Construção de itinerários personalizados de ensino por meio de métodos mistos

 Jesús Salinas-Ibáñez, Palma de Mallorca (Espanha)

 Bárbara De-Benito, Palma de Mallorca (Espanha)

https://doi.org/10.3916/C65-2020-03

Palavras chave

Sequências de aprendizagem, design curricular, itinerário de aprendizagem, estratégias didáticas, aprendizagem autorregulada, pesquisa baseada em design, digital

Resumo

Este trabalho propõe a aplicação de itinerários pessoais de aprendizagem em um ambiente rico em tecnologia para melhorar as experiências de aprendizagem na formação inicial de docentes. Utiliza-se uma abordagem mista, aplicando uma pesquisa baseada em design, para identificar as características que os itinerários personalizados de aprendizagem devem possuir e projetar a estrutura de sequências didáticas que configuram esses itinerários atendendo ao contexto, ao foco do ensino e da aprendizagem, às tarefas e à avaliação. O resultado principal é um protótipo de estrutura permutável de sequência didática que permite que os próprios estudantes configurem itinerários personalizados de aprendizagem, ao mesmo tempo em que ocorre a permuta e o codesign de itinerários entre os diferentes docentes. Os estudantes selecionam as sequências de um catálogo, organizando seus próprios itinerários de aprendizagem a partir da combinação de diferentes tipos de sequências ofertadas, promovendo a autonomia e a autodireção do processo de aprendizagem e o desenvolvimento de competências de gestão pessoal da informação e do trabalho colaborativo por parte dos alunos. Conclui-se que os itinerários personalizados propostos apresentam um equilíbrio adequado entre a estrutura, fruto do trabalho do design e/ou do codesign didático, e a autonomia necessária para a autodireção do próprio processo de aprendizagem, seja ela individual ou na construção colaborativa do conhecimento.

Referências

Adams-Becker, S., Cummins, M., Davis, A., Freeman, A., Hall-Giesinger, C., & Ananthanarayanan, V. (2017). NMC Horizon Report: 2017 Higher Education Edition. The New Media Consortium. https://bit.ly/2Wcd3md

Link Google Scholar

Alghamdi, A.H., & Li, L. (2013). Adapting design-based research as a research methodology in educational Settings. International Journal of Education and Research, 1(10), 1-12. https://bit.ly/3b4q5q3

Link Google Scholar

Anderson, T., & Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-based research: A decade of progress in education research? Educational Researcher, 41(1), 16-25. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x11428813

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Ausubel, D.P., Novak, J.D., & Hanesian, H. (1983). Psicología educativa: Un punto de vista cognitivo. Trillas.

Link Google Scholar

Cabero, J. (2013). El aprendizaje autorregulado como marco teórico para la aplicación educativa de las comunidades virtuales y los entornos personales de aprendizaje. Revista Teoría de la Educación, 14(2), 133-156. https://bit.ly/2We04AK

Link Google Scholar

Cañas, A.J., & Novak, J. (2010). Itineraries: Capturing instructors experience using concept maps as learning object organizers. In J. Sanchez, A.J. Cañas, & J. Novak (Eds.), Concept maps: Making learning meaningful. Universidad de Chile. https://bit.ly/2LL8f1h

Link Google Scholar

Castañeda, L., & Adell, J. (2013). Entornos personales de aprendizaje: Claves para el ecosistema educativo en red. Marfil. https://doi.org/10.21071/edmetic.v2i1.2856

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Castañeda, S., Peñalosa, E., & Austria, F. (2014). Efectos de perfiles agentivos y no agentivos sobre la formación teórica del psicólogo. Componentes de epistemología personal, cognitivos y autorregulatorios. Facultad de Psicología UNAM / CONACyT.

Link Google Scholar

Christ, T.W. (2010). Teaching mixed methods and action research: Pedagogical, practical, and evaluative considerations. In Tashakkori, A., & Teddie, C. (Eds.), SAGE handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioural research. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506335193.n25

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Conole, G. (2013). Designing for learning in an open world. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8517-0

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Conole, G., & Oliver, M. (2007). Contemporary perspectives in e-learning research: themes, methods and impact on practice. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203966266

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Creswell, J.W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage. https://bit.ly/3cQFWdB

Link Google Scholar

Creswell, J.W., & Creswell, J.D. (2018). Research design. Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage. https://bit.ly/2Tk0nYP

Link Google Scholar

Creswell, J.W., & Plano Clark, V. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage.

