TikTok 和 Twitter 上的女权主义、性别认同和两极分化

 Simón Peña-Fernández, Leioa (西班牙)

 Ainara Larrondo-Ureta, Leioa (西班牙)

 Jordi Morales-i-Gras, Leioa (西班牙)

https://doi.org/10.3916/C75-2023-04

关键词

年轻人、性别研究、身份认同、女权主义、社交网络、数字行动主义

摘要

社交网络创造开放、协作和参与空间的能力使年轻女性能够参与政治和社会活动并获得权力。在该背景下，本研究的目标侧重于分析在对女权主义和变性之间的捍卫的社交网络辩论中发生的两极分化，尤其是在以使用限定词“TERF”作为象征的年轻公众中。为此，我们使用了社交网络分析技术分析了 Twitter 和 TikTok 上的现有社区，以及其中年轻人的存在。结果表明，两个网络中的辩论都不是很有凝聚力，高度模块化的结构表明每个社区本身都是孤立的。由于上述原因，我们可以认为关于性别认同的辩论导致了社交网络中女权主义激进主义的强烈两极分化。同样，跨性别女权主义的立场在年轻人中占多数，这强化了女权运动内部意识形态辩论的想法，这也可以从世代的角度来理解。最后，可以验证这两个社交网络之间的差异使用，在这个问题上，TikTok 比 Twitter 显示出更少的党派倾向和更多的对话网络，因为它以更中立的语气进行讨论和参与。

参考资料

Baer, H. (2016). Redoing feminism: Digital activism, body politics, and neoliberalism. Feminist Media Studies, 16(1), 17-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2015.1093070

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Banks, A., Karol, D., Calvo, E.F., & Telhami, S. (2018). #Polarized feeds - Two experiments on polarization and social media. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3122880

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Batsleer, J., & McMahon, G. (2016). Young feminists online: Political and social participation, social action and feminist activism. In Youth social action: What do we know about young people’s participation? Birmingham, UK. https://bit.ly/3YpPRyU

Link Google Scholar

Blondel, V.D., Guillaume, J.L., Lambiotte, R., & Lefebvre, E. (2008). Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 10, P10008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P10008

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Carrera-Fernández, M.V., & DePalma, R. (2020). Feminism will be trans-inclusive or it will not be: Why do two cis-hetero woman educators support transfeminism? The Sociological Review, 68(4), 745-762. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038026120934686

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Cho, J., Ahmed, S., Hilbert, M., Liu, B., & Luu, J. (2020). Do search algorithms endanger democracy? An experimental investigation of algorithm effects on political polarization. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 64(2), 150-172. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2020.1757365

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Consejo de Europa (Ed.) (2014). Young people’s responses to homophobic and transphobic hate speech. SOGI Unit. IGLYO. https://bit.ly/3URrecQ

Link Google Scholar

Demszky, D., Garg, N., Voigt, R., Zou, J., Gentzkow, M., Shapiro, J., & Jurafsky, D. (2019). Analyzing polarization in social media: Method and application to tweets on 21 mass shootings. In J. Burstein, C. Doran, T. Solorio (Eds),

Link Google Scholar

Earles, J. (2017). TERF Wars: Narrative productions of gender and essentialism in radical-feminist (cyber)spaces. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global; Sociology Collection. https://bit.ly/3dVthff

Link Google Scholar

Ferré-Pavia, C., & Zaldívar, G. (2022). El feminismo trans excluyente en Twitter: Un monólogo sesgado en #ContraElBorradoDeLasMujeres. Icono 14, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.7195/ri14.v20i2.1865

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Hagberg, A., Swart, P., & Chult, D.S. (2008). Exploring network structure, dynamics, and function using networkx. United States. https://bit.ly/3y6EBw2

Link Google Scholar

Injuve (Ed.) (2019). Guía breve orientaciones – Para combatir el discurso de odio en internet a través de la educación en derechos humanos. Instituto de la Juventud. https://bit.ly/3BZWVYU

Link Google Scholar

Injuve (Ed.) (2021). Informe juventud en España 2020. Instituto de la Juventud. https://bit.ly/3UMswEJ

Link Google Scholar

Jackson, S. (2018). Young feminists, feminism and digital media. Feminism & Psychology, 28(1), 32-49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353517716952

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Jinsook, K. (2017). #iamafeminist as the ‘mother tag’: Feminist identification and activism against misogyny on Twitter in South Korea. Feminist Media Studies, 17(5), 804-820. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2017.1283343

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Leifeld, P. (2018). Polarization in the social sciences: Assortative mixing in social science collaboration networks is resilient to interventions. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 507, 510-523, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2018.05.109

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Linabary, J.R., Corple, D.J., & Cooky, C. (2020). Feminist activism in digital space: Postfeminist contradictions in #WhyIStayed. New Media & Society, 22(10), 1827-1848. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819884635

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Lu, C.T. (2020). A computational approach to analyzing and detecting trans-exclusionary radical feminists (TERFs) on Twitter. Dartmouth College Undergraduate Theses, 165. https://bit.ly/3CkKqsg

Link Google Scholar

Malatino, H. (2021). The promise of repair: Trans rage and the limits of feminist coalition. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 46(4), 827-851. https://doi.org/10.1086/713292

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Manikonda, L., Beigi, G., Kambhampati, S., & Liu, H. (2018). #metoo through the lens of social media. In R. Thomson, C. Dancy, A. Hyder, & H. Bisgin (Eds), Social, Cultural, and Behavioral Modeling. SBP-BRiMS 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 10899. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93372-6_13

