Palavras chave
Plágio, educação online, plágio cibernético, plano de atividades, percepção estudantil, motivação, anti-plágio, ética acadêmica
Resumo
O objetivo deste trabalho é compreender melhor a natureza do plágio no Ensino Superior. Analisamos uma série de atividades em um curso online de nível universitário, com o objetivo de encontrar quais são as tarefas que levam mais naturalmente ao plágio. Esta análise conclui que as atividades que têm uma menor taxa de plágio são as atividades que incentivam a participação, a originalidade e a criatividade. Posteriormente, reformulamos a tarefa que apresenta a maior taxa de plágio, levando em consideração as conclusões da análise anterior e tentando manter seu esforço relativo e o impacto educativo. Em seguida, comparamos as atividades do novo plano com a dos originais para medir se a reestruturação implica uma redução significativa do plágio. Os resultados são claros e mostram uma queda significativa nas porcentagens de plágio. Além disso, foi realizada uma validação adicional em que se analisou a atividade com a segunda taxa de plágio mais alta, considerando que os grupos eram comparáveis e mostravam atitudes semelhantes em outros exercícios que não tinham sido reestruturados. Este estudo mostra que é possível reduzir a incidência de plágio mediante o plano de atividades de tal maneira que os estudantes se sintam motivados para propor suas próprias ideias usando a informação disponível na internet como veículo para suas soluções, em vez de como soluções em si.
Referências
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Chen, Y. & Chou, C. (2014). Why and Who Agree on Copy-and-Paste? Taiwan College Students’ Perceptions of Cyber-Plagiarism. In J. Viteli, & M. Leikomaa (Eds.), Proceedings of EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology 2014 (pp. 937-943). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). (https://goo.gl/Zo4q5e) (2016-08-03).
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Comas, R., Sureda, J., & Oliver, M. (2011). Prácticas de citación y plagio académico en la elaboración textual del alumnado universitario. Teoría de la Educación: Educación y Cultura en la Sociedad de la Información, 12 (1), 359-385. (http://goo.gl/Xl9JMX) (2016-08-03).
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Eddy, M. (2013). German Politician Faces Plagiarism Accusations. The New York Times. (http://goo.gl/GTDUju) (2016-08-03).
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Gómez, J., Salazar, I., & Vargas, P. (2012). Factors Explaining Student Plagiarism: an Empirical Test in a Spanish University, ICERI2012 Proceedings, 2.724-2.730.
Hart, M., & Friesner, T. (2004). Plagiarism and Poor Academic Practice – A Threat to the Extension of e-learning in Higher Education. Electronic Journal on E-Learning, 2(1), 89-96. (http://goo.gl/zqu78L) (2016-01-08)
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Six Degres (2008). Los usos de Internet en la educación superior: ‘De la documentación al plagio’. Survey by Six Dregres, Compilatio.net and Sphinx Development. (http://goo.gl/avllYX) (2016-08-03).
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Vallejo, M. (2011). Trabajos escritos: el problema del plagio. Escribir para aprender, tareas para hacer en casa. Guatemala: Universidad Rafael Landívar. (http://goo.gl/lfTRzf) (2016-08-03).
Fundref
Este trabalho não tem nenhum apoio financeiro
Technical information
Recebido: 02-01-2016
Revisado: 02-02-2016
Aceite: 22-02-2016
OnlineFirst: 15-05-2016
Data de publicação: 01-07-2016
Tempo de revisão do artigo: 31 dias | Tempo médio de revisão do número 48: 29 dias
Tempo de aceitação do artigo: 51 dias | Tempo médio de aceitação do número 48: 73 dias
Tempo de edição da pré-impressão: 135 dias | Tempo médio de edição pré-impressão do número 48: 157 dias
Tempo de processamento do artigo: 180 dias | Tempo médio de processamento do número 48: 202 dias
Métricas
Métricas deste artigo
Vistas: 32821
Leituras dos resumos: 24105
Descargas em PDF: 8716
Métricas completas do Comunicar 48
Vistas: 378620
Leituras dos resumos: 263017
Descargas em PDF: 115603
Citado por
Citas em Web of Science
Munoz-Cantero, Jesus-Miguel; Rebollo-Quintela, Nuria; Mosteiro-Garcia, Josefa; Ocampo-Gomez, Camilo-Isaac; . Validation of a questionnaire of attributions to the detection of coincidences in academic work RELIEVE-REVISTA ELECTRONICA DE INVESTIGACION Y EVALUACION EDUCATIVA, 2019.
