- ARTÍCULOS
- Número actual
- Números anteriores
- Próximos números
- Artículos más citados
- Artículos en prensa
- Búsquedas
- AUTORES
- Normativas
- Enviar manuscritos
- Consejo de Revisores
- Criterios de Calidad
- Escuela de Autores
- Club de Editores
- Thesaurus
- Código Ético
- Antiplagio
- INDIZACIONES
- Factor de impacto
- Indexaciones
- Métricas
- Estadísticas
- Ranking Revistas ES
- Revistas JCR
- Ranking ESCI
- Metadatos
- Documentos
- TIENDA
- USUARIOS
Comunicar 54: Ciencia y saber compartidos. Acceso abierto, tecnologías y educación
Vol. XXVI, nº 54, 1º trimestre, 1 enero 2018
E-ISSN: 1988-3293 / ISSN: 1134-3478
Co-creación e innovación abierta: Revisión sistemática de literatura
Co-creation and open innovation: Systematic literature review
https://doi.org/10.3916/C54-2018-01
Resumen
La ciencia abierta, como bien común, abre posibilidades para el desarrollo de las naciones a través de innovaciones y construcciones colaborativas que ayudan a democratizar el conocimiento. Los avances en la materia aún son incipientes y el triángulo ciencia abierta, cocreación del conocimiento e innovación abierta se presenta como una oportunidad de generar un aporte original, desde la investigación, para la teoría y las prácticas educativas abiertas. En el estudio se analizaron los artículos que abordan este triángulo, con el fin de identificar los contextos y retos que se presentan en la innovación y en la cocreación de conocimiento para impulsar la ciencia abierta. El método fue una revisión sistemática de literatura (SLR) de 168 artículos publicados en acceso abierto, de enero 2014 a mayo 2017, en las bases de datos Web of Science y Scopus. La validación se dio con los criterios de la Universidad de York: inclusión y exclusión, pertinencia, evaluación de calidad / validez de los estudios y descripción de datos. Los hallazgos reflejan que los contextos de mayor publicación sobre el tema son los de Estados Unidos y Brasil, en los sectores empresariales y académicos (seguido de cerca por el sector social) y los retos se abren en las posibilidades de innovación, apertura e investigación. Se concluye que el contexto y las prácticas de colaboración son elementos sustanciales para la innovación y la ciencia abierta.
Descriptores
Ciencia abierta, ciencia ciudadana, conocimiento, colaboración, apertura, innovación, cocreación de conocimiento, validación
Referencias
Aleksic, J., Alexa, A., Attwood, T.K., Hong, N.C., Dahlö, M., Davey, R., ... Lahti, L. (2015). An open science peer review oath. F1000Research, 2015, 3, 271. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.5686.2
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Álvarez, E.G., & Sintas, J.L. (2012). Ciencia abierta, e-ciencia y nuevas tecnologías: Desafíos y antiguos problemas en la investigación cualitativa en las ciencias sociales. Intangible Capital, 8(3), 497-519. https://doi.org/10.3926/ic.384
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Arabito, S., & Pitrelli, N. (2015). Open Science training and education: challenges and difficulties on the researchers’ side and in public engagement. Journal of Science Communication, 14(04), C01_en. (https://goo.gl/MYUB8V).
