Ключевые слова

Formative assessment, teamwork, cooperative learning, cooperative assessment, preservice teachers, university education, competences, erubrics

Резюме

Teamwork is one of the most widespread teaching methods used to achieve learning skills. Despite the difficulty of finding out the degree of individual learning taking place in each member of the group, these methods are having an increasingly greater importance in university teaching. The present article shows the results of an R+D+i1 project aimed at «analysing the impact of eRubrics ?electronic rubrics? on the assessment of university learning in various forms». Likewise, it aims to show the scope of eRubrics in improving cooperative skills, which are achieved through teamwork and cooperative assessment of tasks in the computer lab. The experiment takes place in three groups selected from a total of six groups of students from the First Year of Primary Education Teaching during the 2011-12 academic year. From the three groups, one acted as the control group and the other two as the experimental groups in which eRubrics were used. Differences were found in students’ results in a written test taken by all the groups, as the group using eRubrics achieved better results than the other two. Additionally, a qualitative analysis was conducted, by classifying the answers of students in the control group with regard to the evaluation criteria that they used, in order to check for coincidences with the eRubric criteria used by students in the experimental groups.

Ссылки

Andrade, H. (2005). Teaching with Rubrics: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly. College Teaching, 53(1), 27-31. (DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/CTCH.53.1.27-31).

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Bartolomé, A. (2012). De la Web 2.0 al e-learning 2.0. Perspectiva, 30 (1), 131-153. (DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/2175-795X.2012v30n1p131).

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Bartolomé, A., Martínez, E. & Tellado, F. (2012). Análisis comparativo de metodologías de evaluación formativa: diarios personales mediante blogs y autoevaluación mediante e-rúbricas. In C. Leite & M. Zabalza (Coords.), Ensino superior. Inovação e qualidade na docencia (417-429). CIIE: Porto.

Link Google Scholar

Blanco, A. (2009). Desarrollo y evaluación de competencias en educación superior. Madrid: Narcea.

Link Google Scholar

Brown, S. & Glasner, A. (2003). Evaluar en la Universidad. Madrid: Narcea.

Link Google Scholar

Cebrián-de-la-Serna, M. (2011). Supervisión con e-portafolios y su impacto en las reflexiones de los estudiantes en el Practicum. Estudio de Caso. Revista de Educación, 354, 183-208.

Link Google Scholar

Colás, P., Buendía, L. & Hernández, F. (2009). Competencias científicas para la realización de una tesis doctoral. Madrid: Davinci.

Link Google Scholar

De-Miguel, M. (2006). Modalidades de enseñanza centradas en el desarrollo de competencias. Ediciones Universidad de Oviedo. (http://goo.gl/1X1ESu) (07-07-2013).

Link Google Scholar

Del-Pozo, J. (2012). Competencias profesionales. Herramientas de evaluación y portafolio, la rubrica y las pruebas situacionales. Madrid: Narcea.

Link Google Scholar

Falchikov, N. & Goldfinch, J. (2000). Student Peer Assessment in Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis Comparing Peer & Teacher Marks. Review of Educational Research, 70, 3, 287-322.

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Falchikov, N. (2005). Improving Assessment Trough Student Involment. New York (USA): Routledge.

Link Google Scholar

Gámiz-Sánchez, V., Gallego-Arrufat, M.J. & Moya, E. (2012). Experiencias docentes de evaluación en metodologías activas con TIC: Análisis de casos en la Universidad de Granada. II Congreso Internacional sobre evaluación por competencias mediante e-rúbricas. Universidad de Málaga, Octubre 2012. (http://goo.gl/fUY4Jt) (16-08-2013).

Link Google Scholar

Hafner, J.C. & Hafner, P.H. (2003). Quantitative Analysis of the Rubric as an Assessment Tool: An Empirical Study of Student Peer-Group Rating. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 12, 1.509-1.528. (DOI: http://dxdoi.org/10.1080/0950069022000038268).

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Hargreaves, E. (2007). The Validity of Collaborative Assessment for Learning. Assessment in Education, 14, 2, 185-199. (DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0950069022000038268).

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Jonsson, A. & Svingby, G. (2007). The Use of Scoring Rubrics: Reliability, Validity and Educational Conséquences. Educational Research Review 2, 130-144. (DOI: http://dx.dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2007.05.002).

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

López-Pastor, V. (2009). Evaluación formativa y compartida en educación superior. Madrid: Narcea.

