Diseño participativo de experimentos de ciencia ciudadana

Participatory design of citizen science experiments

Palabras clave

Ciencia ciudadana, cocreación, codiseño, conocimiento, herramientas, interdisciplinariedad, participación, ciencia abierta

Resumen

Este artículo describe y analiza el diseño colaborativo de un proyecto de investigación de ciencia ciudadana a través de la cocreación. Tres grupos de estudiantes de centros de educación secundaria y un equipo de científicos idearon de forma participada tres experimentos sobre comportamiento humano y capital social en espacios públicos y urbanos. El objetivo del estudio es abordar cómo pueden integrarse en una investigación científica el trabajo interdisciplinar y la atención a preocupaciones y necesidades sociales, así como la construcción colectiva de preguntas de investigación. Los 95 estudiantes participantes en el proyecto respondieron una encuesta para evaluar su percepción sobre las dinámicas y herramientas utilizadas en el proceso de cocreación de cada experimento, y los cinco científicos respondieron a una entrevista semiestructurada. Los resultados de las encuestas y entrevistas demuestran cómo la ciencia ciudadana puede alcanzar una modalidad «cocreada» más allá del paradigma habitual «contributivo», el cual únicamente suele implicar al público o amateurs en la recopilación de datos. Esta modalidad de ciencia más colaborativa con la ciudadanía fue posible gracias a la adecuación de materiales y mecanismos de facilitación, así como al fomento de aspectos clave en una investigación como pueden ser la confianza, la creatividad y la transparencia. Los resultados apuntan también hacia la posibilidad de adoptar estrategias similares de codiseño en otros contextos de colaboración científica y generación colaborativa de conocimiento

Referencias

Barnes, T.A., Pashby, I.R., & Gibbons, A.M. (2006). Managing collaborative R&D projects development of a practical management tool. International Journal of Project Management, 24(5), 395-404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.03.003

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Bela, G., Peltola, T., Young, J. C., Balázs, B., Arpin, I., Pataki, G., ... & Keune, H. (2016). Learning and the transformative potential of citizen science. Conservation Biology, 30(5), 990-999. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12762

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Bonney, R., Ballard, H., Jordan, R., McCallie, E., Phillips, T., Shirk, J., & Wilderman, C.C. (2009a). Public Participation in scientific research: Defining the field and assessing its potential for informal science education. A CAISE Inquiry Group Report. Online Submission. (https://goo.gl/wsZYQn)

Link Google Scholar

Bonney, R., Cooper, C.B., Dickinson, J., Kelling, S., Phillips, T., Rosenberg, K.V., & Shirk, J. (2009b). Citizen science: a developing tool for expanding science knowledge and scientific literacy. BioScience, 59(11), 977-984. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2009.59.11.9

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Bonney, R., Shirk, J.L., Phillips, T.B., Wiggins, A., Ballard, H.L., Miller-Rushing, A.J., & Parrish, J.K. (2014). Next steps for citizen science. Science, 343(6178), 1436-1437. https://doi.org.10.1126/science.1251554

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Brown, T., & Katz, B. (2011). Change by design. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(3), 381-383. https://doi.org.10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00806

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Brown, T., & Wyatt, J. (2015). Design thinking for social innovation. Annual Review of Policy Design, 3(1), 1-10. (https://goo.gl/1pgucj)

Link Google Scholar

Cohn, J.P. (2008). Citizen science: Can volunteers do real research? BioScience, 58(3), 192-197. https://doi.org/10.1641/B580303

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Delfanti, A. (2016). Users and peers. From citizen science to P2P science. Cell, 21, 01. https://doi.org/10.1641/B580303

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Dickinson, J.L., Shirk, J., Bonter, D., Bonney, R., Crain, R.L., Martin, J., ... & Purcell, K. (2012). The current state of citizen science as a tool for ecological research and public engagement. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10(6), 291-297. In G. Papadopoulos (Ed.), Proceedings of the 9th International Conference KICSS. Limassol, Cyprus, 6-8 Nov 2014, 446-451. https://doi.org.10.1007/978-3-319-27478-2