Link Google Scholar
Ayris, P. (2017). Brexit - and its potential impact for open access in the UK. Insights, 30(1), 4-10. https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.336
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Bauer, M.A., Berleant, D., Cornell, A.P., & Belford, R.E. (2015). WikiHyperGlossary (WHG): An information literacy technology for chemistry documents. Journal of Cheminformatics, 7(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13321-015-0073-7
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Betancourt, M.C., Celaya, R., & Ramírez-Montoya, M.S. (2014). Open educational practices and technology appropriation: The case of the regional open Latin American community for social and educational research. RUSC, 11(1), 4-17. https://doi.org/10.7238/rusc.v11i1.1794
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Bond-Lamberty, B., Smith, A.P., & Bailey, V. (2016). Running an open experiment: Transparency and reproducibility in soil and ecosystem science. Environmental Research Letters, 11(8), 084004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/8/084004
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Brereton, P., Kitchenham, B.A., Budgen, D., Turner, M., & Khalil, M. (2007). Lessons from applying the systematic literature review process within the software engineering domain. Journal of Systems and Software, 80(4), 571-583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2006.07.009
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Bubela, T., Guebert, J., & Mishra, A. (2015). Use and misuse of material transfer agreements: Lessons in proportionality from research, repositories, and litigation. PLoS Biol, 13(2), e1002060. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002060
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Buttliere, B.T. (2014). Using science and psychology to improve the dissemination and evaluation of scientific work. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 8, 82. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2014.00082
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Carey, T., Davis, A., Ferreras, S., & Porter, D. (2015). Using open educational practices to support institutional strategic excellence in teaching, learning & scholarship. Open Praxis, 7(2), 161-171. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.7.2.201
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Castillo-Molina, Y.Y. (2016). Propuesta de un modelo para gestionar la innovación abierta en los Núcleos de Innovación del Cauca-Colombia. Revista Gestión de las Personas y Tecnología, 9(25), 72-85. (https://goo.gl/S9WdCL).
Link Google Scholar
Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (Ed.) (2009). Systematic Reviews. CRD’s guidance for undertaking reviews in health care. York, UK: CRD, University of York. (https://goo.gl/731Ehh).
Link Google Scholar
Chalk, S.J. (2016). The open spectral database: An open platform for sharing and searching spectral data. Journal of Cheminformatics, 8(1), 55. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13321-016-0170-2
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Dahlander, L., & Gann, D.M. (2010). How open is innovation? Research Policy, 39(6), 699-709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.013
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Das, S., Glatard, T., Rogers, C., Saigle, J., Paiva, S., MacIntyre, L., ... MacFarlane, D. (2016). Cyberinfrastructure for open science at the Montreal Neurological Institute. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 10, 53. https://doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2016.00053
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Franzoni, C., & Sauermann, H. (2014). Crowd science: The organization of scientific research in open collaborative projects. Research Policy, 43(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.07.005
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
García-Aristegui, D., & Rendueles, C. (2014). Abierto, libre… y público. Los desafíos políticos de la ciencia abierta. Argumentos de Razón Técnica, 17, 45-64. (https://goo.gl/Xoh3a1).
Link Google Scholar
García-Peñalvo, F.J., Conde, M.A., Johnson, M., & Alier, M. (2013). Knowledge co-creation process based on informal learning competences tagging and recognition. International Journal of Human Capital and Information Technology Professionals, 4(4), 18-30. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijhcitp.2013100102
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
García-Peñalvo, F.J., García-de-Figuerola, C., & Merlo-Vega, J.A. (2010). Open knowledge: Challenges and facts. Online Information Review, 34(4), 520-539. https://doi.org/10.1108/14684521011072963
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Hackseq Organizing Committee (2017). Hackseq: Catalyzing collaboration between biological and computational scientists via hackathon. F1000Research, 6, 10. https://doi.org/12688/f1000research.10964.1
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Higgins, J.P., & Green, S. (Eds.) (2006). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions 4.2.6. The Cochrane collaboration. (https://goo.gl/6uU6tM).
Link Google Scholar
Higham, D.J., Batty, M., Bettencourt, L.M., Greetham, D.V., & Grindrod, P. (2017). An overview of city analytics. Royal Society Open Science. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.161063
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Hormia-Poutanen, K., & Forsström, P. (2016). Collaboration at international, national and institutional level – Vital in fostering open science. Liber Quarterly, 26(1), 3-12. https://doi.org/10.18352/lq.10157
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Hughes, S.F. (2017). A new model for identifying emerging technologies. Journal of Intelligence Studies in Business, 7(1), 79-86. (https://goo.gl/yKd3fA).
