Palavras chave

Análise de redes, análise quantitativa, desinformação, comunidades virtuais, redes sociais, pensamento crítico

Resumo

O Twitter se transformou em uma das principais plataformas de engajamento do cidadão na atualidade. No entanto, embora estudos anteriores tenham se concentrado na opinião sobre vacinas em geral ou vacinas específicas, até o momento as opiniões sobre as vacinas contra a COVID-19 não foram investigadas no Twitter. O objetivo desta pesquisa é, por meio de ferramentas de monitoramento de mídias sociais e ferramentas de processamento de linguagem, verificar o grau em que as opiniões e interações presentes no Twitter são favoráveis ou não para as principais vacinas contra a COVID-19. Além disso, estuda-se a relevância de cada uma das principais vacinas, bem como o seu nível de controvérsia. Da mesma forma, esta pesquisa investiga pela primeira vez a discussão não só do ponto de vista do conteúdo, mas também dos participantes, analisando detalhadamente contas verificadas e utilizando ferramentas de detecção de bots. Em termos globais, os resultados mostram opiniões moderadamente favoráveis às vacinas contra a COVID-19, sendo as mais aceitas as da Oxford-AstraZeneca, Pfizer e Moderna e, no caso específico de contas verificadas, a Sputnik V é a mais aceita. Por outro lado, a vacina que mais chama a atenção é a russa Sputnik V, que também é a mais polêmica por trás das de origem chinesa. Por fim, as contas verificadas mostram-se como agentes relevantes dessa discussão devido à sua maior capacidade de divulgação e alcance, enquanto a presença de bots é praticamente inexistente.

Ver infografia

Referências

Andre, F.E., Booy, R., Bock, H.L., Clemens, J., Datta, S. K., John, T.J., Lee, B.W., Lolekha, S., Peltola, H., Ruff, T.A., Santosham, M., & Schmitt, H.J. (2008). Vaccination greatly reduces disease, disability, death and inequity worldwide. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 86(2), 140-146. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.07.040089

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Auger, G.A. (2013). Fostering democracy through social media: Evaluating diametrically opposed nonprofit advocacy organizations’ use of Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube. Public Relations Review, 39(4), 369-376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2013.07.013

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Bello-Orgaz, G., Hernandez-Castro, J., & Camacho, D. (2017). Detecting discussion communities on vaccination in twitter. Future Generation Computer Systems, 66, 125-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2016.06.032

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Bertin, P., Nera, K., & Delouvée, S. (2020). Conspiracy beliefs, rejection of vaccination, and support for hydroxychloroquine: A conceptual replication-extension in the COVID-19 pandemic context. Frontiers in psychology, 11, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.565128

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Bosch, T. (2017). Twitter activism and youth in South Africa: The case of #RhodesMustFall. Information, Communication & Society, 20(2), 221-232. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1162829

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Botometer (Ed.) (2020). Botometer® by OSoMe. FAQ. https://bit.ly/3bGEPh8

Link Google Scholar

Brand, E., & Gomez, H. (2006). Análisis de redes sociales como metodología de investigación. Elementos básicos y aplicación. Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Antioquia. https://bit.ly/3npVOdi

Link Google Scholar

Broniatowski, D.A., Jamison, A.M., Qi, S., AlKulaib, L., Chen, T., Benton, A., Quinn, S.C., & Dredze, M. (2018). Weaponized health communication: Twitter bots and russian trolls amplify the vaccine debate. American Journal of Public Health, 108(10), 1378-1384. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2018.304567

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Burnap, P., Gibson, R., Sloan, L., Southern, R., & Williams, M. (2016). 140 characters to victory? Using Twitter to predict the UK 2015 general election. Electoral Studies, 41, 230-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2015.11.017

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Callaway, E. (2020). Russia announces positive COVID-vaccine results from controversial trial. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-03209-0

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas (CIS) (Ed.) (2021). Barómetro de febrero 2021. https://bit.ly/37LyfFj

