Palabras clave
Ciberodio, discurso del odio, mediación parental, apoyo familiar, afrontamiento, educación mediática
Resumen
Adolescentes de todo el mundo están cada vez más expuestos al ciberodio. Se necesita más conocimiento para comprender cómo los y las adolescentes afrontan estas experiencias. El presente estudio investigó la relación entre la mediación parental en el uso de Internet y las estrategias de afrontamiento entre adolescentes centradas en el problema en una hipotética victimización en ciberodio, al tiempo que se consideró el apoyo familiar como moderador de estas relaciones. La muestra estuvo formada por 5.960 adolescentes de entre 12 y 18 años que completaron autoinformes (M=14,94; DE=1,61; mujeres: 50,7%) de Chipre, Alemania, Grecia, India, España, Corea del Sur y Tailandia. Se estimó un modelo de ecuaciones estructurales para investigar la relación entre mediación parental, apoyo social y afrontamiento. Se halló una relación positiva entre la mediación parental instructiva y el uso de estrategias de afrontamiento centradas en el problema y una relación negativa entre la mediación parental restrictiva y la capacidad de los adolescentes para afrontar de forma adecuada el ciberodio. Además, el apoyo familiar moderó estas relaciones, incrementando la relación entre mediación instructiva y afrontamiento y disminuyendo la relación entre mediación restrictiva y afrontamiento de ciberodio. Los hallazgos enfatizan la necesidad de proporcionar información a los padres y ponen de manifiesto la importancia de que las familias fomenten la habilidad de los adolescentes para afrontar de manera adecuada el ciberodio.
Referencias
Arrizabalaga-Crespo, C., Aierbe-Barandiaran, A., & Medrano-Samaniego, C. (2010). Internet uses and parental mediation in adolescents with ADHD. Revista Latina de Comunicacio?n Social, 65, 561-571. https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-65-2010-919-561-571-EN
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Baumrind, D. (1971). Current patterns of parental authority. Developmental Psychology Monographs, 4(2), 1-103. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0030372
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Cabello-Hutt, T., Cabello, P., & Claro, M. (2018). Online opportunities and risks for children and adolescents: The role of digital skills, age, gender and parental mediation in Brazil. New media & Society, 20(7), 2411-2431. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817724168
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Eckenrode, J., & Hamilton, S. (2000). One to one support interventions. In S. Cohen, L.G. Underwood, & B.H. Gottlieb (Eds.), Social support measurement and intervention: A guide for health and social scientists (pp. 278-308). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/med:psych/9780195126709.003.0008
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Elsaesser, C., Russell, B., Ohannessian, C.M., & Patton, D. (2017). Parenting in a digital age: A review of parents' role in preventing adolescent cyberbullying. Aggression and violent behavior, 35, 62-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2017.06.004
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Fanti, K.A., Demetriou, A.G., & Hawa, V.V. (2012). A longitudinal study of cyberbullying: Examining riskand protective factors. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9(2), 168-181. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2011.643169
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Gámez-Guadix, M., Wachs, S., & Wright, M. (2020). Haters back off! Psychometric properties of the coping with cyberhate questionnaire and relationship with well-being in Spanish adolescents. Psicothema, 32(4), 567-574. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2020.219
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Georgiou, S.N. (2010). Bullying and victimization at school: The role of mothers. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(1), 109-112. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709907X204363
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Gómez-Ortiz, O., Romera, E.M., Ortega-Ruiz, R., & Del-Rey, R. (2018). Parenting practices as risk or preventive factors for adolescent involvement in cyberbullying: Contribution of children and parent gender. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(12), 2664. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15122664
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Görzig, A., & Machackova, H. (2016). Cyberbullying in Europe: A review of evidence from cross-national data. In M. Wright (Ed.), A Social-ecological approach to cyberbullying (pp. 295-326). Nova Science.