Link Google Scholar

Martínez, M.E., Tellado, F. & Raposo, M. (2013). La rúbrica como instrumento para la autoevaluación: un estudio piloto. Revista de Docencia Universitaria, 11(2), 373-390.

Link Google Scholar

Meeus, W., Petegem, P. & Engels, A. (2009). Validity and Reliability of Portfolio Assessment in Pre-Service Teacher Education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(4), 401-413. (DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02602930802062659).

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Moril, R., Ballester, L. & Martínez, J. (2012). Introducción de las matrices de valoración analítica en el proceso de evaluación del Practicum de los Grados de Infantil y de Primaria. Revista de Docencia Universitaria, 10(2), 251-271.

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Osana, H. & Seymour, J. (2004). Critical Thinking in Preservice Teachers: A Rubric for Evaluating Argumentation and Statistical Reasoning. Educational Research and Evaluation, 10, 4-6, 473-498. (DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13803610512331383529).

Link Google Scholar

Panadero, E. & Jonsson, A. (2013). The Use of Scoring Rubrics for Formative Assessment Purposes Revisited: A Review. Educational Research Review, 9, 129-144. (DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.01.002).

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Panadero, E., Alonso-Tapia, J. & Reche, E. (2013). Rubrics vs. self-assessment scripts effect on self-regulation, performance and self-efficacy in pre-service teachers. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 39(3), 125-132. (DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.04.001).

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Prins, F.J., Sluijsmans, D.M.A., Kirschner, P.A. & Strijbos, J.W. (2005). Formative Peer Assessment in a CSCL Environment: A Case Study, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 30, 417-444. (http://goo.gl/u2VOGY).

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Reddy, Y. & Andrade, H. (2010). A Review of Rubric Use in Higher Education. Assessment & Evaluation In Higher Education, 35, 4, 435-448. (DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02602930902862859).

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Rodríguez-Gómez, G. & Ibarra-Sáiz, M.S. (2011). E-Evaluación orientada al e-aprendizaje estratégico en educación superior. Madrid: Narcea.

Link Google Scholar

Vickerman, Ph. (2009). Student Perspectives on Formative Peer Assessment: an Attempt to Deepen Learning, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34, 221-230.

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Voogt, J. & Knezek, G. (2008). International Handbook of Information Technology in Primary and Secondary Education. New York: Springer.

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Zabalza, M. (2010). Planificación de la docencia en la universidad. Madrid: Narcea.

Link Google Scholar

Fundref

Crossmark

Техническая спецификация

метрика

Метрики этой статьи

Просмотров: 34896

Ознакомление с аннотациями: 28411

загрузки PDF-файлов: 6485

Полные метрики 43

Просмотров: 800427

Ознакомление с аннотациями: 635880

загрузки PDF-файлов: 164547

Цитируется

Цитаты в Web of Science

Perez Galan, Rafael; Cebrian Robles, Daniel; Rueda Galiano, Ana B.. Peer assessment and self-evaluation with erubrics: a case study in the Degree in Early Childhood Education REDU-REVISTA DE DOCENCIA UNIVERSITARIA, 2014.

Link Google Scholar

Jacobs, George; Seow, Peter. OOPERATIVE LEARNING PRINCIPLES ENHANCE ONLINE INTERACTION JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL AND COMPARATIVE EDUCATION, 2015.

https://doi.org/10.14425/00.76.07

Mira-Gimenez, Mario-Jesus. Analysis of the eELP (Electronic European Language Portfolio): students' opinion about Descriptors, Learning to learn and Self-Assessment RIED-REVISTA IBEROAMERICANA DE EDUCACION A DISTANCIA, 2017.

https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.20.1.16519

Canton-Mayo, Isabel; Canon-Rodriguez, Ruth; Grande-de-Prado, Mario. COMUNICATION AS A DIGITAL LITERACY SUBDIMENSION ON FUTURE PRIMARY TEACHERS PIXEL-BIT- REVISTA DE MEDIOS Y EDUCACION, 2017.

https://doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.2017.i50.02

Cebrian-Robles, Daniel; Cebrian-de-la-Serna, Manuel; Jesus Gallego-Arrufat, Maria; Quintana Contreras, Jesus. The impact of a scientific argumentation electronic rubric on the blended learning methodology RIED-REVISTA IBEROAMERICANA DE EDUCACION A DISTANCIA, 2018.