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Ferran-Ferrer, N. (2015). Volunteer participation in citizen science projects. El Profesional de la Información, 24, 6, 827-837. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2015.nov.15

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Follett, R., & Strezov, V. (2015). An analysis of citizen science based research: Usage and publication patterns. PloS One, 10(11), e0143687. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143687

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Gura, T. (2013). Citizen science: Amateur experts. Nature, 496(7444), 259-261. https://doi.org/10.1038/nj7444-259a

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Hand, E. (2010). People power. Nature, 466(7307), 685-687. https://doi.org/10.1038/466685a

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Hines, P., Holweg, M., & Rich, N. (2004). Learning to evolve: A review of contemporary lean thinking. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 24(10), 994-1011. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570410558049

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Irwin, A. (1995). Citizen science: A study of people, expertise and sustainable development. London: Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203202395

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Jasanoff, S. (2003). Technologies of humility: Citizen participation in governing science. Minerva, 41(3), 223-244. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025557512320

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Jasanoff, S. (Ed.). (2004). States of knowledge: The co-production of science and the social order. London: Routledge. (https://goo.gl/xBNB3C)

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Kellogg, W.K. (2004). Using logic models to bring together planning, evaluation, and action: Logic model development guide. Battle Creek, Michigan: WK Kellogg Foundation. (https://goo.gl/pCPB52)

Link Google Scholar

Kensing, F., & Blomberg, J. (1998). Participatory design: Issues and concerns. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 7(3-4), 167-185. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008689307411

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Krippendorff, K. (1990). Metodología de análisis de contenido: teoría y práctica. Barcelona: Planeta.

Link Google Scholar

Manzini, E., & Coad, R. (2015). Design, when everybody designs: An introduction to design for social innovation. Cambridge, MA: The Mit Press (https://goo.gl/FRJV3B)

Link Google Scholar

Mindell, J.S., Jones, P., Vaughan, L., Haklay, M., Scholes, S., Anciaes, P., & Dhanani, A. (2017). Street Mobility Project: Toolkit. (https://goo.gl/yxDuXk)

Link Google Scholar

Nagle, T., & Sammon, D. (2016). The development of a Design Research Canvas for data practitioners. Journal of Decision Systems, 25(sup1), 369-380. https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2016.1187386

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Newman, G., Wiggins, A., Crall, A., Graham, E., Newman, S., & Crowston, K. (2012). The future of citizen science: Emerging technologies and shifting paradigms. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10(6), 298-304. https://doi.org/10.1890/110294

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Onwuegbuzie, A.J., & Leech, N.L. (2006). Linking research questions to mixed methods data analysis procedures 1. The Qualitative Report, 11(3), 474-498. (https://goo.gl/dJZ7An)

Link Google Scholar

Perelló, J., Ferran-Ferrer, N., Farré, S., & Bonhoure, I. (2017). Secondary school rubrics for citizen science projects. In C. Heredotouand, E. Scanlon, & M. Sharples, (Eds.), Citizen inquiry: Synthesising science and inquiry learning. London: Taylor and Francis. [In press].

Link Google Scholar

Sagarra Pascual, O. J., Gutiérrez-Roig, M., Bonhoure, I., & Perelló, J. (2016). Citizen Science Practices for Computational Social Science Research: The Conceptualization of Pop-Up Experiments. Frontiers in Physics, 3(93), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2015.00093

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Sanders, E. (2006). Design serving people. Cumulus Working Papers, 28-33. (https://goo.gl/JXqodm)

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Sanders, E., & Stappers, P.J. (2008). Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. Co-design, 4(1), 5-18. http://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875068

Link Google Scholar

Shirk, J., Ballard, H., Wilderman, C., Phillips, T., Wiggins, A., Jordan, R., ... & Bonney, R. (2012). Public participation in scientific research: A framework for deliberate design. Ecology and Society, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-04705-170229

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Tweddle, J.C., Robinson, L.D., Pocock, M.J.O., & Roy, H.E. (2012). Guide to citizen science: developing, implementing and evaluating citizen science to study biodiversity and the environment in the UK. London: Natural History Museum and NERC Centre for Ecology & Hydrology for UK-EOF. (https://goo.gl/9QSBHr)

