Feminismo, identidade de gênero e polarização no TikTok e no Twitter

 Simón Peña-Fernández, Leioa (Espanha)

 Ainara Larrondo-Ureta, Leioa (Espanha)

 Jordi Morales-i-Gras, Leioa (Espanha)

https://doi.org/10.3916/C75-2023-04

Palavras chave

Jovens, estudos de gênero, identidade, feminismo, redes sociais, ativismo digital

Resumo

O potencial das redes sociais para a criação de espaços abertos, colaborativos e participativos tem possibilitado o envolvimento e o empoderamento de mulheres jovens no ativismo político e social. Nesse contexto, o objetivo desta pesquisa centra-se na análise da polarização que ocorre no debate nas redes sociais, na intersecção entre a defesa do feminismo e da transexualidade, preferencialmente entre o público jovem, simbolizada no uso do qualificador 'TERF '. Para isso, foram analisadas as comunidades existentes no Twitter e TikTok utilizando técnicas de Análise de Redes Sociais, bem como a presença de jovens nas mesmas. Os resultados indicam que os debates em ambas as redes são pouco coesos, com uma estrutura altamente modularizada que sugere o isolamento de cada comunidade em si. Por tudo isso, pode-se considerar que o debate sobre a identidade sexual resulta em uma forte polarização do ativismo feminista nas redes sociais. Da mesma forma, as posições do feminismo transinclusivo são majoritárias entre os jovens, o que reforça a ideia de um debate ideológico dentro do movimento feminista que também pode ser entendido a partir de uma perspectiva geracional. Por fim, foi possível verificar usos distintos entre ambas as redes sociais; TikTok se mostra uma rede menos partidária e mais dialógica que o Twitter, uma vez que conduz a discussões e participações num tom mais neutro.

Referências

Baer, H. (2016). Redoing feminism: Digital activism, body politics, and neoliberalism. Feminist Media Studies, 16(1), 17-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2015.1093070

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Banks, A., Karol, D., Calvo, E.F., & Telhami, S. (2018). #Polarized feeds - Two experiments on polarization and social media. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3122880

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Batsleer, J., & McMahon, G. (2016). Young feminists online: Political and social participation, social action and feminist activism. In Youth social action: What do we know about young people’s participation? Birmingham, UK. https://bit.ly/3YpPRyU

Link Google Scholar

Blondel, V.D., Guillaume, J.L., Lambiotte, R., & Lefebvre, E. (2008). Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 10, P10008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P10008

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Carrera-Fernández, M.V., & DePalma, R. (2020). Feminism will be trans-inclusive or it will not be: Why do two cis-hetero woman educators support transfeminism? The Sociological Review, 68(4), 745-762. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038026120934686

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Cho, J., Ahmed, S., Hilbert, M., Liu, B., & Luu, J. (2020). Do search algorithms endanger democracy? An experimental investigation of algorithm effects on political polarization. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 64(2), 150-172. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2020.1757365

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Consejo de Europa (Ed.) (2014). Young people’s responses to homophobic and transphobic hate speech. SOGI Unit. IGLYO. https://bit.ly/3URrecQ

Link Google Scholar

Demszky, D., Garg, N., Voigt, R., Zou, J., Gentzkow, M., Shapiro, J., & Jurafsky, D. (2019). Analyzing polarization in social media: Method and application to tweets on 21 mass shootings. In J. Burstein, C. Doran, T. Solorio (Eds),

Link Google Scholar

Earles, J. (2017). TERF Wars: Narrative productions of gender and essentialism in radical-feminist (cyber)spaces. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global; Sociology Collection. https://bit.ly/3dVthff

Link Google Scholar

Ferré-Pavia, C., & Zaldívar, G. (2022). El feminismo trans excluyente en Twitter: Un monólogo sesgado en #ContraElBorradoDeLasMujeres. Icono 14, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.7195/ri14.v20i2.1865

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Hagberg, A., Swart, P., & Chult, D.S. (2008). Exploring network structure, dynamics, and function using networkx. United States. https://bit.ly/3y6EBw2

Link Google Scholar

Injuve (Ed.) (2019). Guía breve orientaciones – Para combatir el discurso de odio en internet a través de la educación en derechos humanos. Instituto de la Juventud. https://bit.ly/3BZWVYU

Link Google Scholar

Injuve (Ed.) (2021). Informe juventud en España 2020. Instituto de la Juventud. https://bit.ly/3UMswEJ

Link Google Scholar

Jackson, S. (2018). Young feminists, feminism and digital media. Feminism & Psychology, 28(1), 32-49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353517716952

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Jinsook, K. (2017). #iamafeminist as the ‘mother tag’: Feminist identification and activism against misogyny on Twitter in South Korea. Feminist Media Studies, 17(5), 804-820. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2017.1283343

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Leifeld, P. (2018). Polarization in the social sciences: Assortative mixing in social science collaboration networks is resilient to interventions. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 507, 510-523, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2018.05.109

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Linabary, J.R., Corple, D.J., & Cooky, C. (2020). Feminist activism in digital space: Postfeminist contradictions in #WhyIStayed. New Media & Society, 22(10), 1827-1848. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819884635

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Lu, C.T. (2020). A computational approach to analyzing and detecting trans-exclusionary radical feminists (TERFs) on Twitter. Dartmouth College Undergraduate Theses, 165. https://bit.ly/3CkKqsg

Link Google Scholar

Malatino, H. (2021). The promise of repair: Trans rage and the limits of feminist coalition. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 46(4), 827-851. https://doi.org/10.1086/713292

