教师调控实践：青少年媒体行为的机会与风险

 Priscila Berger, Ilmenau (德国)

https://doi.org/10.3916/C64-2020-05

关键词

调控，媒体修养，教学实践，机会，风险，中学，定量分析，媒体使用

摘要

儿童和青少年研究表明，老师是学生的媒体使用受调控的因素之一。然而，教师调控的实践几乎不为人知。研究着眼于在调控的概念下尽可能了解教师的实践情况 – 首先，将一系列与媒体相关的课程胜任度系统化，着眼于达到年轻人媒体行为机会最大化和风险最小化的目的；其次，测试了老师的职业和个体特质，看和学生媒体使用的机会和风险的调控有什么关联。我们分析了德国315名教师调查获得的数据，回归分析结果显示大多数因子按类似的方式预测机会与风险。在老师频繁使用信息和通讯技术(ICT)、考虑各自的胜任度很重要、积极与同事协同工作、不教授STEM的科目、不进健身房的情况下，老师对最大化机会和最小化风险更为积极。接受过ICT相关培训仅对机会管控是一个重要的预估，而年龄仅对风险管控是个重要预估。我们还讨论了研究结果的意义，以及调控的观念如何能为把老师发展成媒体教育者作出贡献。

参考资料

Bartau-Rojas, I., Aierbe-Barandiaran, A., & Oregui-González, E. (2018). Parental mediation of the Internet use of primary students: Beliefs, strategies and difficulties. [Mediación parental del uso de Internet en el alumnado de Primaria: creencias, estrategias y dificultades]. Comunicar, 26(54), 71-79. https://doi.org/10.3916/c54-2018-07

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Berger, P., & Wolling, J. (2019). They need more than technology-equipped schools: Teachers’ practice of fostering students’ digital protective skills. Media and Communication, 7(2), 137-147. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v7i2.1902

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Brüggemann, M. (2013). Digitale Medien im Schulalltag: Eine qualitative rekonstruktive Studie zum Medienhandeln und berufsbezogenen Orientierungen von Lehrkräften. [Digital media in the school reality: A qualitative reconstructive study of media management and teachers’ professional orientation]. Kopaed. https://bit.ly/2J4iZGy

Link Google Scholar

Brüggen, N., Dreyer, S., Drosselmeier, M., Gebel, C., Hasebrink, U., & Rechlitz, M. (2017). Jugendmedienschutzindex: Der Umgang mit onlinebezogenen Risiken—Ergebnisse der Befragung von Heranwachsenden und Eltern. [Youth media protection index: Dealing with online risks—Findings of the survey with youth and parentes]. FSM - Freiwillige Selbstkontrolle Multimedia-Diensteanbieter e.V. http://bit.ly/3b1KCvM

Link Google Scholar

Chen, L., & Shi, J. (2019). Reducing harm from media: A meta-analysis of parental mediation. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 96(1), 173-193. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699018754908

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Ertmer, P.A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 25-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504683

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Ferrari, A. (2013). DIGCOMP: A framework for developing and understanding digital competence in Europe. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2788/52966

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Fraillon, J., Ainley, J., Schulz, W., Friedman, T., & Duckworth, D. (2020). Preparing for life in a digital world: IEA International computer and information literacy study 2018 international report. Springer Open. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38781-5

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Frau-Meigs, D., Velez, I., & Michel, J.F. (2017). Public policies in media and information literacy in Europe: Cross-country comparisons. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315628851

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Hartai, L. (2014). EMEDUS - European media literacy education study: Report on formal media education in Europe. Hungarian Institute for Education Research and Development. http://bit.ly/38UClty

Link Google Scholar

Hatlevik, I.K.R., & Hatlevik, O.E. (2018). Students’ evaluation of digital information: The role teachers play and factors that influence variability in teacher behaviour. Computers in Human Behavior, 83, 56-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.01.022

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Hobbs, R. (2010). Digital and media literacy: A plan of action. http://bit.ly/2tA8mqD