Link Google Scholar

Wiggins, A., & Crowston, K. (2015). Surveying the citizen science landscape. First Monday, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v20i1.5520

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Wylie, S.A., Jalbert, K., Dosemagen, S., & Ratto, M. (2014). Institutions for civic technoscience: How critical making is transforming environmental research. The Information Society, 30(2), 116-126. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2014.875783

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Yañez-Figueroa, J.A., Ramírez-Montoya, M.S., & García-Peñalvo, F.J. (2016). Systematic mapping of the literature: Social innovation laboratories for the collaborative construction of knowledge from the perspective of open innovation. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (pp. 795-803). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3012430.3012609

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Ficha técnica

Recibido: 02-06-2017

Revisado: 26-07-2017

Aceptado: 30-07-2017

Preprint: 15-11-2017

Fecha publicación: 01-01-2018

Tiempo de revisión del artículo : 54 días | Media tiempo revisión número 54: 44 días

Tiempo de aceptación del artículo: 58 días | Media tiempo aceptación número 54: 97 días

Tiempo de edición del preprint: 168 días | Media tiempo edición número preprint 54: 210 días

Tiempo de edición del artículo: 213 días | Media tiempo edición número 54: 255 días

Métricas

Métricas de este artículo

Vistas: 24288

Lectura del abstract: 19939

Descargas del PDF: 4349

Métricas completas de Comunicar 54

Vistas: 284153

Lectura del abstract: 200162

Descargas del PDF: 83991

Citado por

Citas es Web of Science

Golumbic, Yaela N.; Fishbain, Barak; Baram-Tsabari, Ayelet. User centered design of a citizen science air-quality monitoring project INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION PART B-COMMUNICATION AND PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT, 2019.

https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2019.1597314

Bernardez Rodal, Asuncion; Padilla Castillo, Graciela; Sosa Sanchez, Roxana Popelka. From Action Art to Artivism on Instagram: Relocation and instantaneity for a new geography of protest CATALAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION & CULTURAL STUDIES, 2019.

https://doi.org/10.1386/cjcs.11.1.23_1

Pico, Maria-Josep; Saez, Emilio; Galan, Esteban. Transmedia research. Participatory culture in the creation of academic knowledge PROFESIONAL DE LA INFORMACION, 2019.

https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2019.jul.14

Sanchez Vazquez; Luis;. Resistance Science? Participatory environmental monitoring in contexts of environmental conflict. Reflections from a decolonial view REVISTA DE PAZ Y CONFLICTOS , 2019.

https://doi.org/10.30827/revpaz.v12i2.10399

Hidalgo, Enric Senabre; Fuster Morell, Mayo;. Co-designed strategic planning and agile project management in academia: case study of an action research group PALGRAVE COMMUNICATIONS , 2019.

https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-019-0364-0

Garcia-Holgado, Alicia; Jose Garcia-Penalvo, Francisco; Butler, Paul;. Technological Ecosystems in Citizen Science: A Framework to Involve Children and Young People SUSTAINABILITY , 2020.

https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051863

Sauermann, Henry; Vohland, Katrin; Antoniou, Vyron;. Citizen science and sustainability transitions RESEARCH POLICY , 2020.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.103978

Lopez-Doblas, Manuela; Perez-Corral, Olivia; Gomez-Dominguez, David; Danet-Danet, Alina. Qualitative based social media plan participative design for health organizations. Evaluation of the Reina Sofia University Hospital experience PROFESIONAL DE LA INFORMACION, 2019.

https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2019.mar.24

Hidalgo, Enric Senabre; Wandl-Vogt, Eveline; Dorn, Amelie;. Mapping uncertainty around research data: a Digital Humanities transdisciplinary perspective adopting the Johari window TEEM'19: SEVENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TECHNOLOGICAL ECOSYSTEMS FOR ENHANCING MULTICULTURALITY , 2019.

https://doi.org/10.1145/3362789.3362931

Vicens, Julian; Perello, Josep; Duch, Jordi. Citizen Social Lab: A digital platform for human behavior experimentation within a citizen science framework PLOS ONE, 2018.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207219

