Estíbaliz Aragón-Mendizábal, Cádiz (Espanha)
Cándida Delgado-Casas, Cádiz (Espanha)
José-I. Navarro-Guzmán, Cádiz (Espanha)
Palavras chave
Fazer anotações, escrita manual, escrita eletrônica, memória de curto prazo, níveis de processamento, educação superior
Resumo
Fazer anotações é uma estratégia generalizada entre estudantes de Ensino Superior, tendo sua influência constatada no rendimento acadêmico. O uso de computador vem substituindo o método tradicional do lápis e papel. O presente estudo pretende explicar as vantagens e desvantagens decorrentes do uso dos dois métodos nas anotações feitas por estudantes universitários. Um total de 251 estudantes universitários de Ciências Sociais e de Ciências da Saúde participaram do estudo. Estabeleceram-se duas categorias experimentais: fazer anotações de forma manual (n=211) e de forma eletrônica (n=40). Foram encontradas diferenças a favor do grupo que usou o computador baseado em tarefas de completar o abecedário, escrever frases e reconhecer palavras anotadas previamente (p<.05). No entanto, o grupo que fez as anotações manualmente obteve um melhor desempenho na tarefa de recordação livre dos resultados. A hipótese de igualdade entre os grupos foi descartada (X2=60.98; p<.0001). Além disso, a análise discriminante confirmou que 77,3% dos alunos foram classificados corretamente segundo sua categoria experimental. O uso do computador mostrou-se muito útil quando se tratava de anotar dados com rapidez, porém, na tarefa de recordação, os alunos de escrita manual obtiveram melhores pontuações que os de escrita eletrônica.
Referências
Beck, K.M. (2014). Note Taking Effectiveness in the Modern Classroom. The Compass, 1(1). (http://goo.gl/7k4TOj) (2015-09-05).
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Cassany, D. (2012). En línea. Leer y escribir en la Red. [On line. Reading and Writing on the Web]. Barcelona: Anagrama.
Cermak, L.S., & Craik, F.I. (2014). Levels of Processing in Human Memory (PLE: Memory) (Vol. 5). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
Clayton, E. (2015). La historia de la escritura. [The History of Writing]. Madrid: Siruela.
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Kay, R., & Lauricella, S. (2011). Exploring the Benefits and Challenges of Using Laptop Computers in Higher Education Classrooms: A Formative Analysis. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 37(1), 1-18. (http://goo.gl/qh3Wjw) (2015-11-07).
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Paschek, G. (2013). Las ventajas de escribir a mano. [Advantages of Handwriting]. Mente y Cerebro, 62, 18-21.
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Treisman, A. (2014). The Psychological Reality of Levels of Processing. In L.S. Cermak & F.I. Craik (Eds.), Levels of Processing in Human Memory (pp. 301-330). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
Fundref
Este trabalho não tem nenhum apoio financeiro
Technical information
Recebido: 18-11-2015
Revisado: 04-01-2016
Aceite: 22-02-2016
OnlineFirst: 15-05-2016
Data de publicação: 01-07-2016
Tempo de revisão do artigo: 47 dias | Tempo médio de revisão do número 48: 29 dias
Tempo de aceitação do artigo: 96 dias | Tempo médio de aceitação do número 48: 73 dias
Tempo de edição da pré-impressão: 180 dias | Tempo médio de edição pré-impressão do número 48: 157 dias
Tempo de processamento do artigo: 225 dias | Tempo médio de processamento do número 48: 202 dias
Métricas
Métricas deste artigo
Vistas: 55344
Leituras dos resumos: 37709
Descargas em PDF: 17635
Métricas completas do Comunicar 48
Vistas: 434188
Leituras dos resumos: 311057
Descargas em PDF: 123131
Citado por
Citas em Web of Science
Berns, Anke; Palomo-Duarte, Manuel; Isla-Montes, Jose-Luis; Dodero, Juan-Manuel; Delatorre, Pablo. The collaborative agenda for language learning: from paper to the mobile device RIED-REVISTA IBEROAMERICANA DE EDUCACION A DISTANCIA, 2017.
https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.20.2.17713
Jansen, Renee S.; Lakens, Daniel; IJsselsteijn, Wijnand A.. An integrative review of the cognitive costs and benefits of note-taking EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH REVIEW, 2017.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.10.001
Shibata, Hirohito; Omura, Kengo. Reconsideration of the Effects of Handwriting: Comparing Cognitive Load of Handwriting and Typing ITE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDIA TECHNOLOGY AND APPLICATIONS, 2018.
