Chang Zhang Communication University of China, (China)
Zichen Hu London School of Economics and Political Sciences, (China)
Keywords
Políticas aspiracionales, animación, teoría poscolonial, relaciones Internacionales feministas, imaginario geopolítico.
Abstract
Este artículo examina cómo las aspiraciones de las grandes potencias y la identidad nacional se construyen estéticamente a través de la animación política. Analizamos cómo la serie animada El Asunto de Aquellos Conejos de Aquel Año (YHA) transforma las jerarquías geopolíticas en una galería antropomórfica donde China emerge como un conejo vulnerable pero determinado que navega sus relaciones con el águila estadounidense, el oso ruso y otras naciones-animales dentro de una zoopolítica (política animal) alegórica. Mediante un análisis crítico del discurso combinado con un examen computacional del compromiso de la audiencia, teorizamos la zoopolítica como una economía simbólica atravesada por el género que traduce las relaciones internacionales abstractas en narrativas emocionalmente convincentes y políticamente inteligibles. La oscilación del conejo entre una vulnerabilidad kawaii y una autoridad paternalista ejemplifica lo que Bhabha denomina mimetismo colonial, donde la animación representa a China manteniendo una distancia crítica de la dominación del poder, mientras simultáneamente reproduce las trayectorias futuras de China hacia esa misma dominación. Nuestro análisis demuestra cómo el apoyo institucional transforma YHA en un aparato efectivo de pedagogía cívica. La gramática visual transpacífica de la serie demuestra cómo los estados poscoloniales refuncionalizan formas estéticas alegóricas —originadas en representaciones del orden global de potencias dominantes (como Estados Unidos y Japón)— para naturalizar sus propias trayectorias aspiracionales. Aunque gesticula hacia futuros decoloniales, YHA transforma las relaciones internacionales complejas en narrativas patrióticas emocionalmente accesibles. Lo que emerge, por tanto, no es una ruptura clara con el pasado KEYWORDS | PALABRAS CLAVE colonizado, sino un reencantamiento del poder geopolítico, reempaquetado para que una nueva generación forme sus subjetividades políticas bajo el barniz estético del juego animado.
References
Allison, A. (2006). Millennial Monsters: Japanese Toys and the Global Imagination. University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520938991
Althusser, L. (1971). Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays. Monthly Review Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt9qgh9v
Banerjee, S. (2012). Muscular Nationalism: Gender, Violence, and Empire in India and Ireland, 1914-2004. New York University Press. https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9780814789766.001.0001
Barthes, R. (1977). Image, Music, Text. New York: Hill and Wang. https://archive.org/details/imagemusictext0000bart_e3d9
Berlant, L. (2011). Cruel Optimism. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822394716
Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The Location of Culture. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203820551
Bos, D. (2023). Playful Encounters: Games for Geopolitical Change. Geopolitics, 28(3), 1210-1234. https://doi.org/10.1080/1465 0045.2021.2002846
Campbell, D. (1992). Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity. University of Minnesota Press. https://www.upress.umn.edu/9780816631445/writing-security
Chen, D. (2022). Chinese Otaku Culture and Alternative Public Spheres: A Study of Bullet Comments and Bilibili. In M. Samuel & L. Mitchell (Eds.), Streaming and Screen Culture in Asia-Pacific (pp. 181-196). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09374-6_10
Chen, K.-H. (2010). Asia as Method: Toward Deimperialization. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822391692
China Youth Daily. (2016). Lin Chao, Creator of “Na Tu”: Be a Cartoonist Who Steadfastly Pursues Dreams. https://qclz.youth.cn/znl/201609/t20160907_8631795.htm
Cohn, C. (1987). Sex and Death in the Rational World of Defense Intellectuals. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 12(4), 687-718. https://doi.org/10.1086/494362
Cook, M., Cowan, M., & Curtis, S. (2023). Useful Animation: Iconography, Infrastructure and Impact. Animation, 18(3), 196-226. https://doi.org/10.1177/17468477231207613
Crilley, R. (2020). Where We At? New Directions for Research on Popular Culture and World Politics. International Studies Review, 23(1), 164-180. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viaa027
Dittmer, J. (2007). The Tyranny of the Serial: Popular Geopolitics, the Nation, and Comic Book Discourse. Antipode, 39(2), 247-268. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2007.00520.x
Dittmer, J. (2010). Popular Culture, Geopolitics, and Identity. Rowman & Littlefield. https://www.bloomsbury.com/us/popular-culture-geopolitics-and-identity-9781538116715
Dodds, K. (2003). Licensed to Stereotype: Geopolitics, James Bond and the Spectre of Balkanism. Geopolitics, 8(2), 125-156. https://doi.org/10.1080/714001037
Dodds, K. (2010). Popular Geopolitics and Cartoons: Representing Power Relations, repitition and Resistance. Critical African Studies, 2(4), 113-131. https://doi.org/10.1080/20407211.2010.10530760
Enloe, C. (1990). Bananas, Beaches and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics. University of California Press.
Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Polity Press.
