Российская дезинформация в Восточной Европе. Медиа-кадры о вакцинации в ro.sputnik.md

 Andreea-Alina Mogoș, Cluj-Napoca (Румыния)

 Teodora-Elena Grapă, Cluj-Napoca (Румыния)

 Teodora-Felicia Șandru, Cluj-Napoca (Румыния)

https://doi.org/10.3916/C72-2022-03

Ключевые слова

Фрейминг СМИ, ценности новостей, контент-анализ, текстовый анализ, вакцина COVID-19, Sputnik News

Резюме

Новостной сайт ro.sputnik.md является румынской языковой версией платформы новостного сайта Sputnik, принадлежащей российскому правительству, одним из основных каналов, используемых Кремлем для распространения недостоверной и ложной информации за пределами России. Целью данного исследования является определение рамок, связанных с вакцинами против КОВИД-19, и новостных ценностей, используемых при построении новостного дискурса о вакцинации в медиатекстах ro.sputnik.md. Для картирования медиа-фреймов, лексических и дискурсивных конструкций в исследовании предлагается смешанный контент-ориентированный подход, в котором автоматизированный анализ текста (частотный, ко-совпадений, n-граммы) сочетается с тематическим и дискурсивным анализом. В совокупности (N=1,165) выделено шесть акцентных фреймов: Превосходство российской вакцины "Спутник V", летальные/побочные эффекты разрешенных ЕС вакцин, ограничение прав и свобод личности, борьба властей ЕС и/или Румынии, защита детей и подростков и заговор Big Pharma. Результаты показывают, что с негативным значением новостей связаны определенные дискурсивные модели: смерть, побочные эффекты (тромб, тромбоз, свертывание крови), ограничения и запреты или предупреждения (серьезный, риск, негатив, паника и т.д.), а конфликтное значение новостей связано с военной лексикой (защита, угроза, битва, огонь, порох и т.д.); элитарность - с известными акторами (государственные лидеры, европейские лидеры, известные "заговорщики") и странами (влиятельные международные акторы, значимые соседи).

Ссылки

Bednarek, M., & Caple, H. (2014). Why do news values matter? Towards a new methodological framework for analysing news discourse in Critical Discourse Analysis and beyond. Discourse and Society, 25(2), 135-158. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926513516041

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Bednarek, M., & Caple, H. (2017). Language and news values. In M. Bednarek & H. Caple (Eds.), The Discourse of News Values (pp. 77-106). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190653934.003.0004

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Carrasco-Polaino, R., Martín-Cárdaba, M., & Villar-Cirujano, E. (2021). Citizen participation in Twitter: Anti-vaccine controversies in times of COVID-19. [Participación ciudadana en Twitter: Polémicas anti-vacunas en tiempos de COVID-19]. Comunicar, 69, 21-31. https://doi.org/10.3916/C69-2021-02

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Claussen, V. (2018). Fighting hate speech and fake news, The Network Enforcement Act (NetzDG) in Germany in the context of European legislation. Media Laws, 3(3), 110-136. https://bit.ly/3sGwepa

Link Google Scholar

Cvjeticanin, T., Zulejhic, E., Brkan, D., & Livancic-Milic, B. (2019). Disinformation in the online sphere: The case of BiH. Citizens’ Association ‘Why Not’. https://bit.ly/3HLVk9T

Link Google Scholar

de-Vreese, C.H., Boomgaarden, H.G., & Semetko, H.A. (2011). (In)direct framing effects: The effects of news media framing on public support for Turkish membership in the European Union. Communication Research, 38(2), 179-205. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650210384934

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Demjanski, A. (2020). Framing the news: Deutsche Welle, Sputnik News, and Macedonia’s Colorful Revolution [Unpublished Master dissertation]. University of Texas at Austin. https://bit.ly/3q5BPmR

Link Google Scholar

Deverell, E., Wagnsson, C., & Olsson, E.K. (2021). Destruct, direct and suppress: Sputnik narratives on the Nordic countries. Journal of International Communication, 27(1), 15-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/13216597.2020.1817122