Link Google Scholar
Hock, M. (2008). Erziehungsstile und ihre Auswirkungen. [Educational styles and their effects]. In W. Schneider (Eds.), Handbuch der psychologie: Handbuch der pädagogischen psychologie. [Manual of psychology: Manual of educational psychology] (pp. 491-500). Hogrefe. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-05023-6_19
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Hu, L., & Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Klein, A., & Moosbrugger, H. (2000). Maximum likelihood estimation of latent interaction effects with the LMS method. Psychometrika, 65(4), 457-474. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296338
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Kowalski, R.M., Giumetti, G.W., Schroeder, A.N., & Lattanner, M.R. (2014). Bullying in the digital age: A critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 1073. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035618
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Kutscher, N. (2012). Medienbildung in der Kindheit. MedienPädagogik: Zeitschrift für Theorie und Praxis der Medienbildung, 22, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.21240/mpaed/22/2013.10.08.X
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Lazarus, R., & Folkman, S. (1987). Stress, appraisal and coping. Springer.
Link Google Scholar
Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E.J. (2008). Parental mediation of children's internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 52(4), 581-599. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838150802437396
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Livingstone, S., Olafsson, K., Helsper, E.J., Lupiañez-Villanueva, F., Veltri, G.A., & Folkvord, F. (2017). Maximizing opportunities and minimizing risks for children online: The role of digital skills in emerging strategies of parental mediation. Journal of Communication, 67(1), 82-105. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12277
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Machackova, H., Blaya, C., Bedrosova, M., Smahel, D., & Staksrud, E. (2020). Children’s experiences with cyberhate. EU Kids Online. https://bit.ly/3q5vFBi
Link Google Scholar
Machmutow, K., Perren, S., Sticca, F., & Alsaker, F.D. (2012). Peer victimisation and depressive symptoms: Can specific coping strategies buffer the negative impact of cybervictimisation? Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 17, 403-420. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632752.2012.704310
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Martínez, G., Casado, M.A., & Garitaonandia, G. (2020). Online parental mediation strategies in family contexts of Spain. [Estrategias online de mediación parental en contextos familiares de España]. Comunicar, 65, 67-76. https://doi.org/10.3916/C65-2020-06
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Muthén, L.K., & Muthén, B.O. (2017). Mplus user’s guide. Muthén & Muthén. https://bit.ly/3g4tnhf
Link Google Scholar
Navarro, R., Serna, C., Martínez, V., & Ruiz-Oliva, R. (2013). The role of Internet use and parental mediation on cyberbullying victimization among Spanish children from rural public schools. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 28(3), 725-745. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-012-0137-2
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Pascoe, E.A., & Smart-Richman, L. (2009). Perceived discrimination and health: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 135(4), 531. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016059
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Pinkerton, J., & Dolan, P. (2007). Family support, social capital, resilience and adolescent coping. Child & Family Social Work, 12(3), 219-228. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2206.2007.00497.x
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Raykov, T. (2009). Evaluation of scale reliability for unidimensional measures using latent variable modeling. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 42(3), 223-232. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748175609344096
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Reichelmann, A., Hawdon, J., Costello, M., Ryan, J., Blaya, C., Llorent, V., Oksanen, A., Räsänen, P., & Zych, I. (2020). Hate knows no boundaries: Online hate in six nations. Deviant Behavior, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2020.1722337
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Rodríguez-de-Dios, I., van-Oosten, J.M., & Igartua, J.J. (2018). A study of the relationship between parental mediation and adolescents’ digital skills, online risks and online opportunities. Computers in Human Behavior, 82, 186-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.01.012
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Rutter, M., Giller, H., & Hagel, A. (1998). Antisocial behavior by young people. Cambridge University Press.