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Manikonda, L., Beigi, G., Kambhampati, S., & Liu, H. (2018). #metoo through the lens of social media. In R. Thomson, C. Dancy, A. Hyder, & H. Bisgin (Eds), Social, Cultural, and Behavioral Modeling. SBP-BRiMS 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 10899. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93372-6_13

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Maulding, S. (2019). Pussy hats and anti-trans sentiments: When second-wave and third-wave collide. OSR Journal of Student Research, 5, 210. https://bit.ly/3fAur0p

Link Google Scholar

McLean, C. (2021). The growth of the anti-transgender movement in the United Kingdom. The Silent Radicalization of the British Electorate. International Journal of Sociology, 5(6), 473-482. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207659.2021.1939946

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Ott, K. (2018). Social media and feminist values: Aligned or maligned? Frontiers, 39(1), 93-111. https://doi.org/10.5250/fronjwomestud.39.1.0093

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Pearce, R., Erikainen, S., & Vincent, B. (2020). TERF wars: An introduction. The Sociological Review, 68(4), 677-698. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038026120934713

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Peña-Fernández, S., Larrondo-Ureta, A., & Morales-i-Gras, J. (2022). Current affairs on TikTok. Virality and entertainment for digital natives. Profesional de la Información, 31(1). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2022.ene.06

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1. (pp. 2970–3005). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/N19-1304

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Salido-Machado, E. (2017). Ciberfeminismo: Disidencias corporales y género itinerante. Revell, 3(17), 47-75. https://bit.ly/3BBzCFf

Link Google Scholar

Salloum, A. (2021). Quantifying polarization in social networks. Thesis submitted for examination for the degree of Master of Science in Technology. Aalto University. https://bit.ly/3UYwGtl

Link Google Scholar

Schuster, J. (2013) Invisible feminists? Social media and young women’s political participation. Political Science, 65(1), 8-24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032318713486474

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Smyte, V. (2018, November 18). I'm credited with having coined the word 'Terf'. Here's how it happened. The Guardian. https://bit.ly/2IMKyqN

Link Google Scholar

Social Media Family (Ed.) (2022). VIII Informe sobre el uso de las redes sociales en España. The Social Media Family. https://bit.ly/2BR2FHL

Link Google Scholar

Storer, H.L., & Rodriguez, M. (2020). #Mapping a movement: Social media, feminist hashtags, and movement building in the digital age. Journal of Community Practice, 28(2), 160-176. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705422.2020.1757541

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Sulbarán, P. (2020). ¿Qué significa ser ‘TERF’ y por qué se considera un insulto contra feministas radicales? BBC News Mundo. https://bbc.in/3C0IOlW

Link Google Scholar

Taylor, C., Mantzaris, A., & Garibay, I. (2018). Exploring how homophily and accessibility can facilitate polarization in social networks. Information, 9(12), 325. https://doi.org/10.3390/info9120325

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Ticineto-Clough, P., & Halley, J. (2007). The affective turn: Theorizing the social. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv11316pw

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

TikTok (Ed.) (2022). An update on our platform API for researchers. https://bit.ly/3Bozhpv

Link Google Scholar

Tortajada, I., Willem, C., Platero-Méndez, R.L., & Araüna, N. (2021). Lost in transition? Digital trans activism on YouTube. Information, Communication & Society, 24(8), 1091-1107. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1797850

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Turley, E., & Fisher, J. (2018). Tweeting back while shouting back: Social media and feminism activism. Feminism & Psychology, 28(1), 128-132. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353517715875

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Vázquez-González, J., & Cárdenes-Hernández, C. (2021). Discursos trans y transexcluyentes en Instagram. In M. Blanco-Pérez (Ed.), El progreso de la comunicación en la era de los prosumidores (pp. 648-664). Dykinson. https://bit.ly/3YlDAeS

Link Google Scholar

Vincent, B., Erikainen, S., & Pearce, R. (2020). TERF Wars: Feminism and the fight for transgender futures. Community Development Journal, 57(3), 573–577. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsab016

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Willem, C., & Tortajada, I. (2021). Gender, voice and online space: Expressions of feminism on social media in Spain. Media and Communication, 9(2), 62-71. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v9i2.3851

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Williams, C. (2020). The ontological woman: A history of deauthentication, dehumanization, and violence. The Sociological Review, 68(4), 718-734. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038026120938292

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Woolley, S.C., & Howard, P. (2018). Computational propaganda: Political parties, politicians, and political manipulation on social media. Oxford Studies in Digital Politics. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190931407.001.0001

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Fundref

Crossmark

Technical information

Recebido: 30-09-2022

Revisado: 23-10-2022

Aceite: 29-11-2022

OnlineFirst: 30-01-2023

Data de publicação: 01-04-2023

Tempo de revisão do artigo: 23 dias | Tempo médio de revisão do número 75: 32 dias

Tempo de aceitação do artigo: 60 dias | Tempo médio de aceitação do número 75: 93 dias

Tempo de edição da pré-impressão: 138 dias | Tempo médio de edição pré-impressão do número 75: 171 dias

Tempo de processamento do artigo: 183 dias | Tempo médio de processamento do número 75: 216 dias

Métricas

Métricas deste artigo

Vistas: 53926

Leituras dos resumos: 51465

Descargas em PDF: 2461

Métricas completas do Comunicar 75

Vistas: 548603

Leituras dos resumos: 532898

Descargas em PDF: 15705

Citado por