Sun Kyong Lee College of Media & Communication, Korea University (Korea)
Juhyung Sun Department of Media and Communication Studies, Jeonbuk National University (Korea)
Norman Wong Department of Communication, University of Oklahoma (Oklahoma)
Keywords
Social Media, YouTube, TikTok, Mediated Communication, Media Affordances, Cross-Media Analysis
Abstract
This study examined how users perceived media affordances on TikTok and YouTube, adopting a middle-ground perspective between technological determinism and social constructionism. Building on affordance theory, the study aimed to disentangle platform-specific technological features from sociocultural patterns of use and to provide a systematic framework for cross-platform comparison of social media affordances. An online survey was conducted with U.S. college students (N=351). Respondents evaluated perceived affordances of TikTok and YouTube across multiple dimensions. Multivariate analyses of variance were employed to assess differences in perceived affordance salience between the two platforms while demographic factors were controlled. The results showed that YouTube’s affordances were perceived as more salient in three dimensions: editability, searchability, and signaling. In contrast, TikTok was perceived as more salient in six dimensions: awareness, persistence, personalization, pervasiveness, visibility, and sharing. Two affordances—association and evaluability—were perceived as equivalent across platforms, suggesting functional convergence in social connection and feedback mechanisms. The findings contributed to affordance research by systematically organizing overlapping affordances and enabling more precise comparative analyses across platforms. By unconfounding media from their affordances, this study advanced theoretical clarity and offered methodological guidance for future research on social media use, platform design, and media literacy in digitally mediated environments.
References
Adami, E. (2012). The rhetoric of the implicit and the politics of representation in the age of copy-and-paste. Learning, Media and Technology, 37(2), 131-144. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2011.641567
Barta, K., & Andalibi, N. (2021). Constructing Authenticity on TikTok: Social Norms and Social Support on the “Fun” Platform. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 5(CSCW2), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1145/3479574
Baym, N. K. (2015). Personal Connections in the Digital Age (2nd ed.). Polity Press.
Bhandari, A., & Bimo, S. (2020). TikTok and the “algorithmized self”: A new model of online interaction. AoIR Selected Papers of Internet Research. https://doi.org/10.5210/spir.v2020i0.11172
Bibeva, I. (2021). An exploration of older adults’ motivations for creating content on TikTok and the role this plays for fostering new social connections [Unpublished Master thesis]. Malmo University. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1601207/FULLTEXT02.pdf
boyd, D. (2010). Social Network Sites as Networked Publics: Affordances, Dynamics, and Implications. In Z. Papacharissi (Ed.), A Networked Self (pp. 47-66). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203876527-8
Bucher, T., & Helmond, A. (2018). The Affordances of Social Media Platforms. In J. Burgess, A. Marwick, & T. Poell (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Social-Media (pp. 233-253). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473984066.n14
Burgess, J., & Green, J. (2018). Youtube: Online Video and Participatory Culture. Polity Press. https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.5555/3299134
Costa, E. (2018). Affordances-in-practice: An ethnographic critique of social media logic and context collapse. New Media & Society, 20(10), 3641–3656. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818756290
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Eden, A. L., Johnson, B. K., Reinecke, L., & Grady, S. M. (2020). Media for Coping During COVID-19 Social Distancing: Stress, Anxiety, and Psychological Well-Being. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 577639. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.577639
Ellison, N. B., & Vitak, J. (2015). Social Network Site Affordances and Their Relationship to Social Capital Processes. In S. S. Sundar (Ed.), The Handbook of the Psychology of Communication Technology (pp. 203–227). Wiley Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118426456.ch9
Evans, S. K., Pearce, K. E., Vitak, J., & Treem, J. W. (2017). Explicating Affordances: a Conceptual Framework for Understanding Affordances in Communication Research. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22(1), 35-52. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12180
Fox, J., & McEwan, B. (2017). Distinguishing technologies for social interaction: The perceived social affordances of communication channels scale. Communication Monographs, 84(3), 298-318. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2017.1332418
Gibson, J. J. (1986). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Große Deters, F., Mehl, M. R., & Eid, M. (2014). Narcissistic power poster? On the relationship between narcissism and status updating activity on Facebook. Journal of Research in Personality, 53, 165-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.10.004
Guinaudeau, B., Munger, K., & Votta, F. (2022). Fifteen Seconds of Fame: TikTok and the Supply Side of Social Video. Computational Communication Research, 4(2), 463–485. https://doi.org/10.5117/CCR2022.2.004.GUIN
Guinaudeau, B., Vottax, F., & Munger, K. (2021). Fifteen Seconds of Fame: TikTok and the Supply Side of Social Video.