Link Google Scholar
Sasson, H., & Mesch, G. (2014). Parental mediation, peer norms and risky online behavior among adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior, 33, 32-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.12.025
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Satorra, A., & Bentler, P.M. (2001). A scaled difference chisquare test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika, 66, 507-514. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296192
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Slonje, R., & Smith, P.K. (2008). Cyberbullying: Another main type of bullying? Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 49(2), 147-154. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2007.00611.x
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Sousa, V.D., & Rojjanasrirat, W. (2011). Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross?cultural health care research: A clear and user?friendly guideline. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 17(2), 268-274. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01434.x
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Sticca, F., Machmutow, K., Stauber, A., Perren, S., Palladino, B.E., Nocentini, A., Menesini, E., Corcoran, L., & Guckin, C.M. (2015). The coping with cyberbullying questionnaire: Development of a new measure. Societies, 5(2), 515-536. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc5020515
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
UK Safer Internet Centre (Ed.) (2016). Creating a better Internet for all: Young people’s experiences of online empowerment + online hate. https://bit.ly/2Jk6QAD
Link Google Scholar
Von-Soest, T., Mossige, S., Stefansen, K., & Hjemdal, O. (2010). A validation study of the resilience scale for adolescents (READ). Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 32(2), 215-225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-009-9149-x
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Wachs, S., & Wright, M.F. (2019). The moderation of online disinhibition and sex on the relationship between online hate victimization and perpetration. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 22(5), 300-306. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2018.0551
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Wachs, S., Gámez-Guadix, M., Wright, M.F., Görzig, A., & Schubarth, W. (2020). How do adolescents cope with cyberhate? Psychometric properties and socio-demographic differences of a coping with cyberhate scale. Computers in Human Behavior, 104, 106167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.106167
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Wachs, S., Koch-Priewe, B., & Zick, A. (2021). Hate Speech – Multidisziplinäre Analysen und Handlungsoptionen. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Link Google Scholar
Wachs, S., Wachs, S., Costello, M., Wright, M.F., Flora, K., Daskalou, V., Maziridou, E., Kwon, Y., Na, E.Y., Sittichai, R., Biswalk, R., Singh, R., Almendros, C., Gámez-Guadixm, M., G?rzig, A., Hong, J.S. (2021). DNT LET’EM H8 U!: Applying the routine activity framework to understand cyberhate victimization among adolescents across eight countries. Computers & Education, 160, 104026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104026
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Wachs, S., Wright, M.F., & Vazsonyi, A.T. (2019). Understanding the overlap between cyberbullying and cyberhate perpetration: Moderating effects of toxic online disinhibition. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 29(3), 179-188. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbm.2116
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
World Medical Association (Ed.) (2001). World medical association declaration of Helsinki. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Bull World Health Organ, 79, 373-374. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Worsley, J.D., McIntyre, J.C., & Corcoran, R. (2019). Cyberbullying victimisation and mental distress: Testing the moderating role of attachment security, social support, and coping styles. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 24(1), 20-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632752.2018.1530497
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Wright, M., & Wachs, S. (2018). Does parental mediation moderate the longitudinal association among bystanders and perpetrators and victims of cyberbullying? Social Sciences, 7(11), 231. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci7110231
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Wright, M.F., & Wachs, S. (2020). Moderation of parental support on health and cyberbullying among adolescents with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 29, 2390-2401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-020-01739-9
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Yin, X.Q., Wang, L.H., Zhang, G.D., Liang, X.B., Li, J., Zimmerman, M.A., & Wang, J.L. (2017). The promotive effects of peer support and active coping on the relationship between bullying victimization and depression among Chinese boarding students. Psychiatry Research, 256, 59-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2017.06.037
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Zimet, G.D., Dahlem, N.W., Zimet, S.G., & Farley, G.K. (1988). The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. Journal of Personality Assessment, 52(1), 30-41. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa5201_2
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Ficha técnica
Recibido: 03-09-2020
Revisado: 03-10-2020
Aceptado: 16-11-2020
First Online: 15-01-2021
Fecha publicación: 01-04-2021
Tiempo de revisión del artículo : 30 días | Media tiempo revisión número 67: 36 días
Tiempo de aceptación del artículo: 74 días | Media tiempo aceptación número 67: 67 días
Tiempo de edición del preprint: 165 días | Media tiempo edición número preprint 67: 159 días
Tiempo de edición del artículo: 210 días | Media tiempo edición número 67: 204 días
Métricas
Métricas de este artículo
Vistas: 300
Lectura del abstract: 196
Descargas del PDF: 104
Métricas completas de Comunicar 67
Vistas: 3753
Lectura del abstract: 2996
Descargas del PDF: 757
Citado por
Citas en Web of Science
Actualmente no existen citas hacia este documento
Citas en Scopus
Actualmente no existen citas hacia este documento
Citas en Google Scholar
Actualmente no existen citas hacia este documento