Link Google Scholar

Colleoni, E., Rozza, A., & Arvidsson, A. (2014). Echo chamber or public sphere? Predicting political orientation and measuring political homophily in Twitter using big data. Journal of Communication, 64(2), 317-332. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12084

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Cuesta-Cambra, U., Martínez-Martínez, L., & Niño-González, J.I. (2019). Análisis de la información pro vacunas y anti vacunas en redes sociales e internet. Patrones visuales y emocionales. Profesional de la Información, 28(2), e280217. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2019.mar.17

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Denia, E. (2020). The impact of science communication on Twitter: The case of Neil deGrasse Tyson. [El impacto del discurso científico en Twitter: El caso de Neil deGrasse Tyson]. Comunicar, 65, 21-30. https://doi.org/10.3916/C65-2020-02

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Dixon, G., & Clarke, C. (2013). The effect of falsely balanced reporting of the autism-vaccine controversy on vaccine safety perceptions and behavioral intentions. Health Education Research, 28(2), 352-359. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cys110

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Dror, A.A., Eisenbach, N., Taiber, S., Morozov, N.G., Mizrachi, M., Zigron, A., Srouji, S., & Sela, E. (2020). Vaccine hesitancy: the next challenge in the fight against COVID-19. European Journal of Epidemiology, 35, 775-779. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-020-00671-y

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Dubé, E., Vivion, M., & MacDonald, N.E. (2015). Vaccine hesitancy, vaccine refusal and the anti-vaccine movement: Influence, impact and implications. Expert Review of Vaccines, 14(1), 99-117. https://doi.org/10.1586/14760584.2015.964212

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Fauziyyah, A. (2020). Analisis sentimen pandemi Covid19 pada streaming Twitter dengan text mining Python. Jurnal Ilmiah SINUS, 18(2), 31-42. https://doi.org/10.30646/sinus.v18i2.491

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Flaherty, D.K. (2011). The vaccine-autism connection: A public health crisis caused by unethical medical practices and fraudulent science. Annals of Pharmacotherapy, 45(10), 1302-1304. https://doi.org/10.1345/aph.1Q318

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

François, G., Duclos, P., Margolis, H., Lavanchy, D., Siegrist, C.A., Meheus, A., Lambert, P.H., Emiroglu, N., Badur, S., & Van-Damme, P. (2005). Vaccine safety controversies and the future of vaccination programs. The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal, 24(11), 953-961. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.inf.0000183853.16113.a6

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Friedrich, M.J. (2019). WHO’s Top Health Threats for 2019. JAMA, 321(11). https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.1934

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Gintova, M. (2019). Understanding government social media users: An analysis of interactions on immigration, refugees and citizenship Canada Twitter and Facebook. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), 101388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.005

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Graells-Garrido, E., Baeza-Yates, R., & Lalmas, M. (2019). How representative is an abortion debate on Twitter? In P. Boldi, B. Foucault-Welles, K, Kinder-Kurlanda, & C. Wilson (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Web Science - WebSci ’19. (pp. 133-134). Association for Computing Machinery https://doi.org/10.1145/3292522.3326057

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Hansen, D., Shneiderman, B., & Smith, M.A. (2010). Analyzing social media networks with NodeXL: Insights from a connected world. Graduate Journal of Social Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-382229-1.00011-4

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Himelboim, I., Xiao, X., Lee, D.K.L., Wang, M.Y., & Borah, P. (2020). A social networks approach to understanding vaccine conversations on Twitter: Network clusters, sentiment, and certainty in HPV social networks. Health Communication, 35(5), 607-615. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2019.1573446

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Hornsey, M.J., Harris, E.A., & Fielding, K.S. (2018). The psychological roots of anti-vaccination attitudes: A 24-nation investigation. Health Psychology, 37(4), 307-315. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000586

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Jolley, D., & Douglas, K.M. (2014). The effects of anti-vaccine conspiracy theories on vaccination intentions. PLoS ONE, 9(2), 89177. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089177