Hair, J., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed.). Pearson Education International.
Halpern, D., & Gibbs, J. (2013). Social media as a catalyst for online deliberation? Exploring the affordances of Facebook and YouTube for political expression. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 1159-1168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.10.008
Hautea, S., Parks, P., Takahashi, B., & Zeng, J. (2021). Showing They Care (Or Don’t): Affective Publics and Ambivalent Climate Activism on TikTok. Social Media + Society, 7(2), 20563051211012344. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211012344
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Hutchby, I. (2001). Technologies, Texts and Affordances. Sociology, 35(2), 441–456. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0038038501000219
Iqbal, M. (2023). Tiktok Revenue and Usage Statistics (2023). Business of Apps. https://www.businessofapps.com/data/tik-tok-statistics
Karahanna, E., Xu, S. X., Xu, Y., & Zhang, N. (2018). The Needs–Affordances–Features Perspective for the Use of Social Media. MIS Quarterly, 42(3), 737-756. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2018/11492
Katz, E., Blumler, J. G., & Gurevitch, M. (1973). Uses and Gratifications Research. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 37(4), 509-523. https://doi.org/10.1086/268109
Kaye, D. B. V., Zeng, J., & Wikstrom, P. (2022). TikTok: Creativity and Culture in Short Video. Polity Press.
Kline, R. B. (2023). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (5th ed.). Guilford Press.
Leonardi, P. M. (2013). Theoretical foundations for the study of sociomateriality. Information and Organization, 23(2), 59-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2013.02.002
Lewis, R., Marwick, A. E., & Partin, W. C. (2021). “We Dissect Stupidity and Respond to It”: Response Videos and Networked Harassment on YouTube. American Behavioral Scientist, 65(5), 735-756. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764221989781
Lievrouw, L., & Livingstone, S. (2006). Introduction to the Updated Student Edition. In L. Lievrouw & S. Livingstone (Eds.), Handbook of New Media: Social Shaping and Social Consequences (pp. 1-14). Sage Publications.
Maia, R. C. M., & Rezende, T. A. S. (2016). Respect and Disrespect in Deliberation Across the Networked Media Environment: Examining Multiple Paths of Political Talk. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 21(2), 121-139. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12155
Manata, B., & Spottswood, E. (2022). Extending Rice et al. (2017): the measurement of social media affordances. Behaviour & Information Technology, 41(6), 1323-1336. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2021.1875264
Matamoros-Fernández, A. (2017). Platformed racism: the mediation and circulation of an Australian race-based controversy on Twitter, Facebook and YouTube. Information, Communication & Society, 20(6), 930-946. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1293130
McVeigh-Schultz, J., & Baym, N. K. (2015). Thinking of You: Vernacular Affordance in the Context of the Microsocial Relationship App, Couple. Social Media + Society, 1(2), 2056305115604649. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115604649
Nagy, P., & Neff, G. (2015). Imagined Affordance: Reconstructing a Keyword for Communication Theory. Social Media + Society, 1(2), 2056305115603385. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115603385
Norman, D. A. (1999). Affordance, Conventions, and Design. Interactions, 6(3), 38-43. https://doi.org/10.1145/301153.301168
Rice, R. E., Evans, S. K., Pearce, K. E., Sivunen, A., Vitak, J., & Treem, J. W. (2017). Organizational Media Affordances: Operationalization and Associations with Media Use. Journal of Communication, 67(1), 106-130. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12273
Rice, R. E., & Leonardi, P. M. (2013). Information and Communication Technologies in Organizations. In L. Putnam & D. K. Mumby (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Communication: Advances in Theory, Research, and Methods (3rd ed., pp. 425-448). Sage Publications.
