yes
Keywords
Text analysis, ancient texts, song culture, Greek hero, multimedia annotation, MOOC, self-assessment, tagging ontology, semantic tagging
Abstract
Evidence for annotating Homeric poetry in Ancient Greece is as old as the 5th Century BCE, when the «Iliad» and «Odyssey» were performed by professional singers/composers who also performed annotations to the poetry in answer to questions from their audiences. As the long transition from a song culture into a literate society took place in Ancient Greece from the 8th to the 2nd and 1st centuries BCE, annotations were gradually incorporated into written poetic texts. By the 10th Century CE, the quantity of written annotations in the margins of medieval manuscripts has become huge. For the first two versions of «The Ancient Hero», a HarvardX MOOC, it was not possible to implement the set of annotation tools that we requested as a vehicle for close reading and assessment. Using a partial system, we were able to create a semblance of annotations in close reading self-assessment exercises. For the anticipated third version, we expect to have a complete set of textual and video annotation tools developed for HarvardX, including semantic tagging and full sharing of annotations. Such a system, which promises to make the educational experience more effective, will also inaugurate a digital phase in the long history of Homeric annotation.
References
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Cebrián-de-la-Serna, M. & Bergman, M. (2014). Formative Assessment with eRubrics: an Approach to the State of the Art. Revista de Docencia Universitaria. (12)1, 23-29. (http://goo.gl/A4cpaa).
Cebrian-Robles, D. & Desenne, P. (2014). Open Video Annotation Project. Washington DC and Andalusia, Spain. (http://goo.gl/N1sXYD) (29-04-2014).
Comparetti, D. (Ed.) (1901). Homeri Ilias cum Scholiis: Codex Venetus A, Marcianus 454: phototypice editus. Lugduni Batavorum.
Link DOI | Link Google Scholar
Liyanagunawardena, T.R., Adams, A.A. & Williams, S.A. (2013). MOOC: A Systematic Study of the Published Literature 2008-12. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Education, 14, 3, 202-227. (http://goo.gl/CWHwqo) (29-04-2014).
Muellner, L., Nagy, G. & Papadopoulou, I. (2009). The Derveni Papyrus: An Interdisciplinary Research Project. (http://goo.gl/P3BXev) (29-04-2014).
Nagy, G. (2001). Orality and Literacy. (pp. 532-538). In T.O. Sloane (Ed.), Ency-clopedia of Rhetoric. Oxford. (http://goo.gl/j83XOA) (29-04-2014).
Nagy, G. (2004). Homer’s Text and Language. Urbana-Champagne.
Nagy, G. (2008). Homer the Classic, Washington. P§157-171, pp. 59-66. (http://goo.gl/VhIecp) (29-04-2014).
Nietzsche, F. (1982). Daybreak: Thoughts on the Prejudices of Morality, Translated by R.J. Hollingsdale. Cambridge.
Panadero, E. & Alonso-Tapia, J. (2013). Self-assessment: Theoretical and Practical Connotations. When it Happens, How is it Acquired and what to do to Develop it in our Students. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 11(2), 551-576, n. 30. (http://goo.gl/qZF7DV).
Pfeiffer, R. (1968). History of Clasical Scholarship: From the Beginnings to the End of the Hellenistic Age. Oxford.
Photographic archive of Papyri in the Cairo Museum (Pack 616) (http://goo.gl/lAoWQH) (29-04-2014).
Reich, J., Emanuel, J., Nesterko, S., Seaton, D.T., Mullaney, T., Waldo, J., Chuang, I. & Ho, A.D. (2014). HeroesX: The Ancient Greek Hero: Spring 2013 Course Report. (HarvardX Working Paper, 3). (http://goo.gl/fXblRZ) (29-04-2014).
Svembro, J. (1993). Phrasikleia: An Anthropology of Reading in Ancient Greece. N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
Technical information
Received: 29-04-2014
Revised: 13-06-2014
Accepted: 21-06-2014
OnlineFirst: 15-11-2014
Publication date: 01-01-2015
Article revision time: 45 days | Average time revision issue 44: 37 days
Article acceptance time: 53 days | Average time of acceptance issue 44: 69 days
Preprint editing time: 202 days | Average editing time preprint issue 44: 197 days
Article editing time: 247 days | Average editing time issue 44: 242 days
Metrics
Metrics of this article
Views: 35031
Abstract readings: 28552
PDF downloads: 6479
Full metrics of Comunicar 44
Views: 1062982
Abstract readings: 832912
PDF downloads: 230070
Cited by
Cites in Web of Science
Lemos-de-Carvalho-Junior, Giovani; Raposo-Rivas, Manuela; Cebrian-de-la-Serna, Manuel; Sarmiento-Campos, Jose A.. Analysis of the pedagogical perspective of the MOOCs available in Portuguese REVISTA ESPANOLA DE PEDAGOGIA, 2017.
