Ключевые слова
Диалоговое преподавание, инклюзивное образование, средняя школа, педагогическая практика, повышение квалификации преподавателей, диалог
Резюме
Важной задачей является создание более инклюзивных государственных школ, отвечающих потребностям общества знаний XXI века. В настоящем документе мы уделяем особое внимание инклюзии как диалогическому процессу, который должен быть принят и развит как учителями, так и учащимися в любом классе. Идея инклюзивного диалогического преподавания разъясняется и реализуется в рамках учебной программы по инклюзивному диалогу, сосредоточенной на вопросах обучения культурной грамотности. В этом исследовании, которое является частью европейского проекта, включающего несколько стран, восемь учителей средних школ Испании и Португалии и их ученики приняли участие в восьми занятиях, проводившихся в рамках планов проведения уроков, основанных на диалоге. Учителя приняли участие в двух занятиях по повышению квалификации, одно в начале проекта, а другое позже. Данные, собранные на занятиях № 3 и № 8, были собраны и проанализированы с использованием предварительно построенной схемы кодирования. Полученные данные свидетельствуют о небольшом улучшении диалогичности от занятия № 3 к занятию № 8 при постоянном сопротивлении учителей быть более кумулятивными в своем дискурсе. Эти результаты подтверждают предыдущую работу, показывая, что диалогическое преподавание приобретается постепенно, и даже когда меняется позиция учителей, которые становятся более инклюзивными и привлекательными по отношению к ученикам, эти изменения не обязательно представляют собой радикальный сдвиг в методах преподавания в сторону более ориентированной на учеников.
Ссылки
Alexander, R.J. (2017). Towards dialogic teaching: Rethinking classroom talk. Dialogos.
Link Google Scholar
Alexander, R.J., Hardman, F.C., & Hardman, J. (2017). Changing talk, changing thinking: Interim report from the in-house evaluation of the CPRT/UoY Dialogic Teaching Project. University of York and Cambridge Primary Review Trust. https://bit.ly/2ZDfqkl
Link Google Scholar
Asterhan, C.S., Howe, C., Lefstein, A., Matusov, E., & Reznitskaya, A. (2020). Controversies and consensus in research on dialogic teaching and learning. Dialogic Pedagogy, 8, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.5195/dpj.2020.312
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Bakker, A., Smit, J., & Wegerif, R. (2015). Scaffolding and dialogic teaching in mathematics education: Introduction and review. ZDM, 47(7), 1047-1065. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0738-8
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Bereiter, C. (2002). Artifacts, canons, and the progress of pedagogy: A response to contributors. In B. Smith (Ed.), Liberal education in a knowledge society (pp. 223-244). Open Court. https://bit.ly/3j2qI93
Link Google Scholar
Blanton, M.L., & Stylianou, D.A. (2014). Understanding the role of transactive reasoning in classroom discourse as students learn to construct proofs. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 34, 76-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2014.02.001
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Boyd, M. (2016). Connecting ‘Man in the mirror’: Kindling a classroom dialogic teaching and learning trajectory. L1-Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 16, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.17239/L1ESLL-2016.16.02.03
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Camilli-Trujillo, C., & Römer-Pieretti, M. (2017). Meta-synthesis of literacy for the empowerment of vulnerable groups. [Metasíntesis en alfabetización para el empoderamiento de grupos vulnerables]. Comunicar, 53, 9-18. https://doi.org/10.3916/C53-2017-01
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Castillo-Rodríguez, C.C., & Garro-Gil, N. (2015). Inclusion and integration on special education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 1323-1327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.488
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Clarke, S.N., Howley, I., Resnick, L., & Rosé, C.P. (2016). Student agency to participate in dialogic science discussions. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 10, 27-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2016.01.002
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Davey, S., & Gordon, S. (2017). Definitions of social inclusion and social exclusion: the invisibility of mental illness and the social conditions of participation. International Journal of Culture and Mental Health, 10(3), 229-237. https://doi.org/10.1080/17542863.2017.1295091