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Kouzy, R., Abi-Jaoude, J., Kraitem, A., El-Alam, M.B., Karam, B., Adib, E., Zarka, J., Traboulsi, C., Akl, E., & Baddour, K. (2020). Coronavirus goes viral: Quantifying the COVID-19 misinformation epidemic on Twitter. Cureus, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.7255

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

López-Rico, C.M., González-Esteban, J.L., & Hernández-Martínez, A. (2020). Consumo de información en redes sociales durante la crisis de la COVID-19 en España. Revista de Comunicación y Salud, 10(2), 461-481. https://doi.org/10.35669/rcys.2020.10(2).461-481

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Loria, S. (2020). TextBlob: Simplified text processing (0.16.0). https://bit.ly/3knzFL8

Link Google Scholar

Manfredi-Sánchez, J., Amado-Suárez, A., & Waisbord, S. (2021). Presidential Twitter in the face of COVID-19: Between populism and pop politics. [Twitter presidencial ante la COVID-19: Entre el populismo y la política pop]. Comunicar, 66, 83-94. https://doi.org/10.3916/C66-2021-07

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

McKnight, P.E., & Najab, J. (2010). Mann?Whitney U Test. In I.B. Weiner, & W.E. Craighead (Eds.), The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470479216.corpsy0524

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Meyer, S.B., Violette, R., Aggarwal, R., Simeoni, M., MacDougall, H., & Waite, N. (2019). Vaccine hesitancy and Web 2.0: Exploring how attitudes and beliefs about influenza vaccination are exchanged in online threaded user comments. Vaccine, 37(13), 1769-1774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.028

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Micu, A., Micu, A.E., Geru, M., & Lixandroiu, R.C. (2017). Analyzing user sentiment in social media: Implications for online marketing strategy. Psychology & Marketing, 34(12), 1094-1100. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21049

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Milani, E., Weitkamp, E., & Webb, P. (2020). The visual vaccine debate on Twitter: A social network analysis. Media and Communication, 8(2), 364–375. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i2.2847

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Oliphant, T.E. (2007). Python for scientific computing. Computing in Science & Engineering, 9(3), 10-20. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2007.58

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Organización de Naciones Unidas (Ed.) (2020). Covid-19. Impact of the Pandemic on Trade and Development. https://bit.ly/2R4D0Eu

Link Google Scholar

Organización Mundial de la Salud (Ed.) (2020a). Cronología de la respuesta de la OMS a la COVID-19. https://bit.ly/3qV2GA7

Link Google Scholar

Organización Mundial de la Salud (Ed.) (2020b). Draft landscape and tracker of COVID-19 candidate vaccines. https://bit.ly/3snMdF6

Link Google Scholar

Ostertagova, E., Ostertag, O., & Kovác, J. (2014). Methodology and application of the Kruskal-Wallis test. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 611, 115-120. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.611.115

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Poland, G.A., & Spier, R. (2010). Fear, misinformation, and innumerates: How the Wakefield paper, the press, and advocacy groups damaged the public health. Vaccine, 28(12), 2361-2362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.02.052

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Puente, S.N., Maceiras, S.D., & Romero, D.F. (2021). Twitter activism and ethical witnessing: Possibilities and challenges of feminist politics against gender-based violence. Social Science Computer Review, 39(2), 295-311. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439319864898

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Puri, N., Coomes, E.A., Haghbayan, H., & Gunaratne, K. (2020). Social media and vaccine hesitancy: New updates for the era of COVID-19 and globalized infectious diseases. Human Vaccines and Immunotherapeutics, 16(11), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2020.1780846

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Schmidt, A.L., Zollo, F., Scala, A., Betsch, C., & Quattrociocchi, W. (2018). Polarization of the vaccination debate on Facebook. Vaccine, 36(25), 3606-3612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.05.040

