揭露虚假信息：来自西班牙民众的观念和话语

 Lidia Valera-Ordaz, University of Valencia (西班牙)

 Marina Requena-i-Mora, Jaime I University (西班牙)

 Dafne Calvo, University of Valencia (西班牙)

 Guillermo López-García, University of Valencia (西班牙)

https://doi.org/10.3916/C72-2022-02

关键词

错误信息、传播生态系统、讨论组、话语分析、传播媒体、社交网络

摘要

虚假信息已成为传播研究的核心概念。该概念与各种媒体、技术和政治现象相关，这些相关因素使其定义和诊断复杂化。尽管对其研究方法方法是非常定量的，但讨论组也被用来了解观众对这一现象的看法。本研究正是在此背景下进行的，旨在调查在西班牙存在的关于虚假信息的概念和话语。为此，我们实现了七个小组讨论，根据就业状况、意识形态和年龄构建了一个结构样本。结果显示了对按时间顺序排列的两个极点构建的传播生态系统的感知，将过去与当前的信息环境形成对比，即过去为传统媒体，相关信息提供较少; 而当前是具有更多的媒体多样性的信息环境，但对媒体的信任度也较低。这些讨论小组指出信息过多现象，并将虚假信息与去语境化、低质量的新闻报道以及各种行为者的经济和政治利益联系起来。这些话语勾勒出被认为是两极分化和情绪化的新闻业和公共领域衰落的全景图。因此，虚假信息被视为一种多维现象，不仅与互联网发送假消息相关，更与民主重要性的问题相关联。

参考资料

Amazeen, M.A. (2017). Journalistic interventions: The structural factors affecting the global emergence of fact-checking. Journalism, 21(1), 95-111. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884917730217

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Anderson, C.W. (2020). Fake news is not a virus: On platforms and their effects. Communication Theory, 31(1), 42-61. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtaa008

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Bennett, W.L., & Iyengar, S. (2008). A new era of minimal effects? The changing foundations of political communication. Journal of communication, 58(4), 707-731. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00410.x

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Bennett, W.L., & Livingston, S. (2018). The disinformation order: Disruptive communication and the decline of democratic institutions. European Journal of Communication, 33(2), 122-139. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323118760317

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Bimber, B., & Gil-de-Zúñiga, H. (2020). The unedited public sphere. New Media & Society, 22(4), 700-715. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819893980

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Conde F. (2009). Análisis sociológico del sistema de discursos. Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas. https://bit.ly/3tqxsF2

Link Google Scholar

Conde F. (2014). Los órdenes sintáctico, semántico y pragmático en el diseño y en el análisis de las investigaciones cualitativas con grupos de discusión. Arxius de Sociologia, 31, 69-84. https://bit.ly/3r9OCFX

Link Google Scholar

De-Lucas, A. (1995). Memoria de oposición. Proyecto docente. Sociología del consumo e investigación de mercados. Inédito.

Link Google Scholar

Duffy, A., Tandoc, E., & Ling, R. (2020). Too good to be true, too good not to share: the social utility of fake news. Information, Communication & Society, 23(13), 1965-1979. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1623904

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Engesser, S., & Humprecht, E. (2015). Frequency or skillfulness. Journalism studies, 16(4), 513-529. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2014.939849

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Flew, T. (2019). Digital communication, the crisis of trust, and the post-global. Communication Research and Practice, 5(1), 4-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2019.1561394

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Golob, T., Makarovic, M., & Rek, M. (2021). Meta-reflexivity for resilience against disinformation. [Meta-reflexividad para la resiliencia contra la desinformación]. Comunicar, 66, 107-118. https://doi.org/10.3916/C66-2021-09

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Gray, J., Bounegru, L., & Venturini, T. (2020). «Fake news» as infrastructural uncanny. New Media & Society, 22(2), 317-341. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819856912

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Hall, S. (1997). The work of representation. In S. Hall (Ed.), Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices (pp. 13-74). The Open University. https://bit.ly/3CrFPDb

Link Google Scholar

Hallin, D.C., & Mancini, P. (2004). Sistemas mediáticos comparados. Tres modelos de relación entre los medios de comunicación y la política. Hacer.

Link Google Scholar

Hermida, A., Fletcher, F., Korell, D., & Logan, D. (2012). Share, like, recommend. Journalism studies, 13(5-6), 815-824. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2012.664430

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Herrero-Diz, P., Conde-Jiménez, J., & Reyes-de-Cózar, S. (2020). Teens’ motivations to spread fake news on WhatsApp. Social Media+Society, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120942879

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Hjorth, F., & Adler-Nissen, R. (2019). Ideological asymmetry in the reach of pro-Russian digital disinformation to United States audiences. Journal of Communication, 69(2), 168-192. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqz006

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Humanes, M.L. (2014). Exposición selectiva y partidismo de las audiencias en España. El consumo de información política durante las campañas electorales de 2008 y 2011. Palabra Clave, 17(3), 773-802. https://doi.org/10.5294/pacla.2014.17.3.9

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Ibáñez J. (1979). Más allá de la sociología. El grupo de discusión: Técnica y crítica. Siglo XXI. https://bit.ly/3N7SQX6

Link Google Scholar

Katz, E., & Lazarsfeld, P. (1955). Personal influence. The Free Press.

