Keywords
Research Quality, STROBE, Theses, Epidemiological Studies, Peru, Human Medicine.
Abstract
STROBE is a global initiative that provides guidelines to improve the quality of reporting in observational studies, and it is currently used by many high-impact journals as a prerequisite for article acceptance. In the university context, its application not only helps to raise research quality but also represents a more rigorous tool than traditional instruments for evaluating theses. Objective: To evaluate the relationship between methodological quality and STROBE compliance in Human Medicine theses at a public university, highlighting STROBE as a more rigorous tool to improve quality and support scientific publication. Method: A quantitative, observational, cross-sectional, and correlational design was used. A total of 66 theses from 2020 to 2023 were analyzed using a validated methodological quality instrument and the STROBE checklist. Descriptive and inferential statistics (ANOVA and Spearman) were applied. Results: Although the methodological quality instrument classified most theses as good or very good, STROBE compliance was low (mean 53.9% ±14.1), with only 13.6% of theses exceeding 70%. The weakest dimensions were methodology (46.9%) and results (48.6%). A strong and positive relationship was found between methodological quality and STROBE compliance (Spearman p<0.000), as well as significant differences between quality levels (ANOVA p<0.000). Conclusions: STROBE proved to be a more demanding and revealing tool than the methodological quality instrument, since it identified weaknesses in theses that had been classified as good quality. Complying with STROBE not only improves research quality but also increases the chances of publication in high-impact journals. Therefore, it is recommended to institutionalize STROBE in thesis regulations and training programs. Its adoption represents a low-cost and high-impact strategy to strengthen research culture, improve quality, and increase the international visibility of university scientific production. These results provide significant evidence for Peruvian universities and other institutions in developing countries where the research culture is still emerging.
References
Adams, A. D., Benner, R. S., Riggs, T. W. y Chescheir, N. C. (2018). Use of the STROBE Checklist to Evaluate the Reporting Quality of Observational Research in Obstetrics. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 132(2), 507–512. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000002689
Atamari-Anahui, N., Sucasaca-Rodríguez, C. y Marroquin-Santa Cruz, J. A. (2016). Publicación científica de asesores de tesis de pregrado en una escuela de medicina de Cusco, Perú. Investigación en Educación Médica, 5(20), 279–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riem.2016.05.002
Begg, C., Cho, M., Eastwood, S., Horton, R., Moher, D., Olkin, I., Pitkin, R., et al. (1996). Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials: The CONSORT Statement. JAMA, 276(8), 637–639. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1996.03540080059030
Casimiro Urcos, W. H., Casimiro Urcos, C. N. y Casimiro Urcos, J. F. (2020). Los posgrados y la investigación científica en las universidades peruanas. Mendive. Revista de Educación, 18(1), 155–169. https://mendive.upr.edu.cu/index.php/MendiveUPR/article/view/1876
Castro-Maldonado, B., Callirgos-Lozada, C. C., Caicedo-Písfil, M. K., Plasencia-Dueñas, E. A. y Díaz-Vélez, C. (2015). Características de las tesis de pre-grado de Medicina de una universidad pública del Perú. Horizonte Médico (Lima), 15(3), 34–39. https://doi.org/10.24265/horizmed.2015.v15n3.06
Dai, S., Zhou, X., Xu, H., Li, B. y Zhang, J. (2020). Evaluation of the reporting quality of observational studies in master of public health dissertations in China. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 20(1), 230. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-01116-6
Des Jarlais, D. C., Lyles, C., Crepaz, N. y Group, T. (2004). Improving the Reporting Quality of Nonrandomized Evaluations of Behavioral and Public Health Interventions: The TREND Statement. American Journal of Public Health, 94(3), 361–366. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.94.3.361
EQUATOR Network. (2021–2024). STROBE checklist for observational studies. https://www.equator-network.org/reporting-guidelines/strobe
Estrada Araoz, E. G., Gallegos Ramos, N. A. y Huaypar Loayza, K. H. (2022). Calidad metodológica de las tesis de pregrado de una universidad pública peruana. Revista Universidad y Sociedad, 14(3), 22–29. https://rus.ucf.edu.cu/index.php/rus/article/view/2838
Hopewell, S., Clarke, M., Moher, D., Wager, E., Middleton, P., Altman, D. G. y Schulz, K. F. (2008). CONSORT for reporting randomised trials in journal and conference abstracts. The Lancet, 371(9609), 281–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61835-2