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Serrano-Contreras, I.J., García-Marín, J., & Luengo, O.G. (2020). Measuring online political dialogue: Does polarization trigger more deliberation? Media and Communication, 8(4), 63-72. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i4.3149

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Spier, R.E. (2001). Perception of risk of vaccine adverse events: A historical perspective. Vaccine, 20(1), 78-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-410X(01)00306-1

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Subrahmanian, V., Azaria, A., Durst, S., Kagan, V., Galstyan, A., Lerman, K., Zhu, L., Ferrara, E., Flammini, A., & Menczer, F. (2016). The DARPA Twitter bot challenge. Computer, 49(6), 38-46. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2016.183

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Sued-Palmeiro, G.E., & Cebral-Loureda, M. (2020). Voces autorizadas en Twitter durante la pandemia de COVID-19: Actores, léxico y sentimientos como marco interpretativo para usuarios ordinarios. Revista de Comunicación y Salud, 10(2), 549-568. https://doi.org/10.35669/rcys.2020.10(2).549-568

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

The American Journal of Managed Care (AJMC) (Ed.) (2020). A Timeline of COVID-19 Developments in 2020. https://bit.ly/3xZI7qk

Link Google Scholar

Tomeny, T.S., Vargo, C.J., & El-Toukhy, S. (2017). Geographic and demographic correlates of autism-related anti-vaccine beliefs on Twitter, 2009-15. Social Science and Medicine, 191, 168-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.08.041

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Tornos-Inza, E. (2020). Tasa de interacción (engagement) en Twitter. Related: Marketing. https://bit.ly/3aSs9Vj

Link Google Scholar

Twitter (Ed.) (2021). Acerca de las cuentas verificadas de Twitter. https://bit.ly/3dGRmUF

Link Google Scholar

Vu, H.T., Do, H.V., Seo, H., & Liu, Y. (2020). Who leads the conversation on climate change? A study of a global network of NGOS on Twitter. Environmental Communication, 14(4), 450-464. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2019.1687099

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

World Economic Forum (Ed.) (2021). More people now plan to get a COVID-19 vaccine than in December. https://bit.ly/3r6cQ1f

Link Google Scholar

Xiong, Y., Cho, M., & Boatwright, B. (2019). Hashtag activism and message frames among social movement organizations: Semantic network analysis and thematic analysis of Twitter during the #MeToo movement. Public Relations Review, 45(1), 10-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2018.10.014

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Yang, S., Quan-Haase, A., & Rannenberg, K. (2017). The changing public sphere on Twitter: Network structure, elites and topics of the #righttobeforgotten. New Media & Society, 19(12), 1983-2002. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816651409

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Yelin, D., Wirtheim, E., Vetter, P., Kalil, A.C., Bruchfeld, J., Runold, M., Guaraldi, G., Mussini, C., Gudiol, C., Pujol, M., Bandera, A., Scudeller, L., Paul, M., Kaiser, L., & Leibovici, L. (2020). Long-term consequences of COVID-19: Research needs. The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 20(10), 1115-1117. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30701-5

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

YouGov (Ed.). (2021). COVID-19 Public Monitor. COVID-19 Public Monitor. https://yougov.co.uk/COVID-19

Link Google Scholar

Zimmer, C., Corum, J., & Wee, S.L. (2021, January 11). Coronavirus vaccine tracker. The New York Times. https://nyti.ms/2NCtMxI

Link Google Scholar

Fundref

Crossmark

Technical information

Recebido: 28-02-2021

Revisado: 12-03-2021

Aceite: 27-04-2021

OnlineFirst: 15-06-2021

Data de publicação: 01-10-2021

Tempo de revisão do artigo: 12 dias | Tempo médio de revisão do número 69: 30 dias

Tempo de aceitação do artigo: 58 dias | Tempo médio de aceitação do número 69: 69 dias

Tempo de edição da pré-impressão: 170 dias | Tempo médio de edição pré-impressão do número 69: 181 dias

