Volume index - Journal index - Article index - Map ---- Back

Comunicar Journal 71: Hate speech in communication: Research and proposals (Vol. 30 - 2022)

Twitter and human trafficking: Purposes, actors and topics in the Spanish-speaking scene

https://doi.org/10.3916/C71-2022-06

Alba Sierra-Rodríguez

Wenceslao Arroyo-Machado

Domingo Barroso-Hurtado

Abstract

Human trafficking is a phenomenon linked to several forms of exploitation, such as sexual exploitation, forced labour, forced marriage, begging, forced criminal activity, or organ removal. There are different debates about a potential overrepresentation of some of these exploitation purposes, such as the sexual one, in the discourses underlying international regulations, news or institutional campaigns. This may have consequences on the identification of some of the population affected by this phenomenon and the assistance provided to them. The aim of this paper is to analyse the temporal evolution of the purposes of exploitation, actors and topics most represented in the activity on human trafficking and exploitation on Twitter during the 2011-2020 period. The results show that sexual exploitation is the purpose most represented in Twitter activity and the fact that international organisations and the criminal prosecution of the crime of human trafficking have progressively become more relevant. Furthermore, the networks of topics suggest that sexual exploitation seems to be linked to the notion of prostitution. This may have consequences for the displacement of other purposes of exploitation or the approaches centred on the promotion of human rights to less relevant positions, as well as for the construction of certain images of victims of human trafficking.

Keywords

Trafficking, sexual exploitation, Twitter, social media, social media analysis, prostitution

PDF file in Spanish

PDF file in English

References

Albright, E., & D’Adamo, K. (2017). The media and human trafficking: A discussion and critique of the dominant narrative. In M. Chisolm-Straker, & H. Stoklosa (Eds.), Human trafficking is a public health issue: A paradigm expansion in the United States (pp. 363-378). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47824-1_21

Andrijasevic, R., & Anderson, B. (2009). Anti-trafficking campaigns: Decent? Honest? Truthful? Feminist Review, 92(1), 151-155. https://doi.org/10.1057/fr.2009.1

Arena Pública (Ed.) (2017). México, 'foco rojo' en tráfico de órganos, niños migrantes principal blanco: Unicef. Arena Pública. https://bit.ly/3mYe9zM

Attwood, R. (2021). A very un-English predicament: ‘The White Slave Traffic’ and the construction of national identity in the suffragist and socialist movements’ coverage of the 1912 Criminal Law Amendment Bill. National Identities, 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/14608944.2021.1895096

Austin, R., & Farrell, A. (2017). Human trafficking and the media in the United States. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Criminology. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264079.013.290

Barroso-Hurtado, D., Arroyo-Machado, W., & Torres-Salinas, D. (2021). Formación Profesional Dual: Evolución de red de actores en Twitter. Educación XX1, 24(2), 209-230. https://doi.org/10.5944/educXX1.28136

Bernstein, E. (2018). Brokered subjects sex, trafficking, and the politics of freedom. The University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226573809.001.0001

Blondel, V.D., Guillaume, J.L., Lambiotte, R., & Lefebvre, E. (2008). Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2008(10), 10008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P10008

Burbano, D., & Hernandez-Alvarez, M. (2017). Identifying human trafficking patterns online. In 2017 IEEE Second Ecuador Technical Chapters Meeting (ETCM) (pp. 1-6). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ETCM.2017.8247461

Clemente, M. (2017). Human trafficking in Portugal: An ethnography of research and data. Studi Emigrazione, 208, 663-687. https://bit.ly/3pIyKrO

Comisión Nacional de los Derechos Humanos (Ed.) (2019). Diagnóstico sobre la situación de la trata de personas en México 2019. Resumen ejecutivo. Quinta Visitaduría General/Programa contra la Trata de Personas. https://doi.org/10.5377/cuadernojurypol.v5i13.11134

