Ключевые слова
Citizen science, cocreation, codesign, knowledge, toolkit, interdisciplinarity, participation, open science
Резюме
This article describes and analyzes the collaborative design of a citizen science research project through cocreation. Three groups of secondary school students and a team of scientists conceived three experiments on human behavior and social capital in urban and public spaces. The study goal is to address how interdisciplinary work and attention to social concerns and needs, as well as the collective construction of research questions, can be integrated into scientific research. The 95 students participating in the project answered a survey to evaluate their perception about the dynamics and tools used in the cocreation process of each experiment, and the five scientists responded to a semistructured interview. The results from the survey and interviews demonstrate how citizen science can achieve a “cocreated” modality beyond the usual “contributory” paradigm, which usually only involves the public or amateurs in data collection stages. This type of more collaborative science was made possible by the adaptation of materials and facilitation mechanisms, as well as the promotion of key aspects in research such as trust, creativity and transparency. The results also point to the possibility of adopting similar codesign strategies in other contexts of scientific collaboration and collaborative knowledge generation
Ссылки
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Bonney, R., Ballard, H., Jordan, R., McCallie, E., Phillips, T., Shirk, J., & Wilderman, C.C. (2009a). Public Participation in scientific research: Defining the field and assessing its potential for informal science education. A CAISE Inquiry Group Report. Online Submission. (https://goo.gl/wsZYQn)
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Brown, T., & Wyatt, J. (2015). Design thinking for social innovation. Annual Review of Policy Design, 3(1), 1-10. (https://goo.gl/1pgucj)
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Hand, E. (2010). People power. Nature, 466(7307), 685-687. https://doi.org/10.1038/466685a
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Kellogg, W.K. (2004). Using logic models to bring together planning, evaluation, and action: Logic model development guide. Battle Creek, Michigan: WK Kellogg Foundation. (https://goo.gl/pCPB52)
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Krippendorff, K. (1990). Metodología de análisis de contenido: teoría y práctica. Barcelona: Planeta.
Manzini, E., & Coad, R. (2015). Design, when everybody designs: An introduction to design for social innovation. Cambridge, MA: The Mit Press (https://goo.gl/FRJV3B)
Mindell, J.S., Jones, P., Vaughan, L., Haklay, M., Scholes, S., Anciaes, P., & Dhanani, A. (2017). Street Mobility Project: Toolkit. (https://goo.gl/yxDuXk)
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Onwuegbuzie, A.J., & Leech, N.L. (2006). Linking research questions to mixed methods data analysis procedures 1. The Qualitative Report, 11(3), 474-498. (https://goo.gl/dJZ7An)
Perelló, J., Ferran-Ferrer, N., Farré, S., & Bonhoure, I. (2017). Secondary school rubrics for citizen science projects. In C. Heredotouand, E. Scanlon, & M. Sharples, (Eds.), Citizen inquiry: Synthesising science and inquiry learning. London: Taylor and Francis. [In press].
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Sanders, E. (2006). Design serving people. Cumulus Working Papers, 28-33. (https://goo.gl/JXqodm)
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Sanders, E., & Stappers, P.J. (2008). Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. Co-design, 4(1), 5-18. http://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875068
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Tweddle, J.C., Robinson, L.D., Pocock, M.J.O., & Roy, H.E. (2012). Guide to citizen science: developing, implementing and evaluating citizen science to study biodiversity and the environment in the UK. London: Natural History Museum and NERC Centre for Ecology & Hydrology for UK-EOF. (https://goo.gl/9QSBHr)
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Crossmark
Техническая спецификация
Получила: 02-06-2017
пересмотренный: 26-07-2017
Принятый: 30-07-2017
First Online: 15-11-2017
Дата публикации: 01-01-2018
Время пересмотра статьи: 54 дней | Среднее время пересмотра вопроса 54: 44 дней
Время принятия статьи: 58 дней | Время приема Номер 54: 97 дней
Время редактирования препринта: 168 дней | Выпуск препринта среднего времени редактирования 54: 210 дней
Время редактирования статьи: 213 дней | Среднее время редактирования журнала 54: 255 дней
метрика
Метрики этой статьи
Просмотров: 26497
Ознакомление с аннотациями: 21665
загрузки PDF-файлов: 4832
Полные метрики 54
Просмотров: 376127
Ознакомление с аннотациями: 217034
загрузки PDF-файлов: 159093
Цитируется
Цитаты в Web of Science
Jesus, Manuella Dultra; Zapelini, Cleverson; Schiavetti, Alexandre;. Can citizen science help delimit the geographical distribution of a species? The case of the Callistoctopus sp. ( ETHNOBIOLOGY AND CONSERVATION , 2021.