Ronzhyn, A., Cardenal, A. S., & Batlle Rubio, A. (2023). Defining affordances in social media research: A literature review. New Media & Society, 25(11), 3165-3188. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221135187
Sanders, A. M. (2020). UsTube - A Grounded Theory Analysis of the Relationship Between YouTube and Influencers. Theses and Dissertations, 8893. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/8893
Schrock, A. R. (2015). Communicative Affordances of Mobile Media: Portability, Availability, Locatability, and Multimediality. International Journal of Communication, 9, 1229-1246. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/3288
Simpson, E., & Semaan, B. (2020). For You, or For”You”?: Everyday LGBTQ+ Encounters with TikTok. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 4(CSCW3), 1-34. https://doi.org/10.1145/3432951
Song, S., Zhao, Y. C., Yao, X., Ba, Z., & Zhu, Q. (2021). Short video apps as a health information source: an investigation of affordances, user experience and users’ intention to continue the use of TikTok. Internet Research, 31(6), 2120-2142. https://doi.org/10.1108/intr-10-2020-0593
Statista. (2023). YouTube - statistics & facts. https://www.statista.com/topics/2019/youtube/#topicOverview
Sturken, M., Thomas, D., & Ball-Rokeach, S. (2004). Technological Visions: The Hopes and Fears That Shape New Technologies. Temple University Press.
Sundar, S. S. (2008). The MAIN Model: A Heuristic Approach to Understanding Technology Effects on Credibility. In M. J. Metzger & A. J. Flanagin (Eds.), Digital Media, Youth, and Credibility (pp. 73-100). The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.1162/dmal.9780262562324.073
Treem, J. W., & Leonardi, P. M. (2012). Social Media Use in Organizations: Exploring the Affordances of Visibility, Editability, Persistence, and Association. Annals of the International Communication Association, 36(1), 143-189. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2013.11679130
Unni, Z., & Weinstein, E. (2021). Shelter in Place, Connect Online: Trending TikTok Content During the Early Days of the U.S. COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Adolescent Health, 68(5), 863-868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2021.02.012
Wulf, T., Breuer, J. S., & Schmitt, J. B. (2022). Escaping the Pandemic Present: The Relationship Between Nostalgic Media Use, Escapism, and Well-Being During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Psychology of Popular Media, 11(3), 258-265. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000357
Zhao, Y. C., Zhang, Y., Tang, J., & Song, S. (2021). Affordances for information practices: theorizing engagement among people, technology, and sociocultural environments. Journal of Documentation, 77(1), 229-250. https://doi.org/10.1108/jd-05-2020-0078
Zulli, D., & Zulli, D. J. (2022). Extending the Internet meme: Conceptualizing technological mimesis and imitation publics on the TikTok platform. New Media & Society, 24(8), 1872-1890. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820983603
Technical information
Received: 2025-08-18 | Reviewed: 2025-10-02 | Accepted: 2025-10-18 | Online First: 2026-04-11 | Published: 2026-04-15
Metrics
Metrics of this article
Views: 38099
Abstract readings: 36810
PDF downloads: 1289
Full metrics of Comunicar 77
Views: 459033
Abstract readings: 446071
PDF downloads: 12962
Cited by
Cites in Web of Science
Currently there are no citations to this document

Cites in Scopus
Currently there are no citations to this document

Cites in Google Scholar
Currently there are no citations to this document
Alternative metrics
How to cite
Sun Kyong Lee., Juhyung Sun., Norman Wong. (2026). Perceived Media Affordances on TikTok and YouTube among U.S. College Students. Comunicar, 34(85). 10.5281/zenodo.19690421