Congreso General de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos (Ed.) (2012). Ley General para prevenir, sancionar y erradicar los delitos en materia de trata de personas y para la protección y asistencia a las víctimas de estos delitos. Diario Oficial de la Federación, de 14 de junio de 2012, Primera Sección, 2-32. https://bit.ly/3kJW1XC

Couto, D., Machado, C., Martins, C., & Abrunhosa, R.A. (2012). A construção mediática do tráfico de seres humanos na imprensa escrita portuguesa. Análise Psicológica, 30(1-2), 231-246. https://doi.org/10.14417/ap.551

Denton, E. (2010). International news coverage of human trafficking arrests and prosecutions: A content analysis. Women & Criminal Justice, 20(1-2), 10-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/08974451003641321

Doezema, J. (2010). Sex slaves and discourse masters: The construction of trafficking. Bloomsbury Publishing. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350222502

Edwards, A. (2007). Traffic in human beings: At the intersection of criminal justice, human rights, asylum/migration and labor. Denver Journal of International Law and Policy, 36, 9-53. https://bit.ly/31FrPqV

Gerassi, L. (2015). A heated debate: Theoretical perspectives of sexual exploitation and sex work. Journal of sociology and social welfare, 42(4), 79-100. https://bit.ly/3EFb0Lv

Gong, R. (2015). Indignation, inspiration, and interaction on the Internet: Emotion work online in the anti-human trafficking movement. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 33(1), 87-103. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228835.2014.998988

González, E. (2019). Sacudirse el estigma. Apropiación del término ‘puta’ desde el activismo por los derechos en el trabajo sexual. Gazeta de Antropología, 35(1), artículo 04. https://bit.ly/3dBIUEY

Granizo, S., Valdivieso, A., Barona, L., & Hernández-Álvarez, M. (2020). Detection of possible illicit messages using natural language processing and computer vision on Twitter and linked website. IEEE Access, 8, 44534-44546. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2976530

Gregoriou, C., & Ras, I.A. (2018). Representations of transnational human trafficking: A critical review: Present-day news media, true crime, and fiction. In C. Gregoriou (Ed.), Representations of transnational human trafficking (pp. 1-24). Palgrave MacMillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78214-0_1

Haunschild, R., Leydesdorff, L., Bornmann, L., Hellsten, I., & Marx, W. (2019). Does the public discuss other topics on climate change than researchers? A comparison of explorative networks based on author keywords and hashtags. Journal of Informetrics, 13, 695-707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2019.03.008

Hebert, L.A. (2016). Always victimizers, never victims: Engaging men and boys in human trafficking scholarship. Journal of Human Trafficking, 2(4), 281-296. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322705.2016.1144165

Hernández-Álvarez, M., & Granizo S.L. (2021). Detection of human trafficking ads in twitter using natural language processing and image processing. In T. Ahram (Ed.), Advances in artificial intelligence, software and systems engineering. Proceedings of the AHFE 2020 Virtual Conferences on Software and Systems Engineering, and Artificial Intelligence and Social-Computing (pp. 77-83). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51328-3_12

Hodge, E., Childs, J., & Au, W. (2020). Power, brokers, and agendas: New directions for the use of social network analysis in education policy. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 28(117),1-17. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.28.5874

Kempadoo, K. (2015). The modern-day white (wo)man’s burden: Trends in anti-trafficking and anti-slavery campaigns. Journal of Human Trafficking, 1(1), 8-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322705.2015.1006120

Marcelo, C., & Marcelo, P. (2021). Educational influencers on Twitter. Analysis of hashtags and relationship structure. [Influencers educativos en Twitter. Análisis de hashtags y estructura relacional]. Comunicar, 68, 73-83. https://doi.org/10.3916/C68-2021-06

Marchionni, D.M. (2012). International human trafficking: An agenda-building analysis of the US and British press. International Communication Gazette, 74(2), 145-158. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048511432600