https://doi.org/10.15451/ec2020-09-10.03-1-15
Golumbic, Yaela N.; Fishbain, Barak; Baram-Tsabari, Ayelet. User centered design of a citizen science air-quality monitoring project INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION PART B-COMMUNICATION AND PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT, 2019.
https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2019.1597314
Bernardez Rodal, Asuncion; Padilla Castillo, Graciela; Sosa Sanchez, Roxana Popelka. From Action Art to Artivism on Instagram: Relocation and instantaneity for a new geography of protest CATALAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION & CULTURAL STUDIES, 2019.
https://doi.org/10.1386/cjcs.11.1.23_1
Pico, Maria-Josep; Saez, Emilio; Galan, Esteban. Transmedia research. Participatory culture in the creation of academic knowledge PROFESIONAL DE LA INFORMACION, 2019.
https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2019.jul.14
Sanchez Vazquez; Luis;. Resistance Science? Participatory environmental monitoring in contexts of environmental conflict. Reflections from a decolonial view REVISTA DE PAZ Y CONFLICTOS , 2019.
https://doi.org/10.30827/revpaz.v12i2.10399
Hidalgo, Enric Senabre; Fuster Morell, Mayo;. Co-designed strategic planning and agile project management in academia: case study of an action research group PALGRAVE COMMUNICATIONS , 2019.
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-019-0364-0
Garcia-Holgado, Alicia; Jose Garcia-Penalvo, Francisco; Butler, Paul;. Technological Ecosystems in Citizen Science: A Framework to Involve Children and Young People SUSTAINABILITY , 2020.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051863
Sauermann, Henry; Vohland, Katrin; Antoniou, Vyron;. Citizen science and sustainability transitions RESEARCH POLICY , 2020.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.103978
Lopez-Doblas, Manuela; Perez-Corral, Olivia; Gomez-Dominguez, David; Danet-Danet, Alina. Qualitative based social media plan participative design for health organizations. Evaluation of the Reina Sofia University Hospital experience PROFESIONAL DE LA INFORMACION, 2019.
https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2019.mar.24
Hidalgo, Enric Senabre; Wandl-Vogt, Eveline; Dorn, Amelie;. Mapping uncertainty around research data: a Digital Humanities transdisciplinary perspective adopting the Johari window TEEM'19: SEVENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TECHNOLOGICAL ECOSYSTEMS FOR ENHANCING MULTICULTURALITY , 2019.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3362789.3362931
Vicens, Julian; Perello, Josep; Duch, Jordi. Citizen Social Lab: A digital platform for human behavior experimentation within a citizen science framework PLOS ONE, 2018.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207219
Paredes-Labra, Joaquin; Siri, Ivana-Mariel; Oliveira, Alessandro. Preparing Public Pedagogies with ICT: The Case of Pesticides and Popular Education in Brazil SUSTAINABILITY, 2018.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103377
Senabre Hidalgo, Enric. Dotmocracy and Planning Poker for Uncertainty Management in Collaborative Research Two Examples of Co-creation Techniques Derived from Digital Culture SIXTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TECHNOLOGICAL ECOSYSTEMS FOR ENHANCING MULTICULTURALITY (TEEM'18), 2018.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3284179.3284325
Paredes-Labra, Joaquin; Freitas Cortina, Ada;. The representations of the future teachers on the uses of technology in school. A narrative study TEORIA DE LA EDUCACION , 2020.
https://doi.org/10.14201/teri.21616
Whittle, Clayton; Tiwari, Sonia; Yan, Shulong;. Emergency remote teaching environment: a conceptual framework for responsive online teaching in crises INFORMATION AND LEARNING SCIENCES , 2020.
