Volume index - Journal index - Article index - Map ---- Back

Comunicar Journal 76: Neurotechnology in the classroom: Current research and future potential (Vol. 31 - 2023)

Digital empathy in online education: A comparison study between Portugal and Romania

https://doi.org/10.3916/C76-2023-09

Alexandre Duarte

Romina Surugiu

Madalina Moraru

Valentina Marinescu

Abstract

This study aims to present the extent to which online education influenced the level of empathy displayed by university students. The research relies on a self-evaluated applied survey in two European countries: Portugal and Romania. The participants in this research are 1,085 students enrolled in Communication Studies programs. The purpose of this study is to unfold the connection between gender, exposure to digital technology, empathy level according to the Basic Empathy Scale applied to young adults, and online education self-perception that involves the use of webcams. Empathy can have positive effects on students’ satisfaction and increase students’ outcomes. The shift from a physical environment to a digital one brought significant challenges that most students and teachers were not ready for. The digital environment influences how empathy is expressed. The present research found evidence of a relationship between exposure to technology usage, emotional contagion, and gender. This suggests that understanding the emotions of others might be inhibited during digital education. Also, the most relevant factor of empathy variation in online education is gender. The findings of the present research may contribute to the design of activities or programs that could foster empathy expression during online education for young adults.

Keywords

Neuroscience, digital empathy, technology, education, communication, Basic Empathy Scale

PDF file in Spanish

PDF file in English

References

Ahmed, A. (2022). Emotions in technology-mediated pedagogical spaces. In A. Ahmed, Exploring Silences in the Field of Computer Assisted Language Learning. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06501-9_5

Batson, C.D. (2009). These things called empathy: Eight related but distinct phenomena. In J. Decety, & W. Ickes (Eds.). The social neuroscience of empathy (pp. 3-15). MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262012973.003.0002

Batson, C.D., Duncan, B.D., Ackerman, P., Buckley, T., & Birch, K. (1981). Is empathic emotion a source of altruistic motivation? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40(2), 290. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.40.2.290

Bialystok, L., & Kukar, P. (2018). Authenticity and empathy in education. Theory and Research in Education, 16(1), 23-39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878517746647

Bryman, A. (2012). Social research methods. Oxford University Press. https://bit.ly/3kynzDt

Carré, A., Stefaniak, N., d'Ambrosio, F., Bensalah, L., & Besche-Richard, C. (2013). The Basic Empathy Scale in adults (BES-A): Factor structure of a revised form. Psychological Assessment, 25(3), 679-691. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032297

Decety, J., & Hodges, S.D. (2006). The social neuroscience of empathy. In P.A.M. Van-Lange (Ed.), Bridging Social Psychology (pp. 103-109). Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410616982-21

Decety, J., & Jackson, P.L. (2004). The functional architecture of human empathy. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 3(2), 71-100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534582304267187

Deng, L., Zhou, Y., & Hu, Q. (2022). Off-task social media multitasking during class: Determining factors and mediating mechanism. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(14), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00321-1

Derntl, B., Finkelmeyer, A., Eickhoff, S., Kellermann, T., Falkenberg, D.I., Schneider, F., & Habel, U. (2010). Multidimensional assessment of empathic abilities: Neural correlates and gender differences. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 35(1), 67-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2009.10.006

DESI (Ed.) (2022). Digital economy and society index report. European Commission. https://bit.ly/41JhjcH

Duarte, A., & Riedl, K. (2022). Perceived learning effectiveness and student satisfaction: Lessons learned from an online multinational intensive program. In C. Smith & G. Zhou (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Teaching Strategies for Culturally and Linguistically Diverse International Students (pp. 326-344). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-8921-2

D’Ambrosio, F., Olivier, M., Didon, D., & Besche, C. (2009). The basic empathy scale: A French validation of a measure of empathy in youth. Personality and Individual Differences, 46(2), 160-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.09.020

Feshbach, N.D., & Feshbach, S. (2009). Empathy and education. In J. Decety, & W. Ickes (Eds.), The social neuroscience of empathy (pp. 85-97). MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262012973.003.0008