Link Google Scholar

Dabbagh, N., & English, M. (2015). Using student self-ratings to assess the alignment of instructional design competencies and courses in a graduate program. Techtrends, 59(4), 22-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-015-0868-4

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2013). The role of social media in self-regulated learning. International Journal of Web Based Communities, 9(2), 256-273. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijwbc.2013.053248

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

De-Benito, B., Mesquida, A.D., & Salinas, J.M. (2012). Los itinerarios de aprendizaje mediante mapas conceptuales como recurso para la representación del conocimiento. Edutec, 39, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.21556/edutec.2012.39.372

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

De-Benito, B., Villatoro, S., & Salinas, J., (2020). Propuesta de itinerarios personalizados de aprendizaje en la formación inicial docente. In C. Lindi?n, M.B. Esteban, J.C.F. Bergmann, N. Castell, & P. Rivera-Vargas (Eds.), Llibre d’actes de la I Conferència Internacional de Recerca en Educació. Educació 2019: Reptes, tendències i compromisos. LiberLibro.

Link Google Scholar

Delfino, M., & Persico, D. (2007). Self-regulated Learning in Technology Enhanced Learning Environments – a European review. In R. Carneiro, P. Lefrere, & K. Steffens. (Eds), Kaleidoscope Seed Project. https://bit.ly/2xLsYPc

Link Google Scholar

Design-based Research Collective (Ed.) (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational Inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5-8. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x032001005

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Díaz-Barriga, A. (1997). Didáctica y curriculum. Convergencias en los programas de estudio. Paidós.

Link Google Scholar

Easterday, M., Lewis, D., & Gerber, E. (2014). Design-based research process: Problems, phases and applications. ICLS Proceedings Vol. I (pp. 317–324). https://bit.ly/3fwrQjk

Link Google Scholar

Goodyear, P., & Dimitriadis, Y. (2013). In medias res: Reframing design for learning. Research in Learning Technology, 21, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v21i0.19909

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Gros, B., & Noguera, I. (2013). Mirando el futuro: Evolución de las tendencias tecnopedagógicas en Educación Superior. Campus Virtuales, 2(2), 130-140. https://bit.ly/2LdNtH7

Link Google Scholar

Hernández-Leo, D., Asensio-Pérez, J.I., Derntl, M., Pozzi, F., Chacon-Perez, J., Prieto, L.P., & Persico, D. (2018). An integrated environment for learning design. Frontiers in ICT, 5(9). https://doi.org/10.3389/fict.2018.00009

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Jääskelä, P., Heilala, V., Kärkkäinen, T., & Häkkinen, P. (2020). Student agency analytics: learning analytics as a tool for analysing student agency in higher education. Behaviour & Information Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2020.1725130

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Jääskelä, P., Poikkeus, A., Vasalampi, K., Valleala, U.M., & Rasku-Puttonen. H. (2017). Assessing agency of university students: validation of the AUS Scale. Studies in Higher Education, 42(11), 2061-2079. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1130693

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Laurillard, D. (2012). Teaching as a design science: Building pedagogical patterns for learning and technology. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203125083

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Llorente, M.C. (2013). Aprendizaje autorregulado y PLE. Edmetic, 2(1), 58-75. https://doi.org/10.21071/edmetic.v2i1.2861

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Marcelo, C., Yot, C., Murillo, P., & Mayor, C. (2016). Actividades de aprendizaje con tecnologías en la universidad. ¿Qué uso hacen los profesores? Profesorado, 20(3), 283-312. https://bit.ly/2yvtFwm

Link Google Scholar

Marín-Juarros, V., Negre-Bennasar, F., & Pérez-Garcias, A. (2014). Construction of the foundations of the PLE and PLN for collaborative learning. [Entornos y redes personales de aprendizaje (PLE-PLN) para el aprendizaje colaborativo]. Comunicar, 42, 35-43. https://doi.org/10.3916/C42-2014-03