Paredes-Labra, Joaquin; Siri, Ivana-Mariel; Oliveira, Alessandro. Preparing Public Pedagogies with ICT: The Case of Pesticides and Popular Education in Brazil SUSTAINABILITY, 2018.

https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103377

Senabre Hidalgo, Enric. Dotmocracy and Planning Poker for Uncertainty Management in Collaborative Research Two Examples of Co-creation Techniques Derived from Digital Culture SIXTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TECHNOLOGICAL ECOSYSTEMS FOR ENHANCING MULTICULTURALITY (TEEM'18), 2018.

https://doi.org/10.1145/3284179.3284325

Paredes-Labra, Joaquin; Freitas Cortina, Ada;. The representations of the future teachers on the uses of technology in school. A narrative study TEORIA DE LA EDUCACION , 2020.

https://doi.org/10.14201/teri.21616

Whittle, Clayton; Tiwari, Sonia; Yan, Shulong;. Emergency remote teaching environment: a conceptual framework for responsive online teaching in crises INFORMATION AND LEARNING SCIENCES , 2020.

https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-04-2020-0099

Angel Queiruga-Dios, Miguel; Lopez-Inesta, Emilia; Diez-Ojeda, Maria;. Citizen Science for Scientific Literacy and the Attainment of Sustainable Development Goals in Formal Education SUSTAINABILITY , 2020.

https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104283

Citas es Scopus

Vicens, J., Duch, J., Perelló, J.. Citizen social lab: A digital platform for human behavior experimentation within a citizen science framework), PLoS ONE, .

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207219

Golumbic, Y.N., Fishbain, B., Baram-Tsabari, A.. User centered design of a citizen science air-quality monitoring project), International Journal of Science Education, Part B: Communication, Public Engagement, .

https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2019.1597314

López-Doblas, M., Pérez-Corral, O., Gómez-Domínguez, D., Danet-Danet, A.. Qualitative based social media plan participative design for health organizations. evaluation of the Reina Sofia University Hospital experience [Diseño participativo de un plan de social media en salud a través de metodología cualitativa. Evaluación de la experiencia del Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía]), Profesional de la Informacion, .

https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2019.mar.24

Picó, M.-J., Sáez, E., Galán, E.. Transmedia research. Participatory culture in the creation of academic knowledge [Investigación transmedia. Cultura participativa en la creación del conocimiento académico]), Profesional de la Informacion, .

https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2019.jul.14

Rodal, A.B., Castillo, G.P., Sánchez, R.P.S.. From action art to artivism on instagram: Relocation, instantaneity for a new geography of protest), Catalan Journal of Communication and Cultural Studies, .

https://doi.org/10.1386/cjcs.11.1.23_1

Hidalgo, E.S., Wandl-Vogt, E., Dorn, A., Souza, R.R.. Mapping uncertainty around research data: A Digital Humanities transdisciplinary perspective adopting the Johari window), ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, .

https://doi.org/10.1145/3362789.3362931

Senabre Hidalgo, E., Fuster Morell, M.. Co-designed strategic planning, agile project management in academia: case study of an action research group), Palgrave Communications, .

https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-019-0364-0

Queiruga-Dios, M.A., López-Iñesta, E., Diez-Ojeda, M., Sáiz-Manzanares, M.C., Dorrío, J.B.V. . Citizen science for scientific literacy and the attainment of sustainable development goals in formal education), Sustainability (Switzerland), .

https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104283

Sauermann, H., Vohland, K., Antoniou, V., (...), Samson, R., Winter, S. . Citizen science and sustainability transitions), Research Policy, .