Fox, J., & Weisberg, S. (2020). Car: Companion to Applied Regression. [R package]. https://bit.ly/40adBXV

Garrison, D.R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 87-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6

Gerdes, K.E., Lietz, C.A., & Segal, E.A. (2011). Measuring empathy in the 21st century: Development of an empathy index rooted in social cognitive neuroscience and social justice. Social Work Research, 35(2), 83-93. https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/35.2.83

Gerdes, K.E., Segal, E.A., & Lietz, C.A. (2010). Conceptualising and measuring empathy. British Journal of Social Work, 40(7), 2326-2343. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcq048

Hat?eld, E., Rapson, R.L., & Le, Y.C.L. (2009). Emotional contagion and empathy. In J. Decety, & W. Ickes (Eds.), The social neuroscience of empathy (pp. 19-30). MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262012973.003.0003

Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J.T., & Rapson, R.L. (1994). Emotional contagion. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1080/00029157.1997.10403399

Hosszu, A., Rughinis, C., Rughinis, R., & Rosner, D. (2022). Webcams and social interaction during online classes: Identity work, presentation of self, and well-being. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.761427

Joia, L.A., & Lorenzo, M. (2021). Zoom In, Zoom Out: The Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in the classroom. Sustainability, 13(5), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052531

Jolliffe, D., & Farrington, D.P. (2006). Development and validation of the Basic Empathy Scale. Journal of Adolescence, 29(4), 589-611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2005.08.010

Kalton, G. (2020). Introduction to survey sampling. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412984683

Konrath, S.H., O'Brien, E.H., & Hsing, C. (2011). Changes in dispositional empathy in American college students over time: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15(2), 180-198. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868310377395

Lenth, R. (2020). Emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-Squares Means. [R package]. https://bit.ly/3ZUQWPH

Li, L., Gow, A.D.I., & Zhou, J. (2020). The role of positive emotions in education: A neuroscience perspective. Mind, Brain, and Education, 14(3), 220-234. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12244

Lowenthal, P.R. (2010). Social presence. In S. Dasgupta (Ed.), Social computing: Concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications (pp. 129-136). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60566-984-7.ch011

Nelson-Jones, R. (2005). Practical counselling and helping skills. How to use the life skills helping model. Sage Publications. https://bit.ly/3ZoEXJz

Okoye, K., Rodriguez-Tort, J.A., Escamilla, J., & Hosseini, S. (2021). Technology-mediated teaching and learning process: A conceptual study of educators' response amidst the Covid-19 pandemic. Education and Information Technology, 26(6), 7225-7257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10527-x

R Core Team (Ed.) (2021). R: A Language and environment for statistical computing. (Version 4.1). [Computer software]. https://cran.r-project.org

Rogers, C. (1951). Client-centered theraphy: Its current practice, implications and theory. Constable.

Ross, K., & Padovani, C. (2017). Gender equality and the media. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315709024

Stephan, W.G., & Finlay, K. (1999). The role of empathy in improving intergroup relations. Journal of Social issues, 55(4), 729-743. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00144

Swan, K., & Shea, P. (2005). The development of virtual learning communities. In S.R. Hiltz, & R. Goldman (Eds.), Asynchronous Learning Networks (pp. 239-260). Hampton Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410611482-19

Taylor, C. (2002). Beyond empathy: Confronting homophobia in critical education courses. Journal of Lesbian Studies, 6(3-4), 219-234. https://doi.org/10.1300/J155v06n03_18

Terry, C., & Cain, J. (2016). The emerging issue of digital empathy. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 80(4), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe80458

Titchener, E.B. (1909). Lectures of the experimental psychology of thought processes. Cornell University Library.

UNESCO (Ed.) (2020). Education: From disruption to recovery. Unesco. https://bit.ly/3ZpRHjh

Villarroel, V., & González, A. (2023). Students' learning perception in engineering, health and education during emergency remote education in Chile. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 9(1), 41-51. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.9.1.41