https://doi.org/10.7203/relieve.25.1.13599
del Mar Pamies, Maria; Valverde, Mireia; Cross, Christine; . Organising research on university student plagiarism: a process approach HIGHER EDUCATION, 2019.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1658714
Cebrian Robles, Violeta; Raposo Rivas, Manuela; Sarmiento Campos, Jose Antonio; . STUDY OF THE REASONS FOR AND MEASURES TO AVOID PLAGIARISM IN YOUNG STUDENTS OF EDUCATION PROFESORADO-REVISTA DE CURRICULUM Y FORMACION DE PROFESORADO, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.30827/profesorado.v24i1.8572
Rodriguez-Gomez, David; Castro, Diego; Meneses, Julio; . Problematic uses of ICT among young people in their personal and school life COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2018.
https://doi.org/10.3916/C56-2018-09
Sanchez-Cruzado, Cristina; Santiago Campion, Raul; Teresa Sanchez-Compa, Ma; . Teacher Digital Literacy: The Indisputable Challenge after COVID-19 INTERNET AND HIGHER EDUCATION, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041858
Gallent Torres, Cinta; Tello Fons, Isabel; . University Faculty Perception of Cyber-Plagiarism: A Virtual Discussion Group REVISTA EDUCACION, 0.
https://doi.org/10.15517/revedu.v45i1.43527
#EANF#; . Plagiarism a scourge in the Ecuadorian academic environment Revista Universidad y Sociedad, 2020.
Espineira-Bellon, EM; Perez-Crego, MC and Munoz-Cantero, JM. Relationship between the lack of motivation and the academic plagiarism commission PROFESORADO-REVISTA DE CURRICULUM Y FORMACION DE PROFESORADO, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1030827/profesorado.v26i2.21194
Gomez-Espinosa, M; San Emeterio, MC and Navaridas-Nalda, F. Perceptions about academic plagiarism at university in a digital teaching context BORDON-REVISTA DE PEDAGOGIA, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.13042/Bordon.2022.90340
Espineira-Bellon, EM; Munoz-Cantero, JM; (...); Castro-Pais, MD. Cyber-plagiarism as digital support for the submission of academic writing Comunicar, 2021.
Citas em Scopus
Torres, C.G., Fons, I.T.. Cyber-plagiarism in Spanish higher education: Exploring the causes in order to reach specific solutions [Le cyberplagiat dans le cadre de l’éducation supérieure Espagnole: Explorer les causes pour atteindre des solutions concrètes]), Synergies Espagne, .
Rodriguez-Gomez, D., Castro, D., Meneses, J.. Problematic uses of ICT among young people in their personal, school life), Comunicar, .
https://doi.org/10.3916/C56-2018-09
Pàmies, M.D.M., Valverde, M., Cross, C.. Organising research on university student plagiarism: a process approach), Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, .
https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1658714
Cebrián Robles, V., Raposo Rivas, M., Sarmiento Campos, J.A. . Study of the reasons for and measures to avoid plagiarism in young students of education | [Estudio de las razones y medidas para evitar el plagio en jóvenes estudiantes de educación]), Profesorado, .
https://doi.org/10.30827/profesorado.v24i1.8572
Sánchez-Cruzado, C., Santiago Campión, R., Sánchez-Compaña, M.T. . Teacher digital literacy: The indisputable challenge after covid-19), Sustainability (Switzerland), .
https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041858
Muñoz-Cantero, J.-M., Rebollo-Quintela, N., Mosteiro-García, J., Ocampo-Gómez, C.-I. . Validation of a questionnaire of attributions to the detection of coincidences in academic work | [Validación del cuestionario de atribuciones para la detección de coincidencias en trabajos académicos]), BiD, .
https://doi.org/10.7203/relieve.25.1.13599
Gómez-Espinosa, M., Emeterio, M.C.S., Navaridas-Nalda, F.. Perceptions about academic plagiarism at university in a digital teaching context), Bordon. Revista de Pedagogia, .
https://doi.org/10.13042/Bordon.2022.90340
Espiñeira-Bellón, E.-M., Muñoz-Cantero, J.-M., Gerpe-Pérez, E.-M., Castro-Pais, M.-D.. Cyber-plagiarism as digital support for the submission of academic writing), Comunicar, .
Citas em Google Scholar
Talib, N. (2018). Masalah Plagiarisme Dan Amalan Penggunaan Turnitin Dalam Kalangan Pelajar Siswazah Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Asean Journal Of Teaching And Learning In Higher Education (Ajtlhe), 8(2), 1-15.
http://ejournals.ukm.my/ajtlhe/article/view/17932
Lopez, G. T. (2018). La Percepción Y El Conocimiento Sobre El Ciberplagio en Los Estudiantes Universitarios De Nuevo Ingreso (Doctoral dissertation, Universidad del Turabo (Puerto Rico)).
