A sindicação de conteúdo nos agregadores de notícias: rumo à desvalorização dos critérios técnicos jornalísticos

 Concha Edo, Madrid (Espanha)

 Juan Yunquera, Madrid (Espanha)

 Helder Bastos, Oporto (Portugal)

https://doi.org/10.3916/C59-2019-03

Palavras chave

Qualidade jornalística, agregadores de notícias, ecologia midiática, gatekeeper, ética jornalística, jornalismo digital, robótica, smartphones, sociedade multitela

Resumo

A crescente expansão do acesso à internet e o uso massivo das plataformas de redes sociais e dos motores de busca fizeram com que os meios digitais enfrentassem desafios tais como a necessidade de manter as notícias atualizadas constantemente, a imensa complexidade de identificar fontes, a dificuldade de exercer a função de «gatekeeper» em meio a um ambiente fragmentado onde as opiniões, os preconceitos e as ideias preconcebidas de especialistas juntamente com seus seguidores, os usuários do Twitter, etc., adquiriram influência e poder decisivo, além do crescimento da pressão para se publicar certas notícias simplesmente por que elas vendem. Ademais, precisam dividir a audiência com agregadores cujo negócio consiste em difundir conteúdos produzidos por editores de notícias digitais, blogs e «feeds» RSS, que realizam a seleção baseada em algoritmos de busca, em votações de usuários ou nas preferências dos leitores. O fato de que tais sistemas computadorizados de distribuição de notícias raramente consideram os critérios jornalísticos sugere que o trabalho de seleção passa por um processo de reestruturação que elimina progressivamente os jornalistas do processo de decidir o que é de interesse jornalístico. Este estudo a respeito das tendências descritas foi realizado por meio de uma análise de 47 parâmetros em 30 agregadores de notícias que atualmente oferecem conteúdo sindicado, além de 8 entrevistas semiestruturadas com editores de mídias digitais de qualidade e de alta difusão publicadas nos Estados Unidos, na Espanha e em Portugal.

Referências

Aguado, J.M., Feijóo, C., & Martínez, I.J. (2013). La comunicación móvil. Madrid: Gedisa.

Link Google Scholar

Anderson, C., Bell, E., & Shirky C. (2014). Post-Industrial journalism. Adapting to the present. Columbia University Library. Series: Tow Center for Digital Journalism Publications. https://doi.org/10.7916/D8N01JS7

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Anderson, C.W. (2013). What aggregators do: Towards a networked concept of journalistic expertise in the digital age. Journalism 14(8), 1008-1023. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884913492460

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Athey, S., Mobius, M., & Pal, J. (2017). The impact of news aggregators on Internet news consumption. Working paper 3353. Graduate School of Stanford Business. https://stanford.io/2QVYyhj

Link Google Scholar

Bailey, J. (2015). A Brief Guide to Ethical Aggregation. Plagiarism Today. https://bit.ly/1Ql1g9l

Link Google Scholar

Boczkowski, P. (2004). Digitizing the news. Innovation in online newspapers. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/2435.001.0001

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. (2005). The political field, the social science field, and the journalistic field. In R. Benson, & E. Neveu (Eds.), Bourdieu and the journalistic field (pp. 29-47). Cambridge: Polity Press.

Link Google Scholar

Brottman, M. (2005). High theory / Low culture. New York: Palgrave MacMillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403978226

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Buttry, S. (2012). Aggregation guidelines: Link, attribute, add value. The Buttry Diary. https://bit.ly/1C1qalT.

Link Google Scholar

Carr, N. (2010). The shallows: How the Internet is changing the way we think, read and remember. London: Atlantic Books.