Tempo de processamento do artigo: 215 dias | Tempo médio de processamento do número 69: 226 dias

Métricas

Métricas deste artigo

Vistas: 38030

Leituras dos resumos: 32786

Descargas em PDF: 5244

Métricas completas do Comunicar 69

Vistas: 330554

Leituras dos resumos: 294564

Descargas em PDF: 35990

Citado por

Citas em Web of Science

Mogos, AA; Grapa, TE and Sandru, TF. Russian disinformation in Eastern Europe. Vaccination media frames in ro.sputnik.md COMUNICAR 30 (72), 2022.

https://doi.org/10.3916/C72-2022-03

Cascini, F; Pantovic, A; (...); Ricciardi, W. Social media and attitudes towards a COVID-19 vaccination: A systematic review of the literature ECLINICALMEDICINE, 2022.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101454

Perez-Curiel, C; Ruas-Araujo, J and Rivas-de-Roca, R. When Politicians Meet Experts: Disinformation on Twitter About Covid-19 Vaccination MEDIA AND COMMUNICATION, 2022.

https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v10i2.4955

Padilla-Castillo, G and Rodriguez-Hernandez, J. International Youth Movements for Climate Change: The #FridaysForFuture Case on Twitter Sustainability, 2023.

https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010268

Noguera-Vivo, JM; Grandio-Perez, MD; (...); Camacho, D. Disinformation and vaccines on social networks: Behavior of hoaxes on Twitter Revista Latina de Comunicacion Social, 2023.

https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2023-1820

Paredes, B; Cardaba, MAM; (...); Petty, RE. Strengthening the Link between Vaccine Predispositions and Vaccine Advocacy through Certainty VACCINES, 2022.

https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10111970

Navarro, JT and Santofimia, EO. EU Member States' Institutional Twitter Campaigns on COVID-19 Vaccination: Analyses of Germany, Spain, France and Italy VACCINES, 2023.

https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11030619

Perez-Curiel, C; Dominguez-Garcia, R and Velasco-Molpeceres, A. Exploring the Political Debate over the COVID-19 Vaccination on Twitter: Emotions and Polarization in the Spanish Public Sphere SOCIAL SCIENCES-BASEL, 2023.

https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12020085

Des Jarlais, DC; Lieff, S; (...); Yang, L. COVID-19 stigmatization after the development of effective vaccines: Vaccination behavior, attitudes, and news sources PLOS ONE, 2023.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283467

Citas em Scopus

Noguera-Vivo, J.M., Del Mar Grandío-Pérez, M., Villar-Rodríguez, G., Martín, A., Camacho, D.. Disinformation and vaccines on social networks: Behavior of hoaxes on Twitter), Revista Latina de Comunicacion Social, .

https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2023-1820

Cascini, F., Pantovic, A., Al-Ajlouni, Y.A., (...), Lontano, A., Ricciardi, W.. Social media and attitudes towards a COVID-19 vaccination: A systematic review of the literature), eClinicalMedicine, .

Link Google Scholar

Padilla-Castillo, G., Rodríguez-Hernández, J. . International Youth Movements for Climate Change: The #FridaysForFuture Case on Twitter ), Sustainability, .

https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010268

Open Access Pérez‐curiel, C., Rúas‐araújo, J., Rivas‐de‐Roca, R. . When Politicians Meet Experts: Disinformation on Twitter About Covid‐19 Vaccination ), Media and Communication, .

https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v10i2.4955

Alina-Mogoș, Andreeaa; Grapă, Teodora-Elenab; Șandru, Teodora-Feliciab. Article• Gold Open Access Source type Journal ISSN 11343478 DOI 10.3916/C72-2022-03 View more Russian disinformation in Eastern Europe. Vaccination media frames in ro.sputnik.md), Comunicar, .

https://doi.org/10.3916/C72-2022-03

Advocacy through Certainty Open Access Paredes, B., Cárdaba, M.A.M., Moreno, L., (...), Cuesta, U., Petty, R.E. . Strengthening the Link between Vaccine Predispositions and Vaccine Advocacy through Certainty), Vaccines, .

