关键词
Television, financing from communication media, TV programs, Economy from the communication
摘要
The main purpose of this paper is to analyse the recent Report of the Experts Committee on the Public Media (TV) in Spain. The objective is to understand the complex scenario and the legal and economical circumstances that have determinated the elaboration of this report, essential to prepare the restructuration of RTVE Group. Festival, we are going to refer to the evolution of RTVE Group since its origins, where it is possible to identify most of the actual problems, including the democratic transition and the last years of Aznar’s government. In second place, we are going to present the main proposals of the Experts Report that stresses the role of public television as a public service, including the critics formulated by two members of this Committee, like Miguel Angel Armedo, appointed by the Ministry of Economy and Treasure, and Fernando González Urbaneja, who has presented a particular report. The reaction of the spanish press to this Report will be presented to understand the social context, very politicized in the last year. Finally, this paper ends with a reflection on the oportunity of this report, and the necessity to tackle the financial reform of the public television, and the public mass communication media in Spain. Our paper tries to conclude that the composition of the Experts Committee should be different, with more consensus from the political forces of the spanish Parliament. We think it would be necessary to propose two different Committees, one integrated by experts like Enrique Bustamante, Emilio Lledó, Victoria Camps and Fernando Savater, specially prepared to indicate the main lines for the political overview; and a second Committee, integrated by financial and economical experts, to design the concrete estrategies to reform the spanish public television. We cannot forget that RTVE debt is the main problem that has to be solved in a stricted way as soon as possible, that implies a correction of exploitation debt. In this sense, a first step has been done, defining the necessity of a TV programation as a public service, like it has been argued by Professor Enrique Bustamante. Nonetheless, the RTVE Group reform is still unresolved, and it is a matter that has to be treated rigurously in the next months. The public debt accumulated by RTVE Group, and the public regional televisions debts, is a capital matter that has been negatively critized by european institutions.
参考资料
ABC : «Los sabios entregan su informe sin una propuesta de consenso sobre el futuro modelo de RTVE», en El País, 22 de febrero de 2005.
ARNEDO, M.A.: «El papel del experto en el comité de sabios y su propuesta sobre TVE». Artículo de opinión publicado en El País, el 18 de abril de 2005.
BUSTAMANTE, E. (1999): La televisión económica. Financiación, estrategias y mercados, Barcelona, Gedisa.
BUSTAMANTE, E. (2002): Comunicación y cultura en la era digital. Industrias, mercados y diversidad en España. Barcelona, Gedisa.
BUSTAMANTE, E. (2002): «Televisión: errores y frenos en el camino digital», en Comunicación y cultura en la era digital. Industrias, mercados y diversidad en España. Barcelona, Gedisa.
GARCÍA, E. (1996): «Televisión Española 1975-1982: los cambios antes del cambio», en Archivos de la Filmoteca , nº 23-24.
GARCÍA, F.; GONZÁLEZ, J.M. (1993): Breve historia de España. Madrid, Alianza.
HARO, E. (2005): «Sabios, columna Visto/Oído», en El País, 23 de febrero.
ORTEGA, R.: «De la caverna de Platón al velo de Penélope», en CincoDías.com., del 4 de marzo de 2005.
PALACIO, M. (2001): Historia de la televisión en España. Barcelona, Gedisa.
WEB: Informe del Comité de expertos en www.la-moncloa.es/im.pdf
Fundref
这项工作没有任何财政支持
技术信息
度量
这篇文章的度量
浏览次数: 0
对摘要的解读:
PDF下载:
的全部指标 25
浏览次数: 0
对摘要的解读:
PDF下载:
被引用
引述 Web of Science
目前没有引用这个文件
引述 Scopus
目前没有引用这个文件
引述 Google Scholar
目前没有引用这个文件
替代指标
如何引用
Soler-Campillo, M. (2005). The from «Wises Commission report»: bases for a quality TV. [El Informe del «Comité de sabios»: bases para una televisión de calidad]. Comunicar, 25. https://doi.org/10.3916/C25-2005-104