Volume index - Journal index - Article index - Map ---- Back

Comunicar Journal 62: Learning ecologies in the digital age (Vol. 28 - 2020)

Studygrammers: Learning influencers


Patricia Izquierdo-Iranzo

Eliana-E. Gallardo-Echenique


Present learning ecologies are diverse and change quickly, which demands a similar observation of the phenomenon. This paper is focused on the youth emerging informal learning communities and the study’s object is to discover and characterize a new figure in this landscape, the Studygrammer. With surveys (N=256), focus groups carried out through the Philips 66 technique and analyze with Atlas ti software (thematic analysis) we analyze: practices of academic social media use amongst Communication students and apart of the institutional enviroment, plus their opinions regarding the #Studygram community, #Studygrammer profiles from different degrees are also analyzed. Main results help us to concrete a definition for Studygrammer: a student that performs a mentoring (coach-leader) role amongst peers using Instagram, not only sharing notes (highly performed) but also tips, inspiration and experiences. They have the DNA of an influencer using the same visual code and monetizating their practices but the academic goal adds some peculiarities: the visual code works as lingua franca between different knowledge areas (students of a certain degree follow studygrammers which study different degrees, because they are also interested on the know-how learning process) and in the followers’ adhesion criteria we find more rational than emotional reasons.


Studygrammer, Instagram, influencer, informal learning, social media, learning communities, communication students, transmedia literacy

PDF file in Spanish

PDF file in English


Abdullah, A., & Darshak, P. (2015) Incorporating Twitter, Instagram, and Facebook in economics classrooms. The Journal of Economic Education, 46(1), 56-67. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220485.2014.978922

Allcott, H., Braghieri, L., Eichmeyer, S., & Gentzkow, M. (2019). The welfare effects of social media. Working paper No. 25514. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w25514

Arriaga, A., Marcellan-Baraze, I., & Gonzalez-Vida, M. (2016). Las redes sociales: Espacios de participación y aprendizaje para la producción de imágenes digitales de los jóvenes. Estudios sobre Educación, 30, 197-216. https://doi.org/10.15581/004.30.197-216

Bajo, C. (2015). Social media y derechos humanos en África. Nuevos medios para nuevos horizontes. In A. García-Jimenez & R. Rubira-Garcia (Eds.), África: Comunicación en Derechos Humanos, tan cerca, tan lejos (pp. 99-117). Tenerife: Sociedad Latina de Comunicación Social.

Barbosa, C., Bulhoes, J., Zhang, Y., & Moreira, A. (2017). Utilização do Instagram no ensino e aprendizagem de português língua estrangeira por alunos chineses na Universidade de Aveiro. Revista Latinoamericana de Tecnología Educativa-RELATEC, 16(1), 21-33. https://doi.org/10.17398/1695-288X.16.1.21

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Burgess, J., & Green, J. (2018). YouTube: Online video and participatory culture. Cambridge: Polity Press. https://doi.org/10.1080/10304310903362734

Caldeiro-Pedreira, M.C., & Aguaded, I. (2017). Contenido e interactividad. ¿Quién enseña y quién aprende en la realidad digital inmediata? Virtualidad, Educación y Ciencia, 8(15), 95-105. https://bit.ly/2SjENk0

Callaghan, N., & Bower, M. (2012). Learning through social networking sites. The critical role of the teacher. Educational Media International, 49(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2012.662621

Candon-Mena, J. (2013). Toma la calle, toma las redes. El movimiento 15M en internet. Sevilla: Atrapasueños.

Castells, M. (2001). Galaxia Internet. Madrid: Plaza & Janés.

Castells, M. (2009). Comunicación y poder. Madrid: Alianza.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. London, New York: Routledge.

Creswell, J.W. (2012). Educational research. Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Boston: Pearson.

Ferres, J., & Piscitelli, A. (2012). Media competence. Articulated proposal of dimensions and indicators. [La competencia mediática: Propuesta articulada de dimensiones e indicadores]. Comunicar, 38, 75-82. https://doi.org/10.3916/C38-2012-02-08

Fischer, G.N. (1992). Campos de intervención en psicología social. Madrid: Narcea.

Freedman, K., Heijnen, E., Kallio-Tavin, M., Kárpáti, A., & Papp, L. (2013). Visual culture learning communities: How and what students come to know in informal art groups. Studies in Art Education: A Journal of Issues and Research, 54(2), 103-115. https://bit.ly/2WvEs3D

Fundación Telefónica (Ed.) (2016). La Sociedad de la Información en España 2015. Madrid: Ariel. https://bit.ly/2p4YQYX

Gaitan, J.A., & Piñuel, J.L. (1998). Técnicas de investigación en comunicación social. Madrid: Síntesis.

Gilroy, M. (2010). Higher education migrates to YouTube and social networks. The Education Digest, 75(7), 18. https://bit.ly/2Z1H3A3

IAB Spain (Ed.) (2018). Estudio anual redes sociales 2018. Madrid: IAB. https://bit.ly/2Spfixp

Ibañez, J. (2003). Cómo se realiza una investigación mediante grupos de discusión. In M. García-Ferrando, J. Ibáñez & F. Alvira (Eds.), Análisis de la realidad social (pp. 283-289). Madrid: Alianza.