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.103978

Tauginienė, L., Butkevičienė, E., Vohland, K., (...), Balázs, B., Prūse, B. . Citizen science in the social sciences and humanities: the power of interdisciplinarity), Palgrave Communications, .

https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-0471-y

Hidalgo, E.S.. Dotmocracy, planning poker for uncertainty management in collaborative research), ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, .

https://doi.org/10.1145/3284179.3284325

Paredes-Labra, J., Siri, I.-M., Oliveira, A.. Preparing public pedagogies with ICT: The case of pesticides, popular education in Brazil), Sustainability (Switzerland), .

https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103377

Whittle, C., Tiwari, S., Yan, S., Williams, J. . Emergency remote teaching environment: a conceptual framework for responsive online teaching in crises), Information and Learning Science, .

https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-04-2020-0099

Citas es Google Scholar

Tauginienė, L., Butkevičienė, E., Vohland, K., Heinisch, B., Daskolia, M., Suškevičs, M., ... & Prūse, B. (2020). Citizen science in the social sciences and humanities: the power of interdisciplinarity. Palgrave Communications, 6(1), 1-11.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-020-0471-y

Hidalgo, E. S. (2018, October). Dotmocracy and Planning Poker for Uncertainty Management in Collaborative Research: Two Examples of Co-creation Techniques Derived from Digital Culture. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (pp. 833-839). ACM.

https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=3284325

Vicens Bennasar, J. A. Human Behavior Experimentation and Participation in Scientific Activities in the Wild (Doctoral dissertation, Universitat Rovira i Virgili).

https://www.tdx.cat/handle/10803/663377

Golumbic, Y. N., Fishbain, B., & Baram-Tsabari, A. (2019). User centered design of a citizen science air-quality monitoring project. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 1-19.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/21548455.2019.1597314

Bernárdez rodAl, A., PAdillA cAstillo, G., & Sosa Sánchez, R. P. (2019). From Action Art to Artivism on instagram: relocation and instantaneity for a new geography of protest. Catalan Journal of Communication & Cultural Studies, 11(1), 23-37.

https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/intellect/cjcs/2019/00000011/00000001/art00002

Paredes-Labra, J., Siri, I. M., & Oliveira, A. (2018). Preparing Public Pedagogies with ICT: The Case of Pesticides and Popular Education in Brazil. Sustainability, 10(10), 3377.

https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/10/3377

López-Doblas, M., Pérez-Corral, O., Gómez-Domínguez, D., & Danet-Danet, A. (2019). Diseño participativo de un plan de social media en salud a través de metodología cualitativa. Evaluación de la experiencia del Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía. El profesional de la información, 28(2).

...

Vicens, J., Perelló, J., & Duch, J. (2018). Citizen Social Lab: A digital platform for human behavior experimentation within a citizen science framework. PloS one, 13(12), e0207219.

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0207219

Ospina, S. L. (2019). El diseño como agente potenciador en los procesos de socialización de políticas públicas en Colombia, por medio de los observatorios. Verba luris, (42), 63-71.

https://revistas.unilibre.edu.co/index.php/verbaiuris/article/view/5659

López Ospina, S. (2019). El diseño como agente potenciador en los procesos de socialización de Políticas Públicas en Colombia, por medio de los observatorios. Verba Iuris, (42).

...

Picó, M. J., Sáez, E., & Galán, E. (2019). Investigación transmedia. Cultura participativa en la creación del conocimiento académico.

https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/EPI/article/view/71419

Prado-Jiménez, J. C., Arroyo-Vázquez, M., & Aragonés-Beltrán, P. (2019). Una aproximación a la aplicación de la Ciencia ciudadana en la dirección de proyectos.

http://dspace.aeipro.com/xmlui/handle/123456789/2388

Golumbic, Y. N., Fishbain, B., & Baram-Tsabari, A. (2019). User centered design of a citizen science air-quality monitoring project. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 9(3), 195-213.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/21548455.2019.1597314

Hidalgo, E. S. (2018, October). Dotmocracy and planning poker for uncertainty management in collaborative research: Two examples of co-creation techniques derived from digital culture. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (pp. 833-839).

https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3284179.3284325

Vicens, J., Perelló, J., & Duch, J. (2018). Citizen Social Lab: A digital platform for human behavior experimentation within a citizen science framework. PloS one, 13(12).

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6283465/

Vohland, K., Sauermann, H., Antoniou, V., Balazs, B., Göbel, C., Karatzas, K., ... & Winter, S. (2019). Citizen Science and sustainability transitions. Available at SSRN 3511088.

