Keywords

Teacher Professional Competence, University Education, Primary Education, Research, Assessment, Factor Analysis

Abstract

ABSTRACT In the field of research, it is essential to promote the development of pedagogical innovations that enhance cognitive abilities and skills for evaluating evidence, establishing causal relationships, and making informed decisions that foster educational development. The final degree project (TFG) offers a platform for civic and social learning within the context of teaching practice. This study examines “research skills” for future educators in training. A cross-sectional, instrumental design was employed with 107 students enrolled in the Primary Education Degree program at the University of Murcia (Spain). The questionnaire consisted of 75 items, which were organized into five dimensions (research skills; planning and design training; techniques; analysis and interpretation; communication of results). The instrument was also validated through exploratory factor analysis, testing, and reliability analysis. The five-factor structure obtained explains 59.94% of the total variance, with high sample adequacy (KMO=0.847) and Bartlett’s significance (p<0.001). All dimensions showed high reliability (??0.82), with data interpretation identified as the main predictor. Differentiated profiles of research skills were established. The instrument will enable the implementation of diagnostic assessment policies, the design of curricula based on empirical profiles, and the establishment of quality parameters in formative research. Strengthening these during initial training in students improves educational quality and promotes reflective teaching profiles.

References

Aguilar, V. (2020). Autorregulación docente: Modelos para el fortalecimiento e investigación de la docencia. Editorial Octaedro. https://octaedro.com/libro/autorregulacion-docente
Akkerman, S. F., Bakker, A. y Penuel, W. R. (2021). Relevance of Educational Research: An Ontological Conceptualization. Educational Researcher, 50(6), 416-424. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x211028239
Alférez-Pastor, M., Collado-Soler, R., Lérida-Ayala, V., Manzano-León, A., Aguilar-Parra, J. M. y Trigueros, R. (2023). Training Digital Competencies in Future Primary School Teachers: A Systematic Review. Education Sciences, 13(5), 461. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13050461
Angelova-Stanimirova, A. y Lambovska, M. (2024). Your Article is Accepted. Academic Writing for Publication: A Deep Dive into International Research on Challenges and Strategies. Journal of Language and Education, 10(3), 108-127. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2024.22198
Anwer, M. y Reiss, M. (2022). Linking research and practice in education: the views of expert researchers in the field. Journal of Education for Teaching, 49(2), 326-340. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2022.2055447
Bellaera, L., Weinstein-Jones, Y., Ilie, S. y Baker, S. T. (2021). Critical thinking in practice: The priorities and practices of instructors teaching in higher education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41, 100856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100856
Bower, J., Acar, S. y Kursuncu, U. (2023). Measuring Creativity in Academic Writing: An Analysis of Essays in Advanced Placement Language and Composition. Journal of Advanced Academics, 34(3-4), 183-214. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202x231211633
Castellví, J., Escribano, C., Santos, R. y Marolla, J. (2022). Educación para el futuro: Currículo y prácticas educativas en Australia, España y Chile. Comunicar, 73, 45-55. https://doi.org/10.3916/C73-2022-04
Chan, C. K. Y. y Chen, S. W. (2022). Students’ perceptions on the recognition of holistic competency achievement: A systematic mixed studies review. Educational Research Review, 35, 100431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100431
Connolly, C., Logue, P. A. y Calderon, A. (2022). Teaching about curriculum and assessment through inquiry and problem-based learning methodologies: an initial teacher education cross-institutional study. Irish Educational Studies, 42(3), 443-460. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2021.2019083
Creswell, J. W. y Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (4.ª ed.). SAGE Publications.
De Jong, T., Lazonder, A. W., Chinn, C. A., Fischer, F., Gobert, J., Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Koedinger, K. R., et al. (2023). Let’s talk evidence – The case for combining inquiry-based and direct instruction. Educational Research Review, 39, 100536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100536
Denzin, N. K. y Lincoln, Y. S. (2018). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/the-sage-handbook-of-qualitative-research/book242504
Divrik, R., Pilten, P. y Tas, A. M. (2020). Effect of Inquiry-Based Learning Method Supported by Metacognitive Strategies on Fourth-Grade Students’ Problem-Solving and Problem-Posing Skills: A Mixed Methods Research. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 13(2), 287-308. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2021.191
Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C. y Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the Use of Exploratory Factor Analysis in Psychological Research. Psychological Methods, 4(3), 272-299. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.4.3.272
