Ключевые слова

Ecological perspective, personalised learning network, interrelatedness, cognitive dimension, social dimension, material dimension, blended learning experience, university students

Резюме

In researching student learning experience in Higher Education, a dearth of studies has investigated cognitive, social, and material dimensions simultaneously with the same population. From an ecological perspective of learning, this study examined the interrelatedness amongst key elements in these dimensions of 365 undergraduates’ personalised learning networks. Data were collected from questionnaires, learning analytics, and course marks to measure these elements in the blended learning experience and academic performance. Students reported qualitatively different cognitive engagement between an understanding and a reproducing learning orientation towards learning, which when combined with their choices of collaboration, generated five qualitatively different patterns of collaboration. The results revealed that students had an understanding learning orientation and chose to collaborate with students of similar learning orientation tended to have more successful blended learning experience. Their personalised learning networks were characterized by self-reported adoption of deep approaches to face-to-face and online learning; positive perceptions of the integration between online environment and the course design; the way they collaborated and positioned themselves in their collaborative networks; and they were more engaged with online learning activities in the course. The study had significant implications to inform theory development in learning ecology research and to guide curriculum design, teaching, and learning.

Посмотреть инфографику

Ссылки

Barnett, R. (2018). The ecological university: A feasible utopia. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315194899-1

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Barron, B. (2004). Learning ecologies for technological fluency: Gender and experience differences. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 31(1), 1-36. https://doi.org/10.2190/1n20-vv12-4rb5-33va

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Barron, B. (2006). Interest and self-sustained learning as catalysts of development: A learning ecology perspective. Human Development, 49(4), 193-224. https://doi.org/10.1159/000094368

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Barron, B., Wise, S., & Martin, C. (2013). Creating within and across life spaces: The role of a computer clubhouse in a child’s learning ecology. In B. Bevan, P. Bell, R. Stevens & A. Razfar (Eds.), LOST Opportunities (pp. 99-118). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4304-5_8

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Biggs, J., Kember, D., & Leung, D. (2001). The revised two-factor study process questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 133-149. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709901158433

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Bliuc, A.M, Ellis, R., Goodyear, P., & Piggott, L. (2010). Learning through face-to-face and online discussions: Associations between students’ conceptions, approaches and academic performance in political science. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(3), 512-524. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00966.x

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Bonacich, P. (2007). Some unique properties of eigenvector centrality. Social Networks, 29(4), 555-564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2007.04.002

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Brewe, E., Kramer, L., & Sawtelle, V. (2012). Investigating student communities with network analysis of interactions in a physics learning center. Physical Review Special Topics-PER, 8, 010101. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010101

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Cadima, R., Ojeda, J., & Monguet, M. (2012). Social networks and performance in distributed learning communities. Educational Technology and Society, 15(4), 296-304. https://bit.ly/2ZTD616

Link Google Scholar

Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2017). E-learning ecologies: Principles for new learning and assessment. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315639215

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Crawford, K., Gordon, S., Nicholas, J., & Prosser, M. (1998). Qualitatively different experiences of learning mathematics at university. Learning and Instruction, 8(5), 455-468. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(98)00005-X

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

De-Nooy, W., Mrvar, A., & Batagelj, V. (2011). Exploratory social network analysis with Pajek (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511996368

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Ellis, R., & Bliuc, A. (2016). An exploration into first-year university students’ approaches to inquiry and online learning technologies in blended environments. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(5), 970-980. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12385

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Ellis, R., & Goodyear, P. (2019). The education ecology of universities: Integrating learning, strategy and the academy. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351135863

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Ellis, R., Bliuc, A., & Goodyear, P. (2012). Student experiences of engaged enquiry in pharmacy education: Digital natives or something else? Higher Education, 64(5), 609-626. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9515-6

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Ellis, R., Pardo, A., & Han, F. (2016). Quality in blended learning environments – significant differences in how students approach learning collaborations. Computers & Education, 102, 90-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.07.006

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Entwistle, N., & Ramsden, P. (2015). Understanding student learning. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-805359-1.00012-7

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Fenwick, T. (2014). Sociomateriality in medical practice and learning: Attuning to what matters. Medical Education, 48(1), 44-52. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12295

