Estíbaliz Aragón-Mendizábal, Cádiz (西班牙)
Cándida Delgado-Casas, Cádiz (西班牙)
José-I. Navarro-Guzmán, Cádiz (西班牙)
关键词
记笔记,手写,电脑输入,短期记忆,处理水平度,高等教育
摘要
记笔记是高等教育的学生普遍采用的办法,并证实这对他们的学习成绩有影响。然而当今对电脑的使用正在取代传统的铅笔和纸的办法。当前研究的目的,在于辨识有关大学生使用电脑打字和铅笔加纸(手书)记笔记两种方式的优缺点。共有251名社会和健康科学的学生参加了研究。选了两个实验条件:手写记笔记(n=211),以及用电脑记笔记(n=40)。用电脑记笔记的在复制字母、写句子和识别单词(p<.05)这些任务上完成的更好。然而,手写记笔记者在完成自由回想(p<.05)任务上做得更好。两种条件下的差别有深远的统计学意义,反驳了组间等同的假设(X2=60.98; p<.0001)。另外,判别分析确证本研究正确地根据实验条件对77.3%的学生进行了分类。尽管电脑允许更快地记笔记,但因为同时刺激了大脑处理记忆任务,手写笔记能提高着学生的分数。
参考资料
Beck, K.M. (2014). Note Taking Effectiveness in the Modern Classroom. The Compass, 1(1). (http://goo.gl/7k4TOj) (2015-09-05).
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Cassany, D. (2012). En línea. Leer y escribir en la Red. [On line. Reading and Writing on the Web]. Barcelona: Anagrama.
Cermak, L.S., & Craik, F.I. (2014). Levels of Processing in Human Memory (PLE: Memory) (Vol. 5). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
Clayton, E. (2015). La historia de la escritura. [The History of Writing]. Madrid: Siruela.
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Kay, R., & Lauricella, S. (2011). Exploring the Benefits and Challenges of Using Laptop Computers in Higher Education Classrooms: A Formative Analysis. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 37(1), 1-18. (http://goo.gl/qh3Wjw) (2015-11-07).
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Paschek, G. (2013). Las ventajas de escribir a mano. [Advantages of Handwriting]. Mente y Cerebro, 62, 18-21.
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Treisman, A. (2014). The Psychological Reality of Levels of Processing. In L.S. Cermak & F.I. Craik (Eds.), Levels of Processing in Human Memory (pp. 301-330). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
Fundref
这项工作没有任何财政支持
技术信息
收到: 18-11-2015
修订: 04-01-2016
公认: 22-02-2016
OnlineFirst: 15-05-2016
发布日期: 01-07-2016
文章修改时间: 47 天 | 期刊编号的平均时间修订 48: 29 天
文章接受时间: 96 天 | 期刊编号的平均接受时间 48: 73 天
预印本编辑时间: 180 天 | 期刊编号的平均编辑时间预印 48: 157 天
文章编辑时间: 225 天 | 期刊编号的平均编辑时间 48: 202 天
度量
这篇文章的度量
浏览次数: 54710
对摘要的解读: 37160
PDF下载: 17550
的全部指标 48
浏览次数: 429343
对摘要的解读: 306715
PDF下载: 122628
被引用
引述 Web of Science
Berns, Anke; Palomo-Duarte, Manuel; Isla-Montes, Jose-Luis; Dodero, Juan-Manuel; Delatorre, Pablo. The collaborative agenda for language learning: from paper to the mobile device RIED-REVISTA IBEROAMERICANA DE EDUCACION A DISTANCIA, 2017.
https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.20.2.17713
Jansen, Renee S.; Lakens, Daniel; IJsselsteijn, Wijnand A.. An integrative review of the cognitive costs and benefits of note-taking EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH REVIEW, 2017.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.10.001
Shibata, Hirohito; Omura, Kengo. Reconsideration of the Effects of Handwriting: Comparing Cognitive Load of Handwriting and Typing ITE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDIA TECHNOLOGY AND APPLICATIONS, 2018.
https://doi.org/10.3169/mta.6.255
Weigelt-Marom, Hayley; Weintraub, Naomi. Keyboarding versus handwriting speed of higher education students with and without learning disabilities: Does touch-typing assist in narrowing the gap? COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2018.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.10.008
Sage, Kara; Augustine, Heather; Shand, Hannah; Bakner, Kaelah; Rayne, Sidny. Reading from print, computer, and tablet: Equivalent learning in the digital age EDUCATION AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES, 2019.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09887-2
Halpern, Daniel; Pina, Martina; Ortega-Gunckel, Constanza;. School performance: New multimedia resources versus traditional notes COMUNICAR , 2020.