https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10111970

Pérez-Curiel, C., Domínguez-García, R., Velasco-Molpeceres, A.. Exploring the Political Debate over the COVID-19 Vaccination on Twitter: Emotions and Polarization in the Spanish Public Sphere), Social Sciences, .

https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12020085

Tuñón Navarro, J., Oporto Santofimia, E.. EU Member States’ Institutional Twitter Campaigns on COVID-19 Vaccination: Analyses of Germany, Spain, France and Italy), Vaccines, .

https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11030619

Des Jarlais, D.C., Lieff, S., Grivel, M., (...), Chang, V.W., Yang, L.. COVID-19 stigmatization after the development of effective vaccines: Vaccination behavior, attitudes, and news sources ), PLoS ONE, .

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283467

Citas em Google Scholar

Desinformación y vacunas en redes: Comportamiento de los bulos en Twitter JMN Vivo, M del Mar Grandío… - Revista Latina de …, 2023 - dialnet.unirioja.es

https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=8568741

Mogoș, A. A., Grapă, T. E., & Șandru, T. F. (2022). Desinformación rusa en Europa del Este. Marcos mediáticos de la vacunación en ro. sputnik. md. Comunicar: Revista Científica de Comunicación y Educación, 30(72).

https://www.revistacomunicar.com/index.php?contenido=detalles&numero=72&articulo=72-2022-03

Arias-Chávez, D., Espejo, R. W. A., Juro, R. C., Tovar, J. C., & Latour, J. E. P. (2022). Scientific Production on Social Networks during the COVID 19 Pandemic. Webology, 19(1).

https://www.webology.org/data-cms/articles/20220122102315pmWEB19144.pdf

Pérez-Curiel, C., Rúas-Araújo, J., & Rivas-de-Roca, R. (2022). When Politicians Meet Experts: Disinformation on Twitter About Covid-19 Vaccination. Media and Communication, 10(2), 157-168.

https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/4955

Mogos, A. A., Grapa, T. E., & Sandru, T. F. (2022). Desinformación rusa en Europa del Este. Marcos mediáticos de la vacunación en ro. sputnik. md. Comunicar: Revista científica iberoamericana de comunicación y educación, (72), 33-46.

https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=8485682

Cascini, F., Pantovic, A., Al-Ajlouni, Y. A., Failla, G., Puleo, V., Melnyk, A., ... & Ricciardi, W. (2022). Social media and attitudes towards a COVID-19 vaccination: A systematic review of the literature. EClinicalMedicine, 101454.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589537022001845

Mogoș, A. A., Grapă, T. E., & Șandru, T. F. (2022). Russian disinformation in Eastern Europe. Vaccination media frames in ro. sputnik. md. Comunicar, 30(72), 33-46.

http://eprints.rclis.org/43427/

Análisis de sentimientos y tópicos sobre las vacunas cubanas Soberana 02 y Abdala en Twitter AR Sánchez, LMR González… - Revista Cubana de …, 2023 - acimed.sld.cu

https://acimed.sld.cu/index.php/acimed/article/view/2261

Baixar

Métricas alternativas

Como citar

Carrasco-Polaino, R., Martín-Cárdaba, M., & Villar-Cirujano, E. (2021). Citizen participation in Twitter: Anti-vaccine controversies in times of COVID-19. [Participación ciudadana en Twitter: Polémicas anti-vacunas en tiempos de COVID-19]. Comunicar, 69, 21-31. https://doi.org/10.3916/C69-2021-02

Compartilhar

           

Oxbridge Publishing House

4 White House Way

B91 1SE Sollihul United Kingdom

Administração

Redação

Creative Commons

Este site usa cookies para obter dados estatísticos sobre a navegação de seus usuários. Se você continuar navegando, consideramos que você aceita seu uso. +info X