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Fenwick, T., & Landri, P. (2012). Materialities, textures and pedagogies: Socio-material assemblages in education. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 20(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2012.649421

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Fenwick, T., Nerland, M., & Jensen, K. (2012). Sociomaterial approaches to conceptualizing professional learning and practice. Journal of Education and Work, 25(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2012.644901

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Freeman, L. (1977). A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry, 40(1), 35-41. https://doi.org/10.2307/3033543

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Han, F., & Ellis, R. (2019a). Initial development and validation of the perceptions of the blended learning environment questionnaire. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282919834091

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Han, F., & Ellis, R. (2019b). Identifying consistent patterns of quality learning discussions in blended learning. Internet and Higher Education, 40, 12-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.09.002

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Jackson, N. (2013). The concept of learning ecologies. In N. Jackson & G. Cooper (Eds.), Lifewide learning, education and personal development e-book (pp. 1-21). https://bit.ly/28Jc8As

Link Google Scholar

Kember, D. (2015). Taking qualitative studies beyond findings of a limited number of categories, with motivational orientation as an example. In V. Donche, S. De-Mayer, D. Gijbels, & H. Van-den-Bergh (Eds.), Methodological challenges in research on student learning (pp. 91-106). Antwerp: Garant Publishers. https://bit.ly/2Z2uyUx

Link Google Scholar

Nelson-Laird, T., Seifert, T., Pascarella, E., Mayhew, M., & Blaich, C. (2014). Deeply affecting first-year students’ thinking: Deep approaches to learning and three dimensions of cognitive development. Journal of Higher Education, 85(3), 402-432. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2014.11777333

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Patterson, L., & Holladay, R. (2017). Deep learning ecologies: An invitation to complex teaching and learning. Circle Pines, MN: Human Systems Dynamics Institute. https://amzn.to/33tSPGr

Link Google Scholar

Pintrich, P. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 385-407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-004-0006-x

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (2017). Student learning and the experience of teaching. HERDSA Review of Higher Education, 4, 5-27. https://bit.ly/2H07sYo

Link Google Scholar

Quardokus, K., & Henderson, C. (2015). Promoting instructional change: Using social network analysis to understand the informal structure of academic departments. Higher Education, 70(3), 315-335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9831-0

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Rienties, B., Héliot, Y., & Jindal-Snape, D. (2013). Understanding social learning relations of international students in a large classroom using social network analysis. Studies in Higher Education, 66(4), 489-504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-013-9617-9

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Rodríguez-Hidalgo, R., Zhu, C., Questier, F., & Torrens-Alfonso, A. (2011). Using social network analysis for analysing online threaded discussions. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 10(3), 128-146. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2014.11777333

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Tomás-Miquel, J., Expósito-Langa, M., & Nicolau-Juliá, D. (2016). The influence of relationship networks on academic performance in higher education: A comparative study between students of a creative and a non-creative discipline. Higher Education, 71(3), 307-322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9904-8

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Vermunt, J., & Donche, V. (2017). A learning patterns perspective on student learning in higher education: State of the art and moving forward. Educational Psychology Review, 29(2), 269-299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-017-9414-6

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815478

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Fundref

Crossmark

Техническая спецификация

Получила: 30-05-2019

пересмотренный: 14-07-2019

Принятый: 01-08-2019

First Online: 15-11-2019

Дата публикации: 01-01-2020

Время пересмотра статьи: 45 дней | Среднее время пересмотра вопроса 62: 40 дней

Время принятия статьи: 63 дней | Время приема Номер 62: 72 дней

Время редактирования препринта: 171 дней | Выпуск препринта среднего времени редактирования 62: 176 дней

Время редактирования статьи: 216 дней | Среднее время редактирования журнала 62: 221 дней

метрика

Метрики этой статьи

Просмотров: 13189

Ознакомление с аннотациями: 11584

загрузки PDF-файлов: 1605

Полные метрики 62

Просмотров: 156803

Ознакомление с аннотациями: 134465

загрузки PDF-файлов: 22338

Цитируется

Цитаты в Web of Science

Han, Feifei; Ellis, Robert A.;. Assessing the quality of university student experiences in blended course designs: an ecological perspective HIGHER EDUCATION RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT , 2020.

