Reframing Literacy. (www.bfi.org.uk/education/research/teachlearn/pdf/reframing_literacy.pdf) (03-12-09).

Link Google Scholar

Commission on Educational and Cultural Films (1932). The Film in National Life. London: George Allen and Unwin.

Link Google Scholar

Cook, J. & North, N (1981). BFI Summer Schools 1971-79. London: BFI Education.

Link Google Scholar

Department of Education and Science. (1983). Popular TV and Schoolchildren: the report of a group of teachers. London: DES.

Link Google Scholar

Film Education Working Group (1999). Making Movies Matter. London: BFI. Also at www.bfi.org.uk/education/research/advocacy/pdf/making-movies-matter.pdf (03-12-09).

Link Google Scholar

Film Policy Review Group (1998). A Bigger Picture. London: Department for Culture, Media and Sport.

Link Google Scholar

Masterman, L. (1980).Teaching about Television. London: Macmillan.

Link Google Scholar

Masterman, L. (2002). Down Cemetery Road (privately distributed).

Link Google Scholar

Secretary of State for Education and Science and Secretary of State for Wales (1989). English for ages 5 to 16. London: Department of Education and Science and the Welsh Office.

Link Google Scholar

Fundref

This work has no financial support

Crossmark

Technical information

Metrics

Metrics of this article

Views: 32558

Abstract readings: 27171

PDF downloads: 5387

Full metrics of Comunicar 35

Views: 837566

Abstract readings: 666171

PDF downloads: 171395

Cited by