#TrumpenMexico. Transnational connective action on Twitter and the border wall dispute

 María-Elena Meneses, Ciudad de México (Мексика)

 Alejandro Martín-del-Campo, Ciudad de México (Мексика)

 Héctor Rueda-Zárate, Ciudad de México (Мексика)

https://doi.org/10.3916/C55-2018-04

Ключевые слова

Networks, social networks, public opinion, political communication, digital communication, cultural practices, emotions, virtual environment

Резюме

This article aims to identify how digital public opinion was articulated on Twitter during the visit of the Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump to Mexico City in 2016 by invitation from the Mexican government, which was preceded by the threat to construct a border wall that Mexico would pay for. Using a mixed methodology made up of computational methods such as data mining and social network analysis combined with content analysis, the authors identify conversational patterns and the structures of the net-works formed, beginning with this event involving the foreign policy of both countries that share a long border. The authors study the digital media practices and emotional frameworks these social network users employed to involve themselves in the controversial visit, marked by complex political, cultural and historical relations. The analysis of 352,203 tweets in two languages (English and Spanish), those most used in the conversations, opened the door to an understanding as to how transnational public opinion is articulated in connective actions detonated by newsworthy events in distinct cultural contexts, as well as the emotional frameworks that permeated the conversation, whose palpable differences show that Twitter is not a homogeneous universe, but rather a set of universes co-determined by sociocultural context.

Ссылки

AFP (2016). Visita de Trump a México golpea la popularidad de Peña Nieto. El Economista. (https://goo.gl/DM8yeZ).

Link Google Scholar

Ahmed, A., & Malkin, E. (2016). Mexicans Accuse President of ‘Historic Error’ in Welcoming Donald Trump. The New York Times, A17. (https://goo.gl/yb1Kbu).

Link Google Scholar

Bakshy, E., Hofman, J.M., Mason, W.A., & Watts, D.J. (2011). Everyone’s an influencer: Quantifying influence on twitter. Proceedings of the fourth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (pp. 65-74). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1935826.1935845

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Bennett, W.L., & Segerberg, A. (2013). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Massachusetts: Cambridge University Press. (https://goo.gl/NxxV1Z).

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Bessi, A., & Ferrara, E. (2016). Social bots distort the 2016 US presidential election online discussion. First Monday, 21(11), https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v21i11.7090

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Boyd, D., Golder, S., & Lotan, G. (2010). Tweet, tweet, retweet: Conversational aspects of retweeting on twitter. System Sciences (HICSS): 43rd Hawaii International Conference On (pp. 1-10). IEEE. https://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/HICSS.2010.412

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Brandwatch. (2016). Estadísticas de TW. Brandwatch. (https://goo.gl/rhs3vv).

Link Google Scholar

Bruns, A., & Burgess, J. (2012). Researching news discussion on Twitter: New methodologies. Journalism Studies, 13(5-6), 801-814.

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Cha, M., Haddadi, H., Benevenuto, F., & Gummadi, P.K. (2010). Measuring user influence in twitter: The million follower fallacy. ICWSM, 10(10-17), 30. https://doi.org/10.1145/2897659.2897663

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Chadwick, A. (2013). The hybrid media system: Politics and power. New York: Oxford University Press.

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Chen, G.M. (2011). Tweet this: A uses and gratifications perspective on how active Twitter use gratifies a need to connect with others. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(2), 755-762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.10.023

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Conover, M., Ratkiewicz, J., Francisco, M.R., Gonçalves, B., Menczer, F., & Flammini, A. (2011). Political polarization on Twitter. ICWSM, 133, 89-96. (https://goo.gl/JFkQUD).

Link Google Scholar

Corasaniti, N., & Ahmed, A. (2016). Donald Trump to visit Mexico after more than a year of mocking it. The New York Times, A1. (https://goo.gl/A9c5as).

Link Google Scholar

Couldry, N. (2012). Media, society, world: Social theory and digital media practice. Cambridge: Polity. (https://goo.gl/dMkYYp).

Link Google Scholar

Deuze, M. (2008). The changing context of news work: Liquid journalism for a monitorial citizenry. International Journal of Communication, 2, 18. (https://goo.gl/xR3Q7j).

Link Google Scholar

Donald J. Trump [realDonaldTrump] (2016-08-30). I have accepted the invitation of President Enrique Pena Nieto, of Mexico, and look very much forward to meeting him tomorrow. [Tweet]. (https://goo.gl/o3ieL6).

