青年与社交网络：介于知识民主化与数字信息不平等之间

 Lucy Andrade-Vargas, Loja (厄瓜多尔)

 Margoth Iriarte-Solano, Loja (厄瓜多尔)

 Diana Rivera-Rogel, Loja (厄瓜多尔)

 Deisi Yunga-Godoy, Loja (厄瓜多尔)

https://doi.org/10.3916/C69-2021-07

关键词

社交网站、YouTube、参与度、内容、年轻人、社会经济水平

摘要

当代人对互联网、设备和社交网络的访问不断增加，彻底改变了交流方式，并将对信息的访问和对内容的创作民主化。然而，一些研究人员表明，虽然可以访问互联网可以很容易就实现，但虚拟世界也反映了我们生活的社会的数字信息不平等现象。多项研究提供的证据表明，社会阶层不会影响在网络上用户的出现，但确实会影响他们对网络的使用和对内容的创建，值得一提的是这些研究主要处于欧洲和北美的背景下。本研究探讨了对内容消费和创作的年轻人的社会经济状况，以及与现实世界中发现的社会不平等相关的青少年虚拟世界。本研究采用探索性定量设计，对来自厄瓜多尔高水平教育机构的 2115 名高中生和初中生进行了调查。研究从三个方面进行了分析：（1）使用平台的原因（2）消费时间（3）年轻人创造的内容类型。与以往的研究一致，本研究指出了社会经济环境如何影响年轻人使用社交网络。同样，它表明了内容创建过程的民主化程度有所提高。

参考资料

Al-Rahmi, W., & Othman, M. (2013). The impact of social media use on academic performance among university students: A pilot study. Journal of Information Systems Research and Innovation, 4(12), 1-10. https://bit.ly/3uEL79w

Link Google Scholar

Anderson, M., & Jiang, J. (2018). Teens, social media & technology 2018. Pew Research Center. https://pewrsr.ch/3uGBbfN

Link Google Scholar

Baumer, E.P. (2018). Socioeconomic Inequalities in the Non-use of Facebook. In R. Mandryk, & M. Hancock (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-14). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174190

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Bautista-Sancho, L. (2012). Los cambios en la web 2.0: Una nueva sociabilidad. Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico, 18, 121-128. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_ESMP.2012.v18.40917

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Blank, G. (2013). Who creates content? Stratification and content creation on the Internet. Information, Communication & Society, 16(4), 590-612. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2013.777758

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Blank, G., & Dutton, W.H. (2012). Age and trust in the Internet: The centrality of experience and attitudes toward technology in Britain. Social Science Computer Review, 30(2), 135-151. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439310396186

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Boyd, D. (2014). It's complicated: The social lives of networked teens. Yale University Press. https://bit.ly/3y2HtZc

Link Google Scholar

Briciu, A., & Briciu, V.A. (2020). Participatory culture and tourist experience: Promoting destinations through YouTube. In A. Kavoura, E, Kefallonitis & P, Theodoridis (Eds.), Strategic Innovative Marketing and Tourism (pp. 425-433). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36126-6_47

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Castillo-Abdul, B., Romero-Rodríguez, L.M., & Larrea-Ayala, A. (2020). Kid influencers in Spain: Understanding the themes they address and preteens' engagement with their YouTube channels. Heliyon, 6(9). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05056

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Cipolletta, S., Malighetti, C., Cenedese, C., & Spoto, A. (2020). How can adolescents benefit from the use of social networks? The iGeneration on Instagram. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(19), 6952. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17196952

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Correa, T. (2016). Digital skills and social media use: How Internet skills are related to different types of Facebook use among ‘digital natives’. Information, Communication & Society, 19(8), 1095-1107. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1084023

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Creswell, J.W., & Poth, C.N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Saga publications. https://bit.ly/2ReWsyt

Link Google Scholar

Fardoun, H.M., Alghazzawi, D.M., López, S.R., Penichet, V.M., & Gallud, J.A. (2012). Online social networks impact in secondary education. In P. Vittorini, R, GennariIvana, I, Marenzi, F, de-la-Prieta, & J.M. Corchado- Rodríguez (Eds.), International Workshop on Evidence-Based Technology Enhanced Learning (pp. 37-45). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28801-2_5

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Ferrés, J., & Piscitelli, A. (2012). Media competence. Articulated proposal of dimensions and indicators. [La competencia mediática: propuesta articulada de dimensiones e indicadores]. Comunicar, 38, 75-82. https://doi.org/10.3916/C38-2012-02-08

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

García-Leiva, M. (2017). Desafíos y oportunidades para la diversidad del audiovisual en internet. Política & Sociedade, 16(35), 132-158. https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-7984.2017v16n35p132

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Halpern, D., Piña, M., & Gunckel, C.O. (2020). School performance: New multimedia resources versus traditional notes. [El rendimiento escolar: Nuevos recursos multimedia frente a los apuntes tradicionales]. Comunicar, 64, 39-48. https://doi.org/10.3916/C64-2020-04

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Hargittai, E. (2008). The digital reproduction of inequality. In D.B. Grusky, & S. Szelényi (Eds.), The inequality reader: Contemporary and foundational readings in race, class, and gender (pp. 936-944). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429494468-69