Link Google Scholar

Jiménez-Iglesias, E., Garmendia-Larrañaga, M., & Casado-del-Río, M.A. (2015). Percepción de los y las menores de la mediación parental respecto a los riesgos en Internet. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 70, 49-68. https://bit.ly/2UdqPEs

Link Google Scholar

Kalmus, V. (2013). Making sense of the social mediation of children’s Internet use: Perspectives for interdisciplinary and cross-cultural research. In C.W. Wijnen, S. Trültzsch, & C. Ortner (Eds.), Medienwelten im Wandel: Kommunikationswissenschaftliche Positionen, Perspektiven und Konsequenzen. [Media worlds in change: Positions, perspectives and consequences of the Communication Science] (pp. 137-149). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-19049-5_11

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Kalmus, V., von-Feilitzen, C., & Siibak, A. (2012). Effectiveness of teachers’ and peers’ mediation in supporting opportunities and reducing risks online. In S. Livingstone, & L. Haddon (Eds.), Children, risk and safety on the Internet: Research and policy challenges in comparative perspective (pp. 245-256). Policy Press. http://bit.ly/2PDaRB2

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Karaseva, A., Siibak, A., & Pruulmann-Vengerfeldt, P. (2015). Relationships between teachers’ pedagogical beliefs, subject cultures, and mediation practices of students’ use of digital technology. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2015-1-6

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Kirwil, L. (2009). Parental mediation of children’s Internet use in different European countries. Journal of Children & Media, 3(4), 394-409. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482790903233440

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

KMK (Ed.) (2012). Medienbildung in der Schule—Beschluss der Kultusministerkonferenz vom 8. März 2012. [Media education at school—Resolution of the Kultusministerkonferenz from 8. March 2012]. http://bit.ly/2Z5l3VX

Link Google Scholar

Knezek, G., & Christensen, R. (2016). Extending the will, skill, tool model of technology integration: Adding pedagogy as a new model construct. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 28(3), 307-325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-016-9120-2

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Lee, S.J. (2013). Parental restrictive mediation of children’s Internet use: Effective for what and for whom? New Media & Society, 15(4), 466-481. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444812452412

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Livingstone, S., & Haddon, L. (2009). EU kids online: Final report. LSE, EU Kids Online. https://bit.ly/39do2Pu

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E.J. (2008). Parental mediation of children’s Internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 52(4), 581-599. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838150802437396

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Livingstone, S., Haddon, L., Görzig, A., & Ólafsson, K. (2011). Risks and safety on the Internet: The perspective of European children. Full findings. EU Kids Online. http://bit.ly/35Deqwt

Link Google Scholar

Livingstone, S., Ólafsson, K., Helsper, E.J., Lupiáñez?Villanueva, F., Veltri, G.A., & Folkvord, F. (2017). Maximizing opportunities and minimizing risks for children online: The role of digital skills in emerging strategies of parental mediation. Journal of Communication, 67(1), 82-105. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12277

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Lorenz, R., Endberg, M., & Bos, W. (2019). Predictors of fostering students’ computer and information literacy - Analysis based on a representative sample of secondary school teachers in Germany. Education and Information Technologies, 24(1), 911-928. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9809-0

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Mendoza, K. (2009). Surveying parental mediation: Connections, challenges and questions for media literacy. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 1(1), 28-41. http://bit.ly/2PA5vGF

Link Google Scholar

Nathanson, A. I. (2002). The unintended effects of parental mediation of television on adolescents. Media Psychology, 4(3), 207-230. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532785xmep0403_01

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Nikken, P., & Jansz, J. (2014). Developing scales to measure parental mediation of young children’s Internet use. Learning, Media & Technology, 39(2), 250-266. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2013.782038

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Nikken, P., & Schols, M. (2015). How and why parents guide the media use of young children. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24(11), 3423-3435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-015-0144-4

