英雄与阴影：数字网络社会运动中的迷思

 Toby Miller, Cuajimalpa (墨西哥)

 Eva Aladro-Vico, Madrid (西班牙)

 Paula Requeijo-Rey, Madrid (西班牙)

https://doi.org/10.3916/C68-2021-01

关键词

社会运动，数码网络，迷思，英雄，阴影，行动主义

摘要

本文分析的主题是社交网络中存在的迷思，其源于上个世纪的大众文化，尤其是社会运动。数字网络中的社会运动具有迷思色彩，无论是取材于上个世纪还是具有典型的永恒的心理背景。这种存在说明了关于最有效和最受欢迎的运动是否诉诸更深层的迷思形式的假设。本研究具体目标是描述出现在数字社会运动语言中的具体迷思。我们根据来自四个科学领域的最负盛名的作者的言论回顾了迷思的特征。此外，我们从对内容和影响的跟踪中提取了两个来自数字网络的例子：“Anonymous”运动和“ Je Suis Charlie”社会动员。通过应用启发式分析，显示出了这两个具体迷思主题的持久性： 英雄的深层单一迷思主题，其通过贴标签及标语的方式在在Twitter等网络渠道传播信息，并起到至关重要的识别作用。该迷思与阴影，匿名身份， 混合身份和黑暗身份相关。这些功能和类比在最近其他的运动中也有所展现，例如“ Me Too”和“ Black Lives Matter”。据此可以推断这些迷思与网络上传播的社会运动所体现的交流力量之间的联系。

参考资料

Aladro-Vico, E., & Requeijo-Rey, P. (2020). Interés y participación política de los preuniversitarios madrileños ante el nuevo escenario político. Observatorio (OBS*) Journal, 14(2), 93-120. https://bit.ly/3ulhTN2

Link Google Scholar

Alexopoulou, S., & Pavli, A. (2019). Beneath this mask there is more than flesh, beneath this mask there is an idea: Anonymous as the (super) heroes of the Internet? International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 34, 237-264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-019-09615-6

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Almirón, N., & Jarque, J.M. (2008). El mito digital. Discursos hegemónicos sobre Internet y periodismo. Anthropos.

Link Google Scholar

Barthes, R. (2010). Mitologías. Siglo Veintiuno.

Link Google Scholar

Bauman, Z. (2005). Identidad. Losada.

Link Google Scholar

Borisovna, N. (2019). The human being in the mythological space of media culture. Realities and retrospectives. European Journal of Science and Theology, 5(15), 179-188. https://bit.ly/36yH2Kr

Link Google Scholar

Campbell, J. (2016). El poder del mito. Capitán Swing.

Link Google Scholar

Cassirer, E. (1968). El mito del estado. FCE.

Link Google Scholar

Cassirer, E. (2016). Filosofía de las formas simbólicas. El pensamiento mítico. Tomo II. FCE.

Link Google Scholar

Congosto, M.L. (2015). Elecciones europeas 2014: Viralidad en los mensajes en Twitter. Redes, 1, 23-52. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/redes.529

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Coomaraswamy, A. (1947). Atenea y Efesto. The Journal of Indian Society of Oriental Art, 15, 16-20. https://doi.org/10.2307/594649

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

De-Kerckhove, D. (2010). Inteligencias en conexión. Gedisa.

Link Google Scholar

Deseriis, M. (2012). Improper names: Collective pseudonyms and multiple-use names as minor processes of subjectivation. Subjectivity, 5, 140-160. https://doi.org/10.1057/sub.2012.3

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Eco, U. (1995). Semiótica y filosofía del lenguaje. Lumen.

Link Google Scholar

Eliade, M. (2010). La isla de Eutanasius. Trotta.

Link Google Scholar

Encarnación-Pinedo, E. (2020). Shifting the mythic discourse: Ambiguity and destabilization in Joanne Kyger’s The Tapestry and the Web. Amaltea, 12, 25-35. https://doi.org/10.5209/amal.66717

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Feliú-Albadalejo, A., & Moltó-Berenguer, C. (2019). Los movimientos sociales en las agendas mediática y política en España: El caso de la PAH. Obets, 11, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.14198/OBETS2016.11.1.07

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Fish, A. (2015). Mirroring the videos of Anonymous: Cloud activism, living networks, and political mimesis. The Fibreculture Journal, 26, 85-107. https://doi.org/10.15307/fcj.26.191.2015

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Frye, N. (1996). Poderosas palabras: La Biblia y nuestras metáforas. Muchnik Editores.

Link Google Scholar

Gramsci, A. (2018). Notas sobre Maquiavelo, sobre la política y sobre el Estado. Comares.

Link Google Scholar

Jung, C. (2009). La vida simbólica. Trotta.

Link Google Scholar

Kendall, L. (1998). Meaning and identity in cyberspace: The performance of gender, class, and race online. Symbolic Interaction, 21, 129-154. https://doi.org/10.1525/si.1998.21.2.129

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Kerényi, K. (2012). La religión antigua. Herder.

Link Google Scholar

Kerényi, K., Neumann, E., Scholem, G., & Hillman, J. (2004). Arquetipos y símbolos colectivos. Círculo Eranos 1. Anthropos.