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Hargittai, E., & Walejko, G. (2008). The participation divide: Content creation and sharing in the digital age. Information, Community and Society, 11(2), 239-256. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180801946150

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Helsper, E.J. (2012). A corresponding fields model for the links between social and digital exclusion. Communication Theory, 22(4), 403-426. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2012.01416.x

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Hoffmann, C.P., Lutz, C., & Meckel, M. (2015). Content creation on the Internet: A social cognitive perspective on the participation divide. Information, Communication & Society, 18(6), 696-716. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2014.991343

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Instituto Nacional de Estadisticas y Censos (INEC) (Ed.) (2019). Tecnologías de la información y la comunicación. Instituto Nacional de Estadisticas y Censos. https://bit.ly/3hbn9Pj

Link Google Scholar

Kaplan, A.M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Latorre, M. (2018). Historia de las Web, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0 y 4.0. Universidad Marcelino Champagnat. https://bit.ly/3yekZEK

Link Google Scholar

Micheli, M. (2016). Social networking sites and low-income teenagers: Between opportunity and inequality. Information, Communication & Society, 19(5), 565-581. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1139614

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Ministerio de Telecomunicaciones (Ed.) (2015). 91% de ecuatorianos utiliza las redes sociales en su teléfono inteligente. https://bit.ly/3xYPSwx

Link Google Scholar

Obar, J.A., & Wildman, S.S. (2015). Social media definition and the governance challenge: An introduction to the special issue. Telecommunications Policy, 39(9), 745-750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2015.07.014

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Palo?, R., & Drobot, L. (2010). The impact of family influence on the career choice of adolescents. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 3407-3411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.524

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Pires, F., Masanet, M.J., & Scolari, C.A. (2019). What are teens doing with YouTube? Practices, uses and metaphors of the most popular audio-visual platform. Information, Communication & Society, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1672766

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Raddaoui, A. (2012). Democratization of knowledge and the promise of web 2.0: A historical perspective. In Proceedings of The European Conference On E-Learning (pp. 435-441). https://bit.ly/3bgDP4g

Link Google Scholar

Ríos-Hernández, I.N., Rivera-Rogel, D., & Portugal, M.R. (2020). Análisis de las competencias mediáticas de alumnos y docentes de Latinoamérica: Casos Colombia, Ecuador, Bolivia y Argentina. In Aguaded & Vizcai?no-Verdu? (Eds.), Redes sociales y ciudadania: Hacia un mundo ciberconectado y empoderado (pp.125-134). Grupo Comunicar Ediciones. https://doi.org/10.3916/alfamed2020

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Rodríguez, A. (2020). ¿Cuáles son las redes sociales preferidas por los ecuatorianos? El Comercio. https://bit.ly/3fapSFQ

Link Google Scholar

Romero, S., Fardoun, H.M., Penichet, V.M.R., & Gallud, J.A. (2013). Tweacher: New proposal for online social networks impact in secondary education. ADCAIJ: Advances in Distributed Computing and Artificial Intelligence Journal, 2(1), 9-18. https://doi.org/10.14201/ADCAIJ201324918

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Sánchez-Díaz-de-Mera, D., & Lázaro-Cayuso, P. (2017). La adicción al Whatsapp en adolescentes y sus implicaciones en las habilidades sociales. Tendencias pedagógicas, 29, 121-134. https://doi.org/10.15366/tp2017.29.005

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Shiau, W.L., Dwivedi, Y.K., & Yang, H.S. (2017). Co-citation and cluster analyses of extant literature on social networks. International Journal of Information Management, 37(5), 390-399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.04.007

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Vizcaíno-Verdú, A., Contreras-Pulido, P., & Guzmán-Franco, M.D. (2019). Reading and informal learning trends on YouTube: The booktuber. [Lectura y aprendizaje informal en YouTube: El booktuber]. Comunicar, 59, 95-104. https://doi.org/10.3916/C59-2019-09

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

We Are Social & Hootsuite (Ed.) (2020). Digital 2020. Global Digital Overview. https://bit.ly/2zSvZxQ

Link Google Scholar

Yin, R. (2011). Applications of case study research, applied social research methods series. Sage. https://bit.ly/3y65Vcf

Link Google Scholar

YouTube (Ed.) (2019). YouTube for press. https://bit.ly/3bjiXcw

Link Google Scholar

Fundref

Financial support for this research was received from the following institutions: Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja within the framework of the project “Youtubers and Instagramers: Towards a model for the management of learning”, which was carried out by the Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja in the call for research proposals 2019-2021 (PY2583).

Crossmark

技术信息

收到: 28-02-2021

修订: 23-03-2021

公认: 27-04-2021

OnlineFirst: 15-06-2021

发布日期: 01-10-2021

文章修改时间: 23 天 | 期刊编号的平均时间修订 69: 30 天

文章接受时间: 57 天 | 期刊编号的平均接受时间 69: 68 天

预印本编辑时间: 169 天 | 期刊编号的平均编辑时间预印 69: 180 天

文章编辑时间: 214 天 | 期刊编号的平均编辑时间 69: 225 天

度量

这篇文章的度量

浏览次数: 9554

对摘要的解读: 8050

PDF下载: 1504

的全部指标 69

浏览次数: 88489

对摘要的解读: 71284

PDF下载: 17205

被引用