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Maulding, S. (2019). Pussy hats and anti-trans sentiments: When second-wave and third-wave collide. OSR Journal of Student Research, 5, 210. https://bit.ly/3fAur0p

Link Google Scholar

McLean, C. (2021). The growth of the anti-transgender movement in the United Kingdom. The Silent Radicalization of the British Electorate. International Journal of Sociology, 5(6), 473-482. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207659.2021.1939946

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Ott, K. (2018). Social media and feminist values: Aligned or maligned? Frontiers, 39(1), 93-111. https://doi.org/10.5250/fronjwomestud.39.1.0093

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Pearce, R., Erikainen, S., & Vincent, B. (2020). TERF wars: An introduction. The Sociological Review, 68(4), 677-698. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038026120934713

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Peña-Fernández, S., Larrondo-Ureta, A., & Morales-i-Gras, J. (2022). Current affairs on TikTok. Virality and entertainment for digital natives. Profesional de la Información, 31(1). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2022.ene.06

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1. (pp. 2970–3005). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/N19-1304

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Salido-Machado, E. (2017). Ciberfeminismo: Disidencias corporales y género itinerante. Revell, 3(17), 47-75. https://bit.ly/3BBzCFf

Link Google Scholar

Salloum, A. (2021). Quantifying polarization in social networks. Thesis submitted for examination for the degree of Master of Science in Technology. Aalto University. https://bit.ly/3UYwGtl

Link Google Scholar

Schuster, J. (2013) Invisible feminists? Social media and young women’s political participation. Political Science, 65(1), 8-24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032318713486474

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Smyte, V. (2018, November 18). I'm credited with having coined the word 'Terf'. Here's how it happened. The Guardian. https://bit.ly/2IMKyqN

Link Google Scholar

Social Media Family (Ed.) (2022). VIII Informe sobre el uso de las redes sociales en España. The Social Media Family. https://bit.ly/2BR2FHL

Link Google Scholar

Storer, H.L., & Rodriguez, M. (2020). #Mapping a movement: Social media, feminist hashtags, and movement building in the digital age. Journal of Community Practice, 28(2), 160-176. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705422.2020.1757541

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Sulbarán, P. (2020). ¿Qué significa ser ‘TERF’ y por qué se considera un insulto contra feministas radicales? BBC News Mundo. https://bbc.in/3C0IOlW

Link Google Scholar

Taylor, C., Mantzaris, A., & Garibay, I. (2018). Exploring how homophily and accessibility can facilitate polarization in social networks. Information, 9(12), 325. https://doi.org/10.3390/info9120325

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Ticineto-Clough, P., & Halley, J. (2007). The affective turn: Theorizing the social. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv11316pw

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

TikTok (Ed.) (2022). An update on our platform API for researchers. https://bit.ly/3Bozhpv

Link Google Scholar

Tortajada, I., Willem, C., Platero-Méndez, R.L., & Araüna, N. (2021). Lost in transition? Digital trans activism on YouTube. Information, Communication & Society, 24(8), 1091-1107. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1797850

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Turley, E., & Fisher, J. (2018). Tweeting back while shouting back: Social media and feminism activism. Feminism & Psychology, 28(1), 128-132. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353517715875

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Vázquez-González, J., & Cárdenes-Hernández, C. (2021). Discursos trans y transexcluyentes en Instagram. In M. Blanco-Pérez (Ed.), El progreso de la comunicación en la era de los prosumidores (pp. 648-664). Dykinson. https://bit.ly/3YlDAeS

Link Google Scholar

Vincent, B., Erikainen, S., & Pearce, R. (2020). TERF Wars: Feminism and the fight for transgender futures. Community Development Journal, 57(3), 573–577. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsab016

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Willem, C., & Tortajada, I. (2021). Gender, voice and online space: Expressions of feminism on social media in Spain. Media and Communication, 9(2), 62-71. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v9i2.3851

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Williams, C. (2020). The ontological woman: A history of deauthentication, dehumanization, and violence. The Sociological Review, 68(4), 718-734. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038026120938292

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Woolley, S.C., & Howard, P. (2018). Computational propaganda: Political parties, politicians, and political manipulation on social media. Oxford Studies in Digital Politics. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190931407.001.0001

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Fundref

This article draws on the results of the research project “Noticias, redes y usuarios en el sistema híbrido de medios” (RTI2018-095775-B-C41), financed by the National R&D+i Plan of the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities, and by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) (2018-2022). The authors belong to the Consolidated Research Group of the “Gureiker” Basque University System (IT- 1496-22) (2022-2025).

Crossmark

技术信息

收到: 30-09-2022

修订: 23-10-2022

公认: 29-11-2022

OnlineFirst: 30-01-2023

发布日期: 01-04-2023

文章修改时间: 23 天 | 期刊编号的平均时间修订 75: 32 天

文章接受时间: 60 天 | 期刊编号的平均接受时间 75: 93 天

预印本编辑时间: 138 天 | 期刊编号的平均编辑时间预印 75: 171 天

文章编辑时间: 183 天 | 期刊编号的平均编辑时间 75: 216 天

度量

这篇文章的度量

浏览次数: 43514

对摘要的解读: 41558

PDF下载: 1956

的全部指标 75

浏览次数: 446044

对摘要的解读: 433398

PDF下载: 12646

被引用