Finnemore, M., & Jurkovich, M. (2020). The Politics of Aspiration. International Studies Quarterly, 64(4), 759-769. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqaa052
Foucault, M. (1982). The Subject and Power. Critical Inquiry, 8(4), 777-795. https://doi.org/10.1086/448181
Guan, T., & Hu, T. (2020). The conformation and negotiation of nationalism in China’s political animations—a case study of Year Hare Affair. Continuum, 34(3), 417-430. https://doi.org/10.1080/10304312.2020.1724882
Guo, T., & Wang, A. (2025). “TGCF but lesbian?”: the dangai anime TGCF and its transnational fandom. Popular Communication, 23(1), 53-68. https://doi.org/10.1080/15405702.2025.2451894
Hansen, L. (2011). Theorizing the Image for Security Studies: Visual Securitization and the Muhammad Cartoon Crisis. European Journal of International Relations, 17(1), 51-74. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066110388593
Hu, W. (2022). Character Evaluation and Derivative Product Design of “Hetalia” Based on Kansei Image. In C. Stephanidis, M. Antona, S. Ntoa, & G. Salvendy (Eds.), HCI International 2022 – Late Breaking Posters (pp. 257-266). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19679-9_32
Jenkins, H., Ito, M., & Boyd, D. (2015). Participatory Culture in a Networked Era: A Conversation on Youth, Learning, Commerce, and Politics. John Wiley & Sons. https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.5555/2910980
Lagerkvist, J. (2008). Internet Ideotainment in the PRC: national responses to cultural globalization. Journal of Contemporary China, 17(54), 121-140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670560701693120
Lazar, M. M. (2017). Feminist critical discourse analysis. In J. Flowerdew & J. Richardson (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies (pp. 372-387). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315739342-26
Li, S., & Huang, L. (2021). Author of Martyr Xiao Siyuan’s WeChat Profile Picture: Heroes Are Not Far From Us. Global Times. https://mil.sina.cn/2021-02-24/detail-ikftpnny9545498.d.html
Machin, D., & Mayr, A. (2012). How to Do Critical Discourse Analysis: A Multimodal Introduction. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781036212933
McCloud, S. (1993). Understanding Comics: The Invisible Art. William Morrow Paperbacks. https://www.harpercollins.com/products/understanding-comics-scott-mccloud?variant=32122752565282
Mohanty, C. T. (2003). Feminism Without Borders: Decolonizing Theory, Practicing Solidarity. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822384649
Quijano, A. (2000). Coloniality of Power and Eurocentrism in Latin America. International Sociology, 15(2), 215-232. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580900015002005
Said, E. W. (1978). Orientalism. Pantheon Books.
Sharp, J. P. (1993). Publishing American identity: popular geopolitics, myth and The Reader’s Digest. Political Geography, 12(6), 491-503. https://doi.org/10.1016/0962-6298(93)90001-N
Sharp, J. P. (1996). Hegemony, popular culture and geopolitics: the Reader’s Digest and the construction of danger. Political Geography, 15(6), 557-570. https://doi.org/10.1016/0962-6298(96)00031-5
Sharp, J. P. (2000). Remasculinising geo-politics? Comments on Gearoid O’Tuathail’s critical geopolitics. Political Geography, 19(3), 361-364. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0962-6298(99)00068-2
Sun, J. (2017). The Moe Politics in Year, Hare, Affair. CLAMANTIS: The MALS Journal, 1(3), 4. https://digitalcommons.dartmouth.edu/clamantis/vol1/iss3/4
Tan, X. (2018). China is a hare: The articulation of national identity in Year Hare Affair. Empedocles: European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication, 9(2), 159-175. https://doi.org/10.1386/ejpc.9.2.159_1
Thorogood, J. (2016). Satire and Geopolitics: Vulgarity, Ambiguity and the Body Grotesque in South Park. Geopolitics, 21(1), 215 235. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2015.1089433
Tickner, J. A. (1992). Gender in International Relations: Feminist Perspectives on Achieving Global Security. Columbia University Press. https://cup.columbia.edu/book/gender-in-international-relations/9780231075398
Tuathail, G. Ö. (1996). Critical Geopolitics. The Politics of Writing Social Space. University of Minnesota Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203973059
Weldes, J. (1999). Going Cultural: Star Trek, State Action, and Popular Culture. Millennium, 28(1), 117-134. https://doi.org/10.1 177/03058298990280011201
Woodyer, T., & Carter, S. (2023). Domesticating the Geopolitical: Rethinking Popular Geopolitics through Play. In S. Carter & T. Woodyer (Eds.), Domesticating Geopolitics (pp. 6-30). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003431497-2
Zhang, L., & Cassany, D. (2019). The ‘danmu’ phenomenon and media participation: Intercultural understanding and language learning through ‘The Ministry of Time’. Comunicar, 58, 19-29. https://doi.org/10.3916/C58-2019-02
Zhihu. (2021a). How should we define and evaluate the so-called ‘tuza’ (rabbit scum) and ‘voluntary 50-Cent Army’ (China’s die-hard patriotics) groups? Do these labels carry pejorative connotations? https://www.zhihu.com/question/28675653
Zhihu. (2021b). Is the Representation of Contemporary China’s History in YHA Accurate and Objective? https://www.zhihu.com/question/21964312
Zhihu. (2022). Where have the die-hard patriots from the That Rabbit Baidu forum gone? https://www.zhihu.com/question/545065922
Fundref
The research receives funding from the National Social Science Fund of China [Grant No. 24BCJ002].
Technical information
Received: 2025-06-13 | Reviewed: 2025-07-24 | Accepted: 2025-07-28 | Online First: 2026-01-02 | Published: 2026-01-04
Metrics
Metrics of this article
Views: 38099
Abstract readings: 36810
PDF downloads: 1289
Full metrics of Comunicar 77
Views: 459033
Abstract readings: 446071
PDF downloads: 12962
Cited by
Cites in Web of Science
Currently there are no citations to this document

Cites in Scopus
Currently there are no citations to this document

Cites in Google Scholar
Currently there are no citations to this document
Métricas alternativas
Cómo citar
Chang Zhang., Zichen Hu. (2026). ¿Conejo Agazapado, Dragón Oculto? Animando Narrativas Nacionales de Género y Subjetividad Poscolonial en la Animación China Contemporánea. Comunicar, 34(84). 10.5281/zenodo.18114224