Link Google Scholar

Donald J. Trump [realDonaldTrump] (2016-09-01). Mexico will pay for the wall! [Tweet]. (https://goo.gl/KDfJ1i).

Link Google Scholar

Enrique Peña-Nieto [EPN] (2016,1 de septiembre). Repito lo que le dije personalmente, Sr. Trump: México jamás pagaría por un muro. [Tweet]. (https://goo.gl/vdYSa1).

Link Google Scholar

Enrique Peña-Nieto [EPN] (2016-08-30). Al inicio de la conversación con Donald Trump dejé claro que México no pagará por el muro. [Tweet]. (https://goo.gl/2qsQNX).

Link Google Scholar

Even-Zohar, I. (1999). La posición de la literatura traducida en el polisistema literario. Teori´a de los Polisistemas, 1, 223-231. (https://goo.gl/E7cbxE).

Link Google Scholar

Goffman, E., & Rodríguez, J.L. (2006). Frame analysis: Los marcos de la experiencia. Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas.

Link Google Scholar

González-Bailón, S., Borge-Holthoefer, J., Rivero, A., & Moreno, Y. (2011). The dynamics of protest recruitment through an online network. Scientific Reports, 1, 197. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep00197

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Hansen, L.K., Arvidsson, A., Nielsen, F.Å., Colleoni, E., & Etter, M. (2011). Good friends, bad news-affect and virality in Twitter. In Park J.J., Yang L.T., & Lee C. (Eds.), Future information technology. Communications in computer and information science future information technology (pp. 34-43). Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22309-9_5

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Hermida, A. (2010). Twittering the news: The emergence of ambient journalism. Journalism Practice, 4(3), 297-308. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512781003640703

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Honey, C., & Herring, S.C. (2009). Beyond microblogging: Conversation and collaboration via Twitter. System Sciences, 2009. HICSS’09: 42nd Hawaii International Conference On (pp. 1-10). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/hicss.2009.89

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Hong, L., Convertino, G., & Chi, E.H. (2011). Language matters in Twitter: A large scale study. ICWSM. (https://goo.gl/7yN5Ku).

Link Google Scholar

INEGI (Ed.) (2016). Estadísticas a propósito del día Mundial de Internet. (https://goo.gl/ed9Aet).

Link Google Scholar

Internet Live Stats (Ed.) (2016). Internet live stats 2016. (https://goo.gl/3UQcZL).

Link Google Scholar

Jungherr, A. (2015). Analyzing political communication with digital trace data. Switzerland: Springer. (https://goo.gl/8CWHZs).

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Katz, E., Blumler, J.G., & Gurevitch, M. (1973). Uses and gratifications research. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 37(4), 509-523. https://doi.org/10.1086/268109

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Krippendorff, K. (1997). Metodología de análisis de contenido. Teoría y práctica. Barcelona: Paidós.

Link Google Scholar

Krogstad, J. (2016). 5 facts about Mexico and immigration to the U.S. Pêw Research. (https://goo.gl/eNZn3N).

Link Google Scholar

Kwak, H., Lee, C., Park, H., & Moon, S. (2010). What is Twitter, a social network or a news media? Proceedings of the 19th international Conference on World Wide Web (pp. 591-600). Nueva York: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1772690.1772751

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Liu, I.L., Cheung, C.M., & Lee, M.K. (2010). Understanding Twitter usage: What drive people continue to Tweet. In PACIS, 92, 928-939. (https://goo.gl/fq2iZh).

Link Google Scholar

Lotan, G., Graeff, E., Ananny, M., Gaffney, D., & Pearce, I. (2011). The Arab Spring, the revolutions were tweeted: Information flows during the 2011 Tunisian and Egyptian revolutions. International Journal of Communication, 5(31). (https://goo.gl/bX6Ebo).

Link Google Scholar

Memoria y Tolerancia [MuseoMyT] (ed.) (2016-08-31). #SrTrumpConTodoRespeto, lo invitamos a que nos visite para recordar la historia y no la repita. #TrumpAlMuseoMyT [Tweet]. (https://goo.gl/oVMDT2).

Link Google Scholar

Memoria y Tolerancia [MuseoMyT] (Ed.) (2016-08-31). #SrTrumpConTodoRespeto, lo invitamos a que nos visite para recordar la historia y no la repita. #TrumpAlMuseoMyT [Tweet]. (https://goo.gl/VJ3xB3).