Finney, S. J. y DiStefano, C. (2013). Nonnormal and categorical data in structural equation modeling. En G. R. Hancock y R. O. Mueller (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: A second course (2nd ed., pp. 439-492). IAP Information Age Publishing.
Friesen, S. y Brown, B. (2022). Engaging in Educational Research-Practice Partnerships: Guided Strategies and Applied Case Studies for Scholars in the Field. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003229636
Fry, K., Nakar, S. y Zorn, K. (2025). Professional learning interventions for inquiry-based pedagogies in primary classrooms: A scoping review. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 37(4), 853-887. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-024-00516-x
Fullan, M. (2022). The New Meaning of Educational Change (6th ed.). Teachers College Press. https://michaelfullan.ca/books/the-new-meaning-of-educational-change-6th-edition
Giroux, H. A. (2020). On Critical Pedagogy (2nd ed.). Bloomsbury Academic. https://www.bloomsbury.com/us/on-critical-pedagogy-9781350144989
Giroux, H. A. y Bosio, E. (2021). Critical Pedagogy and Global Citizenship Education. En E. Bosio (Ed.), Conversations on Global Citizenship Education (pp. 3-12). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429346897-1
Gomoll, A., Hmelo-Silver, C. E. y Šabanovi?, S. (2022). Co-constructing Professional Vision: Teacher and Researcher Learning in Co-Design. Cognition and Instruction, 40(1), 7-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2021.2010210
Gusenbauer, M. y Haddaway, N. R. (2020). Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta-analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources. Research Synthesis Methods, 11(2), 181-217. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1378
Guzmán-Calle, E., Martín-Alonso, D. y Rodríguez-Martínez, C. (2023). Las evaluaciones externas en España y sus consecuencias en las prácticas escolares y en la equidad. Ensaio: Avaliação e Políticas Públicas em Educação, 31, e0233821. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-40362023003103821
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Chinn, C., Chan, C. y O’Donnell, A. (2013). The International Handbook of Collaborative Learning. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203837290
Hu, S.-g., Wang, W.-y., Wang, X.-X. y Yin, Y.-M. (2024). Assessing the intention to accept inquiry-based teaching pedagogy among Chinese university students: an extension of technology acceptance model. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1265047. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1265047
Ibarra-Sáiz, M. S., Lukas-Mujika, J.-F., Ponce-González, N. y Rodríguez-Gómez, G. (2023). Percepción del profesorado universitario sobre la calidad de las tareas de evaluación de los resultados de aprendizaje. RELIEVE-Revista Electrónica de Investigación y Evaluación Educativa, 29(1), art. 1. https://doi.org/10.30827/relieve.v29i1.27404
Jiménez Raya, M. y Manzano Vázquez, B. (2022). Case Pedagogy in Initial Teacher Education: An Analysis of its Contribution to the Development of Professional Competences for Autonomy. Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal, 13(2), 262-285. https://doi.org/10.37237/130206
Kim, J. S. (2019). Making Every Study Count: Learning From Replication Failure to Improve Intervention Research. Educational Researcher, 48(9), 599-607. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x19891428
König, J., Jäger-Biela, D. J. y Glutsch, N. (2020). Adapting to online teaching during COVID-19 school closure: teacher education and teacher competence effects among early career teachers in Germany. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 608-622. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1809650
Kumpulainen, K., Rajala, A. y Kajamaa, A. (2019). Researching the materiality of communication in an educational makerspace: The meaning of social objects. En N. Mercer, R. Wegerif, y L. Major (Eds.), The Routledge International Handbook of Research on Dialogic Education (pp. 439-453). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429441677-36
Lavy, S. y Naama-Ghanayim, E. (2020). Why care about caring? Linking teachers’ caring and sense of meaning at work with students’ self esteem, well-being, and school engagement. Teaching and Teacher Education, 91, 103046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103046
Lea, M. R. y Street, B. V. (2006). The “Academic Literacies” Model: Theory and Applications. Theory Into Practice, 45(4), 368 377. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4504_11
Lin, K. (2021). CS Education for the Socially-Just Worlds We Need: The Case for Justice-Centered Approaches to CS in Higher Education. arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.13283. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2109.13283
Lloret-Segura, S., Ferreres-Traver, A., Hernández-Baeza, A. y Tomás-Marco, I. (2014). Exploratory Item Factor Analysis: A practical guide revised and up-dated. Anales de Psicología / Annals of Psychology, 30(3), 1151-1169. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.30.3.199361