Hubbard, D. W. y Carriquiry, A. L. (2019). Quality Control for Scientific Research: Addressing Reproducibility, Responsiveness, and Relevance. The American Statistician, 73(sup1), 46–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2018.1543138
Mamani Benito, O. J. (2018). Calidad metodológica y características de las tesis de pregrado de psicología de una universidad privada del Perú. Propósitos y Representaciones, 6(2), 301–338. https://doi.org/10.20511/pyr2018.v6n2.224
Mandujano-Romero, E. y Ancca, P. G. (2013). Calidad de las tesis para obtener el título de médico cirujano, Universidad Nacional de San Antonio Abad del Cusco-Perú, 2000-2009. Acta Médica Peruana, 30(2), 70–74. https://www.scielo.org.pe/pdf/amp/v30n2/a04v30n2.pdf
Moher, D., Cook, D. J., Eastwood, S., Olkin, I., Rennie, D. y Stroup, D. F. (1999). Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. The Lancet, 354(9193), 1896–1900. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(99)04149-5
Pereyra-Elías, R., Huaccho-Rojas, J. J., Taype-Rondan, Á., Mejia, C. R. y Mayta-Tristán, P. (2014). Publicación y factores asociados en docentes universitarios de investigación científica de escuelas de medicina del Perú. Revista Peruana de Medicina Experimental y Salud Pública, 31(3), 424–430. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/363/36333049003.pdf
Pouwels, K. B., Widyakusuma, N. N., Groenwold, R. H. H. y Hak, E. (2016). Quality of reporting of confounding remained suboptimal after the STROBE guideline. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 69, 217–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.08.009
Rahmani, N., Salehi, A., Molavi Vardanjani, H., Marzban, M. y Behbood, A. (2020). Using STROBE checklist to assess the reporting quality of observational studies affiliated with Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, and its correlates: a scientometric study from Iran. Scientometrics, 122(2), 989–1001. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03317-3
Salazar Legua, M. A. (2007). Calidad de los trabajos de investigación que se realizan para optar el título de especialista en Medicina Humana de la UNMSM en el periodo 2000-2004 [Tesis de maestría, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos]. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12672/2434
Sanabria-Rojas, H. A., Tarqui-Mamani, C. B. y Zárate-Cárdenas, E. E. (2011). Calidad de las tesis de maestría en temas de salud pública: Estudio en una universidad pública de Lima, Perú. Educación Médica, 14(4), 215–220. https://scielo.isciii.es/pdf/edu/v14n4/original1.pdf
Shaghaghian, S. y Astaneh, B. (2020). Adherence to the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology Statement in Observational Studies Published in Iranian Medical Journals. Iranian Journal of Public Health, 49(8), 1520–1529. https://doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v49i8.3896
Stroup, D. F., Berlin, J. A., Morton, S. C., Olkin, I., Williamson, G. D., Rennie, D., Moher, D., et al. (2000). Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology: A Proposal for Reporting. JAMA, 283(15), 2008–2012. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.283.15.2008
Tacconelli, E., Cataldo, M. A., Paul, M., Leibovici, L., Kluytmans, J., Schröder, W., Foschi, F., et al. (2016). STROBE-AMS: recommendations to optimise reporting of epidemiological studies on antimicrobial resistance and informing improvement in antimicrobial stewardship. BMJ Open, 6(2), e010134. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010134
Von Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Egger, M., Pocock, S. J., Gøtzsche, P. C. y Vandenbroucke, J. P. (2007). The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. The Lancet, 370(9596), 1453–1457. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61602-X
Zavaleta-Reyes, C. y Tresierra-Ayala, M. (2017). Calidad metodológica del trabajo de grado de bachiller en una facultad de medicina. Educación Médica, 18(4), 233–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edumed.2016.06.020
Fundref
Not Available
Crossmark
Technical information
Received: 2026-02-24 | Reviewed: 2026-03-21 | Accepted: 2026-05-26 | Online First: 2026-10-01 | Published: 2026-10-05
Metrics
Metrics of this article
Views: 38099
Abstract readings: 36810
PDF downloads: 1289
Full metrics of Comunicar 77
Views: 459033
Abstract readings: 446071
PDF downloads: 12962
Cited by
Cites in Web of Science
Currently there are no citations to this document
Cites in Scopus
Currently there are no citations to this document
Cites in Google Scholar
Currently there are no citations to this document
Download
Alternative metrics
How to cite
Jhosef Franck Quispe Pari., Lucia Karen Bellido Valladares. (2026). Application of STROBE in University Theses: A Strategy to Improve Research Quality and Scientific Publishing. Comunicar, 34(87). 10.5281/zenodo.23183373
Share
Oxbridge Publishing House
4 White House Way
B91 1SE Sollihul United Kingdom
Administration 
Editorial office