Gansinger, M. A., & Kole, A. (2017). Plagiarism and profit. Ethical and moral issues of scientific writing and academic publishing in the 21st century. Mapping Media Responsibility. Contemporary Aspects of Morals, Ethics and Social Discourse, 14.
Creed-Dikeogu, G. F. (2018). The politics behind the library plagiarism tutorial: a case study. Kansas Library Association College and University Libraries Section Proceedings, 8(1), 1.
https://newprairiepress.org/culsproceedings/vol8/iss1/1/
Kight, D. W. (2018). Exploring Adjunct Instructors' Decisions to Pursue Disciplinary Action for Plagiarism (Doctoral dissertation, Grand Canyon University).
Suseela, V. J., & Uma, V. (2017). Plagiarism and Academic Dishonesty: Study of Users’ Perceptions in the University of Hyderabad. SRELS Journal of Information Management, 54(6), 293-301.
http://www.srels.org/index.php/sjim/article/view/116067
Rodríguez-Gómez, D., Castro, D., & Meneses, J. (2018). Usos problemáticos de las TIC entre jóvenes en su vida personal y escolar. Comunicar, 26(56), 91-100.
https://www.redalyc.org/jatsRepo/158/15855661011/15855661011.pdf
Fernández-Ramos, A. (2017). Estrategias y herramientas tecnológicas para evitar el plagio académico. In La infodiversidad y el uso ético del conocimiento individual y colectivo (pp. 253-275). IIBI, UNAM.
http://eprints.rclis.org/31326/
Muñoz-Cantero, J. M., Rebollo-Quintela, N., Mosteiro-García, J., & Ocampo-Gómez, C. I. (2019). Validación del cuestionario de atribuciones para la detección de coincidencias en trabajos académicos. RELIEVE-Revista Electrónica de Investigación y Evaluación Educativa, 25(1).
https://www.uv.es/RELIEVE/v25n1/RELIEVEv25n1_4.pdf
Rodriguez-Gomez, D., Castro, D., & Meneses, J. (2018). Problematic uses of ICTs among young people in their personal and school life. Comunicar, 26(56), 91-100.
http://eprints.rclis.org/33057/
JANKALOVÁ, M., & JANKAL, R. ACADEMIC ETHICS IN CONDITION OF UNIVERSITY OF ŽILINA FROM STUDENTS’POINT OF VIEW.
Costalas, G. (2019). The Meaning Saudi International Undergraduate Students Give to Plagiarism at One Private College in the United States. Wilkes University.
https://www.gerflint.fr/Base/Espagne11/gallent_tello.pdf
Costalas, G. (2019). The Meaning Saudi International Undergraduate Students Give to Plagiarism at One Private College in the United States (Doctoral dissertation, Wilkes University).
Torres, C. G., & Fons, I. T. (2018). Le cyberplagiat dans le cadre de l’éducation supérieure espagnole: explorer les causes pour atteindre des solutions concrètes. Synergies Espagne, (11).
Carhuancho Mendoza, I. M., Sicheri Monteverde, L. G., Nolazco Labajos, F. A., De La Torre Tejada, J. A., Manosalvas Vaca, C. A., Palma León, R., ... & Romero Sandoval, A. (2019). Innova Research Journal.
https://repositorio.uide.edu.ec/handle/37000/4138
Rodriguez-Gomez, D., Castro, D., & Meneses, J. (2018). Problematic uses of ICTs among young people in their personal and school life. Comunicar. Media Education Research Journal, 26(2).
https://www.scipedia.com/public/Rodriguez-Gomez_et_al_2018a
Robles, V. C. ESTUDIO DE LA PERCEPCIÓN DE LAS PRÁCTICAS DESHONESTAS POR LOS ESTUDIANTES DE CIENCIAS DE LA EDUCACIÓN DE LA UNIVERSIDAD DE MÁLAGA.
https://frcatel.fri.uniza.sk/hrme/files/2016/2016_2_05.pdf
Sandoval, A. R., & Cornejo, E. P. (2019). Percepción estudiantil sobre trampa académica en una extensión universitaria. INNOVA Research Journal, 4(3), 38-52.
http://201.159.222.115/index.php/innova/article/view/992
Showalter, R., & Chiorescu, C. (2019, November). Course Redesign and its Impact on Student Success. In E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 1321-1326). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
https://www.learntechlib.org/p/211221/
Burlington, A. (2020). Student Perceptions of Academic Integrity in an Online Psychiatric Nurse Education.
Métricas alternativas
Como citar
Gómez-Espinosa, M., Francisco, V., & Moreno-Ger, P. (2016). The impact of activity design in Internet plagiarism in Higher Education. [El impacto del diseño de actividades en el plagio de Internet en educación superior]. Comunicar, 48, 39-48. https://doi.org/10.3916/C48-2016-04