Palavras chave
Ódio cibernético, discurso de ódio, mediação parental, apoio familiar, enfrentamento, educação midiática
Resumo
Adolescentes de todo o mundo estão cada vez mais expostos ao ódio cibernético. É necessário mais conhecimento para compreender como os e as adolescentes enfrentam estas experiências. O presente estudo investigou a relação entre a mediação parental no uso de Internet e as estratégias de enfrentamento entre adolescentes centradas no problema em uma hipotética vitimização em ódio cibernético, ao mesmo tempo que se considerou o apoio familiar como mediador dessas relações. A amostra foi formada por 5.960 adolescentes entre 12 e 18 anos que preencheram questionários (M=14,94; DP=1,61; mulheres 50,7%) do Chipre, Alemanha, Grécia, Índia, Espanha, Coréia do Sul e Tailândia. Um modelo de equações estruturais foi usado para investigar a relação entre mediação parental, apoio social e enfrentamento. Os resultados mostram uma relação positiva entre a mediação parental instrutiva e o uso de estratégias de enfrentamento centradas no problema, e uma relação negativa entre a mediação parental restritiva e a capacidade dos adolescentes para enfrentar de forma adequada o ódio cibernético. Além disso, o apoio familiar moderou estas relações, incrementando a relação entre mediação instrutiva e o enfrentamento e diminuindo a relação entre mediação restritiva e enfrentamento ao ódio cibernético. Os achados enfatizam a necessidade de proporcionar informações aos pais e destacam a importância de que as famílias fomentem a habilidade dos adolescentes para enfrentar de maneira adequada o ódio cibernético.
Referências
Arrizabalaga-Crespo, C., Aierbe-Barandiaran, A., & Medrano-Samaniego, C. (2010). Internet uses and parental mediation in adolescents with ADHD. Revista Latina de Comunicacio?n Social, 65, 561-571. https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-65-2010-919-561-571-EN
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Baumrind, D. (1971). Current patterns of parental authority. Developmental Psychology Monographs, 4(2), 1-103. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0030372
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Cabello-Hutt, T., Cabello, P., & Claro, M. (2018). Online opportunities and risks for children and adolescents: The role of digital skills, age, gender and parental mediation in Brazil. New media & Society, 20(7), 2411-2431. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817724168
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Eckenrode, J., & Hamilton, S. (2000). One to one support interventions. In S. Cohen, L.G. Underwood, & B.H. Gottlieb (Eds.), Social support measurement and intervention: A guide for health and social scientists (pp. 278-308). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/med:psych/9780195126709.003.0008
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Elsaesser, C., Russell, B., Ohannessian, C.M., & Patton, D. (2017). Parenting in a digital age: A review of parents' role in preventing adolescent cyberbullying. Aggression and violent behavior, 35, 62-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2017.06.004
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Fanti, K.A., Demetriou, A.G., & Hawa, V.V. (2012). A longitudinal study of cyberbullying: Examining riskand protective factors. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9(2), 168-181. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2011.643169
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Gámez-Guadix, M., Wachs, S., & Wright, M. (2020). Haters back off! Psychometric properties of the coping with cyberhate questionnaire and relationship with well-being in Spanish adolescents. Psicothema, 32(4), 567-574. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2020.219
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Georgiou, S.N. (2010). Bullying and victimization at school: The role of mothers. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(1), 109-112. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709907X204363
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Gómez-Ortiz, O., Romera, E.M., Ortega-Ruiz, R., & Del-Rey, R. (2018). Parenting practices as risk or preventive factors for adolescent involvement in cyberbullying: Contribution of children and parent gender. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(12), 2664. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15122664
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Görzig, A., & Machackova, H. (2016). Cyberbullying in Europe: A review of evidence from cross-national data. In M. Wright (Ed.), A Social-ecological approach to cyberbullying (pp. 295-326). Nova Science.