Mendel, J., & Sharapov, K. (2016). Human trafficking and online networks: Policy, analysis, and ignorance. Antipode, 48(3), 665-684. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12213

Meneses-Falcón, C., & Urío, S. (2021). La trata con fines de explotación sexual en España: ¿Se ajustan las estimaciones a la realidad? Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 174, 89-108. https://doi.org/10.5477/cis/reis.174.89

Naciones Unidas (Ed.) (2000). Protocolo de Naciones Unidas, para prevenir, reprimir y sancionar la trata de personas, especialmente mujeres y niños. Naciones Unidas. https://bit.ly/31KS3sf

O´Connell-Davidson, J. (2006). Will the real sex slave please stand up? Feminist Review, 83(1), 4-22. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.fr.9400278

Papadoukaa, M.E., Evangelopoulos, N., & Ignatow, G. (2016). Agenda setting and active audiences in online coverage of human trafficking. Information, Communication & Society, 19(5), 655-672. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1139615

Reina-Peñas, M. (2019). Análisis del fenómeno de la trata de personas desde la perspectiva de los derechos humanos. Icade. Revista de la Facultad de Derecho, 107. https://doi.org/10.14422/icade.i107.y2019.006

Rodríguez-López, S. (2018). (De)constructing stereotypes: Media representations, social perceptions, and legal responses to human trafficking. Journal of Human Trafficking, 4(1), 61-72. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322705.2018.1423447

Rodríguez-López, S. (2020). The invisibility of labour trafficking in Spain. A critical analysis of cases and policies. Revista Española de Investigación Criminológica,18(2), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.46381/reic.v18i2.329

Ruiz-Herrera, A., Ruiz-Guevara, S., & López-Cantero, E. (2018). El papel de los medios de comunicación masiva en la comprensión del fenómeno de la trata de personas. Revista Criminalidad, 60(2), 25-39. https://bit.ly/33jyA2F

Saiz-Echezarreta, V., Alvarado, M.C., & Gómez-Lorenzini, P. (2018). Advocacy of trafficking campaigns: A controversy story. [Incidencia política de las campañas contra la trata: Un relato controvertido]. Comunicar, 55, 29-38. https://doi.org/10.3916/C55-2018-03

Sanford, R., Martínez, D.E., & Weitzer, R. (2016). Framing human trafficking: A content analysis of recent US newspaper articles. Journal of Human trafficking, 2(2), 139-155. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322705.2015.1107341

Sobel, M.R. (2014). Chronicling a crisis: Media framing of human trafficking in India, Thailand, and the USA. Asian Journal of Communication, 24(4), 315-332. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2014.903425

Sweileh, W.M. (2018). Research trends on human trafficking: A bibliometric analysis using Scopus database. Globalization and Health, 14(106), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-018-0427-9

Tundis, A., Jain, A., Bhatia, G., & Muhlhauser, M. (2019). Similarity analysis of criminals on social networks: An example on Twitter. In 2019 28th International Conference on Computer Communication and Networks (ICCCN) (pp. 1-9). https://doi.org/10.1109/icccn.2019.8847028

United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (Ed.) (2018). Global Report on Trafficking in Persons 2018. United Nations. https://bit.ly/2YfbOGo

United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (Ed.) (2020). Global report on trafficking in persons 2020. United Nations. https://bit.ly/3DHTkyx

Van-Schalkwyk, F., Dudek, J., & Costas, R. (2020). Communities of shared interests and cognitive bridges: The case of the anti-vaccination movement on Twitter. Scientometrics, 125, 1499-1516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03551-0

Wolken, C.L. (2006). Feminist legal theory and human trafficking in the United States: Towards a new framework. U. MD. LJ. Race, Religion, Gender & Class, 6(2), 407-438. https://bit.ly/3rW3597

Zhang, S.X. (2012). Measuring labor trafficking: A research note. Crime, Law and Social Change, 58, 469-482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-012-9393-y