Ключевые слова
Ageing, technology, teaching-learning, older adults, youth, intergenerational programmes, intergenerational relationships, communication
Резюме
Nowadays, as ageing increases in Western societies it has become more evident that multiple generations are ageing concurrently at any given time in history. Therefore, ageing must be approached as a multi-generational phenomenon, not just as a question of elders. In this context, situations that engender increased interactions between generations are garnering more attention. There is a growing emphasis on expanding the role of technology in intergenerational programmes, within the field of intergenerational studies. Consequently, this paper is focused on education and learning processes within intergenerational programmes with a strong technology component. Information from a total of 46 intergenerational programmes from 11 countries has been gathered through a survey. Level of impact, status of generational groups, and centrality of technology have been appraised for all programmes in the sample. Technology learning-teaching constitute the main area of intended impact of these programmes. However, the surveyed programmes employ as well a wide range of strategies to facilitate intergenerational communication, cooperation and relationship formation between generations involved. Interest of programmes examined does not just consist of teaching the use technology but of experimenting with technology in different forms and functions and exploring the positive potential for enhancing intergenerational relationships
Ссылки
AARP (2012). Connecting Generations. [A Report of Selected Findings from a Survey and Focus Groups Conducted by Microsoft and AARP]. (http://goo.gl/Kcn0Pk) (13-10-14).
Bailey, C. (2009). Reverse Intergenerational Learning: A Missed Opportunity? AI & Society, 23(1), 111-115. (http://goo.gl/hDgcEt). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00146-007-0169
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Chen, Y., Wen, J., & Xie (2012). I Communicate with my Children in the Game: Mediated Intergenerational Family Relationships through a Social Networking Game. The Journal of Community Informatics, 8(1). (http://goo.gl/LcQRnr) (13-10-14).
Chiong, C. (2009). Can Video Games Promote Intergenerational Play & Literacy Learning? Report from a Research and Design Workshop. (http://goo.gl/S2kvyE) (20-10-14).
CLD Standards for Scotland (2010). Mapping the Future: An Intergenerational Project. (http://goo.gl/IcZWrX) (20-10-14).
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
ECIL. (2013). ECIL Project. Best Practice Guidelines. Unpublished Manuscript. Centre for Intergenerational Practice: The Beth Johnson Foundation, Stoke-on-Trent, United Kingdom.
EMIL. (2013). EMIL’s European Year 2012 Roundtable Events: Final Report. (http://goo.gl/3BK5qB) (01-10-14).
EU Kids Online. (2011). EU Kids Online Final Report. (http://goo.gl/tHHFd6) (15-10-14).
European Commission (2012). ICT for Seniors’ and Intergenerational Learning. (http://goo.gl/McdPPO) (06-10-14).
Feist, H. Parker, K., Hugo, G. (2012). Older and Online: Enhancing Social Connections in Australian Rural Places. The Journal of Community Informatics, 8(1). (http://goo.gl/G79PZt) (13-10-14).
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Flora, P.K., & Faulkner, G.E. (2007). Physical Activity: An Innovative Context for Intergenerational Programming. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 4(4), 63-74. (http://goo.gl/p7lmQU). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J194v04n04_05) (02-02-15).
Fricke, A., Marley, M., Morton, A., & Thomé, J. (2013). The Mix@ges Experience: How to Promote Intergenerational Bonding through Creative Digital Media. (http://goo.gl/QaquBx) (06-10-14).
Gershenfeld, A., & Levine, M. (2012). Can Video Games Unite Generations in Learning? What Makers of Technology for Early Education can learn from ‘Sesame Street’. (http://goo.gl/Zok433) (13-10-14).
Ghosh, R., Ratan, S., Lindeman, D., & Steinmetz, V. (2013). The New Era of Connected Aging: A Framework for Understanding Technologies that Support Older Adults in Aging in Place. (http://goo.gl/NjoVbS) (06-10-14).
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Harper, S. (2013). Future Identities: Changing Identities in the UK – The Next 10 Years. (http://goo.gl/IIzZLq) (13-10-14).
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Jane, B., & Robbins, J. (2007). Intergenerational Learnings: Grandparents Teaching Everyday Concepts in Science and Technology. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 8(1), 1-18. (http://goo.gl/XQkdvh) (13-10-14).
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Kaplan, M., & Sánchez, M. (2014). Intergenerational Programmes. In S. Harper, & K. Hamblin (Eds.), International Handbook on Ageing and Public Policy. (pp. 367-383). Cheltenham: Elgar.
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Lombard, M., Snyder-Duch, J., & Campanella, C. (n.d), Practical Resources for Assessing and Reporting Intercoder Reliability in Content Analysis Research Projects. (http://goo.gl/T2wY8I) (01-10-14).
Madden, M., Lenhart, A., & al. (2013). Teens, Social Media, and Privacy. (http://goo.gl/PKHn8A) (06-10-14).
Pitt, J.C. (2000). Thinking about Technology: Foundations of the Philosophy of Technology. New York: Seven Bridges Press.
Rogers, E.M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations. New York, NY: The Free Press.
Saldaña, J. (2009). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. London: Sage.
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Smith, A. (2014). Older Adults and Technology Use. (http://goo.gl/8MA6Uv) (06-10-14).
Third, A., Richardson, I., Collin, P., Rahilly, K., & Bolzan, N. (2011). Intergenerational Attitudes towards Social Networking and Cybersafety: A Living Lab. (http://goo.gl/xxuCp6) (13-10-14).
Fundref
Эта работа не имеет финансовой поддержки
Техническая спецификация
Получила: 29-10-2014
пересмотренный: 18-11-2014
Принятый: 02-02-2015
OnlineFirst: 15-04-2015
Дата публикации: 01-07-2015
Время пересмотра статьи: 20 дней | Среднее время пересмотра вопроса 45: 46 дней
Время принятия статьи: 96 дней | Время приема Номер 45: 127 дней
Время редактирования препринта: 199 дней | Выпуск препринта среднего времени редактирования 45: 247 дней
Время редактирования статьи: 244 дней | Среднее время редактирования журнала 45: 292 дней
метрика
Метрики этой статьи
Просмотров: 6727
Ознакомление с аннотациями: 5947
загрузки PDF-файлов: 780