Link Google Scholar
Huizingh, E.K. (2011). Open innovation: State of the art and future perspectives. Technovation, 31(1), 2-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2010.10.002
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Joly, Y., Dalpé, G., So, D., & Birko, S. (2015). Fair shares and sharing fairly: A survey of public views on open science, informed consent and participatory research in biobanking. PloS One, 10(7), e0129893. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129893
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Jørgensen, P.S., Barraquand, F., Bonhomme, V., Curran, T.J., Cieraad, E., Ezard, T.G., … Zimmerman, N. (2015). Connecting people and ideas from around the world: Global innovation platforms for next-generation ecology and beyond. Ecosphere, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.1890/ES14-00198.1
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Katsikis, N., Lang, A., & Debreczeny, C. (2016). Evaluation of open innovation in B2B from a company culture perspective. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 11(3), 94-100. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242016000300011
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Kitchenham, B.A. (2004). Procedures for performing systematic reviews. Keele University: Technical Report TR/SE-0401 and NICTA Technical Report 0400011T.1. (https://goo.gl/wQcMaS).
Link Google Scholar
Krause, W., & Schutte, C.S. (2016). Developing design propositions for an open innovation approach for SMEs. South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, 27(3), 37-49. https://doi.org/10.7166/27-3-1625
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Labastida-i-Juan, I. (2015). The time has come for managing and sharing research data in universities. Journal of Science Communication, 14(4). (https://goo.gl/y1qndm).
Link Google Scholar
Lahti, L., Ilomäki, N., & Tolonen, M. (2015). A quantitative study of history in the English short-title catalogue (ESTC), 1470-1800. Liber Quarterly, 25(2), 87-116. https://doi.org/10.18352/lq.10112.
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Lasthiotakis, H., Kretz, A., & Sá, C. (2015). Open science strategies in research policies: A comparative exploration of Canada, the US and the UK. Policy Futures in Education, 13(8), 968-989. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210315579983
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Lee, S.H., Workman, J., & Jung, K. (2016). Perception of time, creative attitudes, and adoption of Innovations: A cross-cultural study from Chinese and US College Students. Sustainability, 8(11), 1193. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8111193
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Lenart-Gansiniec, R. (2016). Relational capital and open innovation - In search of interdepencies. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 64(6), 2007-2013. https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201664062007
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Lhoste, E., & Barbier, M. (2016). FabLabs. L’institutionnalisation de Tiers-Lieux du ‘soft hacking’. Revue d’Anthropologie des Connaissances, 10(1), 43-69. https://doi.org/10.3917/rac.030.0043
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Lichtenthaler, U. (2011). Open innovation: Past research, current debates, and future directions. Academy of Management Perspectives, 25(1), 75-93. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2011.59198451
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
McCormick, M.M., Liu, X., Ibanez, L., & Jomier, J. (2014). ITK: Enabling reproducible research and open science. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 8, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2014.00013
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Mulder, F. (2013). The LOGIC of national policies and strategies for open educational resources. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 14(2), 96-105. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v14i2.1536
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Naqshbandi, M.M., Singh, S.K., & Ma, P. (2016). The link between organisational citizenship behaviours and open innovation: A case of Malaysian high-tech sector. IIMB Management Review, 28(4), 200-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iimb.2016.08.008
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
National Knowledge Commission. (2007). Report to the Nation 2007. New Delhi: Government of India. (https://goo.gl/WbkkAE).
Link Google Scholar
OECD (Ed.) (2012). Connected minds: Technology and today’s learners. Paris: OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264111011-en
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Ojasalo, J., & Tähtinen, L. (2016). Integrating open innovation platforms in public sector decision making: Empirical results from smart city research. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(12). (https://goo.gl/ottFqt).
Link Google Scholar
Okret-Manville, C. (2016). Academic social networks and open access: French researchers at the crossroads. Liber Quarterly, 25(3), 118-135. http://doi.org/10.18352/lq.10131
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Olalla, M. F., Sandulli, F.D., Menéndez, J.F., & Duarte, A.R. (2014). ¿Cómo afectan las características de la industria a la relación entre la capacidad de I+D y la adopción de innovación abierta de entrada? Economía Industrial, 391, 23-32. (https://goo.gl/73V968).