Jalaludin, A.M., Abas, N.A., & Yunus, M.M. (2019). AsKINstagram: Teacher-pupil interaction. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(1), 125–136. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v9-i1/5369

Jenkins, H. (2009). Fans, blogueros y videojuegos: La cultura de la colaboración. Barcelona: Paidós.

López-Pérez, M.V., Pérez-López, M.C., & Rodríguez-Ariza, L. (2011). Blended learning in Higher Education: Students’ perceptions and their relation to outcomes. Computers & Education, 56(3), 818-826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.023

Marchal, N., Kollanyi, B., Neudert, L.M., & Philip N. (2019). Junk news during the EU parliamentary elections: Lessons from a Seven-Language study of Twitter and Facebook. Data Memo 2019.3. Oxford, UK: Project on Computational Propaganda. https://bit.ly/2EoxumG

Mosquera, R., Odunowo, M., McNamara, T., Guo, X., & Petrie, R. (2019). The economic effects of Facebook. Working Paper. Texas: A&M University. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3312462

Muñoz-López, L. (2018). Informe anual del sector de los contenidos digitales en España 2018. Madrid: Observatorio Nacional de las Telecomunicaciones y la Sociedad de la Información (ONTSI). https://bit.ly/2JFQKiQ

Peñafiel, C., Torres, E., & Izquierdo, P. (2016). Percepción cualitativa de gestores universitarios de investigación a través de un Philips 66. In J. Herrero & C. Mateos (Eds.), Del verbo al bit (pp.790-810). Tenerife: Sociedad Latina de Comunicación Social. https://doi.org/10.4185/cac116

Pereira, S., Fillol, J., & Moura, P. (2019). Young people learning from digital media outside of school: The informal meets the formal. [El aprendizaje de los jóvenes con medios digitales fuera de la escuela: De lo informal a lo formal]. Comunicar, 58, 41-50. https://doi.org/10.3916/C58-2019-04

Piscitelli, A., Adaime, I., & Binder, I. (2010). El proyecto Facebook y la posuniversidad. Sistemas operativos sociales y entornos abiertos de aprendizaje. Madrid: Ariel.

Rheingold, H. (2004). Multitudes inteligentes. La próxima revolución social. Barcelona: Gedisa.

Scolari, C. (2016). Alfabetismo transmedia. Estrategias de aprendizaje informal y competencias mediáticas en la nueva ecología de la comunicación. Telos, 13, 1-9. https://bit.ly/2aoH5Zs

Scolari, C. (2018). Adolescentes, medios de comunicación y culturas colaborativas. Aprovechando las competencias transmedia de los jóvenes en el aula. Barcelona: Ce.Ge. https://bit.ly/2wVqZmT

Selwyn, N. (2009). Faceworking: Exploring students’ education-related use of Facebook. Learning, Media and Technology, 34(2), 157-174. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439880902923622

Serrano-Pastor, R.M., & Casanova-López, O. (2018). Recursos tecnológicos y educativos destinados al enfoque pedagógico Flipped Learning. REDU, 16(1),155-173. https://doi.org/10.4995/redu.2018.8921

Strauss, A.L., & Corbin, J.M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications. https://bit.ly/2kDfxdG

Supiandi, U., Sari, S., & Subarkah, C.Z. (2019). Enhancing Students higher order thinking skill through instagram based flipped classroom learning model. In Proceedings of the 3rd Asian Education Symposium (AES 2018), 253 (pp. 233-237). https://doi.org/10.2991/aes-18.2019.55

Tan, E., & Pierce, N. (2011). Open education videos in the classroom: Exploring the opportunities and barrier to the use of YouTube in teaching introductory sociology. Research in Learning Technology, 19, 125-132. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v19s1/7783

Torres-Toukoumidis, A., Romero-Rodríguez, L.M, & Pérez-Rodríguez, M.A. (2018). Ludificación y sus posibilidades en el entorno de blended learning: Revisión documental. RIED, Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 21(1), 95-111. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.21.1.18792

Tuñez, M., & Sixto, J. (2012). Las redes sociales como entorno docente: Análisis del uso de Facebook en la docencia universitaria. Pixel-Bit, 41, 77-92. https://bit.ly/2kMBw1F

Vizcaíno-Verdú, A., Contreras-Pulido, P., & Guzmán-Franco, M.D. (2019). Reading and informal learning trends on YouTube: The booktuber. [Lectura y aprendizaje informal en YouTube: El booktuber]. Comunicar, 59, 95-104. https://doi.org/10.3916/C59-2019-09

Waycott, J., Sheard, J., Thompson, C., & Clerehan, R. (2013). Making students' work visible on the social web: A blessing or a curse? Computers & Education, 68(1), 86-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.04.026