The state of things: two or three things I know about film analysis

 Santos Zunzunegui-Díez, Bilbao (Espanha)

https://doi.org/10.3916/C29-2007-07

Palavras chave

Film analysis, cinema, audiovisual media, audiovisual education, audiovisual teaching, methodology of audiovisual pedagogy

Resumo

This paper offers a reflection on film analysis nature, a regular activity in cinema teaching. In order to understand this perspective, we show the main risk factors: the empirical data fetishism, the context fetishism and the biographism return. Our proposal reivindicates the relevance of film form and the necessity for pointing out how films comunicate.

Referências

COHEN-SEAT, N. (1946): Essais sur les principes d’une philosophie du cinéma. I. Introduction générale. París, PUF.

Link Google Scholar

DANTO, A. (1989): Historia y narración. Barcelona, Paidós.

Link Google Scholar

ECO, U. (1992): Los límites de la interpretación. Barcelona, Lumen.

Link Google Scholar

HOFFSTADTER, D. (1987): Gödel, Escher, Bach. Un eterno y grácil bucle. Barcelona, Tusquets.

Link Google Scholar

MACCABE, C. (2005): Godard. Retrato del artista a los setenta. Barcelona, Seix-Barral.

Link Google Scholar

METZ, C. (1968): Essais sur la signification au cinéma. París, Klincksieck.

Link Google Scholar

PAUL, R. (1987): Tiempo y narración. Madrid, Cristiandad.

Link Google Scholar

TOUBIANA, S. y BAECQUE, A. de (2005): François Truffaut. Madrid, Plot.

Link Google Scholar

WHITE, H. (1992): Metahistoria. La imaginación histórica en la Europa del siglo XIX. México, Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Link Google Scholar

Fundref

Este trabalho não tem nenhum apoio financeiro

Crossmark

Technical information

Métricas

Métricas deste artigo

Vistas: 31236

Leituras dos resumos: 25350

Descargas em PDF: 5886

Métricas completas do Comunicar 29

Vistas: 844075

Leituras dos resumos: 716056

Descargas em PDF: 128019

Citado por