https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1800597

Ellis, Robert; Han, Feifei;. Assessing university student collaboration in new ways ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION , 2020.

https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1788504

Han, Feifei; Ellis, Robert A.;. Configurations of collaborations based on learning orientations amongst medical students ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION , 2020.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-020-09999-2

Han, Feifei; Ellis, Robert;. Combining self-reported and observational measures to assess university student academic performance in blended course designs AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY , 2020.

https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.6369

Noskova, Tatiana; Pavlova, Tatiana; Yakovleva, Olga;. DIVERSITY OF STUDENTS' INFORMATION BEHAVIOUR WITHIN A DIGITAL LEARNING ENVIRONMENT PROCEEDINGS OF THE 17TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE EFFICIENCY AND RESPONSIBILITY IN EDUCATION 2020 (ERIE 2020) , 2020.

Link Google Scholar

Moya Otero, Jose; Hernandez Ortega, Jose;. An educational metamorphosis to achieve sustainable human development. Curricular proposal from the Atlantida innovation experience PROFESORADO-REVISTA DE CURRICULUM Y FORMACION DE PROFESORADO , 2020.

https://doi.org/10.30827/profesorado.v24i3.15971

Цитаты в Scopus

Ellis, R., Han, F. . Assessing university student collaboration in new ways), Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, .

https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1788504

Han, F., Ellis, R.A. . Assessing the quality of university student experiences in blended course designs: an ecological perspective), Higher Education Research and Development, .

https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1800597

Han, F., Ellis, R.A. . Configurations of collaborations based on learning orientations amongst medical students), Advances in Health Sciences Education, .

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-020-09999-2

Han, F., Ellis, R. . Combining Self-Reported and Observational Measures to Assess University Student Academic Performance in Blended Course Designs), Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, .

https://doi.org/10.14742/AJET.6369

Otero, J.M., Ortega, J.H. . An educational metamorphosis to achieve sustainable human development. Curricular proposal from the Atlántida innovation experience | [Una metamorfosis educativa para alcanzar el desarrollo humano sostenible. “Propuesta curricular desde la experiencia de innovación Atlántida”]), Profesorado, .

https://doi.org/10.30827/PROFESORADO.V24I3.15971

Han, F., Ellis, R.A. . Predicting Students’ Academic Performance by Their Online Learning Patterns in a Blended Course: To What Extent Is a Theory-driven Approach and a Data-driven Approach Consistent?), Educational Technology and Society, .

Link Google Scholar

Цитаты в Google Scholar

Ellis, R., & Han, F. (2020). Assessing university student collaboration in new ways. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1-16.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02602938.2020.1788504

Han, F., & Ellis, R. A. (2020). Assessing the quality of university student experiences in blended course designs: an ecological perspective. Higher Education Research & Development, 1-17.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/07294360.2020.1800597

Nasser, D. (2020). Blended Learning Instruction and Classroom Engagement in Community College: A Qualitative Research Study (Doctoral dissertation, Capella University).

...

Han, F., & Ellis, R. A. (2020). Configurations of collaborations based on learning orientations amongst medical students. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 1-18.

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10459-020-09999-2

Burgos Bolós, C. 13. El EEES a evaluación. Análisis de las competencias específicas del Plan de estudios de formación inicial de Infantil y Primaria. La docencia en la Enseñanza Superior Nuevas aportaciones, 132.

...

Arroyo Salgueira, S., & Lozano Cabezas, I. (2020). El alumnado ERASMUS en el Prácticum a maestro/a: estudio de caso.

http://rua.ua.es/dspace/handle/10045/110262

Borges-Gouveia, L. M., Gutiérrez-Pallares, E., & Ramírez-Sánchez, M. Y. (2020). CONSTRUCCIÓN DE UN MODELO EDUCATIVO A DISTANCIA CON FACTORES DE APRENDIZAJE Y PLATAFORMAS TECNOLÓGICAS.