Link Google Scholar
Hock, M. (2008). Erziehungsstile und ihre Auswirkungen. [Educational styles and their effects]. In W. Schneider (Eds.), Handbuch der psychologie: Handbuch der pädagogischen psychologie. [Manual of psychology: Manual of educational psychology] (pp. 491-500). Hogrefe. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-05023-6_19
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Hu, L., & Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Klein, A., & Moosbrugger, H. (2000). Maximum likelihood estimation of latent interaction effects with the LMS method. Psychometrika, 65(4), 457-474. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296338
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Kowalski, R.M., Giumetti, G.W., Schroeder, A.N., & Lattanner, M.R. (2014). Bullying in the digital age: A critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 1073. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035618
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Kutscher, N. (2012). Medienbildung in der Kindheit. MedienPädagogik: Zeitschrift für Theorie und Praxis der Medienbildung, 22, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.21240/mpaed/22/2013.10.08.X
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Lazarus, R., & Folkman, S. (1987). Stress, appraisal and coping. Springer.
Link Google Scholar
Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E.J. (2008). Parental mediation of children's internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 52(4), 581-599. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838150802437396
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Livingstone, S., Olafsson, K., Helsper, E.J., Lupiañez-Villanueva, F., Veltri, G.A., & Folkvord, F. (2017). Maximizing opportunities and minimizing risks for children online: The role of digital skills in emerging strategies of parental mediation. Journal of Communication, 67(1), 82-105. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12277
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Machackova, H., Blaya, C., Bedrosova, M., Smahel, D., & Staksrud, E. (2020). Children’s experiences with cyberhate. EU Kids Online. https://bit.ly/3q5vFBi
Link Google Scholar
Machmutow, K., Perren, S., Sticca, F., & Alsaker, F.D. (2012). Peer victimisation and depressive symptoms: Can specific coping strategies buffer the negative impact of cybervictimisation? Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 17, 403-420. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632752.2012.704310
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Martínez, G., Casado, M.A., & Garitaonandia, G. (2020). Online parental mediation strategies in family contexts of Spain. [Estrategias online de mediación parental en contextos familiares de España]. Comunicar, 65, 67-76. https://doi.org/10.3916/C65-2020-06
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Muthén, L.K., & Muthén, B.O. (2017). Mplus user’s guide. Muthén & Muthén. https://bit.ly/3g4tnhf
Link Google Scholar
Navarro, R., Serna, C., Martínez, V., & Ruiz-Oliva, R. (2013). The role of Internet use and parental mediation on cyberbullying victimization among Spanish children from rural public schools. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 28(3), 725-745. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-012-0137-2
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Pascoe, E.A., & Smart-Richman, L. (2009). Perceived discrimination and health: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 135(4), 531. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016059
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Pinkerton, J., & Dolan, P. (2007). Family support, social capital, resilience and adolescent coping. Child & Family Social Work, 12(3), 219-228. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2206.2007.00497.x
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Raykov, T. (2009). Evaluation of scale reliability for unidimensional measures using latent variable modeling. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 42(3), 223-232. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748175609344096
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Reichelmann, A., Hawdon, J., Costello, M., Ryan, J., Blaya, C., Llorent, V., Oksanen, A., Räsänen, P., & Zych, I. (2020). Hate knows no boundaries: Online hate in six nations. Deviant Behavior, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2020.1722337
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Rodríguez-de-Dios, I., van-Oosten, J.M., & Igartua, J.J. (2018). A study of the relationship between parental mediation and adolescents’ digital skills, online risks and online opportunities. Computers in Human Behavior, 82, 186-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.01.012
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Rutter, M., Giller, H., & Hagel, A. (1998). Antisocial behavior by young people. Cambridge University Press.