https://doi.org/10.22550/REP75-1-2017-06
Belen Perez-Torregrosa, Ana; Diaz-Martin, Cristina; Ibanez-Cubillas, Pilar. The use of Video annotation tools in teacher training Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2017.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2017.02.090
Sanchez Vera, Ma del Mar; Gonzalez Calatayud, Victor; Prendes Espinosa, Maria Paz. The MOOC and student assessment: systematic review (2012-2016) ATTIC-REVISTA D INNOVACIO EDUCATIVA, 2017.
Cites in Scopus
Lemos-De-Carvalho, G., Jr., Raposo-Rivas, M., Cebrián-De-La-Serna, M., Sarmiento-Campos, J.A.. Analysis of the pedagogical perspective of the MOOCs available in Portuguese [Análisis de la perspectiva pedagógica de los MOOC ofertados en lengua portuguesa]), Revista Espanola de Pedagogia, .
https://doi.org/10.22550/REP75-1-2017-06
Garrido Gómez, M.I.. The communicability in MOOC, its strengthen by the multimedia annotations [La comunicabilidad en los MOOC y su potenciación mediante las anotaciones multimedia]), Opcion, .
Cebrián-de-la-Serna, M., Gallego-Arrufat, M.J., Cebrián-Robles, V. . Multimedia Annotations for Practical Collaborative Reasoning), Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, .
Cites in Google Scholar
Lemos-de-Carvalho-Júnior, G., Raposo-Rivas, M., Cebrían-de-la-Serna, M., & Sarmiento-Campos, J. A. (2017). Análisis de la perspectiva pedagógica de los MOOC ofertados en lengua portuguesa.
https://reunir.unir.net/handle/123456789/6201
Lemos-de-Carvalho-Junior, G., Raposo-Rivas, M., Cebrian-de-la-Serna, M., & A. SARMIENTO-CAMPOS, J. (2017). Análisis de la perspectiva pedagógica de los MOOC ofertados en lengua portuguesa/Analysis of the pedagogical perspective of the MOOCs available in Portuguese. revista española de pedagogía, 101-119.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/26379349
Robles, V. C. capítulo 2. lasanotacIonesenInternet: el Ágora dIgItal grIego.
http://gtea.uma.es/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/libro-gtea6.pdf#page=14
Rey, F. J. R., & Robles, D. C. capítulo 1. oVa: una herramIenta.
Vera, M. D. M. S., Calatayud, V. G., & Espinosa, M. P. P. (2017). Los MOOC y la evaluación del alumnado: revisión sistemática (2012-2016). @ tic. revista d'innovació educativa, (18), 65.
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=6043573
Vera, M. D. M. S., Calatayud, V. G., & Espinosa, M. P. P. The MOOC and student assessment: systematic review (2012-2016). @ tic revista d'innovació educativa, (18), 65.
https://ojs3.uv.es/index.php/attic/article/view/10013
Dos Santos, N. B., & Santos, G. L. (2018). PERSPECTIVAS EMERGENTES DAS PESQUISAS SOBRE MOOCS. CIET: EnPED.
https://cietenped.ufscar.br/submissao/index.php/2018/article/view/552
Robles, V. C. capítulo 2. lasanotacIonesenInternet: el Ágora dIgItal grIego.
http://gtea.uma.es/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/libro-gtea6.pdf#page=14
Rey, F. J. R., & Robles, D. C. capítulo 1. oVa: una herramIenta.
Pérez-Torregrosa, A. B., Díaz-Martín, C., & Ibáñez-Cubillas, P. (2017). The use of video annotation tools in teacher training. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 237, 458-464.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042817300903
Ortiz Jiménez, J. G. MOOCS: miradas críticas desde la pedagogía.
http://repository.usta.edu.co/handle/11634/13963
Gómez, M. I. G. (2015). La comunicabilidad en los MOOC y su potenciación mediante las anotaciones multimedia. Opción, 31(3), 528-540.
https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/310/31045567027.pdf
VASSALLO, L. Il Vangelo secondo Giovanni Il Vangelo secondo Giovanni come testo aurale.
Alternative metrics
How to cite
Muellner, L. (2015). Annotations and the ancient greek hero: Past, present, and future. [Anotaciones y el héroe griego antiguo: Pasado, presente y futuro]. Comunicar, 44, 45-53. https://doi.org/10.3916/C44-2015-05