Link Google Scholar

Lazarsfeld, P., Berelson, B., & Gaudet, H. (1944). The people’s choice: How the voter makes up his mind in a presidential campaign. Columbia University Press. https://bit.ly/3wjoYRR

Link Google Scholar

Madrid-Morales, D., Wasserman, H., Gondwe, G., Ndlovu, K., Sikanku, E., Tulley, M., ... & Uzuegbunam, C. (2021). Motivations for sharing misinformation: A comparative study in six Sub-Saharan African countries. International Journal of Communication, 15, 1200-1219. https://bit.ly/3vEdoQI

Link Google Scholar

Masip, P., Ruiz-Caballero, C., & Suau, J. (2019). Active audiences and social discussion on the digital public sphere. Review article. Profesional de la Información, 28(2). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2019.mar.04

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Mercenier, H., Wiard, V., & Dufrasne, M. (2022). Teens, social media and fake news: A user’s perspective. In G. Lopez-García, D. Palau-Sampio, B. Palomo, E. Campos-Dominguez, & P. Masip (Eds.), Politics of disinformation: The influence of fake news on public sphere (pp. 161-172). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119743347.ch12

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Molina, M.D., Sundar, S.S., Le, T., & Lee, D. (2019). «Fake News» is not simply false information: A concept explication and taxonomy of online content. American Behavioral Scientist, 65(2) 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764219878224

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Nelson, J.L., & Taneja, H. (2018). The small, disloyal fake news audience: The role of audience availability in fake news consumption. New Media & Society, 20(10), 3720-3737. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818758715

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Newman, N., & Levy, D.A. (2014). Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2014. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2619576

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Nielsen, R.K., & Graves, L. (2017). News you don’t believe: Audience perspectives on fake news. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. https://bit.ly/3CTvHBJ

Link Google Scholar

Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the internet is hiding from you. Penguin. https://doi.org/10.3139/9783446431164

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Photiou, I., & Maniou, T. A. (2018). Changing audiences, changing realities: Identifying disinformation via new teaching curricula [Conference]. Crisis reporting: Proceedings of the EJTA Teachers’ Conference, Grecia. https://bit.ly/2ZthopO

Link Google Scholar

Prior, M. (2007). Post-broadcast democracy: How media choice increases inequality in political involvement and polarizes elections. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139878425

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Roses-Campos, S., & Humanes-Humanes, M. (2019). Conflicts in the professional roles of journalists in Spain: Ideals and practice. [Conflictos en los roles profesionales de los periodistas en España: Ideales y práctica]. Comunicar, 58, 65-74. https://doi.org/10.3916/C58-2019-06

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Salaverría, R., Buslón, N., López-Pan, F., León, B., López-Goñi, I., & Erviti, M.C. (2020). Desinformación en tiempos de pandemia: tipología de los bulos sobre la Covid-19. Profesional de la Información, 29(3). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Sampedro, V., & Pérez-Seoane, F. (2008). Las elecciones generales españolas de 2008: Bipolarización antagónica fomentada por intereses político-mediáticos y las nuevas tecnologías. Revista de Sociología e Política, 17(34), 129-135. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-44782009000300010

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Shin, J., & Thorson, K. (2017). Partisan selective sharing: The biased diffusion of fact-checking messages on social media. Journal of Communication, 67(2), 233-255. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12284

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Stella, M., Ferrara, E., & De-Domenico, M. (2018). Bots sustain and inflate striking opposition in online social systems. PNAS, 115(49), 12435-12440. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1803470115

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Sunstein, C.R. (2009). Republic.com 2.0. Princeton University Press. https://bit.ly/3ueYkqn

Link Google Scholar

Tandoc, E.C., Lim, Z.W., & Ling, R. (2018). Defining «fake news»: A typology of scholarly definitions. Digital Journalism, 6(2), 137-153. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1360143

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Valera-Ordaz, L., & Humanes, M.L. (2022). What drives selective exposure to political information in Spain? Comparing political interest and ideology. In D. Palau-Sampio, G. López-García, & L. Ianelli (Eds.), Contemporary politics, communication and the impact on democracy (pp. 93-112). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-8057-8.ch006

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Vallone, R.P., Ross, L., & Lepper, M.R. (1985). The hostile media phenomenon: Biased perception and perceptions of media bias in coverage of the Beirut massacre. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(3), 577-585. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.49.3.577

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Wenzel, A. (2019). To verify or to disengage: Coping with «fake news» and ambiguity. International Journal of Communication, 13, 1977-1995. https://bit.ly/3KhCn0i

Link Google Scholar

Fundref

This research has been funded by the Generalitat Valenciana project ”Ecology of disinformation: the construction of false news and its impact on public space” (AICO2020/224) and by the national “Disinformation flows, polarization and mediation crisis (Disflows)” Project (PID2020-113574RB-I00).

Crossmark

技术信息

收到: 11-12-2021

修订: 12-01-2022

公认: 02-03-2022

OnlineFirst: 15-05-2022

发布日期: 01-07-2022

文章修改时间: 32 天 | 期刊编号的平均时间修订 72: 31 天

文章接受时间: 81 天 | 期刊编号的平均接受时间 72: 75 天

预印本编辑时间: 157 天 | 期刊编号的平均编辑时间预印 72: 151 天

文章编辑时间: 202 天 | 期刊编号的平均编辑时间 72: 196 天

度量

这篇文章的度量

浏览次数: 37124

对摘要的解读: 34609

PDF下载: 2515

的全部指标 72

浏览次数: 417422

对摘要的解读: 381952

PDF下载: 35470

被引用