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Dias-Fonseca, T., & Potter, J. (2016). Media education as a strategy for online civic participation in Portuguese schools [La educación mediática como estrategia de participación cívica on-line en las escuelas portuguesas]. Comunicar, 24(49), 9-18. https://doi.org/10.3916/C49-2016-01
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
European Union (Ed.) (2006). Recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18th December 2006 on key competences for lifelong learning. Official Journal of the European Union, 30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116506060911
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Fisher, R. (2007). Dialogic teaching: Developing thinking and metacognition through philosophical discussion. Early Child Development and Care, 177(6-7), 615-631. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430701378985
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Freire, S. (2008). Um olhar sobre a inclusão. Revista da Educação, 16(1), 5-20. https://bit.ly/2X4U4KL
Link Google Scholar
Haneda, M., Teemant, A., & Sherman, B. (2017). Instructional coaching through dialogic interaction: Helping a teacher to become agentive in her practice. Language and Education, 31(1), 46-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2016.1230127
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Kim, M.Y., & Wilkinson, I.A. (2019). What is dialogic teaching? Constructing, deconstructing, and reconstructing a pedagogy of classroom talk. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 21, 70-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.02.003
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Kumpulainen, K., & Lipponen, L. (2010). Productive interaction as agentic participation in dialogic enquiry. In K. Littleton, & C. Howe (Eds.), Educational dialogues: Understanding and promoting productive interaction (pp. 48-63). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203863510
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Kumpulainen, K., & Rajala, A. (2017). Dialogic teaching and students’ discursive identity negotiation in the learning of science. Learning & Instruction, 48, 23-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.05.002
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Lehesvuori, S., Viiri, J., & Rasku-Puttonen, H. (2011). Introducing dialogic teaching to science student teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22(8), 705-727. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-011-9253-0
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Lehesvuori, S., Viiri, J., Rasku?Puttonen, H., Moate, J., & Helaakoski, J. (2013). Visualizing communication structures in science classrooms: Tracing cumulativity in teacher?led whole class discussions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(8), 912-939. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21100
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Licsandru, T.C., & Cui, C.C. (2018). Subjective social inclusion: A conceptual critique for socially inclusive marketing. Journal of Business Research, 82, 330–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.08.036
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Littleton, K., & Mercer, N. (2013). Interthinking: Putting talk to work. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203809433
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Maine, F., Cook, V., & Lähdesmäki, T. (2019). Reconceptualizing cultural literacy as a dialogic practice. London Review of Education, 17(3), 383-392. https://doi.org/10.18546/LRE.17.3.12
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Michaels, S., O’Connor, C., & Resnick, L.B. (2008). Deliberative discourse idealized and realized: Accountable talk in the classroom and in civic life. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 27(4), 283-297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-007-9071-1
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Mitchell, D., & Sutherland, D. (2020). What really works in special and inclusive education: Using evidence-based teaching strategies. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429401923
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Osborne, J. (2007). Towards a more social pedagogy in science education: the role of argumentation. Revista Brasileira de Pesquisa em Educação em Ciências, 7(1). https://bit.ly/2X6nTLh
Link Google Scholar
Osler, A., & Starkey, H. (1999). Rights, identities and inclusion: European action programmes as political education 1. Oxford Review of Education, 25(1-2), 199-215. https://doi.org/10.1080/030549899104215
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
O’Connor, C., & LaRusso, M. (2014). Working with a low-inference discourse observation tool: What can we see? [Paper session] Annual Educational Research Association, Philadelphia, PA.
