Keywords
Critical citizenship, critical thinking, media education, social mobilization, educational software, technology innovation, collective intelligence, textual analysis
Abstract
Strengthening critical thinking abilities of citizens in the face of news published on the web represents a key challenge for education. Young citizens appear to be vulnerable in the face of poor quality news or those containing nonexplicit ideologies. In the field of data science, computational and statistical techniques have been developed to automatically collect and characterize online news media in real time. Nevertheless, there is still not a lot of interdisciplinary research on how to design data exploration platforms supporting an educational process of critical citizenship. This article explores this opportunity through a case study analyzing critical thinking ability of students when facing news dealing with the social mobilization “No+APF”. From data collected through 4 online exercises conducted by 75 secondary school students, 55 university students and 25 communication specialists, we investigate to what extent young citizens are able to classify news headlines and ideological orientation of news media outlets. We also question the influence of the media’s brand name and the subjectivity of each participant in regards to the social mobilization “No+APF”. The results underline the importance of group work, the influence of the brand name and the correlation between criticalthinking abilities and having a defined opinion.
References
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Barranquero-Carretero, A., Lema-Blanco, I. (2016). La juventud española y los medios del Tercer Sector de la Comunicación. Madrid: Centro Reina Sofía sobre Adolescencia y Juventud /FAD. (goo.gl/EGRfJ3).
Cadem (2016). Track semanal de opinión pública, 16 de Agosto 2016, Estudio #135. (http://goo.gl/QJJ6dQ).
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Freinet, C. (1927). L’imprimerie à l’école. Brochures d’éducation nouvelle populaire. Boulogne, Ferrary.
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Iglesias, M. (2011). Rompiendo el cerco: el movimiento de pobladores contra la dictadura. Santiago: Radio Universidad de Chile.
Islas, O. (2010). Internet 2.0: El territorio digital de los prosumidores. Estudios Culturales, 5(3), 43-64. (http://goo.gl/RJJk6b).
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Maigrot, C., Kijak, E., & Claveau, V. (2016). Médias traditionnels, médias sociaux: Caractériser la réinformation. TALN 2016 - 23ème Conférence sur le Traitement Automatique des Langues Naturelles, Jul. 2016, Paris, France. (http://goo.gl/2Lrzze).
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2005). Estándares de competencia para el pensamiento crítico. Estándares, principios, desempeño, indicadores y resultados con una rúbrica maestra en el pensamiento crítico. Dillon Beach: Fundación para el Pensamiento Crítico. (http://goo.gl/UMVRP1).
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Ruiz, A., Medina, M., & García, L. (2001). ¿Fomenta la prensa onubense la integración de los inmigrantes en nuestra sociedad? Comunicar, 17, 176-179. (http://goo.gl/Lrg92C).
Scolari, C. (2015). Ecología de los medios: entornos, evoluciones e interpretaciones. Madrid. Gedisa.
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Surowiecki, J. (2004). The wisdom of crowds. New York: Anchor.
Vernier, M., Cárcamo-Ulloa, L., & Scheihing, E. (2016). Diagnóstico de la estrategia editorial de medios informativos chilenos en Twitter mediante un clasificador de noticias automatizado. Revista Austral de Ciencias Sociales, 30, 183-201. (goo.gl/D7msKH).
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Wolton, D. (2011). Informar no es comunicar. Madrid: Gedisa.
Fundref
Technical information
Received: 28-02-2017
Revised: 03-04-2017
Accepted: 28-07-2017
OnlineFirst: 15-11-2017
Publication date: 01-01-2018
Article revision time: 34 days | Average time revision issue 54: 44 days
Article acceptance time: 150 days | Average time of acceptance issue 54: 97 days
Preprint editing time: 262 days | Average editing time preprint issue 54: 210 days
Article editing time: 307 days | Average editing time issue 54: 255 days
Metrics
Metrics of this article
Views: 68276
Abstract readings: 57919
PDF downloads: 10357