Keywords

Disinformation, communicative ecosystem, focus groups, discourse analysis, media, social media

Abstract

Disinformation has become a core concept in communications research, related to media, technological and political phenomena that complexify its definition and diagnosis. Although its approach has been mainly quantitative, focus groups have also been used to understand the perception of the audience of this particular issue. This research is part of this second group of studies, and attempts to investigate the notions and discourses on disinformation in the case of Spain. For this purpose, seven discussion groups were conducted, with a structural sample constructed according to employment situation, ideology and age. The results show a perception of the communicative ecosystem structured in two chronological poles, which contrasts a past of reduced information supply – associated with traditional media – with a current informational environment where there is more media diversity, but also less trust in them. The groups point to the overabundance of information and associated disinformation with decontextualisation, low-quality journalism and the economic and political interests of different actors. Discourses outline a scenario of decline in journalism and the public sphere, which is perceived as polarised and emotional. Disinformation is therefore perceived as a multidimensional phenomenon that is associated with issues of major democratic transcendence rather than merely sending hoaxes through the Internet.

View infography

References

Amazeen, M.A. (2017). Journalistic interventions: The structural factors affecting the global emergence of fact-checking. Journalism, 21(1), 95-111. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884917730217

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Anderson, C.W. (2020). Fake news is not a virus: On platforms and their effects. Communication Theory, 31(1), 42-61. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtaa008

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Bennett, W.L., & Iyengar, S. (2008). A new era of minimal effects? The changing foundations of political communication. Journal of communication, 58(4), 707-731. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00410.x

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Bennett, W.L., & Livingston, S. (2018). The disinformation order: Disruptive communication and the decline of democratic institutions. European Journal of Communication, 33(2), 122-139. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323118760317

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Bimber, B., & Gil-de-Zúñiga, H. (2020). The unedited public sphere. New Media & Society, 22(4), 700-715. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819893980

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Conde F. (2009). Análisis sociológico del sistema de discursos. Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas. https://bit.ly/3tqxsF2

Link Google Scholar

Conde F. (2014). Los órdenes sintáctico, semántico y pragmático en el diseño y en el análisis de las investigaciones cualitativas con grupos de discusión. Arxius de Sociologia, 31, 69-84. https://bit.ly/3r9OCFX

Link Google Scholar

De-Lucas, A. (1995). Memoria de oposición. Proyecto docente. Sociología del consumo e investigación de mercados. Inédito.

Link Google Scholar

Duffy, A., Tandoc, E., & Ling, R. (2020). Too good to be true, too good not to share: the social utility of fake news. Information, Communication & Society, 23(13), 1965-1979. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1623904

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Engesser, S., & Humprecht, E. (2015). Frequency or skillfulness. Journalism studies, 16(4), 513-529. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2014.939849

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Flew, T. (2019). Digital communication, the crisis of trust, and the post-global. Communication Research and Practice, 5(1), 4-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2019.1561394

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Golob, T., Makarovic, M., & Rek, M. (2021). Meta-reflexivity for resilience against disinformation. [Meta-reflexividad para la resiliencia contra la desinformación]. Comunicar, 66, 107-118. https://doi.org/10.3916/C66-2021-09

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Gray, J., Bounegru, L., & Venturini, T. (2020). «Fake news» as infrastructural uncanny. New Media & Society, 22(2), 317-341. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819856912

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Hall, S. (1997). The work of representation. In S. Hall (Ed.), Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices (pp. 13-74). The Open University. https://bit.ly/3CrFPDb

Link Google Scholar

Hallin, D.C., & Mancini, P. (2004). Sistemas mediáticos comparados. Tres modelos de relación entre los medios de comunicación y la política. Hacer.

Link Google Scholar

Hermida, A., Fletcher, F., Korell, D., & Logan, D. (2012). Share, like, recommend. Journalism studies, 13(5-6), 815-824. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2012.664430

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Herrero-Diz, P., Conde-Jiménez, J., & Reyes-de-Cózar, S. (2020). Teens’ motivations to spread fake news on WhatsApp. Social Media+Society, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120942879

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Hjorth, F., & Adler-Nissen, R. (2019). Ideological asymmetry in the reach of pro-Russian digital disinformation to United States audiences. Journal of Communication, 69(2), 168-192. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqz006

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Humanes, M.L. (2014). Exposición selectiva y partidismo de las audiencias en España. El consumo de información política durante las campañas electorales de 2008 y 2011. Palabra Clave, 17(3), 773-802. https://doi.org/10.5294/pacla.2014.17.3.9

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Ibáñez J. (1979). Más allá de la sociología. El grupo de discusión: Técnica y crítica. Siglo XXI. https://bit.ly/3N7SQX6

Link Google Scholar

Katz, E., & Lazarsfeld, P. (1955). Personal influence. The Free Press.

Link Google Scholar

Lazarsfeld, P., Berelson, B., & Gaudet, H. (1944). The people’s choice: How the voter makes up his mind in a presidential campaign. Columbia University Press. https://bit.ly/3wjoYRR

Link Google Scholar

Madrid-Morales, D., Wasserman, H., Gondwe, G., Ndlovu, K., Sikanku, E., Tulley, M., ... & Uzuegbunam, C. (2021). Motivations for sharing misinformation: A comparative study in six Sub-Saharan African countries. International Journal of Communication, 15, 1200-1219. https://bit.ly/3vEdoQI

Link Google Scholar

Masip, P., Ruiz-Caballero, C., & Suau, J. (2019). Active audiences and social discussion on the digital public sphere. Review article. Profesional de la Información, 28(2). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2019.mar.04