https://doi.org/10.3916/C64-2020-04
Bouriga, Sirine; Olive, Thierry;. Is typewriting more resources-demanding than handwriting in undergraduate students? READING AND WRITING , 2021.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-021-10137-6
Umejima, Keita; Ibaraki, Takuya; Yamazaki, Takahiro;. Paper Notebooks vs. Mobile Devices: Brain Activation Differences During Memory Retrieval FRONTIERS IN BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE , 2021.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2021.634158
Courtney, M; Costley, J; (...); Fanguy, M. Individual versus collaborative note-taking: Results of a quasi-experimental study on student note completeness, test performance, and academic writing INTERNET AND HIGHER EDUCATION, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2022.100873
Isla-Montes, JL; Berns, A; (...); Dodero, JM. Redesigning a Foreign Language Learning Task Using Mobile Devices: A Comparative Analysis between the Digital and Paper-Based Outcomes APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.3390/app12115686
Voyer, D; Ronis, ST and Byers, N. The effect of notetaking method on academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis CONTEMPORARY EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2021.102025
Emory, J; Teal, T and Holloway, G. Electronic note taking technology and academic performance in nursing students CONTEMPORARY NURSE, 2021.
引述 Scopus
Halpern, D., Piña, M., Ortega-Gunckel, C. . School performance: New multimedia resources versus traditional notes), Comunicar, .
https://doi.org/10.3916/C64-2020-04
Ito, R., Hamano, K., Nonaka, K., (...), Kake, A., Ishimaru, K. . Comparison of the Remembering Ability by the Difference Between Handwriting and Typeface), Communications in Computer and Information Science, .
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50726-8_69
Jansen, R.S., Lakens, D., IJsselsteijn, W.A.. An integrative review of the cognitive costs, benefits of note-taking), Educational Research Review, .
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.10.001
Sage, K., Augustine, H., Shand, H., Bakner, K., Rayne, S.. Reading from print, computer,, tablet: Equivalent learning in the digital age), Education and Information Technologies, .
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09887-2
Cárdenas, M.I.Z., Ortiz, C.A.G. . The university book in digital format. Analysis model for the circulation of academic knowledge | [El libro universitario en formato digital Modelo de análisis para la circulación del conocimiento académico]), Informacion, Cultura y Sociedad, .
https://doi.org/10.34096/ics.i41.6482
Manuel, P.-D., Berns, A., Isla-Montes, J.-L., Dodero, J.-M., Kabtoul, O.. A collaborative mobile learning system to facilitate foreign language learning, assessment processes), ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, .
https://doi.org/10.1145/3012430.3012575
Weigelt-Marom, H., Weintraub, N. . Keyboarding versus handwriting speed of higher education students with and without learning disabilities: Does touch-typing assist in narrowing the gap?), Computers and Education, .
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.10.008
Kryzhevich, L.S. . Method of user authentication on the basis of recognition of computer handwriting peculiarities), CEUR Workshop Proceedings, .
Umejima, K., Ibaraki, T., Yamazaki, T., Sakai, K.L. . Paper Notebooks vs. Mobile Devices: Brain Activation Differences During Memory Retrieval), Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, .
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2021.634158
Bouriga, S., Olive, T. . Is typewriting more resources-demanding than handwriting in undergraduate students?), Reading and Writing, .
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-021-10137-6
Isla-Montes, J.-L., Berns, A., Palomo-Duarte, M., Dodero, J.-M.. Redesigning a Foreign Language Learning Task Using Mobile Devices: A Comparative Analysis between the Digital and Paper-Based Outcomes), Applied Sciences, .
https://doi.org/10.3390/app12115686
Lorio, A.K., Greenberg, D., Oshima, T.C., Gore, J.B., Carruth, L.L.. Does Note-Taking Method Matter in Physical Therapy School?), Journal of Physical Therapy Education, .
https://doi.org/10.1097/JTE.0000000000000215
Voyer, D., Ronis, S.T., Byers, N.. The effect of notetaking method on academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis), Contemporary Educational Psychology, .
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2021.102025
Lee, B.J., Al Khateeb, A.A.. Analyzing writing fluency on smartphones by Saudi EFL students), Computers and Composition, .
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2021.102667
Emory, J., Teal, T., Holloway, G.. Electronic note taking technology and academic performance in nursing students), Contemporary Nurse, .
https://doi.org/10.1080/10376178.2021.1997148
Courtney, M., Costley, J., Baldwin, M., Lee, K., Fanguy, M.. Individual versus collaborative note-taking: Results of a quasi-experimental study on student note completeness, test performance, and academic writing), Internet and Higher Education, .