https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-04-2020-0099
Angel Queiruga-Dios, Miguel; Lopez-Inesta, Emilia; Diez-Ojeda, Maria;. Citizen Science for Scientific Literacy and the Attainment of Sustainable Development Goals in Formal Education SUSTAINABILITY , 2020.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104283
Diaz-Lopez, Lourdes; Tarango, Javier; Refugio Romo-Gonzalez, Jose;. Virtual Reality in learning processes in university students: motivation and interest to awaken scientific vocations CUADERNOS DE DOCUMENTACION MULTIMEDIA , 2020.
https://doi.org/10.5209/cdmu.68958
Seron Torrecilla; Francisco Javier;. THE STEAM APPROACH: PARTICIPATORY DESIGN IN A CITIZEN SCIENCE EXPERIENCE AUSART , 2020.
https://doi.org/10.1387/ausart.21474
Kral, Rosana Maria; Maftukhah, Rizki; Mentler, Axel;. Citizen Science in the Field: Co-experimentation at Pilot Scale for Sustainable Use of Natural Resources SUSTAINABILITY , 2020.
Цитаты в Scopus
Vicens, J., Duch, J., Perelló, J.. Citizen social lab: A digital platform for human behavior experimentation within a citizen science framework), PLoS ONE, .
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207219
Golumbic, Y.N., Fishbain, B., Baram-Tsabari, A.. User centered design of a citizen science air-quality monitoring project), International Journal of Science Education, Part B: Communication, Public Engagement, .
https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2019.1597314
López-Doblas, M., Pérez-Corral, O., Gómez-Domínguez, D., Danet-Danet, A.. Qualitative based social media plan participative design for health organizations. evaluation of the Reina Sofia University Hospital experience [Diseño participativo de un plan de social media en salud a través de metodología cualitativa. Evaluación de la experiencia del Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía]), Profesional de la Informacion, .
https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2019.mar.24
Picó, M.-J., Sáez, E., Galán, E.. Transmedia research. Participatory culture in the creation of academic knowledge [Investigación transmedia. Cultura participativa en la creación del conocimiento académico]), Profesional de la Informacion, .
https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2019.jul.14
Rodal, A.B., Castillo, G.P., Sánchez, R.P.S.. From action art to artivism on instagram: Relocation, instantaneity for a new geography of protest), Catalan Journal of Communication and Cultural Studies, .
https://doi.org/10.1386/cjcs.11.1.23_1
Hidalgo, E.S., Wandl-Vogt, E., Dorn, A., Souza, R.R.. Mapping uncertainty around research data: A Digital Humanities transdisciplinary perspective adopting the Johari window), ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, .
https://doi.org/10.1145/3362789.3362931
Senabre Hidalgo, E., Fuster Morell, M.. Co-designed strategic planning, agile project management in academia: case study of an action research group), Palgrave Communications, .
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-019-0364-0
Queiruga-Dios, M.A., López-Iñesta, E., Diez-Ojeda, M., Sáiz-Manzanares, M.C., Dorrío, J.B.V. . Citizen science for scientific literacy and the attainment of sustainable development goals in formal education), Sustainability (Switzerland), .
https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104283
Sauermann, H., Vohland, K., Antoniou, V., (...), Samson, R., Winter, S. . Citizen science and sustainability transitions), Research Policy, .
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.103978
Tauginienė, L., Butkevičienė, E., Vohland, K., (...), Balázs, B., Prūse, B. . Citizen science in the social sciences and humanities: the power of interdisciplinarity), Palgrave Communications, .
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-0471-y
Hidalgo, E.S.. Dotmocracy, planning poker for uncertainty management in collaborative research), ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, .
https://doi.org/10.1145/3284179.3284325
Paredes-Labra, J., Siri, I.-M., Oliveira, A.. Preparing public pedagogies with ICT: The case of pesticides, popular education in Brazil), Sustainability (Switzerland), .
https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103377
Whittle, C., Tiwari, S., Yan, S., Williams, J. . Emergency remote teaching environment: a conceptual framework for responsive online teaching in crises), Information and Learning Science, .
https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-04-2020-0099
Kral, R.M., Maftukhah, R., Mentler, A., (...), Ngadisih, N., Keiblinger, K.M. . Citizen science in the field: Co-experimentation at pilot scale for sustainable use of natural resources), Sustainability (Switzerland), .
https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187700
Paredes-Labra, J., Freitas Cortina, A. . The representations of the future teachers on the uses of technology in school. A narrative study | [LAS REPRESENTACIONES DE LOS FUTUROS PROFESORES SOBRE LOS USOS DE LA TECNOLOGÍA EN LA ESCUELA. UN ESTUDIO NARRATIVO]), Teoria de la Educacion, .
https://doi.org/10.14201/TERI.21616
García-Holgado, A., García-Peñalvo, F.J., Butler, P. . Technological ecosystems in citizen science: A framework to involve children and young people), Sustainability (Switzerland), .