Link Google Scholar
Oumlil, R., & Juiz, C. (2016). An Up-to-date Survey in barriers to open innovation. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 11(3), 137-152. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242016000300016
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Pernet, C., & Poline, J.B. (2015). Improving functional magnetic resonance imaging reproducibility. GigaScience, 4(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13742-015-0055-8
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Poehlman, W.L., Rynge, M., Branton, C., Balamurugan, D., & Feltus, F.A. (2016). OSG-GEM: Gene expression matrix construction using the open science Grid. Bioinformatics and Biology Insights, 10, 133-141. https://doi.org/10.4137/BBI.S38193
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Ramírez-Montoya, M.S. (2015). Acceso abierto y su repercusión en la sociedad del conocimiento: Reflexiones de casos prácticos en Latinoamérica. Education in the Knowledge Society, 16(1), 103-118. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks2015161103118.
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Randhawa, K., Wilden, R., & Hohberger, J. (2016). A bibliometric review of open innovation: Setting a research agenda. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 33(6), 750-772. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12312
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Ferradas, M.I., & Alfaro-Tanco, J.A. (2016). Open innovation in automotive SMEs suppliers: An opportunity for new product development. Universia Business Review, 50, 142. https://doi.org/10.3232/UBR.2016.V13.N2.05
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Schmidt, B., Orth, A., Franck, G., Kuchma, I., Knoth, P., & Carvalho, J. (2016). Stepping up open science training for European research. Publications, 4(2), 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications4020016
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Schuurman, D., & Tõnurist, P. (2017). Innovation in the public sector: Exploring the characteristics and potential of living labs and innovation labs. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(1), 7-14. (https://goo.gl/pqVcQy).
Link Google Scholar
Schuurman, D., De-Marez, L., & Ballon, P. (2016). The impact of living lab methodology on open innovation contributions and outcomes. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(1), 7-16. (https://goo.gl/DmwJRP).
Link Google Scholar
Seguí-Mas, E., Signes-Pérez, E., Sarrión-Viñes, F., & Vidal, J.A. (2016). Bibliometric analysis of the international literature on open innovation and absorptive capacity. Intangible Capital, 12(1), 51-72. https://doi.org/10.3926/ic.685
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Shim, S.O., & Park, K. (2016). Technology for production scheduling of jobs for open innovation and sustainability with fixed processing property on parallel machines. Sustainability, 8(9), 904. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8090904
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Sloep, P., & Berlanga, A. (2011). Learning networks, networked learning. [Redes de aprendizaje, aprendizaje en Red]. Comunicar, 37(19), 55-63. https://doi.org/10.3916/C37-2011-02-05
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Tandon, R., Singh, W., Clover, D., & Hall, B. (2017). Knowledge democracy and excellence in engagement. IDS Bulletin, 47(6), 19-35. https://doi.org/10.19088/1968-2016.197
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Tripathi, S.S. (2016). Open innovation in Indian organizations: Types of collaboration. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(5), 15-23. (https://goo.gl/yqXrbb).
Link Google Scholar
Tukiainen, T., Leminen, S., & Westerlund, M. (2015). Cities as collaborative innovation platforms. Technology Innovation Management Review, 5(10), 16-23. (https:// goo.gl/UrrtGB).
Link Google Scholar
UNESCO (Ed.) (2004). Ética de la Ciencia y la Tecnología. Contacto, XXIX(3-4). (https://goo.gl/FGvb8S).