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Druckman, J.N. (2001). The implications of framing effects for citizen competence. Political Behavior, 23(3), 225-256. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015006907312

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Entman, R.M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Entman, R.M., & Rojecki, A. (1993). Freezing out the public: Elite and media framing of the U.S. anti?nuclear movement. Political Communication, 10(2), 155-173. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.1993.9962973

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Galtung, J., & Ruge, M.H. (1965). The Structure of foreign news. Journal of Peace Research, 2(1), 64-91. https://doi.org/10.1038/166923b0

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Harcup, T., & O’Neill, D. (2016). What is news?: News values revisited (again). Journalism Studies, 18(12), 1470-1488. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2016.1150193

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Higgins, A. (2021, November 9). In Romania, hard-hit by COVID, doctors fight vaccine refusal. The New York Times. https://nyti.ms/3EALCp9

Link Google Scholar

Innes, M. (2019). Techniques of disinformation: Constructing and communicating “soft facts” after terrorism. The British Journal of Sociology, 71(2), 284-299. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12735

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

IRES – Institutul Român pentru Evaluare si Strategie (Ed.) (2021). Vaccinarea in România. Perceptii. Atitudini. Comportamente. Opinion poll. https://bit.ly/32Ji8Zd

Link Google Scholar

Ireton, C., & Posetti, J. (2018). Journalism, “fake news” & disinformation: Handbook for Journalism Education and Training. UNESCO. http://bitly.ws/oXHE

Link Google Scholar

Joye, S. (2010). News discourses on distant suffering: A critical discourse analysis of the 2003 SARS outbreak. Discourse & Society, 21(5), 586-601. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926510373988

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Joye, S., Heinrich, A., & Wöhlert, R. (2016). 50 years of Galtung and Ruge: Reflections on their model of news values and its relevance for the study of journalism and communication today. Communication and Media, 11(38), 5-28. https://doi.org/10.5937/comman11-9514

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Kaiser, J. (2020). Emphasis framing effects in political communication - An experimental approach to the role of issue-specific argument strength, cross-thematic salience emphasis frames, and political value preferences in citizens’ attitude formation. [Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Zurich]. https://bit.ly/3tciYbG

Link Google Scholar

Kang, G.J., Ewing-Nelson, S.R., Mackey, L., Schlitt, J.T., Marathe, A., Abbas, K.M., & Swarup, S. (2017). Semantic network analysis of vaccine sentiment in online social media. Vaccine, 35(29), 3621-3638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.05.052

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Kottasová, I. (2021, October 1). They have all the vaccines they need, but these EU nations are still miles behind their neighbors. CNN. https://cnn.it/3sFOr6f

Link Google Scholar

Kragh, M., & Asberg, S. (2017). Russia’s strategy for influence through public diplomacy and active measures: The Swedish case. Journal of Strategic Studies, 40(6), 773-816. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2016.1273830

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

MacFarquhar, N. (2016, August 28). A powerful Russian weapon: The spread of false stories. New York Times. https://nyti.ms/33TJY5k

Link Google Scholar

McCombs, M.E., & Shaw, D.L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176-187. https://doi.org/10.1086/267990

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Müller, P., & Schultz, A. (2021). Alternative media for a populist audience? Exploring political and media use predictors of exposure to Breitbart, Sputnik, and Co. Information, Communication and Society, 47(4), 124-134. https://doi.org/10.31857/S013116462104007X

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Nossier, S.A. (2021). Vaccine hesitancy: The greatest threat to COVID-19 vaccination programs. Journal of the Egyptian Public Health Association, 96(1), 18-20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42506-021-00081-2

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Our World in Data (Ed.) (2019). Skepticism to vaccines and what to do about it.Oxford Martin School/University of Oxford.. https://bit.ly/3z5ToGp