http://dspace.unach.edu.ec/handle/51000/7148

Gutiérrez-Pallares, E., Ramírez-Sánchez, M. Y., & Borges-Gouveia, L. M. (2020). CONSTRUCCIÓN DE UN MODELO EDUCATIVO A DISTANCIA CON FACTORES DE APRENDIZAJE Y PLATAFORMAS TECNOLÓGICAS. Chakiñan, Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, (12), 18-31.

http://chakinan.unach.edu.ec/index.php/chakinan/article/view/395

Moya Otero, J., & Hernández Ortega, J. (2020). Una metamorfosis educativa para alcanzar un desarrollo humano sostenible.

https://digibug.ugr.es/handle/10481/64800

Otero, J. M., & Ortega, J. H. (2020). Una metamorfosis educativa para alcanzar el desarrollo humano sostenible. Profesorado, Revista de Currículum y Formación del Profesorado, 24(3), 149-173.

https://revistaseug.ugr.es/index.php/profesorado/article/view/15971

Otero, J. M., & Ortega, H. UNA METAMORFOSIS EDUCATIVA PARA ALCANZAR EL DESARROLLO HUMANO SOSTENIBLE.“PROPUESTA CURRICULAR DESDE LA EXPERIENCIA DE INNOVACIÓN.

...

Gutiérrez-Pallares, E., Ramírez-Sánchez, M. Y., & Borges-Gouveia, L. M. (2020). CONSTRUCCIÓN DE UN MODELO EDUCATIVO A DISTANCIA CON FACTORES DE APRENDIZAJE Y PLATAFORMAS TECNOLÓGICAS. Revista Chakiñan de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, (12), 18-31.

http://scielo.senescyt.gob.ec/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2550-67222020000300018

Paz-Perea, M. E. (2020). Estudio documental sobre Innovación educativa: Nuevos retos y perspectivas. Polo del Conocimiento, 5(12), 465-487.

https://polodelconocimiento.com/ojs/index.php/es/article/view/2070

Gutiérrez-Pallares, E., Ramírez-Sánchez, M. Y., & Borges-Gouveia, L. M. (2020). CONSTRUCTION OF A DISTANCE EDUCATIONAL MODEL WITH LEARNING FACTORS AND TECHNOLOGICAL PLATFORMS. Revista Chakiñan de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, (12), 18-31.

...

Han, F., & Ellis, R. (2020). Combining self-reported and observational measures to assess university student academic performance in blended course designs. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36(6), 1-14.

https://ajet.org.au/index.php/AJET/article/view/6369

Moya Otero, J., & Hernández Ortega, J. (2020). Una metamorfosis educativa para alcanzar el desarrollo humano sostenible.“Propuesta curricular desde la experiencia de innovación Atlántida”. Profesorado.

https://accedacris.ulpgc.es/handle/10553/77832

Han, F., & Ellis, R. A. (2021). Predicting Students’ Academic Performance by Their Online Learning Patterns in a Blended Course. Educational Technology & Society, 24(1), 191-204.

https://www.jstor.org/stable/26977867

Noskova, T., Pavlova, T., & Yakovleva, O. (2021). A Study of Students’ Preferences in The Information Resources of The Digital Learning Environment. Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science, 14(1), 53-65.

https://www.eriesjournal.com/index.php/eries/article/view/338

Almazán, J. A. H., Vega, J. D. L., Amaya, A. A., & Cadena, R. M. (2021). Grafo de conocimiento para determinar el dominio del aprendizaje en la educación superior. Apertura, 13(1).

http://www.udgvirtual.udg.mx/apertura/index.php/apertura/article/view/1937

Скачать

Альтернативные метрики

Как процитировать

Han, F., & Ellis, R. (2020). Personalised learning networks in the university blended learning context. [Redes de aprendizaje personalizadas en contextos universitarios de aprendizaje semipresencial]. Comunicar, 62, 19-30. https://doi.org/10.3916/C62-2020-02

Доля

           

Почтовый ящик 527

21080 Уэльва (Испания)

Администрация

Редакция

Creative Commons

Данный сайт использует куки-файлы для получения статистических данных о навигации своих пользователей. Если вы продолжите просмотр, мы считаем, что вы принимаете его использование. +info X