Link Google Scholar

Castellet, A., & Aguado, J.M. (2015). Innovar cuando todo cambia. El valor disruptivo de la tecnología móvil en la industria de la información. Sur le Journalisme, About Journalism, Sobre Jornalismo (En ligne) 3(2), 26-39. https://bit.ly/2PG9Epi

Link Google Scholar

Chiou, L., & Tucker, C. (2012). Copyright, digitization, and aggregation, discussion paper, NET Institute Working Paper, 11-18. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1864203

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Chiou, L., & Tucker, C. (2017). Content aggregation by platforms: The case of the news media. Journal of Economics Management Strategy, 26(4), 782-805. https://doi.org/10.3386/w21404

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Christensen, Clayton & Skok, David (2012). Be the disruptor. Nieman Reports, 66(3). https://bit.ly/2Eshhhl

Link Google Scholar

Clark, D. (1999). Post-PC Internet. MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory. Talk at the LCS 35th celebration, April 13. https://bit.ly/2UOUdyV

Link Google Scholar

Costera, I. (2013). Valuable journalism: A search for quality from the vantage point of the user. Journalism. 14(6), pp. 754-770. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884912455899

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

De Corniere, A., & Sarvary, M. (2017). Social media and the news industry. NET Institute Working Paper 17-07. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3049358

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Dellarocas, C., Katona, Z., & Rand, W. (2012). Media, aggregators and the link economy: Strategic hyperlink formation in content networks. Working Papers 10-13, NET Institute. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2013.1710

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Deuze, M. (2006). O jornalismo e os novos meios de comunicação social. Comunicação e Sociedade, 9(10), 15-37. https://doi.org/10.17231/comsoc.9(2006).1152

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Diakopoulos, N. (2014). Algorithmic accountability. Journalistic investigation of computational power structures. Digital Journalism, 3(3), 398-415. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2014.976411

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Domingo, D., Quandt, T., Heinonen, A., Paulussen, S., Singer, J.B., & Vujnovic, M. (2008). Participatory journalism practices in the media and beyond. Journalism Practice, 2(3), 326-342. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512780802281065

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Enck, W., Gilbert, P., Chun, B.G., Cox, L., Jung, J., … Sheth, A. (2014). TaintDroidt: An information-flow tracking system for realtime privacy monitoring on smartphones. ACM Trans. Comput. Syst. (TOCS) 32(2), 5. https://doi.org/10.1145/2619091

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Falaki, H., Mahaja, R., Kandula, S., Lymberopoulos, D., Govindan, R., & Estrin, D., (2010). Diversity in smartphone usage. MobiSys ’10. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications and Services, pp. 179-194. San Francisco. https://doi.org/10.1145/1814433.1814453

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Friedman, A. (2014). We’re all aggregators now. So we should be ethical about it. Columbia Journalism Review. May, 23. https://bit.ly/2EpH7Cq

Link Google Scholar

George, L., & Hogendorn, C. (2012). Aggregators, search and the economics of new media institutions, Information Economics and Policy, 24(1), 40-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoecopol.2012.01.005

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Hamborg, F., Meuschke, N., Aizawa, A., & Gipp, B. (2017). Identification and analysis of media Biasin News Articles. In M. Gäde, V. Trkulja, & V. Petras (Eds.), Everything changes, everything stays the same? Understanding information spaces. Proceedings of the 15th International Symposium of Information Science (ISI 2017), Berlin, 13th-15th March 2017. Glückstadt: Verlag Werner Hülsbusch, pp. 224-236. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004319523_015

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Holzer, A., & Ondrus, J. (2011). Mobile application market: A developer’s perspective. Telematics and Informatics 28, 22-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2010.05.006

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Jarvis, J. (2013). There are no journalists. Buzz machine. https://bit.ly/2fWEdoX

Link Google Scholar

Jeon, D.S., & Nasr, N. (2016). News aggregators and competition among newspapers in the Internet. american economic journal: Microeconomics, 8(4), 91-114. https://doi.org/10.1257/mic.20140151

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Kapuscinki, R. (2005). Los cinco sentidos del periodista. Colombia, Spain: Fundación Nuevo Periodismo Iberoamericano, Asociación de la Prensa de Madrid.

Link Google Scholar

Kovach, B., & Rosentiel, T. (2014). The Elements of Journalism. New York: Three Rivers Press. Crown Publishing Group. Random House LLC.