Цитаты в Google Scholar
Tauginienė, L., Butkevičienė, E., Vohland, K., Heinisch, B., Daskolia, M., Suškevičs, M., ... & Prūse, B. (2020). Citizen science in the social sciences and humanities: the power of interdisciplinarity. Palgrave Communications, 6(1), 1-11.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-020-0471-y
Hidalgo, E. S. (2018, October). Dotmocracy and Planning Poker for Uncertainty Management in Collaborative Research: Two Examples of Co-creation Techniques Derived from Digital Culture. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (pp. 833-839). ACM.
https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=3284325
Vicens Bennasar, J. A. Human Behavior Experimentation and Participation in Scientific Activities in the Wild (Doctoral dissertation, Universitat Rovira i Virgili).
https://www.tdx.cat/handle/10803/663377
Golumbic, Y. N., Fishbain, B., & Baram-Tsabari, A. (2019). User centered design of a citizen science air-quality monitoring project. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 1-19.
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/21548455.2019.1597314
Bernárdez rodAl, A., PAdillA cAstillo, G., & Sosa Sánchez, R. P. (2019). From Action Art to Artivism on instagram: relocation and instantaneity for a new geography of protest. Catalan Journal of Communication & Cultural Studies, 11(1), 23-37.
https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/intellect/cjcs/2019/00000011/00000001/art00002
Paredes-Labra, J., Siri, I. M., & Oliveira, A. (2018). Preparing Public Pedagogies with ICT: The Case of Pesticides and Popular Education in Brazil. Sustainability, 10(10), 3377.
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/10/3377
López-Doblas, M., Pérez-Corral, O., Gómez-Domínguez, D., & Danet-Danet, A. (2019). Diseño participativo de un plan de social media en salud a través de metodología cualitativa. Evaluación de la experiencia del Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía. El profesional de la información, 28(2).
Vicens, J., Perelló, J., & Duch, J. (2018). Citizen Social Lab: A digital platform for human behavior experimentation within a citizen science framework. PloS one, 13(12), e0207219.
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0207219
Ospina, S. L. (2019). El diseño como agente potenciador en los procesos de socialización de políticas públicas en Colombia, por medio de los observatorios. Verba luris, (42), 63-71.
https://revistas.unilibre.edu.co/index.php/verbaiuris/article/view/5659
López Ospina, S. (2019). El diseño como agente potenciador en los procesos de socialización de Políticas Públicas en Colombia, por medio de los observatorios. Verba Iuris, (42).
Picó, M. J., Sáez, E., & Galán, E. (2019). Investigación transmedia. Cultura participativa en la creación del conocimiento académico.
https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/EPI/article/view/71419
Prado-Jiménez, J. C., Arroyo-Vázquez, M., & Aragonés-Beltrán, P. (2019). Una aproximación a la aplicación de la Ciencia ciudadana en la dirección de proyectos.
http://dspace.aeipro.com/xmlui/handle/123456789/2388
Golumbic, Y. N., Fishbain, B., & Baram-Tsabari, A. (2019). User centered design of a citizen science air-quality monitoring project. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 9(3), 195-213.
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/21548455.2019.1597314
Hidalgo, E. S. (2018, October). Dotmocracy and planning poker for uncertainty management in collaborative research: Two examples of co-creation techniques derived from digital culture. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (pp. 833-839).
https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3284179.3284325
Vicens, J., Perelló, J., & Duch, J. (2018). Citizen Social Lab: A digital platform for human behavior experimentation within a citizen science framework. PloS one, 13(12).