Link Google Scholar

Palm, R., Bolsen, T., & Kingsland, J.T. (2021). The effect of frames on COVID-19 vaccine resistance. Frontiers in Political Science, 3, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2021.661257

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Rosenberg, H., Syed, S., & Rezaie, S. (2020). The Twitter pandemic: The critical role of Twitter in the dissemination of medical information and misinformation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine, 22(4), 418-421. https://doi.org/10.1017/cem.2020.361

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Salaverría, R., Buslón, N., López-Pan, F., León, B., López-Goñi, I., & Erviti, M.C. (2020). Desinformación en tiempos de pandemia: Tipología de los bulos sobre la Covid-19. Profesional de la Información, 29(3), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.may.15

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Salmon, D.A., Dudley, M.Z., Granz, J.M., & Omer, S.B. (2015). Vaccine hesitancy: Causes, consequences, and a call to action. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 49(6), 391-398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2015.06.009

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Scales, D., Gorman, J., Leff, C., & Gorman, S. (2021). Effective ways to combat online medical and scientific misinformation: A hermeneutic narrative review and analysis. [Unpublished Pre-print]. https://doi.org/10.33767/osf.io/rcugs

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Scannell, D., Desens, L., Guadagno, M., Tra, Y., Acker, E., Sheridan, K., Rosner, M., Mahieu, J., & Fulk, M. (2021). COVID-19 vaccine discourse on Twitter: A content analysis of persuasion techniques, sentiment and mis/disinformation. Journal of Health Communication, 26(7), 443-459. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2021.1955050

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Scheufele, D.A. (1999). Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication, 49(1), 103-122. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02784.x

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Semetko, H.A., & Valkenburg, P.M. (2000). Framing European politics: A content analysis of press and television news. Journal of Communication, 50(2), 93-109. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02843.x

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Snegovaya, M. (2015). Russia Report 1: Putin’s Information Warfare in Ukraine. Institute for the Study of War. http://bitly.ws/oVf6

Link Google Scholar

Sputnik. (2020a). Un virolog explica riscurile unui vaccin creat prea repede. ro.sputnik.md. https://bit.ly/32Hw7ym

Link Google Scholar

Sputnik. (2020b). Orban si Arafat, calcati in picioare de un RENUMIT om de afaceri! Ponta, reactie ironica. ro.sputnik.md. https://bit.ly/3Jr7APe

Link Google Scholar

Sputnik. (2020c). George Soros rupe tacerea: Interviu fulminant – interese si strategii in spatele Pandemiei. ro.sputnik.md. https://bit.ly/3qwsio3

Link Google Scholar

Sputnik. (2021a). Gamaleia: Sputnik V poate proteja de toate tulpinele cunoscute. ro.sputnik.md. https://bit.ly/3FvGoMN

Link Google Scholar

Sputnik. (2021b). Noi date: Sputnik V, eficient in proportie de 97,6%. ro.sputnik.md. https://bit.ly/32ERhgI

Link Google Scholar

Sputnik. (2021c). Scandal urias: trei decedati dupa vaccinarea Pfizer! ro.sputnik.md. https://bit.ly/3mH4k8F

Link Google Scholar

Sputnik. (2021d). Eleva de liceu decedata dupa vaccinul Pfizer – familia devastata, Sofia era sanatoasa. ro.sputnik.md. https://bit.ly/3Ey20qn

Link Google Scholar

Sputnik. (2021e). Un europarlamentar român compara vaccinarea obligatorie cu nazismul. ro.sputnik.md. https://bit.ly/3FDo7wW

Link Google Scholar

Sputnik. (2021f). Cristian Terhes, attacks European Parliament’s “democracy” harshly – Video. ro.sputnik.md. https://bit.ly/3mE5Fgg

Link Google Scholar

Sputnik. (2021g). Chitic: Our freedom’s winter began. ro.sputnik.md. https://bit.ly/3FNdB6k