Link Google Scholar

Kermode, F. (2000). El sentido de un final. Gedisa.

Link Google Scholar

Landers, C. (2008, April 19). Serious business. Baltimore City Paper. https://bit.ly/35cLgqw

Link Google Scholar

Lanier, J. (2018). Diez razones para borrar tus redes sociales de inmediato. Debate.

Link Google Scholar

Leporini, N. (2015). The transculturation of mythic archetypes: Margaret Atwood’s Circe. Amaltea, 7, 37-55. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_AMAL.2015.v7.48348

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Lévi-Strauss, C. (2005). Mitológicas. FCE.

Link Google Scholar

Losada, J.M. (2015). Mitocrítica y metodología. In J.M. Losada, & A. Lipscomb (Eds), Nuevas formas del mito. Logos Verlag (pp. 9-27). https://bit.ly/3rfgAxg

Link Google Scholar

Lovink, G., Rossiter, N., & Ippolita (2017). El supuesto digital. Diez tesis. Cuadernos de Información y Comunicación, 22, 13-18. https://doi.org/10.5209/CIYC.55953

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Maxwell, R., & Miller, T. (2012). Greening the media. Oxford University Press.

Link Google Scholar

McChesney, R. (2012). Digital disconect: How capitalism is turning the Internet against democracy. New Press.

Link Google Scholar

Miller, T. (2020). How green is your smartphone? Polity Press.

Link Google Scholar

Miller, T., & McHoul, A. (1998). Popular culture and everyday life. Sage.

Link Google Scholar

Morin, E. (2008). L’esprit du temps. Colin.

Link Google Scholar

Morozov, E. (2012). El desengaño de Internet. Los mitos de la libertad en la red. Destino.

Link Google Scholar

Mosco, V. (2011). Sublimidad digital. Ciberespacio, mito y poder. Universidad Veracruzana.

Link Google Scholar

Nugier, A., & Guimond, S. (2016). Je suis Charlie: New findings on the social and political psychology of terrorism. International Review of Social Psychology, 29, 45-49. https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.60

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Otto, W. (2005). Las musas y el origen divino del canto y del habla. Siruela.

Link Google Scholar

Pelletier, P., & Drozda-Senkowska, E. (2016). The Charlie Hebdo terror attack in Paris: Follow-up of French citizens’ terrorist threat perception and its aftermath. International Review of Social Psychology, 29, 85-98. https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.51

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Pinazo-Calatayud, D., Nós-Aldás, E., & Agut-Nieto, S. (2020). Positive or negative communication in social activism [Comunicar en positivo o negativo en el activismo social]. Comunicar, 62, 69-78. https://doi.org/10.3916/C62-2020-06

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Provost, L. (2015, January 7). Je suis Charlie: Qui est à l'origine de l'image et du slogan que le monde entier reprend par solidarité?», Le Huffington Post. https://bit.ly/3dkUUrK

Link Google Scholar

Riechmann, J. (2020, September 7). Decrecer, desdigitalizar. Quince tesis. 15-15-15. https://bit.ly/2GCFQeV

Link Google Scholar

Robinson, L. (2007). The cyberself: The self-ing project goes online; symbolic interaction in the digital age. New Media & Society, 9, 93-110. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444807072216

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Sorel, G. (2005). Reflexiones sobre la violencia. Alianza Editorial.

Link Google Scholar

Titley, G. Freedman, D., Khiabany, G., & Mondon, A. (2017). After Charlie Hebdo: Terror, racism and free speech. Zed Books. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350218260

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Treré, E., & Barranquero, A. (2013). De mitos y sublimes digitales: Movimientos sociales y tecnologías de la comunicación desde una perspectiva histórica. Redes.Com, 8, 27-47. https://doi.org/10.15213/redes.n8.p27

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Zuckerman, E., Matias, J., Bhargava, R., Bermejo, F., & Ko, A. (2019). Whose Death Matters? A quantitative analysis of media attention to deaths of Black Americans in police confrontations, 2013–2016. International Journal of Communication, 13, 4751-4777. https://bit.ly/39LAdXZ

Link Google Scholar

Fundref

This research received financial support from the AGLAYA Project Strategies for innovation in Mytocritic, European Social Fund / CAM, (Ref. H2019 / HUM5714).

Crossmark

技术信息

收到: 01-12-2020

修订: 03-01-2021

公认: 15-02-2021

OnlineFirst: 15-04-2021

发布日期: 01-07-2021

文章修改时间: 33 天 | 期刊编号的平均时间修订 68: 37 天

文章接受时间: 76 天 | 期刊编号的平均接受时间 68: 78 天

预印本编辑时间: 166 天 | 期刊编号的平均编辑时间预印 68: 168 天

文章编辑时间: 211 天 | 期刊编号的平均编辑时间 68: 213 天

度量

这篇文章的度量

浏览次数: 31983

对摘要的解读: 28278

PDF下载: 3705

的全部指标 68

浏览次数: 317491

对摘要的解读: 275447

PDF下载: 42044

被引用