Link Google Scholar
Reznitskaya, A. (2012). Dialogic teaching: Rethinking language use during literature discussions. The Reading Teacher, 65(7), 446-456. https://doi.org/10.1002/TRTR.01066
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Reznitskaya, A., & Gregory, M. (2013). Student thought and classroom language: Examining the mechanisms of change in dialogic teaching. Educational Psychologist, 48(2), 114-133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2013.775898
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Reznitskaya, A., & Wilkinson, I. (2015). Professional development in dialogic teaching: Helping teachers promote argument literacy in their classrooms. In D. Scott, & E. Hargreaves (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of learning (pp. 219-232). Sage Press. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473915213.n21
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Sandoval, W.A., Kwako, A.J., Modrek, A.S., & Kawasaki, J. (2018). Patterns of classroom talk through participation in discourse-focused teacher professional development. In J. Kay, & R. Luckin (Eds.) Rethinking learning in the digital age: Making the learning sciences count, 13th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS). International Society of the Learning Sciences. https://bit.ly/38ZczEO
Link Google Scholar
Schmidt, B.J., Macwilliams, B.R., & Neal-Boylan, L. (2016). Becoming inclusive: A code of conduct for inclusion and diversity. Journal of Professional Nursing, 33(2), 102-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2016.08.014
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Sedova, K. (2017). A case study of a transition to dialogic teaching as a process of gradual change. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 278-290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.06.018
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Sedova, K., Salamounova, Z., & Svaricek, R. (2014). Troubles with dialogic teaching. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 3(4), 274-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2014.04.001
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Sedova, K., Sedlacek, M., & Svaricek, R. (2016). Teacher professional development as a means of transforming student classroom talk. Teaching and Teacher Education, 57, 14-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.03.005
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Seeland, K., Dübendorfer, S., & Hansmann, R. (2009). Making friends in Zurich’ s urban forests and parks: The role of public green space for social inclusion of youths from different cultures. Forest Policy and Economics, 11(1), 10-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2008.07.005
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Simpson, A. (2016). Dialogic teaching in the initial teacher education classroom: ‘Everyone's voice will be heard’. Research Papers in Education, 31(1), 89-106. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2016.1106697
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Tienda, M. (2013). Diversity? Inclusion: Promoting integration in higher education. Educational Researcher, 42(9), 467-475. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X13516164
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Vass, E. (2018). Building dialogic spaces through inclusive conversations. In. W. Sawyer, G. Munns, K. Zammit, C. Attard, E. Vass, & C. Hatton (Eds.), Engaging schooling: Developing exemplary education for students in poverty (pp. 101-119). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315561905-14
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Vázquez, O. (2001). Inmigrantes en la escuela: Un espacio para la cooperación. Comunicar, 16, 73-78. https://doi.org/10.3916/C16-2001-11
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Viana, C. (2020, February 17). Empatia na escola? Aqui, o que conta não é estar certo ou errado. Público. https://bit.ly/2Zz1Lug
Link Google Scholar
Wegerif, R. (2010). Dialogue and teaching thinking with technology: opening, expanding, and deepening the ‘inter-face’. In K. Littleton & Ch. Howe (Eds.), Educational dialogues: Understanding and promoting productive interaction (pp. 304-322). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203863510
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Wilkinson, I.A.G., Reznitskaya, A., Bourdage, K., Oyler, J., Glina, M., Drewry, R., Kim, M.Y., & Nelson, K. (2017). Toward a more dialogic pedagogy: changing teachers’ beliefs and practices through professional development in language arts classrooms. Language and Education, 31(1), 65-82. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2016.1230129
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Woodcock, S., & Woolfson, L.M. (2019). Are leaders leading the way with inclusion? Teachers’ perceptions of systemic support and barriers towards inclusion. International Journal of Educational Research, 93, 232-242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2018.11.004
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Wright, N., & Stickley, T. (2013). Concepts of social inclusion, exclusion and mental health: a review of the international literature. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 20(1), 71-81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2850.2012.01889.x
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Fundref

Техническая спецификация
Получила: 29-05-2020
пересмотренный: 05-06-2020
Принятый: 03-07-2020
First Online: 15-11-2020
Дата публикации: 01-01-2021
Время пересмотра статьи: 7 дней | Среднее время пересмотра вопроса 66: 16 дней
Время принятия статьи: 35 дней | Время приема Номер 66: 51 дней
Время редактирования препринта: 172 дней | Выпуск препринта среднего времени редактирования 66: 193 дней
Время редактирования статьи: 217 дней | Среднее время редактирования журнала 66: 238 дней
метрика
Метрики этой статьи
Просмотров: 3970
Ознакомление с аннотациями: 3599
загрузки PDF-файлов: 371
Полные метрики 66
Просмотров: 52787
Ознакомление с аннотациями: 47446
загрузки PDF-файлов: 5341
Цитируется
Цитаты в Web of Science
В настоящее время нет ссылок на этот документ
Цитаты в Scopus
В настоящее время нет ссылок на этот документ
Цитаты в Google Scholar
В настоящее время нет ссылок на этот документ