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

McKenney, S.E., & Reeves, T. (2012). Conducting educational design research. Routledge. https://bit.ly/2LHAQEK

Link Google Scholar

Miranda, E. (2017). Documentless assessments using nominal group interviews, Software Quality Professional, 19(2), 50-61. https://bit.ly/35zs3h8

Link Google Scholar

Novak, J.D. (1998). Learning, creating and using knowledge. Concept maps as facilitative tools in schools and corporations. Lawrence Erlbaum As. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410601629

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Prats, E. (2016). Herramientas para la evaluación de mapas conceptuales: una primera aproximación. Edutec. Revista electrónica de Tecnología educativa, 56, 74-88. https://doi.org/10.21556/edutec.2016.56.738

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Prendes, M.P., Solano, I.M., Serrano, J.L., Gonzalez-Calatayud, V., & Roman, M.M. (2018). Entornos Personales de Aprendizaje para la comprensión y desarrollo de la competencia digital: Análisis de los estudiantes universitarios en España. Educatio Siglo XXI, 3(2), 115-134. https://doi.org/10.6018/j/333081

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Reeves, T.C. (2006). Design research from the technology perspective. In J. van-den-Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney, & N. Nieveen (Ed.), Educational design research (pp. 86-109). Routledge.

Link Google Scholar

Reigeluth, C.M. (1999). The elaboration theory: Guidance for scope and sequence decisions. In C.M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory, Vol. 2 (pp. 425–453). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

Link Google Scholar

Richey, R., & Klein, J. (2014). Design and development research: Methods, strategies, and issues. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203826034

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Sharples, M., de-Roock, R., Ferguson, R., Gaved, M., Herodotou, C., Koh, E., Kukulska-Hulme, A., Looi, C.K., McAndrew, P., Rienties, B., Weller, M., & Wong, L.H. (2016). Innovating Pedagogy 2016: Open University Innovation Report 5. The Open University. https://bit.ly/2xGDozs

Link Google Scholar

Taba, H. (1974). Elaboración del curriculum. Ed. Troquel.

Link Google Scholar

Teddie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2010). Overview of contemporary issues in mixed methods. In A. Tashakkori, & C. Teddie (Eds.), SAGE handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 1-41). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506335193.n1

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Tobón, S., Pimienta, J., & García, J. (2010). Secuencias Didácticas: Aprendizaje y evaluación de competencias. Pearson-Prentice Hall. https://bit.ly/2LHK5Vk

Link Google Scholar

Tur, G., Marín, V.I., Moreno, J., Gallardo, A., & Urbina, S. (2016). From diagrams to self-regulated learning: student teachers’ reflections on the construction of their PLE. Educational Media International, 53(2), 139-152. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2016.1211335

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Varga-Atkins, T., McIsaac, J., & Willis, I. (2017). Focus Group meets Nominal Group Technique: An effective combination for student evaluation? Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 54(4), 289-300, https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2015.1058721

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Wang, F., & Hannafin, M.J. (2005). Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 5-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02504682

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Zheng, L. (2015). A systematic literature review of design-based research from 2004 to 2013. Journal of Computer Education, 2(4), 399-420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-015-0036-z

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Fundref

Crossmark

Technical information

Recebido: 28-02-2020

Revisado: 04-04-2020

Aceite: 27-04-2020

OnlineFirst: 15-06-2020

Data de publicação: 01-10-2020

Tempo de revisão do artigo: 35 dias | Tempo médio de revisão do número 65: 36 dias

Tempo de aceitação do artigo: 58 dias | Tempo médio de aceitação do número 65: 78 dias

Tempo de edição da pré-impressão: 170 dias | Tempo médio de edição pré-impressão do número 65: 190 dias

Tempo de processamento do artigo: 215 dias | Tempo médio de processamento do número 65: 235 dias

Métricas

Métricas deste artigo

Vistas: 23857

Leituras dos resumos: 21174

Descargas em PDF: 2683

Métricas completas do Comunicar 65

Vistas: 259755

Leituras dos resumos: 221963

Descargas em PDF: 37792

Citado por