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6283465/
Vohland, K., Sauermann, H., Antoniou, V., Balazs, B., Göbel, C., Karatzas, K., ... & Winter, S. (2019). Citizen Science and sustainability transitions. Available at SSRN 3511088.
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3511088
Hidalgo, E. S., & Morell, M. F. (2019). Co-designed strategic planning and agile project management in academia: case study of an action research group. Palgrave Communications, 5(1), 1-13.
http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/526284/
Groom, Q., Strubbe, D., Adriaens, T., Davis, A. J., Desmet, P., Oldoni, D., ... & Vanderhoeven, S. (2019). Empowering citizens to inform decision-making as a way forward to support invasive alien species policy. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 4(1).
http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/526284/
Borda, A., Gray, K., & Fu, Y. (2019). Research data management in health and biomedical citizen science: practices and prospects. JAMIA Open.
https://academic.oup.com/jamiaopen/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/jamiaopen/ooz052/5670773
Steiner, S. M. (2020). Popular Epidemiology and Community-Based Citizen Science: Using a Bio-Indicator for Toxic Air Pollution.
Hidalgo, E. S., Wandl-Vogt, E., Dorn, A., & Souza, R. R. (2019, October). Mapping uncertainty around research data: a Digital Humanities transdisciplinary perspective adopting the Johari window. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (pp. 804-809). ACM.
https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=3362931
Bonhoure, I., Cigarini, A., Vicens, J., & Perelló, J. (2019). Citizen Social Science in practice: a critical analysis of a mental health community-based project.
https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/63aj7/
Senabre Hidalgo, E., & Fuster Morell, M. (2020). Co-designed strategic planning and agile project management in academia: case study of an action research group.
http://openaccess.uoc.edu/webapps/o2/handle/10609/105146
Senabre Hidalgo, E. (2019). Co-creation for transdisciplinarity-Adoption of participatory design and agile project management in collaborative research processes (Doctoral dissertation, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya).
https://84.88.27.106/handle/10803/668172
Hassanzadeh, P. (2019). FindSampo: A Citizen Science Platform for Archaeological Finds on the Semantic Web.
https://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/handle/123456789/41720
Picó, M. J., Sáez Soro, E., & Galán Cubillo, E. (2019). Investigación transmedia. Cultura participativa en la creación del conocimiento académico.
http://repositori.uji.es/xmlui/handle/10234/184161
Díaz-López, L., Tarango, J., & Romo-González, J. R. Realidad Virtual en procesos de aprendizaje en estudiantes universitarios: motivación e interés para despertar vocaciones científicas.
https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/CDMU/article/download/68958/4564456553363
Borda, A., Gray, K., & Fu, Y. (2020). Research data management in health and biomedical citizen science: practices and prospects. JAMIA Open, 3(1), 113-125.
https://academic.oup.com/jamiaopen/article-abstract/3/1/113/5670773
Sánchez-Vázquez, L. (2019). ¿ Ciencia de resistencia? Monitoreos ambientales participativos en contextos de conflicto ambiental. Reflexiones desde una mirada decolonial.
https://digibug.ugr.es/handle/10481/60596
Labra, J. P., & CORTINA, A. F. (2020). Las representaciones de los futuros profesores sobre los usos de la tecnología en la escuela. Un estudio narrativo. Teoría de la Educación. Revista Interuniversitaria, 32(2), 157-180.
https://revistas.usal.es/index.php/1130-3743/article/view/teri.21616
García-Holgado, A., García-Peñalvo, F. J., & Butler, P. (2020). Technological Ecosystems in Citizen Science: A Framework to Involve Children and Young People. Sustainability, 12(5), 1863.
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/5/1863
Sauermann, H., Vohland, K., Antoniou, V., Balázs, B., Göbel, C., Karatzas, K., ... & Winter, S. (2020). Citizen science and sustainability transitions. Research Policy, 49(5), 103978.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733320300585
Скачать
Альтернативные метрики
Как процитировать
Senabre, E., Ferran-Ferrer, N., & Perelló, J. (2018). Participatory design of citizen science experiments. [Diseño participativo de experimentos de ciencia ciudadana]. Comunicar, 54, 29-38. https://doi.org/10.3916/C54-2018-03
Доля
Почтовый ящик 527
21080 Уэльва (Испания)
Администрация 
Редакция