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Partnership for 21st Century Learning (Ed.) (2015). P21 framework definitions. https://bit.ly/2QAPSik

Link Google Scholar

Petko, D. (2012). Teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and their use of digital media in classrooms: Sharpening the focus of the ‘will, skill, tool’ model and integrating teachers’ constructivist orientations. Computers & Education, 58(4), 1351-1359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.12.013

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Pöttinger, I., & Meister, D.M. (2014). School’s out? Informal and formal media education—An international perspective. In S. Aßmann, D.M. Meister, & A. Pielsticker (Eds.), School’s out? Informelle und formelle Medienbildung. Kopaed. http://bit.ly/2Ws1hog

Link Google Scholar

Shin, W., & Lwin, B. (2017). Parental mediation of children’s digital technology use in Singapore. Journal of Children & Media, 11(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2016.1203807

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Siddiq, F., Scherer, R., & Tondeur, J. (2016). Teachers’ emphasis on developing students’ digital information and communication skills (TEDDICS): A new construct in 21st century education. Computers & Education, 92-93, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.10.006

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Smahelova, M., Juhová, D., Cermak, I., & Smahel, D. (2017). Mediation of young children’s digital technology use: The parents’ perspective. Cyberpsychology, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2017-3-4

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Tejedor, S., & Pulido, C. (2012). Challenges and risks of Internet use by children. How to empower minors? [Retos y riesgos del uso de Internet por parte de los menores. ¿Cómo empoderarlos?]. Comunicar, 39, 65-72. https://doi.org/10.3916/C39-2012-02-06

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Thüringer Ministerium für Bildung, Jugend und Sport (Ed.) (2018). Statistisches Informationssystem Bildung: Personal nach Alter und Durschnittsalter. [Statistical education information system: Staff by age and average age]. http://bit.ly/36OmkU1

Link Google Scholar

Trültzsch-Wijnen, C., Murru, M.F., & Papaioannou, T. (2017). Definitions and values of media and information literacy in a historical context. In D. Frau-Meigs, I. Velez, & J.F. Michel (Eds.), Public policies in media and information literacy in Europe: Cross-country comparisons (pp. 91-115). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315628851-3

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

UNESCO (Ed.) (2013). Global media and information literacy assessment framework: Country readiness and competencies. http://bit.ly/2PWFal8

Link Google Scholar

Wernstedt, R., & John-Ohnesorg, M. (2008). Soziale Herkunft entscheidet über Bildungserfolg Konsequenzen aus IGLU 2006 und PISA III. [Social background decides about success in education. Consequences from the IGLU 2006 and the PISA III]. Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung. http://bit.ly/2Ss3xKc

Link Google Scholar

Wolling, J., & Berger, P. (2018). Die Vermittlung von Medienkompetenz in allgemeinbildenden Schulen: Zentrale Ergebnisse eines Evaluationsprojekts. [Fostering media literacy in general education schools: Central results of an evaluation project]. Ilmenau Universitätsverlag. https://doi.org/10.22032/dbt.34913

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Fundref

The data analyzed in this study were collected in the realm of the project “Media literacy in Thuringian schools” (2551000176), financed by the Thüringer Ministerium für Bildung, Jugend und Sport.

Crossmark

技术信息

收到: 26-12-2019

修订: 30-01-2020

公认: 11-03-2020

OnlineFirst: 15-04-2020

发布日期: 01-07-2020

文章修改时间: 35 天 | 期刊编号的平均时间修订 64: 36 天

文章接受时间: 76 天 | 期刊编号的平均接受时间 64: 91 天

预印本编辑时间: 142 天 | 期刊编号的平均编辑时间预印 64: 157 天

文章编辑时间: 187 天 | 期刊编号的平均编辑时间 64: 202 天

度量

这篇文章的度量

浏览次数: 38854

对摘要的解读: 36984

PDF下载: 1870

的全部指标 64

浏览次数: 463565

对摘要的解读: 425410

PDF下载: 38155

被引用