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3511088

Hidalgo, E. S., & Morell, M. F. (2019). Co-designed strategic planning and agile project management in academia: case study of an action research group. Palgrave Communications, 5(1), 1-13.

http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/526284/

Groom, Q., Strubbe, D., Adriaens, T., Davis, A. J., Desmet, P., Oldoni, D., ... & Vanderhoeven, S. (2019). Empowering citizens to inform decision-making as a way forward to support invasive alien species policy. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 4(1).

http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/526284/

Borda, A., Gray, K., & Fu, Y. (2019). Research data management in health and biomedical citizen science: practices and prospects. JAMIA Open.

https://academic.oup.com/jamiaopen/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/jamiaopen/ooz052/5670773

Steiner, S. M. (2020). Popular Epidemiology and Community-Based Citizen Science: Using a Bio-Indicator for Toxic Air Pollution.

...

Hidalgo, E. S., Wandl-Vogt, E., Dorn, A., & Souza, R. R. (2019, October). Mapping uncertainty around research data: a Digital Humanities transdisciplinary perspective adopting the Johari window. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (pp. 804-809). ACM.

https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=3362931

Bonhoure, I., Cigarini, A., Vicens, J., & Perelló, J. (2019). Citizen Social Science in practice: a critical analysis of a mental health community-based project.

https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/63aj7/

Senabre Hidalgo, E., & Fuster Morell, M. (2020). Co-designed strategic planning and agile project management in academia: case study of an action research group.

http://openaccess.uoc.edu/webapps/o2/handle/10609/105146

Senabre Hidalgo, E. (2019). Co-creation for transdisciplinarity-Adoption of participatory design and agile project management in collaborative research processes (Doctoral dissertation, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya).

https://84.88.27.106/handle/10803/668172

Hassanzadeh, P. (2019). FindSampo: A Citizen Science Platform for Archaeological Finds on the Semantic Web.

https://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/handle/123456789/41720

Picó, M. J., Sáez Soro, E., & Galán Cubillo, E. (2019). Investigación transmedia. Cultura participativa en la creación del conocimiento académico.

http://repositori.uji.es/xmlui/handle/10234/184161

Díaz-López, L., Tarango, J., & Romo-González, J. R. Realidad Virtual en procesos de aprendizaje en estudiantes universitarios: motivación e interés para despertar vocaciones científicas.

https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/CDMU/article/download/68958/4564456553363

Borda, A., Gray, K., & Fu, Y. (2020). Research data management in health and biomedical citizen science: practices and prospects. JAMIA Open, 3(1), 113-125.

https://academic.oup.com/jamiaopen/article-abstract/3/1/113/5670773

Sánchez-Vázquez, L. (2019). ¿ Ciencia de resistencia? Monitoreos ambientales participativos en contextos de conflicto ambiental. Reflexiones desde una mirada decolonial.

https://digibug.ugr.es/handle/10481/60596

Labra, J. P., & CORTINA, A. F. (2020). Las representaciones de los futuros profesores sobre los usos de la tecnología en la escuela. Un estudio narrativo. Teoría de la Educación. Revista Interuniversitaria, 32(2), 157-180.

https://revistas.usal.es/index.php/1130-3743/article/view/teri.21616

García-Holgado, A., García-Peñalvo, F. J., & Butler, P. (2020). Technological Ecosystems in Citizen Science: A Framework to Involve Children and Young People. Sustainability, 12(5), 1863.

https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/5/1863

Sauermann, H., Vohland, K., Antoniou, V., Balázs, B., Göbel, C., Karatzas, K., ... & Winter, S. (2020). Citizen science and sustainability transitions. Research Policy, 49(5), 103978.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733320300585

Descarga

Métricas alternativas

Cómo citar

Senabre, E., Ferran-Ferrer, N., & Perelló, J. (2018). Participatory design of citizen science experiments. [Diseño participativo de experimentos de ciencia ciudadana]. Comunicar, 54, 29-38. https://doi.org/10.3916/C54-2018-03

Compartir

           

Apartado de Correos 527

21080 Huelva (España)

Administración

Redacción

Creative Commons

Esta web utiliza cookies para obtener datos estadísticos de la navegación de sus usuarios. Si continúas navegando consideramos que aceptas su uso. +info X