Link Google Scholar
Užiene, L. (2015). Open innovation, knowledge flows and intellectual capital. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 213, 1057-1062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.525
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Wallin, M.W., & Von-Krogh, G. (2010). Organizing for open innovation. Organizational Dynamics, 39(2), 145-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2010.01.010
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Yang, M., & Wang, J. (2016). Overflow mechanism and demonstration of knowledge flow on enterprise endogenous innovation by the three-dimensional space: Based on the open innovation perspective. International Journal of Security and Its Applications, 10(3), 321-332. https://doi.org/10.14257/ijsia.2016.10.3.28
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Yoon, B., Shin, J., & Lee, S. (2016). Open innovation projects in SMEs as an engine for sustainable growth. Sustainability, 8(2), 146. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8020146
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Yun, J.J., Jeong, E., & Park, J. (2016). Network analysis of open innovation. Sustainability, 8(8), 729. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8080729
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Zander, F., & Kralisch, S. (2016). River basin information system: Open environmental data management for research and decision making. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 5(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi5070123
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Cómo citar este texto
Ramírez-Montoya, M.S. & García-Peñalvo, F. (2018). Co-creation and open innovation: Systematic literature review. [Co-creación e innovación abierta: Revisión sistemática de literatura]. Comunicar, 54, 09-18. https://doi.org/10.3916/C54-2018-01
Crossmark
Ficha técnica
Received: 31-05-2017
Revisado: 19-06-2017
Aceptado: 26-07-2017
Preprint: 15-11-2017
Fecha publicación: 01-01-2018
Tiempo de revisión del artículo : 19 días | Media tiempo revisión número 54: 44 días
Tiempo de aceptación del artículo: 56 días | Media tiempo aceptación número 54: 97 días
Tiempo de edición del preprint: 170 días | Media tiempo edición número preprint 54: 210 días
Tiempo de edición del artículo: 215 días | Media tiempo edición número 54: 255 días
Citas en Web of Science
Garcia Penalvo; Francisco Jose;. WYRED Project EDUCATION IN THE KNOWLEDGE SOCIETY , 2017.
https://doi.org/10.14201/eks2017183714
Griselda Argueta-Velazquez, Martha; Soledad Ramirez-Montoya, Maria;. Innovation in the Instructional Design of Massive Open Courses with Gamification and OER to Train in Energy Sustainability EDUCATION IN THE KNOWLEDGE SOCIETY , 2017.
https://doi.org/10.14201/eks20171847596
Jose Garcia-Penalvo; Francisco;. The Transversal Competences of Graduates of University Master's Degrees EDUCATION IN THE KNOWLEDGE SOCIETY , 2018.
https://doi.org/10.14201/eks2018191719
Jose Garcia-Penalvo; Francisco;. The Future of Institutional Repositories EDUCATION IN THE KNOWLEDGE SOCIETY , 2017.
https://doi.org/10.14201/eks2017184719
Perez Rodriguez, Maria Amor; Delgado Ponce, Agueda;. EMERGING MOBILE MEDIA IN LANGUAGE TEACHING PRISMA SOCIAL , 2018.
Link Google Scholar
Citas en Scopus
Abhari, K., Xiao, B.S., Davidson, E.. The role of actor capability in (Re)defining technology affordances: The case of open innovation platform), Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 2018.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91716-0_44
Fusco, E., Mucheroni, M.L.. The informational platform of the São Paulo state innovation ecosystem: A semantic computing model in support of innovation), Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 2018.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77712-2_63
Osma, J.I.P., Montoya, M.S.R., Villalba, J.C., Burgos, D.. Maturity model for collaborative innovation: Higher education challenge | Modelo de Madurez para Innovacion Colaborativa: Retos de la Educación Superior), Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies, CISTI, 2018.
https://doi.org/10.23919/CISTI.2018.8399247
Rodríguez, M.A.P., Ponce, A.D.. Emerging mobile media in language teaching | Medios móviles emergentes en la enseñanza de lenguas), Prisma Social, 2018.
Link Google Scholar
Xu, J., Liu, G., Liu, S., Xu, R.. The collaboration learning in the interdisciplinary workshop based on design thinking: A learning outcome perspective), Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 2018.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91803-7_12
Citas en CrossRef
José, F. (2018). Las competencias transversales de los egresados de los másteres universitarios, Education in the Knowledge Society (EKS), 19(1).