Link Google Scholar
Sasson, H., & Mesch, G. (2014). Parental mediation, peer norms and risky online behavior among adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior, 33, 32-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.12.025
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Satorra, A., & Bentler, P.M. (2001). A scaled difference chisquare test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika, 66, 507-514. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296192
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Slonje, R., & Smith, P.K. (2008). Cyberbullying: Another main type of bullying? Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 49(2), 147-154. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2007.00611.x
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Sousa, V.D., & Rojjanasrirat, W. (2011). Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross?cultural health care research: A clear and user?friendly guideline. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 17(2), 268-274. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01434.x
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Sticca, F., Machmutow, K., Stauber, A., Perren, S., Palladino, B.E., Nocentini, A., Menesini, E., Corcoran, L., & Guckin, C.M. (2015). The coping with cyberbullying questionnaire: Development of a new measure. Societies, 5(2), 515-536. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc5020515
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
UK Safer Internet Centre (Ed.) (2016). Creating a better Internet for all: Young people’s experiences of online empowerment + online hate. https://bit.ly/2Jk6QAD
Link Google Scholar
Von-Soest, T., Mossige, S., Stefansen, K., & Hjemdal, O. (2010). A validation study of the resilience scale for adolescents (READ). Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 32(2), 215-225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-009-9149-x
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Wachs, S., & Wright, M.F. (2019). The moderation of online disinhibition and sex on the relationship between online hate victimization and perpetration. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 22(5), 300-306. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2018.0551
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Wachs, S., Gámez-Guadix, M., Wright, M.F., Görzig, A., & Schubarth, W. (2020). How do adolescents cope with cyberhate? Psychometric properties and socio-demographic differences of a coping with cyberhate scale. Computers in Human Behavior, 104, 106167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.106167
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Wachs, S., Koch-Priewe, B., & Zick, A. (2021). Hate Speech – Multidisziplinäre Analysen und Handlungsoptionen. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Link Google Scholar
Wachs, S., Wachs, S., Costello, M., Wright, M.F., Flora, K., Daskalou, V., Maziridou, E., Kwon, Y., Na, E.Y., Sittichai, R., Biswalk, R., Singh, R., Almendros, C., Gámez-Guadixm, M., G?rzig, A., Hong, J.S. (2021). DNT LET’EM H8 U!: Applying the routine activity framework to understand cyberhate victimization among adolescents across eight countries. Computers & Education, 160, 104026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104026
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Wachs, S., Wright, M.F., & Vazsonyi, A.T. (2019). Understanding the overlap between cyberbullying and cyberhate perpetration: Moderating effects of toxic online disinhibition. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 29(3), 179-188. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbm.2116
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
World Medical Association (Ed.) (2001). World medical association declaration of Helsinki. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Bull World Health Organ, 79, 373-374. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Worsley, J.D., McIntyre, J.C., & Corcoran, R. (2019). Cyberbullying victimisation and mental distress: Testing the moderating role of attachment security, social support, and coping styles. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 24(1), 20-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632752.2018.1530497
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Wright, M., & Wachs, S. (2018). Does parental mediation moderate the longitudinal association among bystanders and perpetrators and victims of cyberbullying? Social Sciences, 7(11), 231. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci7110231
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Wright, M.F., & Wachs, S. (2020). Moderation of parental support on health and cyberbullying among adolescents with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 29, 2390-2401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-020-01739-9
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Yin, X.Q., Wang, L.H., Zhang, G.D., Liang, X.B., Li, J., Zimmerman, M.A., & Wang, J.L. (2017). The promotive effects of peer support and active coping on the relationship between bullying victimization and depression among Chinese boarding students. Psychiatry Research, 256, 59-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2017.06.037
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Zimet, G.D., Dahlem, N.W., Zimet, S.G., & Farley, G.K. (1988). The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. Journal of Personality Assessment, 52(1), 30-41. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa5201_2
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Fundref
Technical information
Recebido: 03-09-2020
Revisado: 03-10-2020
Aceite: 16-11-2020
First Online: 15-01-2021
Data de publicação: 01-04-2021
Tempo de revisão do artigo: 30 dias | Tempo médio de revisão do número 67: 36 dias
Tempo de aceitação do artigo: 74 dias | Tempo médio de aceitação do número 67: 67 dias
Tempo de edição da pré-impressão: 165 dias | Tempo médio de edição pré-impressão do número 67: 159 dias
Tempo de processamento do artigo: 210 dias | Tempo médio de processamento do número 67: 204 dias
Métricas
Métricas deste artigo
Vistas: 5506
Leituras dos resumos: 4996
Descargas em PDF: 510
Métricas completas do Comunicar 67
Vistas: 60576
Leituras dos resumos: 54756
Descargas em PDF: 5820
Citado por
Citas em Web of Science
Actualmente não há citações a este documento
Citas em Scopus
Actualmente não há citações a este documento
Citas em Google Scholar
Actualmente não há citações a este documento