Mardia, K. V. (1970). Measures of Multivariate Skewness and Kurtosis with Applications. Biometrika, 57(3), 519-530. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/57.3.519
Mardia, K. V. (1974). Applications of Some Measures of Multivariate Skewness and Kurtosis in Testing Normality and Robustness Studies. Sankhy?: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Series B, 36(2), 115-128. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25051892
Martínez Valdivia, E., Pegalajar Palomino, M. d. C. y Burgos-Garcia, A. (2023). Active methodologies and curricular sustainability in teacher training. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 24(6), 1364-1380. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijshe-05-2022-0168
Matjaši?, M. y Vogrinc, J. (2024). Research Competence of Pre-Service Teachers: A Systematic Literature Review. European Journal of Educational Research, 13(2), 877-894. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.13.2.877
Menéndez-Alvarez-Hevia, D., Urbina-Ramírez, S., Forteza-Forteza, D. y Rodríguez-Martín, A. (2022). Contribuciones de los estudios de futuros para la educación: Una revisión sistemática. Comunicar, 73, 9-20. https://doi.org/10.3916/C73-2022-01
Paseka, A., Hinzke, J.-H. y Boldt, V.-P. (2025). Learning through perplexities in inquiry-based learning settings in teacher education. Teachers and Teaching, 31(2), 281-296. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2023.2266379
Paul, R. y Elder, L. (2020). The Miniature Guide to Critical Thinking Concepts and Tools (8.ª ed.). Rowman & Littlefield.
Peled-Raz, M., Tzafrir, S. S., Enosh, G., Efron, Y. y Doron, I. (2021). Ethics Review Boards for Research With Human Participants: Past, Present, and Future. Qualitative Health Research, 31(3), 590-599. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732320972333
Philp-Clark, C. y Grieshaber, S. (2024). Teacher critical reflection: what can be learned from quality research? The Australian Educational Researcher, 51(2), 697-717. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-023-00619-7
Prinz, A., Golke, S. y Wittwer, J. (2020). How accurately can learners discriminate their comprehension of texts? A comprehensive meta-analysis on relative metacomprehension accuracy and influencing factors. Educational Research Review, 31, 100358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100358
Riegle-Crumb, C., Morton, K., Moore, C., Chimonidou, A., Labrake, C. y Kopp, S. (2023). Do Inquiring Minds Have Positive Attitudes? The Science Education of Preservice Elementary Teachers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.04015. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2301.04015
Robson, C. y McCartan, K. (2016). Real World Research: A Resource for Users of Social Research Methods in Applied Settings (4.ª ed.). Wiley.
Rosen, S. M., Jacobs, C. E., Whitelaw, J., Mallikaarjun, V. R. y Rust, F. (2024). Justice-Centered Reflective Practice in Teacher Education: Pedagogy as a Process of Imaginative and Hopeful Invention. Education Sciences, 14(4), 376. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14040376
?ahin, N. y Bilir, F. P. (2024). The effect of transformational leadership and personal cultural values on creating a learning organization. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 206. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02701-6
Samaras, A. P. (2010). Self-Study Teacher Research: Improving Your Practice Through Collaborative Inquiry. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452230481
Severini, E., Kožuchová, M. y Barnová, S. (2024). Inquiry-Based Approach in the Context of Undergraduate Teacher Training. Journal of Human, Earth, and Future, 5(3), 438-455. https://doi.org/10.28991/HEF-2024-05-03-09
Talavera-Mendoza, F., Cayani Caceres, K. S., Urdanivia Alarcon, D. A., Gutiérrez Miranda, S. A. y Rucano Paucar, F. H. (2024). Teacher Performance Level to Guide Students in Inquiry-Based Scientific Learning. Education Sciences, 14(8), 805. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14080805
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Zeichner, K. M. (2017). The Struggle for the Soul of Teacher Education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315098074

Fundref

Not Available

Crossmark

Technical information

Received: 2025-08-11 | Reviewed: 2025-10-02 | Accepted: 2025-10-04 | Online First: 2026-04-11 | Published: 2026-04-15

Metrics

Metrics of this article

Views: 38099

Abstract readings: 36810

PDF downloads: 1289

Full metrics of Comunicar 77

Views: 459033

Abstract readings: 446071

PDF downloads: 12962

Cited by

Cites in Web of Science

Currently there are no citations to this document

Cites in Scopus

Currently there are no citations to this document

Cites in Google Scholar

Currently there are no citations to this document

Download

Alternative metrics

How to cite

Dra. Eva Ortiz-Cermeño., Dr. José David Cuesta-Sáez de Tejada. (2026). Research Skills and Formative Profiles among Primary Education Degree Students. Comunicar, 34(85). 10.5281/zenodo.19690053

Share

        

Oxbridge Publishing House

4 White House Way

B91 1SE Sollihul United Kingdom

Administration

Editorial office

Creative Commons

This website uses cookies to obtain statistical data on the navigation of its users. If you continue to browse we consider that you accept its use. +info X