https://doi.org/10.14201/eks2018191719
Citas en Google Scholar
El futuro de los repositorios institucionales
FJG PEÑALVO- Education in the Knowledge Society (EKS) - revistas.usal.es
http://revistas.usal.es/~revistas_trabajo/index.php/revistatesi/article/view/eks2017184719
El Proyecto WYRED
FJ García-Peñalvo- Education in the Knowledge Society, 2017 - search.proquest.com
http://search.proquest.com/openview/2e9bceb72c305aa9b5f22d92767173e7/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=2032089
Innovación en el diseño instruccional de cursos masivos abiertos con gamificación y REA para formar en sustentabilidad energética
MGA VELÁZQUEZ,MGA VELÁZQUEZ,MSR MONTOYA- Education in the Knowledge Society … - revistas.usal.es
http://revistas.usal.es/index.php/revistatesi/article/view/eks20171847596
Inteligencia Colectiva en el aula. Un paradigma cooperativo
Á Fidalgo-Blanco,Á Fidalgo-Blanco,ML Sein-Echaluce… - 2017 - repositorio.grial.eu
https://repositorio.grial.eu/handle/grial/1018
Investigación y Ciencia Abierta
MA Tena Espinoza de los Monteros,MA Tena Espinoza de los Monteros,FJ García-Peñalvo- 2017 - repositorio.grial.eu
https://repositorio.grial.eu/handle/grial/1037
Mapeos sistemáticos de literatura, revisiones sistemáticas de literatura y benchmarking de programas formativos
FJ García-Peñalvo- 2017 - repositorio.grial.eu
https://repositorio.grial.eu/handle/grial/1056
Mapping sistemáticos de literatura. Caso práctico de planificación usando Parsifal
FJ García-Peñalvo- 2017 - repositorio.grial.eu
https://repositorio.grial.eu/handle/grial/1058
Marco para la Ciencia Abierta
FJ García-Peñalvo- 2017 - repositorio.grial.eu
https://repositorio.grial.eu/handle/grial/1057
Reflecting about the key issues to design and implement an Open Education strategy
FJ García-Peñalvo- 2017 - repositorio.grial.eu
https://repositorio.grial.eu/handle/grial/992
Research projects in WYRED
WYRED Consortium - 2017 - repositorio.grial.eu
https://repositorio.grial.eu/handle/grial/1052
Sesión de Kick-off del Programa de Doctorado “Formación en la Sociedad del Conocimiento” Edición 2017-2018
FJ García-Peñalvo- 2017 - repositorio.grial.eu
https://repositorio.grial.eu/handle/grial/1054
Tema 1. Innovación Educativa
FJ García-Peñalvo- 2017 - repositorio.grial.eu
https://repositorio.grial.eu/handle/grial/979
Tema 2. Ecologías de Aprendizaje
FJ García-Peñalvo- 2017 - repositorio.grial.eu
https://repositorio.grial.eu/handle/grial/980
Tema 2. Ecologías de Aprendizaje
FJG Peñalvo - researchgate.net
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Francisco_Garcia-Penalvo/publication/320011435_Tema_2_Ecologias_de_Aprendizaje/links/59c7eb2da6fdccc71923f751/Tema-2-Ecologias-de-Aprendizaje.pdf
Tema 3. Gestión de la Innovación Educativa
FJ García-Peñalvo- 2017 - repositorio.grial.eu
https://repositorio.grial.eu/handle/grial/981
Uso de herramientas digitales para investigación y publicación
FJ García-Peñalvo- 2017 - repositorio.grial.eu
https://repositorio.grial.eu/handle/grial/1055
Vinculación universidad-sociedad para la innovación educativa: Los casos de laboratorios ciudadanos
MS Ramírez-Montoya,MS Ramírez-Montoya,FJ García-Peñalvo… - 2017 - repositorio.grial.eu
https://repositorio.grial.eu/handle/grial/1064
Métricas de este artículo
| Vistas: 10402 vistas. |
| Lectura del Abstrac: 7976 Descargas del pdf: 2426 |
Métricas completas de Comunicar 54
| 90391 vistas totales |
| Lectura del Abstrac: 71802 Descargas del pdf: 18589 |
Este artículo ha sido leido 7976 veces
=Co-creation and open innovation: Systematic literature review
www.grupocomunicar.com
Esta web utiliza cookies para obtener datos estadísticos de la navegación de sus usuarios. Si continúas navegando consideramos que aceptas su uso. Más información X Cerrar