https://doi.org/10.3169/mta.6.255
Weigelt-Marom, Hayley; Weintraub, Naomi. Keyboarding versus handwriting speed of higher education students with and without learning disabilities: Does touch-typing assist in narrowing the gap? COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2018.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.10.008
Sage, Kara; Augustine, Heather; Shand, Hannah; Bakner, Kaelah; Rayne, Sidny. Reading from print, computer, and tablet: Equivalent learning in the digital age EDUCATION AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES, 2019.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09887-2
Halpern, Daniel; Pina, Martina; Ortega-Gunckel, Constanza;. School performance: New multimedia resources versus traditional notes COMUNICAR , 2020.
https://doi.org/10.3916/C64-2020-04
Bouriga, Sirine; Olive, Thierry;. Is typewriting more resources-demanding than handwriting in undergraduate students? READING AND WRITING , 2021.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-021-10137-6
Umejima, Keita; Ibaraki, Takuya; Yamazaki, Takahiro;. Paper Notebooks vs. Mobile Devices: Brain Activation Differences During Memory Retrieval FRONTIERS IN BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE , 2021.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2021.634158
Courtney, M; Costley, J; (...); Fanguy, M. Individual versus collaborative note-taking: Results of a quasi-experimental study on student note completeness, test performance, and academic writing INTERNET AND HIGHER EDUCATION, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2022.100873
Isla-Montes, JL; Berns, A; (...); Dodero, JM. Redesigning a Foreign Language Learning Task Using Mobile Devices: A Comparative Analysis between the Digital and Paper-Based Outcomes APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.3390/app12115686
Voyer, D; Ronis, ST and Byers, N. The effect of notetaking method on academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis CONTEMPORARY EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2021.102025
Emory, J; Teal, T and Holloway, G. Electronic note taking technology and academic performance in nursing students CONTEMPORARY NURSE, 2021.
Citas em Scopus
Halpern, D., Piña, M., Ortega-Gunckel, C. . School performance: New multimedia resources versus traditional notes), Comunicar, .
https://doi.org/10.3916/C64-2020-04
Ito, R., Hamano, K., Nonaka, K., (...), Kake, A., Ishimaru, K. . Comparison of the Remembering Ability by the Difference Between Handwriting and Typeface), Communications in Computer and Information Science, .
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50726-8_69
Jansen, R.S., Lakens, D., IJsselsteijn, W.A.. An integrative review of the cognitive costs, benefits of note-taking), Educational Research Review, .
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.10.001
Sage, K., Augustine, H., Shand, H., Bakner, K., Rayne, S.. Reading from print, computer,, tablet: Equivalent learning in the digital age), Education and Information Technologies, .
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09887-2
Cárdenas, M.I.Z., Ortiz, C.A.G. . The university book in digital format. Analysis model for the circulation of academic knowledge | [El libro universitario en formato digital Modelo de análisis para la circulación del conocimiento académico]), Informacion, Cultura y Sociedad, .
https://doi.org/10.34096/ics.i41.6482
Manuel, P.-D., Berns, A., Isla-Montes, J.-L., Dodero, J.-M., Kabtoul, O.. A collaborative mobile learning system to facilitate foreign language learning, assessment processes), ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, .
https://doi.org/10.1145/3012430.3012575
Weigelt-Marom, H., Weintraub, N. . Keyboarding versus handwriting speed of higher education students with and without learning disabilities: Does touch-typing assist in narrowing the gap?), Computers and Education, .
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.10.008
Kryzhevich, L.S. . Method of user authentication on the basis of recognition of computer handwriting peculiarities), CEUR Workshop Proceedings, .
Umejima, K., Ibaraki, T., Yamazaki, T., Sakai, K.L. . Paper Notebooks vs. Mobile Devices: Brain Activation Differences During Memory Retrieval), Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, .
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2021.634158
Bouriga, S., Olive, T. . Is typewriting more resources-demanding than handwriting in undergraduate students?), Reading and Writing, .
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-021-10137-6
Isla-Montes, J.-L., Berns, A., Palomo-Duarte, M., Dodero, J.-M.. Redesigning a Foreign Language Learning Task Using Mobile Devices: A Comparative Analysis between the Digital and Paper-Based Outcomes), Applied Sciences, .
https://doi.org/10.3390/app12115686
Lorio, A.K., Greenberg, D., Oshima, T.C., Gore, J.B., Carruth, L.L.. Does Note-Taking Method Matter in Physical Therapy School?), Journal of Physical Therapy Education, .
https://doi.org/10.1097/JTE.0000000000000215
Voyer, D., Ronis, S.T., Byers, N.. The effect of notetaking method on academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis), Contemporary Educational Psychology, .
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2021.102025
Lee, B.J., Al Khateeb, A.A.. Analyzing writing fluency on smartphones by Saudi EFL students), Computers and Composition, .