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Mercenier, H., Wiard, V., & Dufrasne, M. (2022). Teens, social media and fake news: A user’s perspective. In G. Lopez-García, D. Palau-Sampio, B. Palomo, E. Campos-Dominguez, & P. Masip (Eds.), Politics of disinformation: The influence of fake news on public sphere (pp. 161-172). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119743347.ch12

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Molina, M.D., Sundar, S.S., Le, T., & Lee, D. (2019). «Fake News» is not simply false information: A concept explication and taxonomy of online content. American Behavioral Scientist, 65(2) 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764219878224

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Nelson, J.L., & Taneja, H. (2018). The small, disloyal fake news audience: The role of audience availability in fake news consumption. New Media & Society, 20(10), 3720-3737. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818758715

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Newman, N., & Levy, D.A. (2014). Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2014. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2619576

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Nielsen, R.K., & Graves, L. (2017). News you don’t believe: Audience perspectives on fake news. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. https://bit.ly/3CTvHBJ

Link Google Scholar

Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the internet is hiding from you. Penguin. https://doi.org/10.3139/9783446431164

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Photiou, I., & Maniou, T. A. (2018). Changing audiences, changing realities: Identifying disinformation via new teaching curricula [Conference]. Crisis reporting: Proceedings of the EJTA Teachers’ Conference, Grecia. https://bit.ly/2ZthopO

Link Google Scholar

Prior, M. (2007). Post-broadcast democracy: How media choice increases inequality in political involvement and polarizes elections. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139878425

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Roses-Campos, S., & Humanes-Humanes, M. (2019). Conflicts in the professional roles of journalists in Spain: Ideals and practice. [Conflictos en los roles profesionales de los periodistas en España: Ideales y práctica]. Comunicar, 58, 65-74. https://doi.org/10.3916/C58-2019-06

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Salaverría, R., Buslón, N., López-Pan, F., León, B., López-Goñi, I., & Erviti, M.C. (2020). Desinformación en tiempos de pandemia: tipología de los bulos sobre la Covid-19. Profesional de la Información, 29(3). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Sampedro, V., & Pérez-Seoane, F. (2008). Las elecciones generales españolas de 2008: Bipolarización antagónica fomentada por intereses político-mediáticos y las nuevas tecnologías. Revista de Sociología e Política, 17(34), 129-135. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-44782009000300010

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Shin, J., & Thorson, K. (2017). Partisan selective sharing: The biased diffusion of fact-checking messages on social media. Journal of Communication, 67(2), 233-255. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12284

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Stella, M., Ferrara, E., & De-Domenico, M. (2018). Bots sustain and inflate striking opposition in online social systems. PNAS, 115(49), 12435-12440. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1803470115

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Sunstein, C.R. (2009). Republic.com 2.0. Princeton University Press. https://bit.ly/3ueYkqn

Link Google Scholar

Tandoc, E.C., Lim, Z.W., & Ling, R. (2018). Defining «fake news»: A typology of scholarly definitions. Digital Journalism, 6(2), 137-153. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1360143

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Valera-Ordaz, L., & Humanes, M.L. (2022). What drives selective exposure to political information in Spain? Comparing political interest and ideology. In D. Palau-Sampio, G. López-García, & L. Ianelli (Eds.), Contemporary politics, communication and the impact on democracy (pp. 93-112). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-8057-8.ch006

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Vallone, R.P., Ross, L., & Lepper, M.R. (1985). The hostile media phenomenon: Biased perception and perceptions of media bias in coverage of the Beirut massacre. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(3), 577-585. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.49.3.577

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Wenzel, A. (2019). To verify or to disengage: Coping with «fake news» and ambiguity. International Journal of Communication, 13, 1977-1995. https://bit.ly/3KhCn0i

Link Google Scholar

Crossmark

Technical information

Received: 11-12-2021

Revised: 12-01-2022

Accepted: 02-03-2022

OnlineFirst: 15-05-2022

Publication date: 01-07-2022

Article revision time: 32 days | Average time revision issue 72: 31 days

Article acceptance time: 81 days | Average time of acceptance issue 72: 75 days

Preprint editing time: 156 days | Average editing time preprint issue 72: 150 days

Article editing time: 201 days | Average editing time issue 72: 195 days

Metrics

Metrics of this article

Views: 10621

Abstract readings: 9783

PDF downloads: 838

Full metrics of Comunicar 72

Views: 110981

Abstract readings: 98893

PDF downloads: 12088

Cited by

Cites in Web of Science

Palau-Sampio, D and Lopez-Garcia, G. Communication and crisis in the public space: Dissolution and uncertainty PROFESIONAL DE LA INFORMACION, 2022.

https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2022.may.16

Cites in Scopus

Palau-Sampio, D., López-García, G.. Communication and crisis in the public space: Dissolution and uncertainty), Profesional de la Informacion, .

https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2022.may.16

Cites in Google Scholar

Palau-Sampio, D., & López-García, G. (2022). Communication and crisis in the public space: Dissolution and uncertainty. Profesional de la información, 31(3).

https://revista.profesionaldelainformacion.com/index.php/EPI/article/view/87021

Palau-Sampio, D., & López-García, G. (2022). Comunicación y crisis en el espacio público: disolución e incertidumbre. Profesional de la información, 31(3).

http://eprints.rclis.org/43291/

Download

Alternative metrics

How to cite

Valera-Ordaz, L., Requena-i-Mora, M., Calvo, D., & López-García, G. (2022). Unraveling disinformation: Notions and discourses from the Spanish population. [Desenredando la desinformación: Nociones y discursos de la población española]. Comunicar, 72, 21-32. https://doi.org/10.3916/C72-2022-02

Share

           

Post Office Box 527

21080 Huelva (Spain)

Administration

Editorial office

Creative Commons

This website uses cookies to obtain statistical data on the navigation of its users. If you continue to browse we consider that you accept its use. +info X