Discourse analysis in the quality of expected learning

 Ana-Elena Schalk-Quintanar, Santiago de Chile (Chile)

 Carlos Marcelo, Sevilla (Spain)

https://doi.org/10.3916/C35-2010-03-06

Keywords

E-learning, quality learning, interaction, asynchronous communication, on-line education, knowledge building

Abstract

Universities are gradually implementing virtual learning processes. However, research still remains limited in examining the internal processes that occur in learning in virtual environments. This article presents an investigation that seeks to describe the relationship between the quality of interaction in asynchronous discussion forums in training experiences in e-learning, and the quality of learning offered and achieved. The main objective was to determine how interactions in online environments add quality to the learning of students. For this, a descriptive investigation was done that combines qualitative and quantitative phase, analyzing more than 10,000 messages in 171 participants from four postgraduate courses developed in the form of e-learning. Asynchronous communication was analyzed through a category system that analyzes the social, cognitive and didactic discourse online. Among the research findings, there highlights a positive relationship between quality and quantity of speech of the participants and the quality of learning achieved and reflected in the different levels of assessment. We can conclude that the need to analyze, not only the written discourse in asynchronous communication, but also to establish relations with both cognitive and social learning of students. Moreover, we conclude the necessity to train teachers to deal with the processes of online communication.

References

Anderson, G. (2004). E-Learning in the 21st Century: A Framework for Research and Practice. London: Routledge Falmer.

Link Google Scholar

Anderson, T.; Rourke, L. & Garrison, D. (2001). Assessing Teaching Presence in Asynchronous Text-Based Computer Conferencing, 5; (2-3).

Link Google Scholar

Castaño, C. (2003). El rol del profesor en la transición de la enseñanza presencial al aprendizaje on-line. Comunicar, 21; 49-55.

Link Google Scholar

Cebrián Herreros, M. (2009). Comunicación interactiva en los cibermedios. Comunicar, 33; 15-24.

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

De Wever, B.; Schellens, T.; Valcke, M. & Van Keer, H. (2006). Content Analysis Schemes to Analyze Transcripts of On-line Asynchronous Discussion Groups: A Review. London: Science Direct, Elsevier; 46; 6-28.

Link Google Scholar

Duffy, T. & Jonassen, D. (1992). Constructivism and the Techonology of Instruction. London:United States of America: LEA Editors.

Link Google Scholar

Fainholc, B. (2006). La interactividad en la educación a distancia. Buenos Aires: Paidós.

Link Google Scholar

Garrison, D. & Anderson, T. (2003). E-learning in the 21th Century. Great Britain: RoutledgeFalmer.

Link Google Scholar

Garrison, D.R.; Anderson, T. & Archer, W. (2001): Critical Thinking, Cognitive Presence, and Computer Conferencing in Distance Education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15 (1); 7-23.

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Hara, N.; Bonk, C. & Angeli, C. (2000): Content Analysis of On-line Discussion in an Applied Educational Psychology Course. Instructional Science, 28; 115-152.

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Hillman, W. & Gunawardena, A. (1994). Learner-interface Interaction in Distance Education: an Extension of Contemporary Models and Strategies for Practitioners. American Journal of Distance Education, 8; 30-42.

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Jiménez, G. & Llitjós, A. (2006). Procesos comunicativos en entornos telemáticos cooperativos. Comunicar, 47; 149-154.

Link Google Scholar

Lipman, M. (1991). Thinking in Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Link Google Scholar

Marcelo, C. & Perera, V.H. (2007). Comunicación y aprendizaje electrónico: la interacción didáctica en los nuevos espacios virtuales de aprendizaje. Revista de Educación, 343; 381-429. Mason, R. (1990). Computer Conferencing in Distance Education. En Bates, A. (Ed.). Media and Technology in European Distance Education. London: Routledge Falmer Studies in Distance Education Series.

Link Google Scholar

Marcelo, C. (2002). Aprender con otros en la red. Investigando evidencias. Zaragoza: Congreso Virtual Educa 2002.

Link Google Scholar

OECD. (2001). E-learning: The Partnership Challenge. Paris: OECD.

Link Google Scholar

Palloff, R. & Pratt, K. (1999). Building Learning Communities in Cyberspace. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Link Google Scholar

Perera, V. (2007). Estudio de la interacción didáctica en e-learning. Sevilla: Universidad de Sevilla.

Link Google Scholar

Rourke, L.; Anderson, L.; Garrison, D. & Archer, W. (2001): Methodological Issues in the Content Analysis of Computer Conference Transcripts. International Journal of Artificial Inteligence in Education, 12; 8-22.

Link Google Scholar

Schalk, A. (2006). Modelo pedagógico para formación de adultos en el desarrollo de competencias. Gestión en el Tercer Milenio. UNMSM, 8, 16; Revista de Investigación de la Facultad de Ciencias Administrativas,. Lima, diciembre 2005).63-87.

Link Google Scholar

Schalk, A.E. (2007). El valor de la comunicación e interacción asincrónica en una experiencia de formación virtual: análisis del discurso, desarrollo de competencias y calidad del producto final con los aprendizajes esperados. Programa de Experto y Máster en E-learning de la Universidad de Sevilla.

Link Google Scholar

Schotsberger, P. (2001). Classifying Forms of Synchronous Dialogue Resulting from Web-Based Teacher Professional Development. Orlando: SITE Conference.

Link Google Scholar

Schrire, S. (2006). Knowledge Building in Asynchronous Discussion Groups: Going Beyond Quantitative Analysis. Computer & Education, 46; 49-70.

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Van Dijk, T.A. (2000). El discurso como interacción social. In El discurso como interacción social. Estudios sobre el discurso II: Una introducción multidisciplinaria. Barcelona: Gedisa; 213-262.

Link Google Scholar

Fundref

This work has no financial support

Crossmark

Technical information

Metrics

Metrics of this article

Views: 34508

Abstract readings: 29477

PDF downloads: 5031

Full metrics of Comunicar 35

Views: 837522

Abstract readings: 666131

PDF downloads: 171391

Cited by