https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.21.1.18827

Herrada Valverde, Rosario Isabel; Banos Navarro, Raul. Cooperative learning through new technologies: A review ATTIC-REVISTA D INNOVACIO EDUCATIVA, 2018.

https://doi.org/10.7203/attic.20.11266

Rodriguez-Minambres, Paloma; Martinez, Arantza Rico; Lopez de Robles, Alfredo Lopez de Sosoaga; Ugalde Gorostiza, Ana Isabel. Evaluation by rubrics of a Primary School Project simulation in a Primary Teacher Training Degree REVISTA ELECTRONICA INTERUNIVERSITARIA DE FORMACION DEL PROFESORADO, 2018.

https://doi.org/10.6018/reifop.21.2.315011

Concepcion Velasco-Martinez, Leticia; Tojar Hurtado, Juan Carlos. The use of rubrics in higher education and competences evaluation PROFESORADO-REVISTA DE CURRICULUM Y FORMACION DE PROFESORADO, 2018.

https://doi.org/10.30827/profesorado.v22i3.7998

Cabero-Almenara, Julio; Luisa Arancibia, Maria; Del Prete, Annachiara. Technical and Didactic Knowledge of the Moodle LMS in Higher Education. Beyond Functional Use JOURNAL OF NEW APPROACHES IN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 2019.

https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2019.1.327

Sanchez Marin, Francisco Jose; Concepcion Parra-Merono, Maria; Pena-Acuna, Beatriz. EXPERIENCES OF COOPERATIVE WORK IN HIGHER EDUCATION. PERCEPTIONS ABOUT ITS CONTRIBUTION TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF SOCIAL COMPETENCE VIVAT ACADEMIA, 2019.

https://doi.org/10.15178/va.2019.147.87-108

Romero Alonso, Rosita; Riquelme Plaza, Irma; Halal Orfali, Carol; . Barriers in teacher perception about the use of technology for evaluation in Higher Education DIGITAL EDUCATION REVIEW, 2019.

https://doi.org/#EANF#

Sierra-Martinez, Silvia; Esther Martinez-Figueira, Maria; Raposo-Rivas, Manuela; Parrilla, Angeles. Participative Digital Photography to Evaluate the Transition to University DIGITAL EDUCATION REVIEW, 2019.

Link Google Scholar

Sanchez, Y.; Tomas-Folch, M.;. Elements for the analysis of the interaction of learning between the different agents intervening in the Practicum of Physiotherapy REDU-REVISTA DE DOCENCIA UNIVERSITARIA , 2019.

https://doi.org/10.4995/redu.2019.11183

Arancibia Munoz, M. L.; Halal Orfali, C.; Chova, LG;. THE ROLE OF LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS (LMS) IN EDUCATIONAL ENVIRONMENTS: DIDACTIC AND TECHNICAL USE 11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF EDUCATION, RESEARCH AND INNOVATION (ICERI2018) , 2018.

Link Google Scholar

Цитаты в Scopus

Marín, V.I., Pérez Garcias, A.. Collaborative e-Assessment as a Strategy for Scaffolding Self-Regulated Learning in Higher Education), Formative Assessment, Learning Data Analytics and Gamification: In ICT Education, .

https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-803637-2.00001-4

Velasco-Martínez, L.C., Hurtado, J.C.T.. The use of rubrics in higher education, competences evaluation [Uso de rúbricas en educación superior y evaluación de competencias]), Profesorado, .

https://doi.org/10.30827/profesorado.v22i3.7998

Cabero-Almenara, J., Arancibia, M.L., Del Prete, A.. Technical, didactic knowledge of the moodle LMS in higher education. Beyond functional use), Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, .

https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2019.1.327

Alonso, R.R., Plaza, I.R., Orfali, C.H.. Barriers in teacher perception about the use of technology for evaluation in higher education), Digital Education Review, .

Link Google Scholar

Grande-De-Prado, M., Cañón-Rodríguez, R., Ferrero-De-Lucas, E., Vázquez-Fernández, J.L.. Technology, knowledge management: Educational approach [Tecnología y gestión del conocimiento: Aproximación educativa]), Espacios, .

Link Google Scholar

Sierra-Martínez, S., Martínez-Figueira, M.E., Raposo-Rivas, M., Parrilla, Á.. Participative digital photography to evaluate the transition to university), Digital Education Review, .