Link Google Scholar

Kunelius, R. (2006). Good journalism. Journalism Studies, 7(5), 671-690. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700600890323

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Lavin, A., & Gray, S. (2016). Fast algorithms for convolutional neural networks. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). https://doi.org/10.1109/cvpr.2016.435

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Law, P., Fortunati, L., & Yang, S. (2006). New technologies in global societies. River Edge, NJ, USA: World Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812773555

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Lee, A., & Chyi, H. (2015). The rise of online news aggregators: Consumption and competition. The International Journal on Media Management, 17(1), 3-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/14241277.2014.997383

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Lee-Wright, P., Phillips, A., & Witschge, T. (2013). Changing Journalism. USA: Routledge.

Link Google Scholar

McBride, K., & Rosenstiel, T. (Eds.) (2014). The new ethics of journalism: A guide for the 21st century. Los Angeles: SAGE.

Link Google Scholar

McCombs, M. (2006). Estableciendo la agenda. El impacto de los medios en la opinión pública y el conocimiento. Barcelona: Paidós.

Link Google Scholar

Mills, J., Egglestone, P., Rashid, O., & Väätäjä, H. (2012) MoJo in action: The use of mobiles in conflict, community and cross platform Journalism. Continuum, 26(5), 669-683. https://doi.org/10.1080/10304312.2012.706457

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Nasr, N., & Jeon, D.S. (2014). News aggregators and competition among newspapers in the Internet. TSE. 12-20. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2164396

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Kalogeropoulos, A., Levy, D., & Nielsen, R. (2017). Reuters Institute digital news report 2017. Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. https://bit.ly/2R3kNVS

Link Google Scholar

Pavlik, J. (2001). Journalism and new media. New York: Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/pavl11482

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Pavlik, J. (2008). Media in the digital age. New York: Columbia University Press.

Link Google Scholar

Pavlik, J. (2013). Innovation and the future of journalism. Digital Journalism, 1(2), 181-193. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2012.756666

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Rosentiel, T., Jurkowitz, M., & Ji, H. (2012). The Search for a new business model. Pew Research Center. Journalism & Media. https://pewrsr.ch/2R0TOdD

Link Google Scholar

Rutt, J. (2011). Aggregators and the News Industry: Charging for access to content. NET Institute. Working Paper 11-19. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1958028

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Souza-e-Silva, A. (2006). Mobile technologies as interfaces of hybrid spaces. Space and Culture, 9(3), 261-278. https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331206289022

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Stivers, C. (2012). Aggregated assault. Whose work is it, anyway? A plea for standards. Columbia Journalism Review, may-june. https://bit.ly/2rGwX90

Link Google Scholar

Vos, T.P., & Finneman, T. (2017). The early historical construction of journalism’s gatekeeping role. Journalism, 18(3), 265-280. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884916636126

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Yang, D., Xue, G., Fang, X., & Tang, J. (2012). Crowdsourcing to smartphones: Incentive mechanism design for mobile phone sensing. 18th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, August 22, 2012 / August 26, 2012, Istanbul, Turkey, pp. 173-184. https://doi.org/10.1145/2348543.2348567

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Fundref

Crossmark

Technical information

Recebido: 29-09-2018

Revisado: 10-11-2018

Aceite: 28-11-2018

OnlineFirst: 15-02-2019

Data de publicação: 01-04-2019

Tempo de revisão do artigo: 42 dias | Tempo médio de revisão do número 59: 48 dias

Tempo de aceitação do artigo: 60 dias | Tempo médio de aceitação do número 59: 98 dias

Tempo de edição da pré-impressão: 139 dias | Tempo médio de edição pré-impressão do número 59: 178 dias

Tempo de processamento do artigo: 184 dias | Tempo médio de processamento do número 59: 223 dias

Métricas

Métricas deste artigo

Vistas: 32463

Leituras dos resumos: 27373

Descargas em PDF: 5090

Métricas completas do Comunicar 59

Vistas: 456075

Leituras dos resumos: 363396

Descargas em PDF: 92679

Citado por