Link Google Scholar

Sputnik. (2021h). Norvegia cere procurarea vaccinului Sputnik V pe fondul unui numar record de infectari. ro.sputnik.md. https://bit.ly/3z40N9o

Link Google Scholar

Sputnik. (2021i). Scandalul infectarii stranii a lui Mirel Curea. Reactia dura a dr. Razvan Constantinescu. ro.sputnik.md. https://bit.ly/3etN9mn

Link Google Scholar

Sputnik. (2021j). Medicii, avertisment legat de o decizie a Ministerului Sanatatii: creste riscul de deces. ro.sputnik.md. https://bit.ly/3Evi1gN

Link Google Scholar

Sputnik. (2021k). Indonezia suspenda un lot de AstraZeneca dupa moartea unei victime a vaccinului. ro.sputnik.md. https://bit.ly/3ew9gJ6

Link Google Scholar

Sputnik. (2021l). Kremlinul a raspuns la acuzatiile The Sun despre furtul formulei vaccinului AstraZeneca. ro.sputnik.md. https://bit.ly/32Hx6P4

Link Google Scholar

Sputnik. (2021m). “Rusia nu urmareste banii”. Sputnik V a inceput sa fie aparat in Europa. ro.sputnik.md. https://bit.ly/32Hxayi

Link Google Scholar

Sputnik. (2021n). Expertii din India: Sputnik V, eficient in combaterea tulpinii Delta. ro.sputnik.md. https://bit.ly/3etOjyf

Link Google Scholar

Sputnik. (2021o). Analist: “Ceea ce se intâmpla in România, in Europa si in lume miroase a praf de pusca”. ro.sputnik.md. https://bit.ly/3sCh2cw

Link Google Scholar

Sputnik. (2021p). Ungaria pune NATO la punct: Nu vede Rusia ca o amenintare. ro.sputnik.md. https://bit.ly/3z9CEOz

Link Google Scholar

Stefan, B. (2020). Understanding Sputnik news agency internet traffic analysis. Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Brasov, 13(1), 113-124. https://doi.org/10.31926/but.scl.2020.62.13.1.12

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Voicu, M. (2018). Matrioska Mincinosilor: Fake news, manipulare, populism, Humanitas. https://bit.ly/3sQ2juq

Link Google Scholar

Westerståhl, J., & Johansson, F. (1994). Foreign news: News values and ideologies. European Journal of Communication, 9(1), 71-89. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323194009001004

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

White, J. (2016). Dismiss, distort, distract, and dismay: Continuity and change in Russian disinformation. Institute for European Studies: Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 13. [Policy Paper]. https://bit.ly/3sE5y8l

Link Google Scholar

World Health Organization (Ed.) (2019). Top threats to global health in 2019. WHO.Int. https://bit.ly/3qvEjtX

Link Google Scholar

Yablokov, I. (2015). Conspiracy theories as a Russian public diplomacy tool: The case of Russia Today (RT). Politics, 35(3-4), 301-315. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9256.12097

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Zarocostas, J. (2020). How to fight an infodemic. The Lancet, 395(10225), 676. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30461-X

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Fundref

Crossmark

Техническая спецификация

Получила: 29-12-2021

пересмотренный: 08-02-2022

Принятый: 02-03-2022

OnlineFirst: 15-05-2022

Дата публикации: 01-07-2022

Время пересмотра статьи: 41 дней | Среднее время пересмотра вопроса 72: 31 дней

Время принятия статьи: 63 дней | Время приема Номер 72: 75 дней

Время редактирования препринта: 138 дней | Выпуск препринта среднего времени редактирования 72: 150 дней

Время редактирования статьи: 183 дней | Среднее время редактирования журнала 72: 195 дней

метрика

Метрики этой статьи

Просмотров: 11380

Ознакомление с аннотациями: 10456

загрузки PDF-файлов: 924

Полные метрики 72

Просмотров: 240779

Ознакомление с аннотациями: 217145

загрузки PDF-файлов: 23634

Цитируется