Link Google Scholar

Brent, R., Prince, M., Felder, R. . Promoting and managing student-student interactions in online STEM classes), International Journal of Engineering Education, .

Link Google Scholar

Moncada-Arce, A.M., Ortiz-Vidal, E., Casagrande, D.E.. Students' views on linking curricular content of three first-year courses of a mechanical engineering program ), Formacion Universitaria, .

https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-50062022000100083

Martiáñez-Ramírez, N.L., Pineda-Galán, C., Rodríguez-Bailón, M., Romero-Galisteo, R.-P.. Competence assessment rubric in the Physiotherapy Practicum), PLoS ONE, .

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264120

Torres-Hernández, N., Gallego-Arrufat, M.-J.. Indicators to assess preservice teachers’ digital competence in security: A systematic review), Education and Information Technologies, .

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10978-w

Díez-Gutiérrez, E.-J., Gajardo Espinoza, K.. Higher Education and online assessment in the time of Coronavirus. What do students think?), Bordon. Revista de Pedagogia, .

https://doi.org/10.13042/Bordon.2021.86058

Franco-Mariscal, A.-J., Cebrián-Robles, D., Rodríguez-Losada, N.. Impact of a Training Programme on the e-rubric Evaluation of Gamification Resources with Pre-Service Secondary School Science Teachers), Technology, Knowledge and Learning, .

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-021-09588-1

Pérez-Torregrosa, A.-B., Gallego-Arrufat, M.-J.. Progressive electronic self-assessment to promote reflective processes of future teachers), Revista Fuentes, .

https://doi.org/10.12795/REVISTAFUENTES.2021.15401

Цитаты в Google Scholar

Jacobs, G., & Seow, P. (2015). Cooperative learning principles enhance online interaction. Journal of International and Comparative Education (JICE), 28-38.

http://jice.um.edu.my/index.php/JICE/article/view/2698

Doffo, M. L. A. (2016). Estudio sobre la evaluación formativa y compartida en la formación docente en inglés. Revista Electrónica" Actualidades Investigativas en Educación", 16(1), 1-21.

https://www.scielo.sa.cr/pdf/aie/v16n1/1409-4703-aie-16-01-00282.pdf

Angelini, M. L. (2016). Análisis y estrategias en la aplicación de la evaluación formativa y compartida en magisterio. Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios Educativos (México), 46(1), 51-78.

https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/270/27044739003.pdf

Jurāne-Brēmane, A. (2018). Formatīvā vērtēšana studiju procesā.

http://dspace.lu.lv/dspace/handle/7/38330

Hall Jr, O. P., & Griffy-Brown, C. (2016). Crowdsourcing management education assessment. Journal of International Technology and Information Management, 25(2), 1.

http://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1270&context=jitim

Romera, D. D. M. (2017). La evaluación de diseños de intervención para el Prácticum como instrumento de formación e investigación en el Máster de Profesorado de Ciencias Sociales. Revista Practicum, 2(2), 32-49.

https://idp.gteavirtual.org/ojs/index.php/iop/article/view/33

Angelini Doffo, M. L. (2016). Formative and shared assessment research in teacher training degrees in english. Actualidades Investigativas en Educación, 16(1), 282-303.

http://www.scielo.sa.cr/scielo.php?pid=S1409-47032016000100282&script=sci_arttext

de la Serna, M. C., Arrufat, M. J. G., & Rivas, M. R. Evaluación de competencias con tecnologías emergentes.

https://gteavirtual.org/citee/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Mesa-CITEE19.pdf

COWIE, N., & SAKUI, K. (2016). The use of rubrics for the assessment of digital products in language learning. In JACET Summer Seminar Proceedings.

...

Скачать

Альтернативные метрики

Как процитировать

Cebrián-de-la-Serna, M., Serrano-Angulo, J., & Ruiz-Torres, M. (2014). eRubrics in cooperative assessment of learning at university. [Las eRúbricas en la evaluación cooperativa del aprendizaje en la universidad]. Comunicar, 43, 153-161. https://doi.org/10.3916/C43-2014-15

Доля

           

Почтовый ящик 527

21080 Уэльва (Испания)

Администрация

Редакция

Creative Commons

Данный сайт использует куки-файлы для получения статистических данных о навигации своих пользователей. Если вы продолжите просмотр, мы считаем, что вы принимаете его использование. +info X