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2021.102667
Emory, J., Teal, T., Holloway, G.. Electronic note taking technology and academic performance in nursing students), Contemporary Nurse, .
https://doi.org/10.1080/10376178.2021.1997148
Courtney, M., Costley, J., Baldwin, M., Lee, K., Fanguy, M.. Individual versus collaborative note-taking: Results of a quasi-experimental study on student note completeness, test performance, and academic writing), Internet and Higher Education, .
Citas em Google Scholar
Berns, A., Duarte, M. P., Montes, J. L. I., Beardo, J. M. D., & Delatorre, P. (2017). Agenda colaborativa para el aprendizaje de idiomas: del papel al dispositivo móvil. RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 20(2), 119-139.
http://revistas.uned.es/index.php/ried/article/view/17713
Jansen, R. S., Lakens, D., & IJsselsteijn, W. A. (2017). An integrative review of the cognitive costs and benefits of note-taking. Educational Research Review, 22, 223-233.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1747938X17300374
Weigelt-Marom, H., & Weintraub, N. (2018). Keyboarding versus handwriting speed of higher education students with and without learning disabilities: Does touch-typing assist in narrowing the gap?. Computers & Education, 117, 132-140.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131517302348
Texeira, J., Realini, L., Nicoliello, M., Fernández, F., & Mesta, M. (2019). Estudio de toma de apuntes en un centro de profesores uruguayo. InterCambios. Dilemas y transiciones de la Educación Superior, 6(1), 23-33.
http://www.scielo.edu.uy/scielo.php?pid=S2301-01262019000100023&script=sci_abstract&tlng=en
Binkley, Z. W. M. (2017). Quantitative Study on Computer Self-Efficacy and Computer Anxiety Differences in Academic Major and Residential Status (Doctoral dissertation, Northcentral University).
Sánchez, F. G. Fourth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (TEEM 16) GRIAL Research Group Research Institute for Educational Sciences (IUCE) Paseo de Canalejas 169.
Shibata, H., & Omura, K. (2018). Reconsideration of the Effects of Handwriting. ITE Transactions on Media Technology and Applications, 6(4), 255-261.
https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/mta/6/4/6_255/_article/-char/ja/
Jansen, R. S., Lakens, D., & IJsselsteijn, W. A. Educational Research Review.
Ryff, T. D. (2018). The Use of Cursive Writing in a Digital Age: A Mixed-Methods Analysis of the Differences between Modes of Transcription in Private Schools (Doctoral dissertation, Northwest Nazarene University).
Özçakmak, H., & Sarigöz, O. (2019). Evaluation of Turkish Teacher Candidates' Perception of Note Taking Concept. Educational Research and Reviews, 14(3), 78-86.
https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1203856
Maclaren, P. (2018). Enhancing the teaching of mathematically intensive STEM disciplines at a tertiary level through the use of pen-enabled Tablet PCs (Doctoral dissertation, Auckland University of Technology).
Horwitz, S. M. (2017). Is Note-Taking More Effective with a Keyboard or a Pen?.
https://scholar.colorado.edu/honr_theses/1369/
Sage, K., Augustine, H., Shand, H., Bakner, K., & Rayne, S. (2019). Reading from print, computer, and tablet: Equivalent learning in the digital age. Education and Information Technologies, 1-26.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10639-019-09887-2
Karjo, C. H. (2018). Comparing the effect of ICT and longhand note-taking instructions towards learners’ comprehension test results. Indonesian JELT, 13(1), 17-30.
http://ojs.atmajaya.ac.id/index.php/ijelt/article/view/1170
Palomo-Duarte, M., Berns, A., Isla-Montes, J. L., Dodero, J. M., & Kabtoul, O. (2016, November). A collaborative mobile learning system to facilitate foreign language learning and assessment processes. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (pp. 567-572). ACM.
https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=3012575
Hamza, A. (2018). STL-metoden-en social process som ökar motivationen hos elever i läs-och skrivsvårigheter: Några lärarens uppfattningar, strategier och förutsättningar för att arbeta med STL-metoden för elever i läs-och skrivsvårigheter.
http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2:1222613
Saxin, J., & Nyvaller, H. (2018). Traditionellt och digitalt. En forskningsöversikt om datorers påverkan på läsning och skrivande i skolan.
https://gupea.ub.gu.se/handle/2077/56432
Lindell, I. (2017). Penna eller tangentbord?:–En litteraturstudie om två verktyg för att skriva anteckningar och dess påverkan på lärande vid anteckningsmoment.
http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2:1140074
Métricas alternativas
Como citar
Aragón-Mendizábal, E., Delgado-Casas, C., Navarro-Guzmán, J., Menacho-Jiménez, I., & Romero-Oliva, M. (2016). A comparative study of handwriting and computer typing in note-taking by university students. [Análisis comparativo entre escritura manual y electrónica en la toma de apuntes de estudiantes universitarios ]. Comunicar, 48, 101-107. https://doi.org/10.3916/C48-2016-10