引述 Google Scholar
Berns, A., Duarte, M. P., Montes, J. L. I., Beardo, J. M. D., & Delatorre, P. (2017). Agenda colaborativa para el aprendizaje de idiomas: del papel al dispositivo móvil. RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 20(2), 119-139.
http://revistas.uned.es/index.php/ried/article/view/17713
Jansen, R. S., Lakens, D., & IJsselsteijn, W. A. (2017). An integrative review of the cognitive costs and benefits of note-taking. Educational Research Review, 22, 223-233.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1747938X17300374
Weigelt-Marom, H., & Weintraub, N. (2018). Keyboarding versus handwriting speed of higher education students with and without learning disabilities: Does touch-typing assist in narrowing the gap?. Computers & Education, 117, 132-140.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131517302348
Texeira, J., Realini, L., Nicoliello, M., Fernández, F., & Mesta, M. (2019). Estudio de toma de apuntes en un centro de profesores uruguayo. InterCambios. Dilemas y transiciones de la Educación Superior, 6(1), 23-33.
http://www.scielo.edu.uy/scielo.php?pid=S2301-01262019000100023&script=sci_abstract&tlng=en
Binkley, Z. W. M. (2017). Quantitative Study on Computer Self-Efficacy and Computer Anxiety Differences in Academic Major and Residential Status (Doctoral dissertation, Northcentral University).
Sánchez, F. G. Fourth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (TEEM 16) GRIAL Research Group Research Institute for Educational Sciences (IUCE) Paseo de Canalejas 169.
Shibata, H., & Omura, K. (2018). Reconsideration of the Effects of Handwriting. ITE Transactions on Media Technology and Applications, 6(4), 255-261.
https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/mta/6/4/6_255/_article/-char/ja/
Jansen, R. S., Lakens, D., & IJsselsteijn, W. A. Educational Research Review.
Ryff, T. D. (2018). The Use of Cursive Writing in a Digital Age: A Mixed-Methods Analysis of the Differences between Modes of Transcription in Private Schools (Doctoral dissertation, Northwest Nazarene University).
Özçakmak, H., & Sarigöz, O. (2019). Evaluation of Turkish Teacher Candidates' Perception of Note Taking Concept. Educational Research and Reviews, 14(3), 78-86.
https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1203856
Maclaren, P. (2018). Enhancing the teaching of mathematically intensive STEM disciplines at a tertiary level through the use of pen-enabled Tablet PCs (Doctoral dissertation, Auckland University of Technology).
Horwitz, S. M. (2017). Is Note-Taking More Effective with a Keyboard or a Pen?.
https://scholar.colorado.edu/honr_theses/1369/
Sage, K., Augustine, H., Shand, H., Bakner, K., & Rayne, S. (2019). Reading from print, computer, and tablet: Equivalent learning in the digital age. Education and Information Technologies, 1-26.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10639-019-09887-2
Karjo, C. H. (2018). Comparing the effect of ICT and longhand note-taking instructions towards learners’ comprehension test results. Indonesian JELT, 13(1), 17-30.
http://ojs.atmajaya.ac.id/index.php/ijelt/article/view/1170
Palomo-Duarte, M., Berns, A., Isla-Montes, J. L., Dodero, J. M., & Kabtoul, O. (2016, November). A collaborative mobile learning system to facilitate foreign language learning and assessment processes. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (pp. 567-572). ACM.
https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=3012575
Hamza, A. (2018). STL-metoden-en social process som ökar motivationen hos elever i läs-och skrivsvårigheter: Några lärarens uppfattningar, strategier och förutsättningar för att arbeta med STL-metoden för elever i läs-och skrivsvårigheter.
http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2:1222613
Saxin, J., & Nyvaller, H. (2018). Traditionellt och digitalt. En forskningsöversikt om datorers påverkan på läsning och skrivande i skolan.
https://gupea.ub.gu.se/handle/2077/56432
Lindell, I. (2017). Penna eller tangentbord?:–En litteraturstudie om två verktyg för att skriva anteckningar och dess påverkan på lärande vid anteckningsmoment.
http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2:1140074
替代指标
如何引用
Aragón-Mendizábal, E., Delgado-Casas, C., Navarro-Guzmán, J., Menacho-Jiménez, I., & Romero-Oliva, M. (2016). A comparative study of handwriting and computer typing in note-taking by university students. [Análisis comparativo entre escritura manual y electrónica en la toma de apuntes de estudiantes universitarios ]. Comunicar, 48, 101-107. https://doi.org/10.3916/C48-2016-10