Link Google Scholar

Merica, D. (2016). Clinton: In Mexico ‘Trump just failed his first foreign test’. CNN. (https://goo.gl/fksyKB).

Link Google Scholar

Papacharissi, Z. (2015). Affective publics: Sentiment, technology, and politics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Link Google Scholar

Papacharissi, Z., & Oliveira, M. (2012). Affective news and networked publics: The rhythms of news storytelling on# Egypt. Journal of Communication, 62(2), 266-282. https://doi.org/0.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01630.x

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Parmelee, J.H., & Bichard, S.L. (2011). Politics and the Twitter revolution: How tweets influence the relationship between political leaders and the public. London: Lexington Books. (https://goo.gl/pmRtWH).

Link Google Scholar

Peddinti, S.T., Ross, K.W., & Cappos, J. (2014). On the Internet, nobody knows you’re a dog: A Twitter case study of anonymity in social networks. Proceedings of the Second ACM Conference on Online Social Networks (pp. 83-94). Nueva York: ACM. (https://goo.gl/pAgVTL).

Link Google Scholar

Politico (Ed.) (2016). Full text: Donald Trump immigration speech in Arizona. Político. (https://goo.gl/hLVjLK).

Link Google Scholar

Presidencia México [PresidenciaMX] (2016-08-30). El Señor @realDonaldTrump ha aceptado esta invitación y se reunirá mañana en privado con el Presidente @EPN. [Tweet]. (https://goo.gl/zFuPSF).

Link Google Scholar

Riding, A. (2011). Distant neighbors: A portrait of the Mexicans. New York: Vintage Books. (https://goo.gl/WBMfJK).

Link Google Scholar

Rogers, E.M. (2010). Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press. (https://goo.gl/tftE3J).

Link Google Scholar

Secretaría de Relaciones Exteriores (Ed.) (2016). Comercio México-Estados Unidos. (https://goo.gl/Qd3gBb).

Link Google Scholar

Secure Fence Act (2006). Public Law 109-367 109th Congress. Congressional Record, US, 26th october 2006. (https://goo.gl/HjdUv8).

Link Google Scholar

Statista (2016). Number of twitter users in the United States from 2014 to 2020 (in millions). Statista. (https://goo.gl/VVdzcg).

Link Google Scholar

The Economist (Ed.) (2016). The unspeakable and the inexplicable. The Economist. (https://goo.gl/cMERzb).

Link Google Scholar

Time (Ed.) (2015). Here’s Donald Trump’s Presidential announcement speech. Time. (https://goo.gl/2CRgBy).

Link Google Scholar

Washington Post [WashingtonPost] (Ed.) (2016-08-30). Breaking: Trump considers meeting in Mexico with the country’s president ahead of wednesday immigration speech. [Tweet]. (https://goo.gl/7WTsZ6).

Link Google Scholar

Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis. Methods and applications. Cambridge University Press. (https://goo.gl/q2KgCM).

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Watts, D.J., & Dodds, P.S. (2007). Influentials, networks, and public opinion formation. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(4), 441-458. https://doi.org/10.1086/518527

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Wu, S., Hofman, J.M., Mason, W.A., & Watts, D.J. (2011). Who says what to whom on Twitter. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on World Wide Web (pp. 705-714). Nueva York: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1963405.1963504

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Fundref

Эта работа не имеет финансовой поддержки

Crossmark

Техническая спецификация

Получила: 27-09-2017

пересмотренный: 26-10-2017

Принятый: 04-12-2017

OnlineFirst: 15-02-2018

Дата публикации: 01-04-2018

Время пересмотра статьи: 29 дней | Среднее время пересмотра вопроса 55: 54 дней

Время принятия статьи: 68 дней | Время приема Номер 55: 93 дней

Время редактирования препринта: 141 дней | Выпуск препринта среднего времени редактирования 55: 161 дней

Время редактирования статьи: 186 дней | Среднее время редактирования журнала 55: 206 дней

метрика

Метрики этой статьи

Просмотров: 31212

Ознакомление с аннотациями: 27510

загрузки PDF-файлов: 3702

Полные метрики 55

Просмотров: 464046

Ознакомление с аннотациями: 373040

загрузки PDF-файлов: 91006

Цитируется